As Bakken E&Ps have ascended into full development phase, the real question now is how to maximize the productivity of Bakken wells whilst simultaneously driving down cost. Completions and well spacing play a huge role in cost and production efficiency, and mastering the optimization of both aspects has the ability to significantly transform the economics of every Bakken well drilled. Amongst all of the available completion techniques available to operators, deciding upon the highest performing frac recipe is not an easy task. Operators not only need to look at increasing efficiency at every stage of completions, but need to do this in a way that balances increased recovery with reduced costs. Needless to say, if funds were unlimited, operators could spend millions of dollars testing all possible combinations of frac fluids, proppants, liners, frac stages and frac spacing to deduce the optimal recipe for the reservoir in place. However, as reality would have it, trial and error on a grand scale is neither economically viable nor operationally feasible. So, what operators must do is learn from successes and failures of other operators and understand what different producers are seeing with regard to.... Plug & Perf vs. Sliding Sleeves Slick Water vs. Cross Link vs. Hybrid Fracs Cemented vs. Open Hole Completions Cost vs. Increased Recovery Of Additional Frac Stages Resin vs. Sand vs. Ceramic Proppants ...thus enabling for the first time ever, operators to compare and contrast the production results seen from varying completions across different Bakken fields. The second biggest challenge facing Bakken operators is well spacing. Producers are now down-spacing to fully exploit the potential of the reservoirs; but what is the optimal spacing? How can operators increase well density without causing wellbore interference and pressure drops in the reservoir? From an economic standpoint, how many wells are too many? Operators need to examine data and interpretations on drain and drillings per well from latest down spacing pilots to identify whether or not the right spacing has been reached and ultimately, determine how far apart Bakken wells should be drilled for maximum recovery.

1. Making Decisions That Increase Efficiency At Every Stage Of
Completions: Balancing Increased Recovery With Cost Reduction
www.bakken-completions-2014.com
Attended By over 79.30% End Users’
REGISTER HERE
Brandon Rollins
Operations Engineer
Whiting Petroleum
Chris Wright
CEO
Liberty Resources
David Veltri
COO
Emerald Oil
Matt Bauerschlag
VP Engineering
Kraken Oil & Gas
Stan Wilson
Reserves Engineering Manager
Continental Resources
Larry Griffin
VP Operations
Liberty Resources
Dominic Spencer
EVP
Triangle Petroleum USA
Corporation
Darren Schmidt
Completions & Operations Engineer
Statoil USA
Using Latest Frac And High Density Pilot Results
From Bakken And Three Forks Wells To Identify The
Highest Performing Completion Techniques And
Optimal Well Spacing:
Maximizing Drainage Per Well While Driving Costs Down At
Every Stage Of Completions
Key Issues To Be Discussed Include:
May 28-29 | Denver | Colorado
Technical Insight From 20+ Industry Professionals Including Major
EP Companies Actively Operating In The Bakken Three Forks
M Follow us @UnconventOilGas
• PLUG PERF VS. SLIDING SLEEVES: Comparing the results of plug and perf vs.
