SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 10
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
HRS Insight 
2013, Vol. 25 
www.pwc.com 
New pension accounting for 
insurance companies 
November 25, 2013 
In brief 
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has changed employers’ accounting for 
pensions and other postretirement benefits. The new guidance applies the provisions of ASC 715, 
Compensation — Retirement Benefits, to pension and other postretirement benefits accounting for 
insurance companies, with several exceptions. This Insight describes the new accounting guidance. 
In detail 
Background 
Insurance companies are 
regulated on a state-by-state 
basis in the United States. As 
discussed in the NAIC’s 
Statutory Accounting Principles 
Preamble, each state has its own 
regulatory framework generally 
led by an insurance 
commissioner. Insurance 
commissioners are charged with 
overseeing the financial 
condition of insurance 
companies doing business in 
their jurisdictions and they 
require meaningful financial, 
statistical, and operating 
information about the 
companies. 
This financial oversight is 
designed to help ensure that 
policyholders and claimants 
receive the requisite benefits 
from the policies sold, 
oftentimes such products having 
been sold years or decades prior 
to when the benefits are due. 
Frequently, this regulatory 
perspective differs markedly 
from the perspectives of other 
users of insurers’ accounting 
information. In recognition of 
these special concerns and 
responsibilities, statutory 
accounting principles have been 
established by statute and 
regulation. 
The objective of US GAAP 
reporting differs in certain 
respects from the objective of 
Statutory Accounting Principles 
(SAP). US GAAP is designed to 
meet the varying needs of the 
different users of financial 
statements. SAP is designed to 
address the concerns of 
regulators, who are the primary 
users of statutory financial 
statements. As a result, GAAP 
stresses the current financial 
performance and operating 
results of the entity, while SAP 
stresses measurement of the 
insurance company's ability to 
pay claims in the future. 
Insurance companies that 
report financial results under 
both US GAAP Accounting 
Standards Codification (ASC) 
and the NAIC Statements of 
Statutory Accounting Principles 
(SSAPs) need to ensure that 
differences in accounting and 
reporting for employee benefits 
are appropriately considered. 
While the NAIC's SSAPs are 
primarily based on existing US 
GAAP guidance, some 
significant differences exist. For 
employee benefits, some of the 
more recent accounting 
standards issued under US 
GAAP such as FAS 158 had not 
been adopted by the NAIC as 
part of the SSAPs. 
At its Spring 2012 National 
Meeting, the NAIC adopted 
Statement of Statutory 
Accounting Principles No. 102 
(SSAP No. 102), Accounting
HRS Insight 
for Pensions, A Replacement of SSAP 
No.89 and Statement of Statutory 
Accounting Principles No. 92 (SSAP 
No. 92), Accounting for 
Postretirement Benefits Other Than 
Pensions, A Replacement of SSAP No. 
14. The more significant changes from 
SSAP No. 89 and SSAP No. 14 
include: 
 Inclusion of obligations 
attributable to nonvested benefits 
in the determination of projected 
benefit obligation (PBO) and 
accumulated postretirement 
benefit obligation (APBO) and net 
periodic plan cost 
 Requirement to use fair value of 
plan assets in determining net 
periodic pension plan costs 
 Recognition of unfunded benefit 
obligations in the statement of 
financial position (surplus/non-admitted 
assets) 
 Recognition of unamortized 
transition assets or obligations, 
prior service costs and gains and 
losses in unassigned funds 
 Measurement date as of fiscal year 
end. 
Observation 
For employers filing under US GAAP 
as well as SAP, the new guidance 
may simplify the process of 
determining employee benefit 
obligations and net periodic plan 
cost, since the new SAP requirements 
incorporate many of the provisions of 
ASC 715 that had previously not been 
included in the prior SSAPs. 
However, the requirement to 
recognize the unfunded benefit 
obligation, including obligations for 
nonvested plan participants, may 
prove onerous for many employers, 
especially employers who provide 
other postretirement benefits, since 
obligations for employees who are 
not yet eligible to retire are generally 
considered to be nonvested. 
SSAP No. 102 and SSAP No. 92 adopt 
the provisions of ASC 715 with the 
following exceptions: 
 In determining the expected 
return on plan assets and the 10% 
corridor for gain/loss 
amortization, plan assets must be 
valued at fair value (i.e. a 
calculated value as permitted 
under US GAAP will not be 
permitted under SAP). 
 All references to other 
comprehensive income (OCI) and 
accumulated OCI in US GAAP 
have been revised to reflect 
unassigned funds (surplus). 
 Prepaid assets continue to be non-admitted. 
In addition, the cost of 
a participation right of an annuity 
contract is also non-admitted. 
 The reduced disclosure for non-public 
entities permitted under 
US GAAP is not permitted under 
SAP. 
 Classification in US GAAP of 
unfunded obligations as current 
or noncurrent is eliminated. 
 Fair value of assets will continue 
to be determined under statutory 
guidance rather than under US 
GAAP. 
 Transition rules in applying the 
new standards differ from 
transition under US GAAP. 
The effective date for both standards 
is January 1, 2013, with the exception 
of the effective date of January 1, 2014 
for the required change in 
measurement date. Early adoption is 
permitted; however, early adoption 
must be applied to all benefit plans of 
the insurance company. The transition 
rules including the following: 
 Net periodic benefit cost will 
include amortization of 
unrecognized prior service cost 
existing prior to adoption for 
nonvested employees. 
 Other unrecognized balances 
(gains and losses, prior service 
costs for vested and nonvested 
employees, and transition 
obligations or assets from initial 
application of SSAP 89 and SSAP 
14) are recognized in unassigned 
funds as of December 31, 2012 
(i.e. the date prior to the adoption 
date of January 1, 2013) unless 
the company elects to amortize 
the transition surplus (i.e. the 
alternative transition). The offset 
to unassigned funds is reported 
separately as an aggregate write-in 
for other than invested assets 
or for other liabilities. 
 The insurance company may 
either elect to recognize the entire 
amount of transition surplus (i.e. 
unrecognized balances described 
above) in the year of adoption or 
elect to amortize the transition 
surplus into income over a period 
of not more than ten years. 
Companies who elect the 
alternative transition must 
disclose the entire transition 
surplus. 
 In transitioning to a fiscal year-end 
measurement date, 
companies will be required to 
remeasure obligations and plan 
assets at the beginning of the first 
year that the measurement date 
provisions are applied. The 
remeasured amounts are used to 
determine the effects of the 
change in measurement date. 
