CDE Competition on FASS - technology challenge 1
â˘
1 gefällt mirâ˘5,270 views
Overview of the Technology Challenge for the Future Aviation Security Solutions CDE competition - announced on 17 Nov 2016.
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ăhnlich wie CDE Competition on FASS - technology challenge 1
Ăhnlich wie CDE Competition on FASS - technology challenge 1 (20)
Mehr von Defence and Security Accelerator
Mehr von Defence and Security Accelerator (20)
KĂźrzlich hochgeladen
KĂźrzlich hochgeladen (20)
CDE Competition on FASS - technology challenge 1
- 1. Competition briefing This CDE competition will focus on 4 elements of the wider FASS scope ⢠people ⢠hand baggage ⢠hold Baggage ⢠cargo OFFICIAL
- 3. Research and Development Manager Heathrow Security Policy Team
- 4. Delivering security Increased and varied threat Passenger numbers are increasing Sophisticated travellers â greater expectations ⢠no excessive queuing ⢠do not want to take their shoes and coats off ⢠want to carry liquids in cabin baggage ⢠do not want their items spread over two or more trays ⢠will challenge procedures that they do not understand
- 5. Operational factors Space constraints in existing buildings Detection technologies footprints are increasing Some detection technologies are too slow in throughput terms ⢠false alarm rate ⢠concept of operations ⢠process time ⢠operator decision time
- 6. The perfect solution Design ďźsmaller in size ďźfaster in throughput ďźlower in false alarm rates ďźgrowth in detection ďźIT flexible Human Factors ďźsecurity user friendly ďźpassenger user friendly ďźmaintenance friendly
- 7. Technology challenge 1: Screening individuals and their hand baggage OFFICIAL Threat list ⢠explosive devices ⢠incendiary devices ⢠device components ⢠explosive main charge ⢠explosive detonators ⢠power/timer elements ⢠firearms ⢠ammunition ⢠knives
- 8. Technology challenge 1: Screening individuals⌠OFFICIAL
- 9. âŚand their hand baggage OFFICIAL
- 10. Current multi layered approach OFFICIAL Recompose area Dives t Explosiv e trace detection Metal detector X-ray Manual bag searchBody Scanner Canine Search Resolution Canine Search Staff Shoe screen
- 11. Hand search Effective against all threat types if carried out correctly ⢠slow ⢠intrusive ⢠strenuous for the screener ⢠unpleasant for both the passenger and the screener OFFICIAL
- 12. Metal detectors ⢠Walk Through Metal Detectors (WTMD) supported by Hand Held Metal Detectors (HHMD) ⢠zonal alarms ⢠random search ratio for non metallic threats ⢠only detects metals OFFICIAL
- 13. Active millimetre wave scanners ⢠non-ionising radiation ⢠no image of passenger ⢠automatic threat recognition Advantages ⢠removes privacy concerns ⢠removes âhumanâ element Disadvantages ⢠current ATR has higher FAR than screener ⢠canât easily distinguish benign anomalies OFFICIAL
- 14. Explosive detections dogs ⢠trained to detect multiple target materials ⢠effective at picking up these target odours if trained correctly ⢠developing and maintaining this capability is reliant on training in an operational environment ⢠limited coverage as dogs only able to work short shifts ⢠good deterrent OFFICIAL
- 15. Explosive trace detection Effectiveness of trace screening relies on ⢠detection systems performing at required level ⢠effective surface swabbing Too slow to sample all people OFFICIAL
- 16. People screening requirements Metallic and non-metallic threat items ⢠better identification of item/material ⢠reduce false alarm rate ⢠further increase detection of difficult concealments on person Increased throughput ⢠remove need to divest ⢠walking speed/non-compliant screening an aspiration Technologies/processes to resolve initial alarm ⢠systems to aid alarm resolution ⢠reduce searcher burden ⢠high accuracy OFFICIAL
- 17. Automated X-ray (Explosive Detection System) OFFICIAL
- 18. Cabin baggage systems OFFICIAL Weapons detection? Explosive detection solid and liquid Central Search X- Rays Remote Screeners
- 19. Explosive trace detection Effectiveness of trace screening relies on: ⢠detection systems performing at required level ⢠effective surface swabbing Too slow to sample all bags OFFICIAL
- 20. Liquid, aerosol and gels screening Wide range of underlying technology to exploit physical and chemical properties of liquid explosives OFFICIAL Wideband Radio Frequency Complex Impedance Calorimetric wet chemistry Spatially Off-set Raman Spectroscopy (SORS) X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Multi Mode Microwave near field sensor Multi Spectral Analysis Computed Tomography RF + Ultra Sound
- 21. Hand baggage screening requirements Handle complex bags ⢠screen quickly in the presence of complex metal, dense objects or clutter ⢠reduce the need to divest items from bags ⢠assist screener in detecting artfully concealed items Detection of a wide range of threats ⢠all types of explosive materials ⢠firearms identification ⢠respond easily to new/emerging threats (material, shape) Increase throughput OFFICIAL