SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 55
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Meaningful Use Mini-Camp
October 21, 2015
LISA ISRAEL, MBA, CPHIMS, CPHQ
EMR/MEANINGFUL USE SPECIALIST
REDWOOD COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION
Agenda
• Introductions
• California Technical Assistance Program
• 2015-2017 Modification Final Rule
• Challenging Measures
• Strategic Planning for Meaningful Use
• Q&A
CTAP:
California Technical
Assistance Program
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
• New funding program funded by ONC
• CalHIPSO is Regional Extension Center
• RCHC is Local Extension Center
• RCHC Members/Affiliates are part of RCHC CTAP group
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
• Program is milestone-driven
• DHCS pays CalHIPSO for each milestone
• CalHIPSO pays RCHC 80%
of what DHCS pays them
• The GOOD news:
• RCHC will funnel 80% of what CalHIPSO pays them back to the
health centers
• Payments are per provider.
• Milestones include:
• Enrollment
• Successful attestation for AIU or MU
• Specialist “bonus”
• Legally binding contract with HIE
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
Milestone CalHIPSO Pays RCHC RCHC Pays Health Center
Signed CTAP Contract $400 $320
EP is Specialist $600 $480
DHCS-Approved AIU Application $1,200 $960
First year attestation (S1, S2, S3) $1,800 $1,440
Subsequent year attestation (S1, S2, S3) $400 $320
HIE Contract $400 $320
• First year/second year attestations based on “scheduled” year for MU program.
• 80% pass-through applies to 2015 and may be adjusted in 2016 and 2017
• Program is for 3 years – payments payable each year based on milestones met that year
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
Milestone 2015
TA Agreement 320
Specialist Bonus 480
AIU 960
MU Stage 1, Year 1 0
MU Stage 1, Year 2 0
Total Payment for EP for 2015 1760
Example: Dentist, never participated in MU
(AIU for 2015)
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
Example: Family Practitioner
Scheduled for Stage 2/Year 1 – No HIE Contract Signed
Milestone 2015
TA Agreement 320
MU Stage 2, Year 1 1,440
Total Payment for EP for 2015 1,760
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
• Enrollment
• Enrollment package in binder pocket.
• Must have complete enrollment agreement to participate
• RCHC has 200 enrollment slots available
• Last year MU attestations ~230 EPs for all health centers
• Enroll strategically
• Available slots for each health center based on number of EPs as
percentage of total EPs.
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
• Enrollment, cont’d
• Complete Practice Enrollment Agreement first, submit to RCHC
with list of participating EPs
• Within 4 months, must have Technical Assistance Agreement
signed by EACH PROVIDER who is participating
• TA will be provided to each health center, not each provider
• If you don’t have all of your EPs enrolled, that doesn’t mean all the rest are out of
luck!
CTAP:
California Technical Assistance Program
CTAP:
Example of Assignment of Providers
Health Center # of EPs Percentage of total
# of Participating Slots
assigned
#1 60 20% 40
#2 100 33% 66
#3 20 7% 14
Assumptions: Total EP population assigned to RCHC 300
Total slots available: 200
• Prepare for enrollment
• Practice enrollment agreement
• Attach list of EPs who will participate
• Good time to think about Dental MU because of specialist bonus!!
• Announcement of number of EPs per health center will be made
via email next week.
CTAP: What to do now
Stretch Break!
Modification Final Rule
2015-2017
DISCLAIMER
• All information given in this seminar relates to Medicaid
Meaningful Use rules for EPs only.
• Information included in this presentation and seminar is
for informational purposes only.
• References to Stage 1 and Stage 2 in this presentation
refer to the stages for which EPs are scheduled in 2015.
• The CMS Final Rule reviewed in this presentation may
be found at https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-
inspection.federalregister.gov/2015-25595.pdf
REVIEW OF PROGRAM BASICS
• The EHR Incentive Program (“Meaningful Use”) will
pay incentives through 2021.
• Eligible professionals can participate for 6 years.
• Participation years do not have to be consecutive.