Alternative methods provided 
under FAS 158 are not permitted 
under SAP. 
2 pwc
HRS Insights 
Determination of net periodic 
plan cost 
The determination of net periodic 
plan cost under SSAP No. 102 and 
SSAP No. 92 is similar to the 
determination of net periodic plan 
cost under ASC 715, with the 
exception of the following: 
 Fair value of plan assets is used to 
determine the expected return 
component and the 10% corridor 
for gain/loss amortization. A 
calculated value, as permitted 
under ASC 715, is not permitted 
under SAP. 
 At transition, a new prior service 
cost base equal to nonvested 
benefit obligations is established. 
Net periodic plan cost will include 
amortization of the new prior 
service cost over the vesting 
period of the nonvested plan 
participants. 
Existing transition, gain/loss and 
prior service cost bases will continue 
to be amortized; however, the 
amortization of gains and losses will 
include nonvested benefit obligations 
in the corridor and the future working 
lifetime of nonvested plan participants 
in the amortization period. 
Observation 
SSAP No. 92 has changed the 
amortization period for gains and 
losses and prior service costs. Unless 
all or almost all the plan participants 
are fully eligible for benefits, SSAP 
No. 92 requires amortization of prior 
service costs over the average 
remaining years of service to full 
eligibility of active plan participants 
not yet fully eligible. For gains and 
losses in excess of the corridor, the 
minimum amortization period is the 
average remaining service period of 
active plan participants. Previously, 
SSAP No. 14 defined the amortization 
periods for prior service costs and 
gains and losses as the average life 
expectancy of the plan's fully vested 
and retired plan participants. 
Transition 
For an insurance company adopting 
the SSAPs on January 1, 2013, ‘a 
transition surplus impact’ is defined 
by the guidance as the unrecognized 
items as of December 31, 2012 (i.e. 
gains and losses, prior service costs, 
including prior service costs for 
nonvested plan participants, and 
transition assets or obligations from 
original application of SSAP No.89 
and SSAP No. 14) which have not been 
included as a component of net 
periodic benefit costs. The 
unrecognized items shall be 
recognized in unassigned funds 
(surplus) as of January 1, 2013, unless 
the deferral option, described below, 
is elected. 
In lieu of immediately recognizing the 
entire surplus impact, companies may 
elect, on a plan-by-plan basis, to 
recognize the surplus impact over a 
period not to exceed ten years. The 
annual amount to be recognized is the 
greater of: 
1. 10% of the transition surplus 
impact determined as of 
December 31, 2012 
2. Amortization of the unrecognized 
items as of December 31, 2012, 
following the existing 
amortization schedules in effect 
on the transition date (reflecting 
accelerated amortization of these 
amounts due to subsequent 
settlements or curtailments) 
3. For pension plans, unfunded ABO 
as of December 31, 2012, less any 
previously accrued amounts (any 
prepaid pension asset is not 
considered). 
Any gain or loss or prior service cost 
arising after the transition date is not 
subject to the deferral option, but 
must be immediately recognized in 
unassigned funds. In addition, if 
future gains or employer 
contributions to the plan result in a 
prepaid benefit cost or overfunded 
status of that plan, the recognition of 
the transition surplus impact shall be 
accelerated to the extent the plan is 
overfunded. If the plan experiences 
subsequent gains that will be 
recognized in earnings, an additional 
amount of the remaining transition 
liability must be recognized to offset 
the gain. 
The takeaway 
The new SSAPs may simplify the 
determination of obligations and net 
periodic benefit cost for many 
employers. However, the requirement 
to record the unfunded benefit 
obligations as a charge to surplus may 
prove onerous. While the transition 
rules may ease the financial burden of 
transitioning to the new requirements, 
the transition rules are complex and 
require analysis based on the 
attributes of each particular plan. You 
may consider consulting with your 
local PwC engagement team or the 
authors on specific implementation 
questions prior to year-end. 
The attached Appendix provides a 
comparison of the accounting for 
defined benefit pensions and other 
postretirement benefits under US 
GAAP, prior SAP and amended SAP. 
3 pwc
HRS Insights 
Appendix 
Topic US GAAP — accounting 
standards codification 
Prior NAIC statements of statutory 
accounting principles 
Amended NAIC statements of 
statutory accounting principles 
Accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits 
Guidance ASC 715, Compensation — 
Retirement Benefits, provides 
guidance on the disclosure and 
other accounting and reporting 
requirements related to single-company 
defined benefit pension 
and other postretirement benefit 
plans under US GAAP. 
SSAP 89 - Accounting for Pensions, A 
Replacement of SSAP 8 and SSAP 14 - 
Postretirement Benefits Other Than 
Pensions established statutory accounting 
principles and related reporting for 
companies’ pension and other 
postretirement benefit plans. For defined 
benefit plans, SSAP 89 and SSAP 14 
adopted the provisions of FAS 87, FAS 
106 and FAS 132 (R), with certain 
modifications discussed below, but did not 
include the provisions of FAS 158. 
For defined benefit plans, SSAP 
102 and SSAP 92 supersede the 
guidance in SSAP 89 and SSAP 
14, respectively. The guidance 
incorporates the guidance from 
FAS 158 with certain 
modifications discussed below. 
Pension asset/ 
liability 
A company is required to recognize 
on its balance sheet the funded 
status of its defined benefit plans. 
The funded status is measured as 
the difference between the fair value 
of plan assets and the defined 
pension/other postretirement benefit 
obligation on a plan-by-plan basis. 
Accrued/prepaid pension or other 
postretirement plan cost (similar to FAS 
87/FAS 106 prior to application of FAS 
158): A liability (unfunded accrued plan 
cost) is recognized if the pension or other 
postretirement plan expense exceeds 
amounts the company has contributed to 
the plan. An asset (prepaid plan cost) is 
recognized if the pension or other 
postretirement plan expense is less than 
amounts the company has contributed to 
the plan (see discussion of non-admitted 
assets below). 
For defined benefit pension plans, an 
adjustment to reflect the additional 
minimum liability (AML) may be required 
(see discussion of AML below). 
Same as US GAAP with 
modifications for non-admitted 
assets (see discussion of non-admitted 
assets below). Transition 
options are included in the 
guidance. 
Measurement date Fiscal year-end. Fiscal year end, or, if used consistently 
from year to year, as of a date not more 
than three months prior to fiscal year end. 
If the measurement date is prior to the 
Same as US GAAP. 
In transitioning to a fiscal year end 
measurement date, a company 
remeasures plan assets and 
2 pwc
HRS Insights 
Topic US GAAP — accounting 
standards codification 
Prior NAIC statements of statutory 