sliding sleeves in the Bakken to identify the highest performing frac
• SLICK WATER VS. CROSS LINK VS. HYBRIDS: Analyzing the production results from
the latest pilot tests to examine how the performance of different frac fluids vary
across the Bakken
• CEMENTED VS. OPEN HOLE COMPLETIONS: Comparing the results seen from
cemented vs. open hole completions to determine the extent to which performance is
driven by geology
• FRAC STAGES - COST VS. INCREASED RECOVERY: Determining the number of frac
stages in which, on a given lateral length, incremental production no longer justifies cost
• PROPPANTS - RESIN VS. SAND VS. CERAMIC: Examining the recovery on a resin
coated vs. sand vs. ceramic well to determine the most effective proppant type in
different Bakken fields
• WELL SPACING INTERFERENCE: Presenting data and interpretations on drainage
per well to determine how close wells can be drilled without causing interference
• EXTENTION INTO THE DEEPER THREE FORKS BENCHES: Assessing the reservoir
communication between the Bakken Three Forks to determine the viability of
extending into the lower benches
Organized By: Co-Sponsor:

2. The Congress Will Be Held At:
Marriott City Center Denver
Ballroom A-E
1701 California Street
Denver, CO 80202
Phone: 303-297-1300
Web: http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/
dendt-denver-marriott-city-center/
Day two will start with a discussion on how operators have increased productivity
economically to maximize money spent against return on investment. This will then
be followed by a presentation on key techniques for determining optimal well
density. Latest data and interpretations from high density pilots will be shared to
increase Bakken operators understanding of how close wells can be drilled without
causing interference. The day will then move into discussing the economic viability
of extending into deeper Three Fork benches with case studies on Bakken Three
Forks communication and economic returns seen from the deeper benches of
the Three Forks. The day will end with determining if lateral stacking has led to significant
increase in production and the point at which production stops justifying the additional
lateral foot drilled.
Day one will be completely dedicated to increasing efficiency at every stage of
completions. The day will start with a keynote address looking into how to optimize
completions and stimulation designs for increased value production in the Bakken,
followed by a discussion on the successful implementation of integrated completions
approaches. The day will then break down to compare the production results seen from
the utilization of a combination of different completions techniques including: plug and perf
vs. sliding sleeve designs, slick water vs. cross link vs. hybrid fluids, cemented
liners vs. open hole completions with swell packers, sand vs. ceramic proppants,
number, length and spacing of frac stages vs. cost.
Venue Information:
Day 2: Well Spacing And Three Forks Communication
Day 1: Optimizing Completion Techniques
www.bakken-completions-2014.com (1) 800 7213915 info@american-business-conferences.com
As Bakken EP companies have now
ascended into full development phase,
the real question now is how to maximize
the productivity of Bakken wells whilst
simultaneously driving down cost.
Completions and well spacing play a huge
role in cost and production efficiency and
mastering the optimization of both aspects
has the ability to significantly transform the
economics of every Bakken well drilled.
Amongst all of the available completion
techniques available to operators, deciding
upon the highest performing frac recipe is
not an easy task. Operators not only need
to look at increasing efficiency at every
stage of completions, but need to do this
in a way that balances increased recovery
with reduced costs. Needless to say, if
funds were unlimited, operators could
spend millions of dollars testing all possible
combinations of frac fluids, proppants,
liners, frac stages and frac spacing to
deduce the optimal recipe for the reservoir
in place. However, as reality would have it,
trial and error on a grand scale is neither
economically viable nor operationally
feasible so, what operators must do is
learn from successes and failures of
other operators with regard to….
• Plug Perf vs. Sliding Sleeves
• Slick Water vs. Cross Link vs. Hybrid Fracs
• Cemented vs. Open Hole Completions
• Cost vs. Increased Recovery Of
Additional Frac Stages
• Resin vs. Sand vs. Ceramic Proppants
…thus enabling operators for the first time
ever, to compare and contrast the production
results seen from varying completions across
different Bakken fields.
The second biggest challenge facing Bakken
operators is that of well spacing. Producers
are now down-spacing to fully exploit
the potential of the reservoirs but what is
the optimal spacing? How can operators
increase well density without causing
wellbore interference and pressure drops in
the reservoir? From an economic standpoint,
how many wells are too many? Operators
need to examine data and interpretations
on drain and drillings per well from
latest down spacing pilots to identify
whether or not the right spacing has
been reached and ultimately, determine
how far apart Bakken wells should be
drilled for maximum recovery.