• The last year that an eligible professional
can begin participation is 2016.
BIG CHANGES!
BIG CHANGES!
• Reporting periods changed
• Stages 1 and 2 have merged together
• Some measures removed as redundant, duplicative
or topped out
• Now 10 Measures for both S1 and S2 – No more
Core/Menu Measures
• Nothing was added!
Reporting Periods
• 90-day reporting period for 2015 for everyone
• Full calendar year reporting period for 2016-2017 for
everyone
• Option to report Stage 3 in 2017.
• If report Stage 3 in 2017, can report for 90-day reporting
period.
• EVERYONE will report Stage 3 in 2018
Redundant, Duplicative, or
Topped Out
Drug Formularies* Summary of Care (M1 & M3)
Demographics* Lab Results*
Up-to-Date Problem List* Patient Lists
Active Medication List* Reminders
Active Medication Allergy List* Electronic Notes
Record Vital Signs* Imaging Results*
Record Smoking Status* Family Health History
Clinical Visit Summary
* Incorporated into another “active” measure
Most items are still required for PCMH certification/recertification
Stages 1 and 2 Have MERGED
Stage 1 Stage 2
One Set of Measures
 CPOE  Patient Education
 E-Prescribing  Medication Reconciliation
 Clinical Decision Support  Summary of Care (HIE)
 Patient Electronic Access  Public Health
 Privacy & Security  Secure Messaging
CPOE (%)
• The Measure: >60% of medication, 30% of lab, and 30%
of radiology orders are entered using CEHRT.
• Stage 1 EPs may use alternate measure for medication
orders: 30%
• Exclusion: EPs who write fewer than 100 orders each for
medications, labs, and radiology
E-Prescribing (%)
• The Measure: >50% of permissible Rx’s are compared to
one formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT
• Stage 1 – threshold is 40%
• Exclusions:
• EP writes < 100 prescriptions during reporting period
• OR – there is no pharmacy within 10 miles that
accepts e-scripts.
Clinical Decision Support (Y/N)
• Measure 1: 5 CDS interventions tied to >= 4 CQMs.
• Measure 2: Drug-Drug and Drug-Allergy interaction
checks enabled for entire EHR reporting period.
• Exclusion for S2: M2 Only – EP writes < 100 medication
orders
• Stage 1 EPs may use Alternate Measure in 2015:
• 1 CDS rule
• No drug interaction check
Patient Electronic Access (%)
• Measure 1: 50% of unique patients seen are provided
online access within 4 business days
• Measure 2: At least 1 patient PER EP actually views/
downloads/transmits (reduced from 5%).
• Stage 1 EPs may use alternate exclusion for M2
in 2015, as Stage 1 did not have equivalent
Core Measure.
Privacy & Security (Y/N)
• Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance
with the requirements (see Tip Sheet page 3 for
requirements)
• No exclusions
• > 10% of unique patients seen by EP are provided
educational resources identified by CEHRT
• Exclusion: No office visits in the EHR reporting period.
• Stage 1 EPs may use Alternate Exclusion in 2015 if they did
not intend to select this measure for a Stage 1 Menu choice.
Per CMS: “…we acknowledge that it may be difficult for a provider to
document intent and will not require such documentation.”
Patient Education (%)
Medication Reconciliation (%)
• >50% of patients transitioned into care of EP has
medication reconciliation performed
• Stage 2 exclusion: Any EP who was not the recipient of any
transitions of care during the EHR reporting period
• Stage 1 EPs may use Alternate Exclusion
in 2015 if they did not intend to select this
measure for a Stage 1 Menu choice.
Summary of Care (HIE) (%)
• Stage 2: 10% of Summary of Care records are created in
CEHRT and sent electronically
• Will go more into this statement in Challenging Measures
section
• Stage 1: Alternate Exclusion;
this did not have equivalent Core Measure
Public Health (Y/N)
• Active engagement with a Public Health Agency or Clinical
Data Registry to submit electronic public health data using
CEHRT.
• Registry options:
• Immunization registry
• Syndromic Surveillance
• Specialized Registry
• Stage 2 must meet 2 of the 3 options
• Stage 1 must meet 1 of the 3 options
More on this in the Challenging Measures section!
Secure Messaging (Y/N)
• 5% of unique patients send electronic message that
contains health information
• Modified Objective: Capability = Yes
• Stage 1 EPs may use “Alternate Exclusion”
