Presents a reflection on the assessment of mobile Web content for people with disabilities. It proposes a rationale for an evaluation framework considering: (1) the coherent merge of state of the art guidelines on Web accessibility and mobile best practices; and (2) the usage of current and prospective practices particularly for people with visual impairments. It also presents the preliminary results of a questionnaire that validates that rationale laying the grounds for a coherent evaluation approach.
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
Crosschecking the Mobile Web for People with Visual Impairments
1. Crosschecking the Mobile Web for People with VisualImpairments Luís Carriço, Rui Lopes, Rogério Bandeira UniversityofLisbon AbsInt – AbsoluteInteractionGroup LaSIGEResearchUnit
2. Motivation Is it worth to visit this Web site? … and using my mobile device? Atl: A beach in Goa at the sunset with coconut trees, listening to the birds and the waves… WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 2
3. Which Guidelines WCAG , … Answer: yes MWBP Answer: no! … and with disability specifics? We argue: it depends! (… and with mobile specifics? It also depends) WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 3
4. WCAG & Disabilities BW, Yesilada et al ACCESSIBLE, Chalkiaet al WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 4
5. WCAG & MWBP Chuter and Yesilada for WCAG/MWBP levels of effort (nothing, some.. But… with specifics Dropping guidelines is not straightforward WCAG 2.1 is dropped for non–visual impaired; USE_OF_COLOR should not! Should MWBP be always applied? WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 5
6. MWBP & Disabilities A “really smart” phone recognizing a visually impaired user… Towards Mobile Web Accessibility…, Lopes et al WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 6
7. Rationale For a specific disability Select WGAG subset Select MWBP subset Adopt them considering the “levels of effort” Mobile Web Accessibly Evaluation Tool, Bandeira WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 7
8. Disabilities and Configuration Really drop visual related checks?! Visual impaired & browsers’ configuration What about mobile devices? WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 8
9. Questionnaire Desktop Frequency of use Screen readers or what else Browser configuration Why or why not Mobile Basically the same + use it for web browsing Why or why not User profile WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 9
10. Sample 18 responses; 9 blind; 9 partially sighted All web desktop users Half use mobile devices 5 blind; 4 partially sighted Thus preliminary WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 10
11. Results Blind users Pattern confirmed on both settings Mob: 4/5 disable picture; 5th browse specific sites Both: 6/9 disable picture; 2 disable CSS&JS Partially sighted Generally, no configuration done WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 11
12. Discussion Blind users Checks expectations Must be consolidated by numbers Partially sighted Rejects expectations Must be further studied Could be generalized Evaluate the content based on the user-agent settings WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 12
13. What next Extend the study Further understand the scope of the pattern Find other patterns Understand new guidelines for new mobile devices Devices/configurations/disabilities! WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 13
14. Thank you Luis Carriço, lmc@di.fc.ul.pt WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 14
15. Motivation Do I want to visit this Web site using my mobile device? Alt: none Atl: this is a HUGE picture of a beach in Goa at the sun set with a coconut tree in the first plane… Do not load images! WWW, 03-2011 lmc@di.fc.ul.pt 15