accounting principles 
Amended NAIC statements of 
statutory accounting principles 
financial statement date and an additional 
minimum liability is required, any 
contribution to the plan to fund that 
additional minimum liability prior to the 
financial statement date may be used to 
reduce the additional minimum liability 
recognized in the financial statements. 
benefit obligations as of the 
beginning of the fiscal year that 
the new measurement date 
provisions are applied. A company 
uses those new measurements to 
determine the effects of the 
measurement date change as of 
the beginning of the fiscal year 
that the measurement date 
provisions are applied. Other 
approaches allowed under ASC 
715 are not permitted under SSAP 
102 and SSAP 92. 
Non-admitted 
assets 
N/A under US GAAP. The prepaid asset that results from an 
excess of the fair value of plan assets 
over the pension or postretirement benefit 
obligation is recorded as a non-admitted 
asset. 
Any intangible asset offsetting the 
minimum pension liability (excluding the 
unamortized transition obligation) is non-admitted 
and charged to surplus (see 
Intangible Assets section below). 
Any prepaid asset resulting from 
the excess of the fair value of plan 
assets over the PBO is recorded 
as a non-admitted asset. In 
addition, the cost of a participation 
right of an annuity contract is 
recorded as a non-admitted asset. 
Additional 
minimum liability 
(AML) 
FAS 158 eliminated the AML 
concept included in FAS 87. 
For defined benefit pension plans, if the 
accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) 
exceeds the fair value of plan assets, the 
company shall recognize a liability 
(including unfunded accrued pension cost) 
that is at least equal to the unfunded ABO. 
SSAP 102 eliminated the AML 
concept included in SSAP 89. 
Intangible asset 
(offset to AML) 
N/A Under SSAP 89, if an AML is recognized, 
an equal amount is recognized as an 
intangible asset; however, the intangible 
cannot exceed unamortized prior service 
costs (including any unamortized 
transition obligation). Only the portion of 
the intangible asset in excess of the 
unamortized transition obligation is non-admitted. 
N/A 
3 pwc
HRS Insights 
Topic US GAAP — accounting 
standards codification 
Prior NAIC statements of statutory 
accounting principles 
Amended NAIC statements of 
statutory accounting principles 
If an intangible asset generated by the 
AML is recognized, only that portion in 
excess of the unamortized incremental 
liability associated with the transition 
obligation shall be non-admitted. If an 
additional liability required to be 
recognized exceeds unrecognized PSC, 
the excess shall be reported as a 
component of unassigned funds (surplus), 
net of any tax benefits that result. 
When a new determination of the amount 
of additional liability is made, the related 
intangible asset and the balance 
accumulated in unassigned funds 
(surplus) shall be eliminated or adjusted 
as necessary. 
Measurement of 
benefit obligations 
The PBO for pension plans and the 
APBO include obligations for all plan 
participants and all benefits provided 
under the plan, whether or not 
vested. 
Obligations attributable to nonvested 
employees are excluded; obligations 
attributable to partially vested employees 
are included only to the extent of their 
vested amounts. 
Obligations for ancillary benefits (e.g. 
death and disability benefits) are accrued 
prior to the date of the triggering event 
(e.g. date of death or disability) in 
accordance with FAS 87. Obligations for 
protected, nonvested benefits and for 
nonvested, nonqualified benefits prior to 
retirement when there is no longer a 
substantial risk of forfeiture are accrued in 
accordance with FAS 87. 
Same as US GAAP. 
Measurement of 
plan assets 
In determining the expected return 
on plan assets and the 10% corridor 
for gain/loss amortization, a market 
related value of assets is used. The 
market related value is either fair 
value or a calculated value which 
spreads asset gains and losses over 
a period not greater than five years. 
For pension plans: same as US GAAP. 
For other postretirement benefit plans: In 
determining the expected return on plan 
assets and the 10% corridor for gain/loss 
amortization, the fair value of assets is 
used. The use of a calculated value is not 
permitted. 
In determining the expected return 
on plan assets and the 10% 
corridor for gain/loss amortization, 
the fair value of assets is used. 
The use of a calculated value is 
not permitted. 
Service cost The present value of benefits 
attributed under the benefit formula 
to employee service during the 
current period. 
The present value of benefits becoming 
vested during the current period. 
Same as US GAAP. 
4 pwc
HRS Insights 
Topic US GAAP — accounting 
standards codification 
Prior NAIC statements of statutory 
accounting principles 
Amended NAIC statements of 
statutory accounting principles 
Amortization of net 
gain or loss 
Minimum amortization of a net 
unamortized gain or loss (excluding 
plan asset gains and losses not yet 
reflected in market-related value) is 
the excess of the net unamortized 
gain or loss over a corridor equal to 
10% of the greater of the PBO or 
APBO and the market-related value 
of plan assets, divided by the 
average remaining service period of 
active plan participants. 
If all or almost all of a plan's 
participants are inactive, the 
amortization period is the average 
remaining life expectancy of the 
inactive participants. 
Gains and losses that are not 
recognized immediately as a 
component of net periodic 
postretirement benefit cost are 
recognized as increases or 
decreases in OCI as they arise. 
For pensions, same as US GAAP. 
For other postretirement benefits, same 
as US GAAP, except that the amortization 
period is equal to the average life 
expectancy of retirees and fully vested 
actives, whether all or almost all of the 
plan participants are inactive or not. In 
addition, the corridor is based on the 
greater of the benefit obligation or the fair 
value of assets. A calculated value is not 
permitted. 
Same as US GAAP, except that 
the corridor is based on the 
greater of the benefit obligation or 
the fair value of assets. A 
calculated value is not permitted. 
Gains and losses that are not 
recognized immediately as a 
component of net periodic 
postretirement benefit cost are 
recognized as increases or 
decreases in unassigned funds as 
they arise. 
Plan amendments Prior service costs are amortized 
over the average remaining service 
period (pensions) or average 
remaining period to full eligibility 
(other postretirement benefits). If all 
or almost all of the plan participants 
are inactive (for pension plans) or 
fully eligible (for other postretirement 
plans), the amortization period is the 
average remaining life expectancy of 
the inactive or fully eligible plan 
participants. 
Prior service costs that are not 
recognized immediately as a 
component of net periodic 
postretirement benefit cost are 
recognized as increases or 
decreases in OCI as they arise. 
Same as US GAAP except that plan 