Attended By over 79.30% End Users’
REGISTER HERE

3. OPTIMIZING COMPLETIONS TECHNIQUES Day one will feature a number of case study comparisons
to enable result driven conclusions on the optimum frac design, frac type, frac fluid, proppant type, liner,
number of frac stages and frac length in different areas of the Bakken Three Forks
Day 1
Wednesday May 28, 2014
8.30 Chair’s Opening Remarks
Chaired by: Dominic Spencer, Executive Vice President,
Triangle USA Petroleum Corporation
DAY 1 KEYNOTE ADDRESS: OPTIMIZING COMPLETION
DESIGNS
8.40 Demonstrating How Advanced Completions And
Stimulation Designs Have Increased Value Production In
The Bakken Central Basin
• Developing a robust benchmarking process for
comparing completion techniques across the Bakken
Central Basin
• Establishing what combination of completion techniques
have achieved the best production results in the Central
Basin Middle Bakken to identify a superior completion
recipe
• Deciphering which completion processes are having the
highest impact on production to inform capital allocation
• Understanding how applying the correct combination of
completion techniques will double the value of an asset
by boosting long-term production
• Comparing EUR vs. completion technique recipes most
widely applied in the Bakken Central Basin to determine
the most effective combinations that will boost production
economically
Chris Wright, CEO, Liberty Resources
9.10 Question Answer Session
INTEGRATED DRILLING COMPLETION DESIGNS
9.20 Showing How Integrated Drilling And Completion
Designs Have Systematically Improved In The Bakken
And Three Forks To Double EUR Results For An Individual
Well
• Understanding a completion design that has been used to
achieve significant increases in production
• Isolating the key drilling and completion elements of the
development process have have significantly contributed
to production performance
• Understanding and identifying why an operator should
change well and frac design according to particular
improvement targets and to the reservoir in place
• Exploring unsuccessful optimization attempts in the
Bakken Three Forks to learn through trial and error
and implement specific improvements
• Using latest results to map the evolution of the completion
optimization process to identify new areas for future
optimizationn
Cal Crawley, Advisor - Manager, Cornerstone Natural
Resources
9.50 Question Answer Session
COMPLETION DESIGNS EVOLUTION
10.00 Understanding How A Completion Design Has
Evolved Over Time In The Bakken To Achieve Increases In
Production And Significant Cost Savings
• Looking at cost vs. production results of previously used
completion techniques vs. newly applied recipes to identify
the improvements and most effective modifications
• Understanding if an operator has changed completion
recipes according to a particular stage or according to
the rock
• Isolating the single completion techniques that have been
tweaked and their contribution to production to determine
the significance of their impact on increasing efficiency
Cody Duran, Completions Manager, Zavanna
10.30 Question Answer Session
10.40 Morning Refreshments In Exhibition Showcase Area
OPTIMIZING PRODUCTION: SOUTH ANTELOPE CASE
STUDY
11.10 Modifying Drilling, Reservoir And Completion
Engineering To Optimize Production In The Bakken Shale
• Analyzing how focused modifications in drilling, reservoir
and completion engineering from 2009 to the present
have improved production as much as 50-75%
• Identifying 10 key workflow changes including landing
zones, lateral length, completion techniques, frac
processes and proppant type and real-time pressure
management that have transformed production
• Understanding how an operator has drilled some of
the best wells in the Williston Basin by deviating from
conventional Williston Basin philosophy
Tyler Micheli, Advisor/Consultant, Helis Oil Gas
11.40 Question Answer Session
COMPLETION SELECTION - PANEL DISCUSSION
11.50 Identifying Key Methodologies, Techniques
And Criteria Being Used By Leading Operators When
Determining Optimum Completion Strategy For Geology
In Place
• Understanding how operators have selected their completion
techniques in different areas of the basin to identify the key
factors that drive the decision-making process
• Identifying the reservoir, geological and economic variables
that need to be considered to select a productive and cost
effective completion recipe for any given area of the basin
• Discussing how operators estimate cost vs. production to
strike a successful balance and achieve best frac results
• Looking at what drove successful and unsuccessful
completion choices to learn through trial and error
Dominic Spencer, Executive Vice President, Triangle USA
Petroleum Corporation
Matt Bauerschlag, VP Engineering, Kraken Oil Gas
Tyler Micheli, Advisor/Consultant, Helis Oil Gas
12.20 Question Answer Session
PLUG PERF VS. SLIDING SLEEVES
12.30 Comparing The Performance Of Plug And Perf
Vs. Sliding Sleeves In The Bakken: Examining Cost Vs.