as Stage 1 does not have an equivalent
core measure
Technology Updates
• 2014 CEHRT will be used for 2015 and 2016 reporting
• Until you are ready to attest to Stage 3, you can continue
to use 2014 CEHRT
• Must upgrade to 2015 CEHRT to report Stage 3 (2017 or
2018)
Let’s take a break!
Challenging Measures
Patient Electronic Access
(Patient Portal)
• Measure 1: 50% of unique patients seen are provided
online access within 4 business days
• Measure 2: At least 1 patient PER EP actually views/
downloads/transmits (reduced from 5%).
• Stage 1 EPs may use alternate exclusion for M2 in 2015, as
Stage 1 did not have equivalent Core Measure
• Challenges
• No Exclusions
• Portals not available in Spanish
• Possible Solutions
• PEDS/Teens – activate PEDS/deactivate at age 12
• Activate dental patients
• Staff incentive
Patient Electronic Access
(Patient Portal)
Summary of Care (HIE)
• Challenges
• What does “sent electronically” mean?
• Verbiage different from prior rule that stipulated NwHIN Exchange
Participant to send.
• Final rule states that CMS is “widening the pathways acceptable for
transmitting Summary of Care records.”
• Probably does NOT mean faxing, as CMS states that is analog.
• May allow for sending via secure/encrypted email.
• Referral partners not set up to receive electronic
transmission
Summary of Care (HIE)
• For now:
• Awaiting CMS to publish a FAQ answer to definition of electronic
transmission.
• Keep using methods you have for sending electronic referrals and records.
• Provider relationships and referral partner office staff – do they have
capacity to receive electronic transmission?
• What are other health centers doing?
• Discuss at bi-weekly focus calls
Public Health (Y/N)
• Active engagement with a Public Health Agency or Clinical
Data Registry to submit electronic public health data
using CEHRT.
• Registry options:
• Immunization registry – Final rule struck bidirectional requirement
• Syndromic Surveillance
• Specialized Registry
• Stage 2 must meet 2 of the 3 options
• Stage 1 must meet 1 of the 3 options
HIE Gateway
Sonoma County
Marin County
Napa County
Yolo County
Challenges and Options
• CalREDIE provider portal:
• Online manual entry – does not meet MU requirements that data be
submitted electronically using CEHRT
• California Cancer Registry
• EP is excluded if does not diagnose or treat cancer
• Most EPs in our CHCs would meet this exclusion
• No other statewide Public Health options
Challenges and Options
• Exclusions
• An exclusion will not count as 1 of the 2 needed to successfully attest
for this measure
• If exclude for 1, then need to attest for the other 2
• If exclude for 2, then need to attest for the remaining 1.
• Likelihood
• For Stage 2, attest to immunization registry option, exclude for the
other two options.
• Stage 1 only needs to attest to 1 of the 3 options, so IZ registry will
meet this measure
Stand Up and Stretch!
Strategic Planning for
Meaningful Use:
What to do when you get back to
your health centers
• Get a baseline, if you do not have one
• Run the reports that you do have and compare them to the final rule
measures
• The measures did not change enough to prevent you from using the reports you have!
• Are you too low on any of the measures? Let’s find out why!
• CTAP enrollment – get started!
• Strategic enrollment – providers who are at highest likelihood of
successful attestation
Strategic Planning for MU
• Update groups in SLR
• SLR will go down on/about December 15 for
reprogramming
• Anticipated that AIU and group updates will remain open
• SLR may take about 5-6 months to reprogram – so
attestation would be extended
• Any providers AIU?
• Can do it now!
Strategic Planning for MU
Strategic Planning for MU
• Biweekly Focus Calls
• Restarting Thursday, October 29, 2-3 p.m.
• Every other Thursday from 2-3 p.m.
• Calls will not be recorded – great to team up to have a representative
• Call for topics/questions will go out on Monday prior to the call
• Calendar invitations sent out October 14
• If you did not receive one, let me know and I will add you to the invite list
Strategic Planning for MU
• Questions?
• Freaking out?
• Is the sky falling?
Contact Me!
This is my job!
May not have the answer, but I know where to find it!
Q&A