amendments are only reflected for vested 
participants. Note that for other 
postretirement benefits, the amortization 
period is equal to the average life 
expectancy of the company's fully vested 
and retiree group. 
Same as US GAAP. 
In the year of adoption of the new 
standards, any prior service cost 
attributable to nonvested 
employees and recorded in 
unassigned funds is amortized as 
a component of expense over the 
average remaining service period 
of the nonvested employees who 
were active at the time of the 
amendment. 
Gains and losses that are not 
recognized immediately as a 
component of net periodic 
postretirement benefit cost are 
recognized as increases or 
decreases in unassigned funds as 
they arise. 
Timing of 
settlements and 
curtailments 
If a settlement occurs, the gain or 
loss is recognized when the 
transaction is irrevocable, e.g. when 
annuities have been purchased or 
lump sums have been paid. 
If a settlement occurs and the net result is 
a loss, the loss is recognized at the time 
of the settlement. If a settlement occurs 
and the net result is a gain, the gain is not 
recognized until the proceeds are 
Same as US GAAP. 
5 pwc
HRS Insights 
Topic US GAAP — accounting 
standards codification 
Prior NAIC statements of statutory 
accounting principles 
Amended NAIC statements of 
statutory accounting principles 
If a curtailment occurs and the net 
result is a loss, the loss is 
recognized when it is probable that 
the curtailment will occur and that 
the effects can be reasonably 
estimated. If the net result is a gain, 
the gain is not recognized in 
earnings until the employees 
terminate or the plan suspension or 
amendment is adopted. 
received by the reporting entity. 
Similarly, if a curtailment occurs and the 
net result is a loss, the loss is recognized 
when it is probable that the curtailment will 
occur and that the effects can be 
reasonably estimated. If the net result is a 
gain, the gain is not recognized in 
earnings until the employees terminate or 
the plan suspension or amendment is 
adopted and the proceeds are received 
by the reporting entity. 
Disclosures ASC 715-20 (FAS 132(R)) was 
effective for fiscal years beginning 
after December 15, 1997. ASC 715- 
20 provides for reduced disclosure 
requirements for nonpublic entities. 
Same as US GAAP, except that the ASC 
715 -20 disclosure requirements apply to 
only vested employees. Obligations 
related to nonvested or employees are 
disclosed separately. In addition, the 
reduced disclosure requirements for 
nonpublic entities under ASC 715-20 do 
not apply. All companies are required to 
follow the disclosure requirements 
included in ASC 715-20-50-1 & 50-2. 
For pension plans, disclosures relating to 
OCI in ASC 715-20-50-1 apply to 
unassigned funds (surplus) on a statutory 
basis. Other postretirement benefit 
disclosures relating to OCI in ASC 715- 
20-50-1 apply to income on a statutory 
basis. 
Same as US GAAP except that 
the reduced disclosure for non-public 
entities permitted under US 
GAAP is not permitted under SAP. 
Consolidated/holdi 
ng company plans 
In a parent-subsidiary arrangement, 
where the subsidiaries issue 
separate financials, for each 
subsidiary's separate financial 
statements the arrangement should 
be accounted for as a multiemployer 
pension plan. 
Accounting for the postretirement 
benefit plan as a multiemployer plan 
requires that a subsidiary's 
contribution for the period be 
recognized as net periodic 
The employees of many reporting entities 
are eligible for certain postretirement 
benefits provided by a parent company or 
holding company. A reporting entity with 
employees who are eligible for those 
benefits and is not directly liable for those 
related obligations shall recognize an 
expense equal to its allocation of: 
 postretirement benefits other 
than pensions earned during the 
period. A liability shall be 
established for any such 
No material changes from SSAP 
89 and SSAP 14. 
6 pwc
HRS Insights 
Topic US GAAP — accounting 
standards codification 
Prior NAIC statements of statutory 
accounting principles 
Amended NAIC statements of 
statutory accounting principles 
postretirement benefit cost. A liability 
would be recognized for any 
contributions due and unpaid. Each 
subsidiary should provide the 
disclosures required by ASC 715-80 
as well as any related-party 
disclosures required by ASC 850, 
Related Party Disclosures. 
amounts due, but not yet paid. 
 the required contribution to the 
pension plan for the period. A liability 
shall be established for any such 
contributions due and unpaid. 
The reporting entity shall disclose in the 
financial statements that its employees 
participate in a plan sponsored by the 
holding company for which the reporting 
entity has no legal obligation. The amount 
of the postretirement benefit expense 
incurred and the allocation methodology 
utilized by the provider of such benefits 
shall also be disclosed. 
If the reporting entity is directly liable for 
postretirement benefits, then the reporting 
entity should apply the guidance 
described in SSAP 14 and SSAP 89. 
Tax considerations The pension asset or liability that is 
recognized may result in a 
temporary difference, as defined in 
ASC 740, Income Taxes (formerly 
FAS 109). The deferred tax effects 
of any temporary differences shall 
be recognized in income tax 
expense or benefit for the year and 
shall be allocated to various financial 
statement components, including 
other comprehensive income, 
pursuant to ASC 740-45 (formerly 
paragraphs 35–39 of Statement 
109) 
Pension accruals typically are not 
deductible for tax purposes unless they 
are funded during the tax year or before 
the filing of the tax return for the year of 
accrual. To the extent unfunded, pensions 
create deductible temporary differences. 
If pension accounting results in a prepaid 
asset for SAP purposes, a taxable 
temporary difference may result. 
However, the prepaid asset will likely be 
non-admitted, meaning that the SAP basis 
is zero. The tax basis is also zero as the 
tax law does not recognize such an asset. 
No material difference from 
current SSAP. 
7 pwc
HRS Insights 
Let’s talk 
For more information, please contact our authors: 
Ken Stoler, New York 
(646) 471-5745 
ken.stoler@us.pwc.com 
Debbie Rudin, New York 
(646) 471-3087 
debbie.rudin@us.pwc.com 
or your regional Human Resource Services professional: 
Charlie Yovino, Atlanta 
(678) 419-1330 
charles.yovino@us.pwc.com 
Craig O’Donnell, Boston 
(617) 530-5400 
craig.odonnell@us.pwc.com 
Pat Meyer, Chicago 
(312) 298-6229 
patrick.meyer@us.pwc.com 
Terry Richardson, Dallas 
(214) 999-2549 
terrance.f.richardson@us.pwc.com 
Todd Hoffman, Houston 
(713) 356-8440 
todd.hoffman@us.pwc.com 
Carrie Duarte, Los Angeles 
(213) 356-6396 
carrie.duarte@us.pwc.com 
Ed Donovan, New York Metro 
(646) 471-8855 
ed.donovan@us.pwc.com 
Bruce Clouser, Philadelphia 
(267) 330-3194 
bruce.e.clouser@us.pwc.com 
Jim Dell, San Francisco 
(415) 498-6090 
jim.dell@us.pwc.com 
Scott Pollak, San Jose 
(408) 817-7446 
scott.pollak@Saratoga.PwC.com 
Nik Shah, Washington Metro 
(703) 918-1208 
nik.shah@us.pwc.com 
8 pwc