Results
• Evaluating cost against stimulation efficiency to
determine whether production increases justify the added
costs of a sliding sleeve design
• Examining the methods an operator is using to
implement plug perf or staged actuated sliding sleeves
to derive the most effective application
• Looking at recent case studies to understand whether
plug perf can provide the needed isolation and
diversion to create an effective frac
• Examining results seen from hybrid fracs to determine
whether combining frac designs would deliver the best
production results
David Veltri, COO, Emerald Oil
1.00 Question Answer Session
1.10 Lunch In Exhibition Showcase Arena
CEMENTED VS OPEN HOLE COMPLETIONS
2.10 Comparing The Results Seen From Cemented Liner
Plug and Perf Completions Vs. Swell Packers Sliding
Sleeve Completions To Determine The Extent To Which
Performance Depends On Geological Area
• Exploring the pros, cons, cost and performance of
cemented and un-cemented liners to identify the most
suitable completion for particular wells
• Providing a geology focused production analysis of
cemented vs. un-cemented liners to determine which
works better, where, and why
• Understanding whether production increase justifies the
added costs of cemented liners to ensure an economic
return on investment
Brandon Rollins, Operations Engineer, Whiting
Petroleum Corporation
2.40 Question Answer Session
COMPLETION DESIGN: SMALL-CAP PERSPECTIVE
2.50 Optimizing Pipe Exit Strategy: Examining
Completion Design From A Small-Cap Perspective
• Stressingtheimportanceofresults-orienteddataminingin
achievingrateofreturnsuccess
• Underliningtheproblemofmulti-variableanalysistoimprove
analyticalresults
• Identifyingthekeycriteriausedtodeterminewhatcompletions
approachtoadopt: sleevesvs.perfplugvs.hybrid
• Reviewing the results seen from open hole completions
vs. cemented liners to determine what has been more
successful in the Williston Basin deep center
Peter Bommer, VP - Engineering, Abraxas Petroleum
Corporation
3.20 Question Answer Session
FRAC STAGES: COST VS. INCREASED RECOVERY
2.30 Determining The Optimal Length, Number Of Frac
Stages And Stage Design To Balance Cost With Increased
Production
• Looking at cumulative production vs. stage lengths to
identify the highest performing lengths and increase
production
• Comparing the performance of stage length vs.
