Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

WP3.1 Review of Cyprus Workshop

Ad

Review of the Cyprus workshop
and look at the current draft of
the Diploma Supplement
Georg Seppmann & Elena Gladkova
Eval...

Ad

16 months ago ….
•Workshop on the principles of a common Diploma
Supplement (DS) for Lebanon at University of Cyprus

Ad

Topics
•Why is a common DS for Lebanon needed at all?
•Aren't the current diplomas sufficient that we issue
to our student...

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 20 Anzeige
1 von 20 Anzeige

WP3.1 Review of Cyprus Workshop

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

Review of the Cyprus workshop and look at the current draft of the Diploma Supplement by Georg Seppmann & Elena Gladkova from Evaluationsagentur Baden-Württemberg (evalag)(Germany)
WP3.1: Workshop on the use of DS Principles - Germany

May 17, 2021

Review of the Cyprus workshop and look at the current draft of the Diploma Supplement by Georg Seppmann & Elena Gladkova from Evaluationsagentur Baden-Württemberg (evalag)(Germany)
WP3.1: Workshop on the use of DS Principles - Germany

May 17, 2021

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Anzeige
Anzeige

WP3.1 Review of Cyprus Workshop

  1. 1. Review of the Cyprus workshop and look at the current draft of the Diploma Supplement Georg Seppmann & Elena Gladkova Evaluationsagentur Baden-Württemberg (evalag) Mannheim, Germany
  2. 2. 16 months ago …. •Workshop on the principles of a common Diploma Supplement (DS) for Lebanon at University of Cyprus
  3. 3. Topics •Why is a common DS for Lebanon needed at all? •Aren't the current diplomas sufficient that we issue to our students upon successful completion of studies? •What does a DS mean for credit and recognition practice in Lebanon and beyond?
  4. 4. Reflections & Examples •DS in connection with the Bologna process •Different approaches and examples from the European Higher Education Area (Cyprus, Germany, Russia, Albania, Romania …)
  5. 5. Discussion and development of DS Principles appropriate for Lebanon •Consideration of the diversity of the universities as well as of the study programmes •Needs for alignment between the higher education institutions and national educational politics •Wide recognition and applicability must be guaranteed
  6. 6. Cyprus results and work after •Agreement on tentative Diploma Supplement principles and draft template form between the universities involved •Needs analysis to evaluate the chosen approach •Dissemination of the draft concept through a first national conference in March 2021 •Identification and invitation of faculties interested in first implementation
  7. 7. DS General Principles •Issued in 3 languages: Arabic, English, French •DS for BA, Master’s and PhD level •Taking into account demands and recent developments in the neighbouring European Higher Education Area
  8. 8. DS Principles & Structure 1. Information identifying the holder of the qualification 2. Information identifying the qualification 3. Information on the level and duration of the qualification 4. Information on the programme completed and the results obtained 5. Information on the function of the qualification 6. Additional information 7. Certification/ Graduation 8. Information on the national higher education system
  9. 9. Preparation of pilot DS • Introduction of the Diploma Supplement principles and template form to selected faculties • Exemplary presentation of existing practice at a university that has already been using DS for a long time • Derived from this, identification of the processes at the university, especially under the question: what had to be changed due to the implementation of the DS?
  10. 10. Issues and Challenges •Technical implementation / data model (national central system vs. individual solutions) •Impact on organization of studies at each university •Impact on quality assurance (QA) system at each university •Further development towards a LEBPASS comparable to EuroPass?
  11. 11. Georg Seppmann Scientific Advisor at evalag seppmann@evalag.de • Cultural Anthropologist (M.A. Frankfurt University 1995) • Project management experience in educational settings for more than 25 years • Worked in E-learning projects in adult education and with universities • Areas of expertise and focal points: Evaluation, new media & e-learning, assessment and accreditation procedures (national and international) Elena Gladkova Scientific Advisor at evalag gladkova@evalag.de • Teaching Diploma – German, English (Ekaterinburg/Russia 2011), M.A. International literature (University of Tuebingen 2016) • Trainings and workshops with international and intercultural student groups • Areas of expertise and focal points: Evaluation, intercultural education, quality interviews and focus groups evalag Project Team
  12. 12. Wrap up: Planning and scheduling of the individual workshops at USEK, LAU, BAU, LU, LCU … Georg Seppmann & Elena Gladkova Evaluationsagentur Baden-Württemberg (evalag) Mannheim, Germany
  13. 13. Preparation and Implementation •Status at one’s own university: Description and evaluation •Identification of the university bodies to be involved •Agreement on the study programme(s) for the pilot •Formation of an internal project group •Adaptation / extension of the workflow to include DS
  14. 14. Data and information sources Information from the university (Institutional level) • Lebanese HE system • University • Faculty • Degree description • Study programme and subjects Information from the Examination Administration (Individual level) • Personal data • Assessment data • Individual degree • Study programme and subjects • Additional information (e.g. further recognized studies / qualifications …)
  15. 15. Data model •Securing the DS information •Coordination “in-house” (software , terminology) •Standardisation of information (grade statistics) •Recording individual learning paths •Location of the data merge: university, nation- wide, interfaces?
  16. 16. Preparation of the implementation at the pilot universities (1/3) Decision on faculty and degree programme(s) -> Where is the DS to be implemented for the first time? -> Annual or bi-annual final examination? -> How many final examinations per semester? - > Several faculties involved?
  17. 17. Preparation of the implementation at the pilot universities (2/3) View on study programme(s) selected -> Qualification profile of programme and modules – available? -> Responsibilities -> Organisation of examinations (credit system, implementation and securing of results) -> Regulation of recognition of external qualifications / achievements
  18. 18. Preparation of the implementation at the pilot universities (3/3) Formation of the project group from the university bodies involved -> Who needs to be in the group? -> Further time planning
  19. 19. Group work in breakout rooms (20 minutes) •Each university one room •Use the taskcard prepared for further preparation •See link in chat
  20. 20. Thanks for Your Attention Merci Pour Votre Attention ‫الستماعكم‬ ‫شكرا‬

×