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

MHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task Force
MHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task ForceMHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task Force
MHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task ForceMHM (Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.)
 
CAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONS
CAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONSCAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONS
CAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONSCBIZ, Inc.
 
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure CBIZ, Inc.
 
IRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus Plans
IRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus PlansIRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus Plans
IRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus PlansCBIZ, Inc.
 
Employee compensation
Employee compensationEmployee compensation
Employee compensationAnkit Oberoi
 
2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements
2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements 2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements
2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements Wellgreen Platinum
 
GAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek Daniel
GAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek DanielGAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek Daniel
GAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek DanielDecosimoCPAs
 
Jones energy inc final
Jones energy inc finalJones energy inc final
Jones energy inc finaljonesenergy
 
Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016
Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016
Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016Global Holding Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
 
Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021
Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021
Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021Taxmann
 
Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.
Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.
Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.virtu2017ir
 
Virtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter Results
Virtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter ResultsVirtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter Results
Virtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter Resultsvirtu2017ir
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

MHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task Force
MHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task ForceMHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task Force
MHM Messenger: Recent Updates from the Emerging Issues Task Force
 
CAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONS
CAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONSCAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONS
CAPTURING TAX OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE FINAL TANGIBLE PROPERTY REGULATIONS
 
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
 
IRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus Plans
IRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus PlansIRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus Plans
IRS Continues to Attack Accrued Bonus Plans
 
Employee compensation
Employee compensationEmployee compensation
Employee compensation
 
2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements
2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements 2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements
2012 Q2 MD&A & Interim Financial Statements
 
GAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek Daniel
GAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek DanielGAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek Daniel
GAAP Accounting Update: A Review of Recent Changes in GAAP - Derek Daniel
 
Jones energy inc final
Jones energy inc finalJones energy inc final
Jones energy inc final
 
Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016
Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016
Global Group - GTL Limited First Quarter - Apr to June Report 2016
 
Innovative schemes 211116
Innovative schemes 211116Innovative schemes 211116
Innovative schemes 211116
 
2012 q1
2012 q12012 q1
2012 q1
 
Bank audit
Bank auditBank audit
Bank audit
 
Bank Branch Audit
Bank Branch AuditBank Branch Audit
Bank Branch Audit
 
Bank Branch Audit
Bank Branch AuditBank Branch Audit
Bank Branch Audit
 
1 h13 검토 eng
1 h13 검토 eng1 h13 검토 eng
1 h13 검토 eng
 
Karnataka compensation
Karnataka compensationKarnataka compensation
Karnataka compensation
 
Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021
Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021
Taxmann's Guide To Finance Bill 2021
 
Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.
Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.
Virtu Financial, Inc. Agrees to Acquire KCG Holdings, Inc.
 
Virtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter Results
Virtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter ResultsVirtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter Results
Virtu Financial Conference Call Announcing 2016 Fourth Quarter Results
 
CAFR2014Version6
CAFR2014Version6CAFR2014Version6
CAFR2014Version6
 

Ähnlich wie pwc-new-pension-accounting-insurance-companies

FASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based Compensation
FASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based CompensationFASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based Compensation
FASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based CompensationMHM (Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.)
 
Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3
Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3
Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3Bentleys (WA) Pty Ltd
 
39454982 accounting-standards
39454982 accounting-standards39454982 accounting-standards
39454982 accounting-standardsSoumya Sahoo
 
MHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting Changes
MHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting ChangesMHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting Changes
MHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting ChangesMHM (Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.)
 
Governmental Audit Update
Governmental Audit UpdateGovernmental Audit Update
Governmental Audit UpdateDiane Bradley
 
GASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting Changes
GASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting ChangesGASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting Changes
GASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting ChangesJim van Iwaarden
 
GAAP Accounting Update
GAAP Accounting UpdateGAAP Accounting Update
GAAP Accounting UpdateDecosimoCPAs
 
In depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment modelIn depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment modelPwC
 
Current Developments in Welfare Benefits
Current Developments in Welfare BenefitsCurrent Developments in Welfare Benefits
Current Developments in Welfare Benefitsbenefitexpress
 
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 20172017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017PwC
 
McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014
McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014
McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014Brian Marshall
 
As 15 vs ind as 19
As 15 vs ind as 19As 15 vs ind as 19
As 15 vs ind as 19Archana CA
 
Benefits: Safe Harbor 401k
Benefits: Safe Harbor 401kBenefits: Safe Harbor 401k
Benefits: Safe Harbor 401kMatt Johnson
 
Presentation on AS 15 - Gaurav Sehgal
Presentation on AS 15 - Gaurav SehgalPresentation on AS 15 - Gaurav Sehgal
Presentation on AS 15 - Gaurav SehgalGaurav Sehgal
 
pwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reporting
pwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reportingpwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reporting
pwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reportingKen Stoler
 
Governmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing UpdatesGovernmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing UpdatesDiane Bradley
 
Tpub investor deck_2q15_final
Tpub investor deck_2q15_finalTpub investor deck_2q15_final
Tpub investor deck_2q15_finaltribuneIR
 

Ähnlich wie pwc-new-pension-accounting-insurance-companies (20)

FASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based Compensation
FASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based CompensationFASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based Compensation
FASB Simplifies Accounting for Non-employee Stock-based Compensation
 
Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3
Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3
Bentleys Financial Reporting Update: App 3
 
39454982 accounting-standards
39454982 accounting-standards39454982 accounting-standards
39454982 accounting-standards
 
Changes Made to Share-Based Payment Accounting
Changes Made to Share-Based Payment AccountingChanges Made to Share-Based Payment Accounting
Changes Made to Share-Based Payment Accounting
 
MHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting Changes
MHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting ChangesMHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting Changes
MHM Messenger – A Not-for-Profi t’s Guide to Upcoming Accounting Changes
 
Summary of ind as
Summary of ind asSummary of ind as
Summary of ind as
 
Governmental Audit Update
Governmental Audit UpdateGovernmental Audit Update
Governmental Audit Update
 
GASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting Changes
GASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting ChangesGASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting Changes
GASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting Changes
 
GAAP Accounting Update
GAAP Accounting UpdateGAAP Accounting Update
GAAP Accounting Update
 
In depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment modelIn depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment model
 
Current Developments in Welfare Benefits
Current Developments in Welfare BenefitsCurrent Developments in Welfare Benefits
Current Developments in Welfare Benefits
 
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 20172017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
 
McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014
McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014
McGladrey whitepaper - Revenue recognition, A whole new world - June 2014
 
As 15 vs ind as 19
As 15 vs ind as 19As 15 vs ind as 19
As 15 vs ind as 19
 
Benefits: Safe Harbor 401k
Benefits: Safe Harbor 401kBenefits: Safe Harbor 401k
Benefits: Safe Harbor 401k
 
Presentation on AS 15 - Gaurav Sehgal
Presentation on AS 15 - Gaurav SehgalPresentation on AS 15 - Gaurav Sehgal
Presentation on AS 15 - Gaurav Sehgal
 
pwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reporting
pwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reportingpwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reporting
pwc-fasb-proposes-improvements-to-pension-and-opeb-benefits-reporting
 
Governmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing UpdatesGovernmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing Updates
 
Tpub investor deck_2q15_final
Tpub investor deck_2q15_finalTpub investor deck_2q15_final
Tpub investor deck_2q15_final
 
Lay of the Accounting Landscape: Quarter 3
Lay of the Accounting Landscape: Quarter 3Lay of the Accounting Landscape: Quarter 3
Lay of the Accounting Landscape: Quarter 3
 

Mehr von Ken Stoler

pwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensation
pwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensationpwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensation
pwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensationKen Stoler
 
pwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilities
pwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilitiespwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilities
pwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilitiesKen Stoler
 
pwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensation
pwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensationpwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensation
pwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensationKen Stoler
 
pwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-study
pwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-studypwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-study
pwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-studyKen Stoler
 
pwc-pension-opeb-2016-study
pwc-pension-opeb-2016-studypwc-pension-opeb-2016-study
pwc-pension-opeb-2016-studyKen Stoler
 
pwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accounting
pwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accountingpwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accounting
pwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accountingKen Stoler
 
pwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-cost
pwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-costpwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-cost
pwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-costKen Stoler
 
pwc-stock-compensation-2015
pwc-stock-compensation-2015pwc-stock-compensation-2015
pwc-stock-compensation-2015Ken Stoler
 
pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014
pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014
pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014Ken Stoler
 