completion technique to identify the most effective
combinations
• Evaluating performance for the number of clusters within
each stage to identify the optimal amount of entry points
• Cost-benefit analysis of the number of frac stages to
identify the optimal stage number and options for future
developments
Larry Griffin, VP Operations, Liberty Resources
4.00 Question Answer Session
PROPPANTS: HYBRID COMPLETIONS
4.10 Examining The Conductivity Of The Sand/Ceramic
Interface Found In Hybrid Completions To Optimize Frac
Performance
• Exploring arrangements of sand and ceramic proppants
to optimize performance
• Proppant selection: understanding what criteria are used
to select proppant type
• Examining laboratory data of mixed proppant sizes
to understand how conductivity is effected at various
conditions
• Comparing performance at non-Darcy conditions in
conductivity cells
• Identifying the key drivers behind optimizing proppant
selection
Darren Schmidt, Operation Completion Engineer, Statoil
USA
4.40 Question Answer Session
4.50 Afternoon Refreshments In Exhibition Showcase Area
FRAC DESIGN
5.20 Understanding The Role Of Fracture Geometry,
Spacing And Open/Cased-Hole Completion Strategy To
Enhance An Operator’s Optimum Completion Design
• Optimizing horizontal well design for wells with multiple
hydraulic fractures in the Bakken shale to maximize
drainage
• Examining how interfering effects inside the fracture and
inter-fractures impact the ultimate performance of the
well
• Analyzing fracture spacing and intersecting angles in
vertical and horizontal wells to understand it’s impact on
production
• Using reservoir parameters to model fractures in the
reservoir and determine optimal fracture placement
Luigi Saputelli, Advisor, BP
5.50 Question Answer Session
SLICK WATER VS. CROSS LINK VS. HYBRIDS
6.00 Using Results From Latest Pilot Tests To Examine
How Frac Performance Varies With Frac Fluid Selection
• Comparing pilot tests on slick water, cross-link
gel systems and hybrids to demonstrate the typical
production results seen from each fluid
• Learning how to achieve an optimal flow regime to
optimize proppant transport and ensure an effective frac
• Understanding how to identify the most appropriate fluid
according to the specific geology and frac design in place
to achieve the perfect frac
• Exploring opportunities for new, cleaner stable fluids
warranted by proven production results to maximize the
stability of the frac
6.30 Question Answer Session
6.40 Chair’s Closing Remarks
6.50 - 7.50 Networking Drinks Reception In Exhibition
Showcase Area
www.bakken-completions-2014.com (1) 800 7213915 info@american-business-conferences.com

4. 8.30 Chair’s Opening Remarks
Chairedby:DominicSpencer,ExecutiveVicePresident,
TriangleUSAPetroleumCorporation
DAY 2 KEYNOTE PANEL: COST VS. INCREASED RECOVERY
8.40 Increasing Productivity Economically: Balancing
Increased Recovery With Cost Reduction To Optimize
Money Spent Against Return On Investment
• Defining an acceptable return: what is the optimal time
frame to break-even?
• Examining cost saving strategies to effectively drive down
drilling and completion costs
• Exploring the opportunities for operator cost-sharing
and establishing relationships with service companies to
reduce long-term costs
• Understanding how to increase material efficiency to
maximize production without any increased expenditure
DominicSpencer, EVP, TriangleUSAPetroleum
Corporation
LarryGriffin,VPOperations,LibertyResources
9.10 Question Answer Session
MODIFYING DESIGN TO OPTIMIZE PRODUCTION
9.20 Modifying Completion Design According To
Interpretation And Cross-Discipline Integration Of
Multiple Data Sets
• Planning, acquiring, interpreting and integrating
specifically acquired data sets to characterize the
reservoir and optimize completions
• Using microseismic data, tracer, core, specialty logs and
integrated modeling to assess completion efficiency with
the goal of optimizing well spacing
• Evaluating integrated interpretations including 3D
seismic and frac modeling that led an operator to change
completion designs to optimize production
• Using micro seismic data and tracer to evaluate
modifications to completion design
AngieSouthcott,GeologyTeamLead,WPXEnergy
AndrewSchmidt,CompletionsEngineer,WPXEnergy
9.50 Question Answer Session
10.00 Morning Refreshments In Exhibition Showcase Area
WELL SPACING EXPANSION INTO THE DEEPER THREE
FORKS
10.30 Presenting Data From Spacing Tests And
Reservoir Expansion Into The Deeper Benches Of The
