SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Answer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Civil Action, File No. 00000
ANN FORRESTER
AND
WILLIAMFORRESTER,
Plaintiffs DEFENDANTS’ANSWER
v. ANDCOUNTERCLAIM
RICHARDHART
AND
MERCURY PARCEL SERVICE,INC.,
Defendants
COUNT I
1. Admitted.
2. DeniedthatDefendantdrove vehiclenegligently.
3. Defendantlacksknowledgesufficienttoforma beliefregardingthe truthof the allegationin
paragraph 3 of Plaintiff’scomplaint,andtherefore deniessame.
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiff wasmore than50 percentnegligentincausingthe accident,andistherefore barredfrom
recovery.
COUNT II
4. No answerrequired.
5. Denied.
COUNTERCLAIM
On February26, ____, on Highway328 in Capitol County,Columbia,Plaintiff AnnForresternegligently
triedto cross the road infrontof Defendant’svehicle,causinginjurytoDefendantHart.
Asa resultof plaintiff’snegligence,DefendantHartsufferedlacerationsandcontusionsandlostdays
of workall to the sum of $2,200.
SECOND COUNTERCLAIM
DefendantMercuryParcel incorporatesbyreference the factsasallegedinthe firstcounterclaimand
allegesthe plaintiff’snegligence causeddamage tothe defendant’svehicleandrequiredthe hiringof an
extraemployeeforone weekall tothe sumof $4,250.
WHEREFORE, DefendantsrequestthatPlaintiffs’actionbe dismissedanddemandjudgmentagainst
the Plaintiffsfor$2,200 for DefendantHartand $4,250 for DefendantMercuryParcel Service Inc.,plus
interestandcosts.
____________________
AttorneyforDefendants
(Address)
(Phone Number)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Answer (finished)

SHurd Sample Complaint
SHurd Sample ComplaintSHurd Sample Complaint
SHurd Sample ComplaintSandra Hurd
 
FACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdf
FACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdfFACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdf
FACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdfforladies
 
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury ComplaintPennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury ComplaintJames Yoke
 
COMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H Cosby
COMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H CosbyCOMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H Cosby
COMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H CosbyVogelDenise
 
Motionto remand
Motionto remandMotionto remand
Motionto remandmzamoralaw
 
Trial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et al
Trial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et alTrial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et al
Trial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et alSeth Row
 
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geigerAnswer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geigerChris Harden
 

Ähnlich wie Answer (finished) (12)

July 2015
July 2015July 2015
July 2015
 
SHurd Sample Complaint
SHurd Sample ComplaintSHurd Sample Complaint
SHurd Sample Complaint
 
FACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdf
FACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdfFACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdf
FACTS In the spring of 2001, Kitsmiller purchased a house in Van .pdf
 
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury ComplaintPennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
 
COMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H Cosby
COMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H CosbyCOMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H Cosby
COMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H Cosby
 
Motionto remand
Motionto remandMotionto remand
Motionto remand
 
complaint
complaintcomplaint
complaint
 
PETITION MICHIGAN
PETITION MICHIGANPETITION MICHIGAN
PETITION MICHIGAN
 
Trial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et al
Trial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et alTrial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et al
Trial Order Ash Grove v. Travelers et al
 
2005 pa super 55
2005 pa super 552005 pa super 55
2005 pa super 55
 
2005 pa super 55
2005 pa super 552005 pa super 55
2005 pa super 55
 
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geigerAnswer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
 

Answer (finished)

  • 1. Answer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Action, File No. 00000 ANN FORRESTER AND WILLIAMFORRESTER, Plaintiffs DEFENDANTS’ANSWER v. ANDCOUNTERCLAIM RICHARDHART AND MERCURY PARCEL SERVICE,INC., Defendants COUNT I 1. Admitted. 2. DeniedthatDefendantdrove vehiclenegligently. 3. Defendantlacksknowledgesufficienttoforma beliefregardingthe truthof the allegationin paragraph 3 of Plaintiff’scomplaint,andtherefore deniessame. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiff wasmore than50 percentnegligentincausingthe accident,andistherefore barredfrom recovery. COUNT II 4. No answerrequired. 5. Denied. COUNTERCLAIM On February26, ____, on Highway328 in Capitol County,Columbia,Plaintiff AnnForresternegligently triedto cross the road infrontof Defendant’svehicle,causinginjurytoDefendantHart. Asa resultof plaintiff’snegligence,DefendantHartsufferedlacerationsandcontusionsandlostdays of workall to the sum of $2,200. SECOND COUNTERCLAIM DefendantMercuryParcel incorporatesbyreference the factsasallegedinthe firstcounterclaimand allegesthe plaintiff’snegligence causeddamage tothe defendant’svehicleandrequiredthe hiringof an extraemployeeforone weekall tothe sumof $4,250. WHEREFORE, DefendantsrequestthatPlaintiffs’actionbe dismissedanddemandjudgmentagainst the Plaintiffsfor$2,200 for DefendantHartand $4,250 for DefendantMercuryParcel Service Inc.,plus interestandcosts. ____________________ AttorneyforDefendants (Address) (Phone Number)