HRS Insight 11.11 Final
HRS Insight 11.11 FinalHRS Insight 11.11 Final
HRS Insight 11.11 FinalKen Stoler
 
pwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-study
pwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-studypwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-study
pwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-studyKen Stoler
 
pwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-survey
pwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-surveypwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-survey
pwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-surveyKen Stoler
 
pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014
pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014
pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014Ken Stoler
 

Mehr von Ken Stoler (13)

pwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensation
pwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensationpwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensation
pwc-2015-2016-sec-comment-letter-trends-stock-compensation
 
pwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilities
pwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilitiespwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilities
pwc-new-mortality-guidance-could-reduce-employer-pension-liabilities
 
pwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensation
pwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensationpwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensation
pwc-tax-withholdings-for-stock-compensation
 
pwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-study
pwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-studypwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-study
pwc-stock-comp-2016-assumption-disclosure-study
 
pwc-pension-opeb-2016-study
pwc-pension-opeb-2016-studypwc-pension-opeb-2016-study
pwc-pension-opeb-2016-study
 
pwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accounting
pwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accountingpwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accounting
pwc-fasb-finalizes-changes-to-stock-compensation-accounting
 
pwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-cost
pwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-costpwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-cost
pwc-using-multiple-discount-rates-develop-benefit-plan-cost
 
pwc-stock-compensation-2015
pwc-stock-compensation-2015pwc-stock-compensation-2015
pwc-stock-compensation-2015
 
pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014
pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014
pwc-sec-comment-letter-trends-2014
 
HRS Insight 11.11 Final
HRS Insight 11.11 FinalHRS Insight 11.11 Final
HRS Insight 11.11 Final
 
pwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-study
pwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-studypwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-study
pwc-clawbacks-2013-proxy-disclosure-study
 
pwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-survey
pwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-surveypwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-survey
pwc-pension-opeb-2014-assumption-and-disclosure-survey
 
pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014
pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014
pwc-stock-compensation-september-2014
 