Three Forks To Identify The Optimal Well Spacing And
Understand The Potential Of The Deeper Three Forks
• Exploring an operator’s development to date looking at the
Middle Bakken Three Forks to understand the results
achieved
• Looking at the results of the reservoir expansion into the
deeper benches of the Three Forks to understand the
viability of the extension
• Analyzing results from high density well spacing tests
to understand the maximum number of wells in a given
spacing unit
• Presenting future development plans to identify areas and
possibilities for further improvement
StanWilson,ReservesEngineeringManager,ContinentalResources
11.15 Question Answer Session
OPTIMIZING WELL SPACING FOR PRIMARY
SECONDARY RECOVERY
11.30 Optimizing Hydraulic Fracs And Well Spacing
For Primary And Secondary Recovery In Tight Oil
Reservoirs
• Assessing primary and waterflood developments through
fracture half-length, conductivity, density, pattern and well
spacing to determine the most efficient design
• Conducting sensitivity analysis according to total oil
recovery and NPV
• Identifying the key parameters and optimize short-term
(primary) and long-term (waterflood) developments
• Applying reservoir modeling to efficiently place infill wells
and design future waterflood
Xiaoqi(Vicky)Wang,ReservoirEngineer,PennWest
Exploration
12.00 Question Answer Session
12.10 Lunch In Exhibition Showcase Area
RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION FOR OIL IN PLACE
WELL SPACING
1.10 Using Seismically-Driven Reservoir
Characterization To Identify The Most Productive
Reservoir Intervals And Define The Optimal Well
Placement Strategy
• Identifying the key reservoir properties that have a major
impact on the performance of shale wells to increase
productivity
• Analyzing tight oil reservoirs to determine oil in place and
identify the most productive layers
• Using reservoir characterization to optimize reservoir
drainage and predict well productivity
• Understanding what key parameters and variables need
to be taken into account when determining the optimal
well density
TylerMicheli, Advisor,HelisOilGas
1.40 Question Answer Session
MULTI-LAYER RECOVERY
1.50 Exploring The Potential Of The Upper and Lower
Bakken Shale To Identify Production Contributions and
Communication Between The Different Layers
• Understanding the production potential of the Upper or
the Lower Bakken Shale to understand which layers need
to be targeted to achieve maximum recovery
• Using reservoir stimulation analysis to identify the oil in
place and the contribution of the different layers to overall
productivity
• Analyzing Middle Bakken well production forecasts and
revised well EUR to determine how the Upper and Lower
Bakken Shale communicate and maximise recovery
efforts
• Understanding the contribution of the single layers to
determine if there is a need for lateral staking in the
Bakken
SanyogKumar,ResearchAssistant,ColoradoSchoolOf
Mines
3.20 Question Answer Session
3.30 Afternoon Refreshments In Exhibition Showcase Area
BAKKEN THREE FORKS COMMUNICATION
4.00 Exploiting The Reservoir Communication Between
The Bakken Three Forks To Maximize Recovery Per Well
• Using production results to determine which benches of
the Three Forks are contributing to additional production
• Fraccing into the Three Forks from the Bakken and vice
versa to avoid drilling double legs between the separate
formations
• Understanding how the lower benches of the Three Forks
interact with the upper Three Forks benches and the
middle Bakken to optimize drilling efforts
4.30 Question Answer Session
VIABILITY OF DEEPER THREE FORK BENCHES
4.40 Discussing The Commercial Viability Of Extending
Into The Second, Third And Fourth Benches Of The
Three Forks
• Completion optimization in the deeper benches: does it
need to be treated differently and what does this cost?
• Oil in place vs. higher fraccing cost: will there be a return
on investment?
• How to address production interference with the upper
Three Forks Bakken to minimize the economic risk
• Assessing results of specific completions used in pilots to
determine the most successful completions methods for
the Three Forks
5.10 Question Answer Session
5.20 Chair’s Closing Remarks End Of Conference
Day 2
Thursday May 29, 2014
WELL SPACING THREE FORKS Daytwowillfeatureanumberofcasestudiesanddiscussions
addressingoptimalwelldensityinagivenspacingunit,wellinterference,extensionintothedeeperbenchesofthe
TheeForkstomaximizereservoirexploitationandhydrocarbonrecovery.