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Meaningful Use Overview 2016 pp
Meaningful Use Overview 2016 ppMeaningful Use Overview 2016 pp
Meaningful Use Overview 2016 ppApril Lowry
 
New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]
New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]
New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]Practice Fusion
 
State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)
State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)
State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)mihinpr
 
Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5
Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5
Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5Ben Quirk
 
Meaningful Use Stage 1 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 1 KickoffMeaningful Use Stage 1 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 1 KickoffPractice Fusion
 
Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014
Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014
Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014Practice Fusion
 
ONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification Criteria
ONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification CriteriaONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification Criteria
ONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification CriteriaBrian Ahier
 
Measuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice Fusion
Measuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice FusionMeasuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice Fusion
Measuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice FusionPractice Fusion
 
OpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & Illness
OpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & IllnessOpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & Illness
OpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & IllnessOpenNotes
 
What is Results-Based Financing?
What is Results-Based Financing?What is Results-Based Financing?
What is Results-Based Financing?RBFHealth
 
Insights Webinar - Patient Payments
Insights Webinar - Patient PaymentsInsights Webinar - Patient Payments
Insights Webinar - Patient PaymentsBen Quirk
 
Meaningful use Stage 2 Webinar
Meaningful use Stage 2 WebinarMeaningful use Stage 2 Webinar
Meaningful use Stage 2 WebinarPractice Fusion
 
MIPS simplified scoring
MIPS simplified scoringMIPS simplified scoring
MIPS simplified scoringTyler Barnett
 
Quality Payment Program: MIPS Scoring
Quality Payment Program: MIPS ScoringQuality Payment Program: MIPS Scoring
Quality Payment Program: MIPS ScoringTyler Barnett
 
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations Brian Ahier
 
Networking day presentation 2017 john fox
Networking day presentation 2017 john foxNetworking day presentation 2017 john fox
Networking day presentation 2017 john foxPHEScreening
 
NDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin update
NDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin updateNDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin update
NDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin updatePHEScreening
 
PQRS Overview
PQRS OverviewPQRS Overview
PQRS Overviewmklein79
 
Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...
Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...
Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...Practice Fusion
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Meaningful Use Overview 2016 pp
Meaningful Use Overview 2016 ppMeaningful Use Overview 2016 pp
Meaningful Use Overview 2016 pp
 
New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]
New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]
New clinical quality measure reporting in Practice Fusion [slides]
 
State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)
State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)
State of Michigan HIE Update (without Tina Scott)
 
Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5
Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5
Insights2020 COVID-19 episode 5
 
Meaningful Use Stage 1 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 1 KickoffMeaningful Use Stage 1 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 1 Kickoff
 
Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014
Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014
Understanding the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Requirements in 2014
 
ONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification Criteria
ONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification CriteriaONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification Criteria
ONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification Criteria
 
Measuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice Fusion
Measuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice FusionMeasuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice Fusion
Measuring & Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Using Practice Fusion
 
OpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & Illness
OpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & IllnessOpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & Illness
OpenNotes: Transparent Clinicians' Notes for Health & Illness
 
What is Results-Based Financing?
What is Results-Based Financing?What is Results-Based Financing?
What is Results-Based Financing?
 
Insights Webinar - Patient Payments
Insights Webinar - Patient PaymentsInsights Webinar - Patient Payments
Insights Webinar - Patient Payments
 
Meaningful use Stage 2 Webinar
Meaningful use Stage 2 WebinarMeaningful use Stage 2 Webinar
Meaningful use Stage 2 Webinar
 
MIPS simplified scoring
MIPS simplified scoringMIPS simplified scoring
MIPS simplified scoring
 
Quality Payment Program: MIPS Scoring
Quality Payment Program: MIPS ScoringQuality Payment Program: MIPS Scoring
Quality Payment Program: MIPS Scoring
 
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations
 
Networking day presentation 2017 john fox
Networking day presentation 2017 john foxNetworking day presentation 2017 john fox
Networking day presentation 2017 john fox
 
NDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin update
NDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin updateNDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin update
NDESP networking day 2017 Patrick Rankin update
 
PQRS Overview
PQRS OverviewPQRS Overview
PQRS Overview
 
Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...
Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...
Clinical Quality Measures: Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures...
 
178
178178
178
 

Andere mochten auch

Documentos personales !!! =p
Documentos personales !!! =pDocumentos personales !!! =p
Documentos personales !!! =pnormiiscrazy
 
Softengi - Inspired Software Engineering
Softengi - Inspired Software EngineeringSoftengi - Inspired Software Engineering
Softengi - Inspired Software EngineeringSoftengi
 
Usos da Folia
Usos da FoliaUsos da Folia
Usos da FoliaFolia
 
Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009
Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009
Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009Claudio Chiarotto
 
Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic LeadershipAutocratic Leadership
Autocratic Leadershipnabaz4u
 
Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012
Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012
Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012gmasiuk
 
January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...
January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...
January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...Alexander Visotzky
 

Andere mochten auch (12)

Cphq
CphqCphq
Cphq
 
Documentos personales !!! =p
Documentos personales !!! =pDocumentos personales !!! =p
Documentos personales !!! =p
 
Softengi - Inspired Software Engineering
Softengi - Inspired Software EngineeringSoftengi - Inspired Software Engineering
Softengi - Inspired Software Engineering
 
Usos da Folia
Usos da FoliaUsos da Folia
Usos da Folia
 
Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009
Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009
Finalização da Imagem do Cristo - 30/08/2009
 
