3. 3
Edward Angle classified malocclusion in 1899 based on
anteroposterior relationship of the jaws with each other as –
CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III
4. 4
CLASS III MALOCCLUSION
Prenormal occlusion or
mesioclusion
The mesial groove of
mandibular first permanent
molar articulates anteriorly to
the mesiobuccal cusp of
maxillary first permanent
molar
5. 5
1.True or skeletal class III
▪ Prognathic mandible
▪ Retrognathic maxilla
▪ Combination
CLASSIFICATION
A] Angle classified –
6. 6
2. Pseudo or functional or postural class III
▪ Occlusal prematurities
▪ Premature loss of deciduous posteriors
▪ Enlarged adenoids
3. Class III , Subdivision
▪ Class III on one side and class I on other
7. 7
ETIOLOGY
1. HEREDITY
Main etiologic factor
1. ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES
role of habits and mouth breathing
1. FUNCTIONAL
Abnormal tongue position, nasal-respiratory problems, neuromuscular
conditions
1. SKELETAL
Maxillary transverse discrepancy, excess mandibular growth
1. DENTAL
Ectopic eruption of maxillary central incisors, early loss of deciduous molars
8. 8
CLINICAL FEATURES
A] Extraoral features :
1. Concave profile
2. Anterior facial divergence
3. Retrusive nasomaxillary area
4. Prominent lower third of
face/chin
5. Steep mandibular plane angle
9. 9
B] Intraoral features :
1. Class III molar and canine
relationship
2. Narrow upper arch
3. Decreased or reverse
overjet
4. Crowding in upper arch and
spaced lower arch
11. 11
Indications :
Mild to moderate skeletal discrepancies
Growing patients
Functional appliance designed to counteract the
muscle forces acting on the maxillary complex.
MYOFUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES
12. 12
FRANKEL III REGULATOR (FR III)
According to Franke1, the vestibular shields in the
depths of the sulcus are placed away from the
alveolar buccal plates of the maxilla to stretch the
periosteum and allow for forward development of
the maxilla.
The shields are fitted closely to the alveolar
process of the mandible to hold or redirect growth
posteriorly.
13. 13
1. FACE MASK
Used in patients with mild to
moderate Class III with maxillary
retrusion
2 pads connecting soft tissue in
forehead and chin region
ORTHOPAEDIC APPLIANCES
14. 14
2. CHIN CUP
Used in skeletal Class III
malocclusion with a relative
normal maxilla and a moderately
protrusive mandible
Two types:
- Occipital pull
- Vertical pull
15. 15
ORTHODONTIC CAMOFLAGE
Indications :
Skeletal discrepancies not resolved during mixed
dentition
Malocclusions recurring during adolescence after
treatment in childhood
Mild mandibular prognathism and moderate crowding
Types :
With extractions
Without extractions
16. 16
Class III elastics :
From upper molar to lower
anteriors
Corrects molar relation by
moving the molar mesially
Retraction of lower
anteriors
17. 17
ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY
Indications :
Continued disproportionate sagittal and vertical growth
Severe skeletal maxillary retrusion and mandibular
prognathism or both
Non-growing patients
Cleft lip and palate
Facial asymmetries
Treatment…
18. 18
Steps involved :
1. Diagnosis
2. Pre-surgical orthodontics (decompensation)
3. Mock surgery
4. Surgery and stabilization
5. Post-surgical orthodontics
Treatment…
Class III – small proportion of all, about 5% of all , more in Asian population
Class III – wen the mesiobuccal cusp of maxillary first molar occludes interdental space between the distal aspect of distal cusps of mandi 1st molar and mesial aspect of mesial cusps of mandi 2nd molar
Molar and canine relation are often not fully class I ii or iii, but rather intermediate relationships
Therefore, molar and canine that fall between class I and ii are end to end malocclusions
Between class I and class iii are super I malocclusions(notation SI)
The Asian patients with Class III malocclusion typically had a more retrusive facial profile and a longer lower anterior facial height. A backward rotation of the mandible was often observed to accommodate the relatively smaller maxilla.
Severe class iii are often associated with either anterior or posterior crossbites becoz either maxilla is placed too far back or mandible is too far forward
Presence of occlusal pre maturities resulting in habitual forward positioning of the mandible
Take advantage of natural forces and transmit them to skeletal areas to produce desired change
Force is functional and intermittent in nature
Provide growth inhibition or redirection and posterior positioning of mandible
Occipital pull – for patients with mandibular protrusion
Vertical pull – for pts with steep mandi plane angle and excessive lower facial height
Masking the defect
Surgical technique- surgical exposure, osteotomy cuts, pterygomaxillary disjunction
Mobilization and advancement
Fixation
Bone grafting