Interstate Exploration
“Talks were very productive”
SHELL
“Well executed. Good balance
of content and time allocation”
Abraxas Petroleum Corp
“Unique opportunity to
participate with other
operators on topics of
completion strategies and
reservoir description and
delineation”
www.bakken-completions-2014.com (1) 800 7213915 info@american-business-conferences.com

5. Address For Invoice Purposes
Zip/Postal Code
Country
Payment must be received in full prior to the event.
* Option 1. CREDIT CARD Please charge my *VISA *AMERICAN EXPRESS *MASTERCARD
Expiry date
Security Code / CVV (required)
Signature of card holder
Amount $ USD
Card number
Name on card
I would like to register the delegate(s) below for the 2 day conference
Bakken Three Forks Completions Well Spacing 2014
PYes
Details PLEASE USE CAPITALS - PHOTOCOPY FOR MULTIPLE DELEGATES
Delegate Rates GUESTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION ARRANGEMENTS
Payment PLEASE TICK APPROPRIATE BOXES AND COMPLETE DETAILS
How To Finalize Your Registration
* Option 2. INVOICE An invoice containing payment instructions will be sent electronically upon receipt of the completed registration form.
Delegate 1
*Mr *Dr *Miss *Ms *Mrs *Other:
Name
Position
Organization
Email
Telephone
Delegate 2
*Mr *Dr *Miss *Ms *Mrs *Other:
Name
Position
Organization
Email
Telephone
SAVE UP TP 20% ON GROUP DISCOUNTS
Call for rates: (1) 800 721 3915
All prices quoted above are inclusive of GST
Now that your details are completed please send your registration form to
our Customer Service Team using one of the following options:
Option 1. Email: info@american-business-conferences.com
Option 2. Fax: (1) 800 714 1359
Enquiries And More Information
Should you have any enquiries or if you would like to request more
information please contact our friendly Customer Service Team on
(1) 800 721 3915 or visit the conference website at
www.bakken-completions-2014.com
Super Early Booking Discount Early Booking Discount Standard Rate
Book And Pay By Friday March 21 Book And Pay By Friday April 4 From April 5
2 Day Conference Pass *$1399 USD SAVE $400 *$1599 USD SAVE $200 *$1799 USD
Add Pre-Conference Workshop *$399 USD
Pre-Conference Workshop Only *$499 USD
Terms Conditions
The conference is being organized by American Business
Conferences, a division of London Business Conferences
Ltd, a limited liability company formed under English
company law and registered in the UK no. 5090859.
Cancellations received 30 days prior to the start of the event
will be eligible for a refund less $150 administration fee, after
this point no refund will be given. Cancellations must be made
in writing, if you are unable to attend you may nominate a
colleague to attend in your place at no additional cost.
Receipt of this registration form, inclusive or exclusive
of payment constitutes formal agreement to attend and
acceptance of the terms and conditions stated.
All outstanding fees must be paid within our standard
payment period of 7 days. Any outstanding invoices will
remain valid should cancellation of attendance be received
outside of the aforementioned cancellation period.
*If you are claiming the early booking discount this may
not be used in conjunction with other discounts advertised
elsewhere. All discount codes and offers must be claimed at
the time of registration.
American Business Conferences reserves the right to alter
or cancel the speakers or program.
American Business Conferences reserve the right to refuse
admission.
We would like to keep you informed of other American
Business Conferences products and services. This will be
carried out in accordance with the Data Protection Act.
Please write to the Head of Marketing, American Business
Conferences at the address below if you specifically do not
want to receive this information.
American Business Conferences. City Center One. 800
Town Country Blvd. Suite 300. Houston. Texas. 77024
American Business Conferences will not accept liability for
any individual transport delays and in such circumstances
the normal cancellation restrictions apply.
American Business Conferences is a Division of London
Business Conferences Limited, Registered in England No.
5090859 EIN. no: 98-0514924
www.bakken-completions-2014.com (1) 800 7213915 info@american-business-conferences.com