Algia Pélvica Aguda Y Crónica 2016
Algia Pélvica Aguda Y Crónica 2016Algia Pélvica Aguda Y Crónica 2016
Algia Pélvica Aguda Y Crónica 2016
 
Diabetes gestacional si
Diabetes gestacional siDiabetes gestacional si
Diabetes gestacional si
 
Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic LeadershipAutocratic Leadership
Autocratic Leadership
 
Diabetes gestacional
Diabetes gestacional  Diabetes gestacional
Diabetes gestacional
 
Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012
Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012
Gord Masiuk - Case Studies in Continuous Quality Improvement - WCQI Anaheim 2012
 
บุญช่วย
บุญช่วยบุญช่วย
บุญช่วย
 
January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...
January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...
January_2016--Building_and_Sustaining_an_Affordable_Los_Angeles_County_compre...
 

Ähnlich wie Meaningful Use Mini-Camp Presentation

Modifed Stage 2 2015
Modifed Stage 2 2015Modifed Stage 2 2015
Modifed Stage 2 2015Melisa Pierce
 
The Electronic Health Record: Using It Effectively & with Meaning
The Electronic Health Record:Using It Effectively & with MeaningThe Electronic Health Record:Using It Effectively & with Meaning
The Electronic Health Record: Using It Effectively & with MeaningBU School of Medicine
 
Meaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and Payments
Meaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and PaymentsMeaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and Payments
Meaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and PaymentsBen Quirk
 
How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3Iatric Systems
 
Meaningful Use: The Fine Print
Meaningful Use: The Fine PrintMeaningful Use: The Fine Print
Meaningful Use: The Fine PrintQualifacts
 
Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3Iatric Systems
 
Meaningful Use - 8/2010
Meaningful Use - 8/2010Meaningful Use - 8/2010
Meaningful Use - 8/2010rogersons
 
Gartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status Update
Gartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status UpdateGartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status Update
Gartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status Updatepearsonedhealthprof
 
Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015
Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015
Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015Ben Quirk
 
Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]
Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]
Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]Tod Richardson
 
PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMA
 PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMA PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMA
PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMAPYA, P.C.
 
The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017
The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017
The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017MassEHealth
 
Meaningful Use Stage 2: Deep Dive
Meaningful Use Stage 2: Deep DiveMeaningful Use Stage 2: Deep Dive
Meaningful Use Stage 2: Deep Diveathenahealth
 
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 2 KickoffMeaningful Use Stage 2 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 2 KickoffPractice Fusion
 
Dentists and Meaningful Use: An Update
Dentists and Meaningful Use: An UpdateDentists and Meaningful Use: An Update
Dentists and Meaningful Use: An UpdateGreenway Health
 

Ähnlich wie Meaningful Use Mini-Camp Presentation (20)

Modifed Stage 2 2015
Modifed Stage 2 2015Modifed Stage 2 2015
Modifed Stage 2 2015
 
The Electronic Health Record: Using It Effectively & with Meaning
The Electronic Health Record:Using It Effectively & with MeaningThe Electronic Health Record:Using It Effectively & with Meaning
The Electronic Health Record: Using It Effectively & with Meaning
 
Meaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and Payments
Meaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and PaymentsMeaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and Payments
Meaningful Use: Programs, Penalities, and Payments
 
How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
How to get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
 
Meaningful Use: The Fine Print
Meaningful Use: The Fine PrintMeaningful Use: The Fine Print
Meaningful Use: The Fine Print
 
Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
Get Prepared and Find Success with Meaningful Use Stage 2 and 3
 
Meaningful Use - 8/2010
Meaningful Use - 8/2010Meaningful Use - 8/2010
Meaningful Use - 8/2010
 
Gartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status Update
Gartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status UpdateGartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status Update
Gartee: Electronic Health Records and ICD-10 Status Update
 
Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015
Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015
Meaningful Use Final Rule Updates 2015
 
Webinar: CMS Innovation Center Update
Webinar: CMS Innovation Center UpdateWebinar: CMS Innovation Center Update
Webinar: CMS Innovation Center Update
 
Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]
Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]
Cms+ehr incentive program_hospital_training_final[1]
 
PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMA
 PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMA PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMA
PYA Looks Beyond Meaningful Use at AHIMA
 
The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017
The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017
The Impact of Proposed MU Rule Changes 2015 2017
 
Meaningful Use Stage 2: Deep Dive
Meaningful Use Stage 2: Deep DiveMeaningful Use Stage 2: Deep Dive
Meaningful Use Stage 2: Deep Dive
 
NYeC | PCIP Learning Series #1 - DSRIP
NYeC | PCIP Learning Series #1 - DSRIPNYeC | PCIP Learning Series #1 - DSRIP
NYeC | PCIP Learning Series #1 - DSRIP
 
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 2 KickoffMeaningful Use Stage 2 Kickoff
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Kickoff
 
Webinar: Comprehensive Primary Care Plus - Health IT Vendor Overview
Webinar: Comprehensive Primary Care Plus - Health IT Vendor OverviewWebinar: Comprehensive Primary Care Plus - Health IT Vendor Overview
Webinar: Comprehensive Primary Care Plus - Health IT Vendor Overview
 
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Changes for Eligible Professionals
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Changes for Eligible ProfessionalsMeaningful Use Stage 2 Changes for Eligible Professionals
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Changes for Eligible Professionals
 
Zoom mu v 0.2
Zoom mu v 0.2Zoom mu v 0.2
Zoom mu v 0.2
 
Dentists and Meaningful Use: An Update
Dentists and Meaningful Use: An UpdateDentists and Meaningful Use: An Update
Dentists and Meaningful Use: An Update
 

Meaningful Use Mini-Camp Presentation

  • 1. Meaningful Use Mini-Camp October 21, 2015 LISA ISRAEL, MBA, CPHIMS, CPHQ EMR/MEANINGFUL USE SPECIALIST REDWOOD COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION
  • 2. Agenda • Introductions • California Technical Assistance Program • 2015-2017 Modification Final Rule • Challenging Measures • Strategic Planning for Meaningful Use • Q&A
  • 4. CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program • New funding program funded by ONC • CalHIPSO is Regional Extension Center • RCHC is Local Extension Center • RCHC Members/Affiliates are part of RCHC CTAP group
  • 5. CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program • Program is milestone-driven • DHCS pays CalHIPSO for each milestone • CalHIPSO pays RCHC 80% of what DHCS pays them
  • 6. • The GOOD news: • RCHC will funnel 80% of what CalHIPSO pays them back to the health centers • Payments are per provider. • Milestones include: • Enrollment • Successful attestation for AIU or MU • Specialist “bonus” • Legally binding contract with HIE CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program
  • 7. Milestone CalHIPSO Pays RCHC RCHC Pays Health Center Signed CTAP Contract $400 $320 EP is Specialist $600 $480 DHCS-Approved AIU Application $1,200 $960 First year attestation (S1, S2, S3) $1,800 $1,440 Subsequent year attestation (S1, S2, S3) $400 $320 HIE Contract $400 $320 • First year/second year attestations based on “scheduled” year for MU program. • 80% pass-through applies to 2015 and may be adjusted in 2016 and 2017 • Program is for 3 years – payments payable each year based on milestones met that year CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program
  • 8. Milestone 2015 TA Agreement 320 Specialist Bonus 480 AIU 960 MU Stage 1, Year 1 0 MU Stage 1, Year 2 0 Total Payment for EP for 2015 1760 Example: Dentist, never participated in MU (AIU for 2015) CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program
  • 9. Example: Family Practitioner Scheduled for Stage 2/Year 1 – No HIE Contract Signed Milestone 2015 TA Agreement 320 MU Stage 2, Year 1 1,440 Total Payment for EP for 2015 1,760 CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program
  • 10. • Enrollment • Enrollment package in binder pocket. • Must have complete enrollment agreement to participate • RCHC has 200 enrollment slots available • Last year MU attestations ~230 EPs for all health centers • Enroll strategically • Available slots for each health center based on number of EPs as percentage of total EPs. CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program
  • 11. • Enrollment, cont’d • Complete Practice Enrollment Agreement first, submit to RCHC with list of participating EPs • Within 4 months, must have Technical Assistance Agreement signed by EACH PROVIDER who is participating • TA will be provided to each health center, not each provider • If you don’t have all of your EPs enrolled, that doesn’t mean all the rest are out of luck! CTAP: California Technical Assistance Program
  • 12. CTAP: Example of Assignment of Providers Health Center # of EPs Percentage of total # of Participating Slots assigned #1 60 20% 40 #2 100 33% 66 #3 20 7% 14 Assumptions: Total EP population assigned to RCHC 300 Total slots available: 200
  • 13. • Prepare for enrollment • Practice enrollment agreement • Attach list of EPs who will participate • Good time to think about Dental MU because of specialist bonus!! • Announcement of number of EPs per health center will be made via email next week. CTAP: What to do now
  • 16. DISCLAIMER • All information given in this seminar relates to Medicaid Meaningful Use rules for EPs only. • Information included in this presentation and seminar is for informational purposes only. • References to Stage 1 and Stage 2 in this presentation refer to the stages for which EPs are scheduled in 2015. • The CMS Final Rule reviewed in this presentation may be found at https://s3.amazonaws.com/public- inspection.federalregister.gov/2015-25595.pdf
  • 17. REVIEW OF PROGRAM BASICS • The EHR Incentive Program (“Meaningful Use”) will pay incentives through 2021. • Eligible professionals can participate for 6 years. • Participation years do not have to be consecutive. • The last year that an eligible professional can begin participation is 2016.
  • 19. BIG CHANGES! • Reporting periods changed • Stages 1 and 2 have merged together • Some measures removed as redundant, duplicative or topped out • Now 10 Measures for both S1 and S2 – No more Core/Menu Measures • Nothing was added!
  • 20. Reporting Periods • 90-day reporting period for 2015 for everyone • Full calendar year reporting period for 2016-2017 for everyone • Option to report Stage 3 in 2017. • If report Stage 3 in 2017, can report for 90-day reporting period. • EVERYONE will report Stage 3 in 2018
  • 21. Redundant, Duplicative, or Topped Out Drug Formularies* Summary of Care (M1 & M3) Demographics* Lab Results* Up-to-Date Problem List* Patient Lists Active Medication List* Reminders Active Medication Allergy List* Electronic Notes Record Vital Signs* Imaging Results* Record Smoking Status* Family Health History Clinical Visit Summary * Incorporated into another “active” measure Most items are still required for PCMH certification/recertification
  • 22. Stages 1 and 2 Have MERGED Stage 1 Stage 2
  • 23. One Set of Measures  CPOE  Patient Education  E-Prescribing  Medication Reconciliation  Clinical Decision Support  Summary of Care (HIE)  Patient Electronic Access  Public Health  Privacy & Security  Secure Messaging
  • 24. CPOE (%) • The Measure: >60% of medication, 30% of lab, and 30% of radiology orders are entered using CEHRT. • Stage 1 EPs may use alternate measure for medication orders: 30% • Exclusion: EPs who write fewer than 100 orders each for medications, labs, and radiology
  • 25. E-Prescribing (%) • The Measure: >50% of permissible Rx’s are compared to one formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT • Stage 1 – threshold is 40% • Exclusions: • EP writes < 100 prescriptions during reporting period • OR – there is no pharmacy within 10 miles that accepts e-scripts.
  • 26. Clinical Decision Support (Y/N) • Measure 1: 5 CDS interventions tied to >= 4 CQMs. • Measure 2: Drug-Drug and Drug-Allergy interaction checks enabled for entire EHR reporting period. • Exclusion for S2: M2 Only – EP writes < 100 medication orders • Stage 1 EPs may use Alternate Measure in 2015: • 1 CDS rule • No drug interaction check
  • 27. Patient Electronic Access (%) • Measure 1: 50% of unique patients seen are provided online access within 4 business days • Measure 2: At least 1 patient PER EP actually views/ downloads/transmits (reduced from 5%). • Stage 1 EPs may use alternate exclusion for M2 in 2015, as Stage 1 did not have equivalent Core Measure.
  • 28. Privacy & Security (Y/N) • Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements (see Tip Sheet page 3 for requirements) • No exclusions
  • 29. • > 10% of unique patients seen by EP are provided educational resources identified by CEHRT • Exclusion: No office visits in the EHR reporting period. • Stage 1 EPs may use Alternate Exclusion in 2015 if they did not intend to select this measure for a Stage 1 Menu choice. Per CMS: “…we acknowledge that it may be difficult for a provider to document intent and will not require such documentation.” Patient Education (%)
  • 30. Medication Reconciliation (%) • >50% of patients transitioned into care of EP has medication reconciliation performed • Stage 2 exclusion: Any EP who was not the recipient of any transitions of care during the EHR reporting period • Stage 1 EPs may use Alternate Exclusion in 2015 if they did not intend to select this measure for a Stage 1 Menu choice.
  • 31. Summary of Care (HIE) (%) • Stage 2: 10% of Summary of Care records are created in CEHRT and sent electronically • Will go more into this statement in Challenging Measures section • Stage 1: Alternate Exclusion; this did not have equivalent Core Measure
  • 32. Public Health (Y/N) • Active engagement with a Public Health Agency or Clinical Data Registry to submit electronic public health data using CEHRT. • Registry options: • Immunization registry • Syndromic Surveillance • Specialized Registry • Stage 2 must meet 2 of the 3 options • Stage 1 must meet 1 of the 3 options More on this in the Challenging Measures section!
  • 33. Secure Messaging (Y/N) • 5% of unique patients send electronic message that contains health information • Modified Objective: Capability = Yes • Stage 1 EPs may use “Alternate Exclusion” as Stage 1 does not have an equivalent core measure
  • 34. Technology Updates • 2014 CEHRT will be used for 2015 and 2016 reporting • Until you are ready to attest to Stage 3, you can continue to use 2014 CEHRT • Must upgrade to 2015 CEHRT to report Stage 3 (2017 or 2018)
  • 35. Let’s take a break!
  • 37. Patient Electronic Access (Patient Portal) • Measure 1: 50% of unique patients seen are provided online access within 4 business days • Measure 2: At least 1 patient PER EP actually views/ downloads/transmits (reduced from 5%). • Stage 1 EPs may use alternate exclusion for M2 in 2015, as Stage 1 did not have equivalent Core Measure
  • 38. • Challenges • No Exclusions • Portals not available in Spanish • Possible Solutions • PEDS/Teens – activate PEDS/deactivate at age 12 • Activate dental patients • Staff incentive Patient Electronic Access (Patient Portal)
  • 39. Summary of Care (HIE) • Challenges • What does “sent electronically” mean? • Verbiage different from prior rule that stipulated NwHIN Exchange Participant to send. • Final rule states that CMS is “widening the pathways acceptable for transmitting Summary of Care records.” • Probably does NOT mean faxing, as CMS states that is analog. • May allow for sending via secure/encrypted email. • Referral partners not set up to receive electronic transmission
  • 40. Summary of Care (HIE) • For now: • Awaiting CMS to publish a FAQ answer to definition of electronic transmission. • Keep using methods you have for sending electronic referrals and records. • Provider relationships and referral partner office staff – do they have capacity to receive electronic transmission? • What are other health centers doing? • Discuss at bi-weekly focus calls
  • 41. Public Health (Y/N) • Active engagement with a Public Health Agency or Clinical Data Registry to submit electronic public health data using CEHRT. • Registry options: • Immunization registry – Final rule struck bidirectional requirement • Syndromic Surveillance • Specialized Registry • Stage 2 must meet 2 of the 3 options • Stage 1 must meet 1 of the 3 options
  • 47. Challenges and Options • CalREDIE provider portal: • Online manual entry – does not meet MU requirements that data be submitted electronically using CEHRT • California Cancer Registry • EP is excluded if does not diagnose or treat cancer • Most EPs in our CHCs would meet this exclusion • No other statewide Public Health options
  • 48. Challenges and Options • Exclusions • An exclusion will not count as 1 of the 2 needed to successfully attest for this measure • If exclude for 1, then need to attest for the other 2 • If exclude for 2, then need to attest for the remaining 1. • Likelihood • For Stage 2, attest to immunization registry option, exclude for the other two options. • Stage 1 only needs to attest to 1 of the 3 options, so IZ registry will meet this measure
  • 49. Stand Up and Stretch!
  • 50. Strategic Planning for Meaningful Use: What to do when you get back to your health centers
  • 51. • Get a baseline, if you do not have one • Run the reports that you do have and compare them to the final rule measures • The measures did not change enough to prevent you from using the reports you have! • Are you too low on any of the measures? Let’s find out why! • CTAP enrollment – get started! • Strategic enrollment – providers who are at highest likelihood of successful attestation Strategic Planning for MU
  • 52. • Update groups in SLR • SLR will go down on/about December 15 for reprogramming • Anticipated that AIU and group updates will remain open • SLR may take about 5-6 months to reprogram – so attestation would be extended • Any providers AIU? • Can do it now! Strategic Planning for MU
  • 53. Strategic Planning for MU • Biweekly Focus Calls • Restarting Thursday, October 29, 2-3 p.m. • Every other Thursday from 2-3 p.m. • Calls will not be recorded – great to team up to have a representative • Call for topics/questions will go out on Monday prior to the call • Calendar invitations sent out October 14 • If you did not receive one, let me know and I will add you to the invite list
  • 54. Strategic Planning for MU • Questions? • Freaking out? • Is the sky falling? Contact Me! This is my job! May not have the answer, but I know where to find it!
  • 55. Q&A