pwc-new-pension-accounting-insurance-companies

  • 1. HRS Insight 2013, Vol. 25 www.pwc.com New pension accounting for insurance companies November 25, 2013 In brief The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has changed employers’ accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits. The new guidance applies the provisions of ASC 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits, to pension and other postretirement benefits accounting for insurance companies, with several exceptions. This Insight describes the new accounting guidance. In detail Background Insurance companies are regulated on a state-by-state basis in the United States. As discussed in the NAIC’s Statutory Accounting Principles Preamble, each state has its own regulatory framework generally led by an insurance commissioner. Insurance commissioners are charged with overseeing the financial condition of insurance companies doing business in their jurisdictions and they require meaningful financial, statistical, and operating information about the companies. This financial oversight is designed to help ensure that policyholders and claimants receive the requisite benefits from the policies sold, oftentimes such products having been sold years or decades prior to when the benefits are due. Frequently, this regulatory perspective differs markedly from the perspectives of other users of insurers’ accounting information. In recognition of these special concerns and responsibilities, statutory accounting principles have been established by statute and regulation. The objective of US GAAP reporting differs in certain respects from the objective of Statutory Accounting Principles (SAP). US GAAP is designed to meet the varying needs of the different users of financial statements. SAP is designed to address the concerns of regulators, who are the primary users of statutory financial statements. As a result, GAAP stresses the current financial performance and operating results of the entity, while SAP stresses measurement of the insurance company's ability to pay claims in the future. Insurance companies that report financial results under both US GAAP Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) and the NAIC Statements of Statutory Accounting Principles (SSAPs) need to ensure that differences in accounting and reporting for employee benefits are appropriately considered. While the NAIC's SSAPs are primarily based on existing US GAAP guidance, some significant differences exist. For employee benefits, some of the more recent accounting standards issued under US GAAP such as FAS 158 had not been adopted by the NAIC as part of the SSAPs. At its Spring 2012 National Meeting, the NAIC adopted Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles No. 102 (SSAP No. 102), Accounting
  • 2. HRS Insight for Pensions, A Replacement of SSAP No.89 and Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles No. 92 (SSAP No. 92), Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, A Replacement of SSAP No. 14. The more significant changes from SSAP No. 89 and SSAP No. 14 include:  Inclusion of obligations attributable to nonvested benefits in the determination of projected benefit obligation (PBO) and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) and net periodic plan cost  Requirement to use fair value of plan assets in determining net periodic pension plan costs  Recognition of unfunded benefit obligations in the statement of financial position (surplus/non-admitted assets)  Recognition of unamortized transition assets or obligations, prior service costs and gains and losses in unassigned funds  Measurement date as of fiscal year end. Observation For employers filing under US GAAP as well as SAP, the new guidance may simplify the process of determining employee benefit obligations and net periodic plan cost, since the new SAP requirements incorporate many of the provisions of ASC 715 that had previously not been included in the prior SSAPs. However, the requirement to recognize the unfunded benefit obligation, including obligations for nonvested plan participants, may prove onerous for many employers, especially employers who provide other postretirement benefits, since obligations for employees who are not yet eligible to retire are generally considered to be nonvested. SSAP No. 102 and SSAP No. 92 adopt the provisions of ASC 715 with the following exceptions:  In determining the expected return on plan assets and the 10% corridor for gain/loss amortization, plan assets must be valued at fair value (i.e. a calculated value as permitted under US GAAP will not be permitted under SAP).  All references to other comprehensive income (OCI) and accumulated OCI in US GAAP have been revised to reflect unassigned funds (surplus).  Prepaid assets continue to be non-admitted. In addition, the cost of a participation right of an annuity contract is also non-admitted.  The reduced disclosure for non-public entities permitted under US GAAP is not permitted under SAP.  Classification in US GAAP of unfunded obligations as current or noncurrent is eliminated.  Fair value of assets will continue to be determined under statutory guidance rather than under US GAAP.  Transition rules in applying the new standards differ from transition under US GAAP. The effective date for both standards is January 1, 2013, with the exception of the effective date of January 1, 2014 for the required change in measurement date. Early adoption is permitted; however, early adoption must be applied to all benefit plans of the insurance company. The transition rules including the following:  Net periodic benefit cost will include amortization of unrecognized prior service cost existing prior to adoption for nonvested employees.  Other unrecognized balances (gains and losses, prior service costs for vested and nonvested employees, and transition obligations or assets from initial application of SSAP 89 and SSAP 14) are recognized in unassigned funds as of December 31, 2012 (i.e. the date prior to the adoption date of January 1, 2013) unless the company elects to amortize the transition surplus (i.e. the alternative transition). The offset to unassigned funds is reported separately as an aggregate write-in for other than invested assets or for other liabilities.  The insurance company may either elect to recognize the entire amount of transition surplus (i.e. unrecognized balances described above) in the year of adoption or elect to amortize the transition surplus into income over a period of not more than ten years. Companies who elect the alternative transition must disclose the entire transition surplus.  In transitioning to a fiscal year-end measurement date, companies will be required to remeasure obligations and plan assets at the beginning of the first year that the measurement date provisions are applied. The remeasured amounts are used to determine the effects of the change in measurement date. Alternative methods provided under FAS 158 are not permitted under SAP. 2 pwc
  • 3. HRS Insights Determination of net periodic plan cost The determination of net periodic plan cost under SSAP No. 102 and SSAP No. 92 is similar to the determination of net periodic plan cost under ASC 715, with the exception of the following:  Fair value of plan assets is used to determine the expected return component and the 10% corridor for gain/loss amortization. A calculated value, as permitted under ASC 715, is not permitted under SAP.  At transition, a new prior service cost base equal to nonvested benefit obligations is established. Net periodic plan cost will include amortization of the new prior service cost over the vesting period of the nonvested plan participants. Existing transition, gain/loss and prior service cost bases will continue to be amortized; however, the amortization of gains and losses will include nonvested benefit obligations in the corridor and the future working lifetime of nonvested plan participants in the amortization period. Observation SSAP No. 92 has changed the amortization period for gains and losses and prior service costs. Unless all or almost all the plan participants are fully eligible for benefits, SSAP No. 92 requires amortization of prior service costs over the average remaining years of service to full eligibility of active plan participants not yet fully eligible. For gains and losses in excess of the corridor, the minimum amortization period is the average remaining service period of active plan participants. Previously, SSAP No. 14 defined the amortization periods for prior service costs and gains and losses as the average life expectancy of the plan's fully vested and retired plan participants. Transition For an insurance company adopting the SSAPs on January 1, 2013, ‘a transition surplus impact’ is defined by the guidance as the unrecognized items as of December 31, 2012 (i.e. gains and losses, prior service costs, including prior service costs for nonvested plan participants, and transition assets or obligations from original application of SSAP No.89 and SSAP No. 14) which have not been included as a component of net periodic benefit costs. The unrecognized items shall be recognized in unassigned funds (surplus) as of January 1, 2013, unless the deferral option, described below, is elected. In lieu of immediately recognizing the entire surplus impact, companies may elect, on a plan-by-plan basis, to recognize the surplus impact over a period not to exceed ten years. The annual amount to be recognized is the greater of: 1. 10% of the transition surplus impact determined as of December 31, 2012 2. Amortization of the unrecognized items as of December 31, 2012, following the existing amortization schedules in effect on the transition date (reflecting accelerated amortization of these amounts due to subsequent settlements or curtailments) 3. For pension plans, unfunded ABO as of December 31, 2012, less any previously accrued amounts (any prepaid pension asset is not considered). Any gain or loss or prior service cost arising after the transition date is not subject to the deferral option, but must be immediately recognized in unassigned funds. In addition, if future gains or employer contributions to the plan result in a prepaid benefit cost or overfunded status of that plan, the recognition of the transition surplus impact shall be accelerated to the extent the plan is overfunded. If the plan experiences subsequent gains that will be recognized in earnings, an additional amount of the remaining transition liability must be recognized to offset the gain. The takeaway The new SSAPs may simplify the determination of obligations and net periodic benefit cost for many employers. However, the requirement to record the unfunded benefit obligations as a charge to surplus may prove onerous. While the transition rules may ease the financial burden of transitioning to the new requirements, the transition rules are complex and require analysis based on the attributes of each particular plan. You may consider consulting with your local PwC engagement team or the authors on specific implementation questions prior to year-end. The attached Appendix provides a comparison of the accounting for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement benefits under US GAAP, prior SAP and amended SAP. 3 pwc
  • 4. HRS Insights Appendix Topic US GAAP — accounting standards codification Prior NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Amended NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits Guidance ASC 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits, provides guidance on the disclosure and other accounting and reporting requirements related to single-company defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans under US GAAP. SSAP 89 - Accounting for Pensions, A Replacement of SSAP 8 and SSAP 14 - Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions established statutory accounting principles and related reporting for companies’ pension and other postretirement benefit plans. For defined benefit plans, SSAP 89 and SSAP 14 adopted the provisions of FAS 87, FAS 106 and FAS 132 (R), with certain modifications discussed below, but did not include the provisions of FAS 158. For defined benefit plans, SSAP 102 and SSAP 92 supersede the guidance in SSAP 89 and SSAP 14, respectively. The guidance incorporates the guidance from FAS 158 with certain modifications discussed below. Pension asset/ liability A company is required to recognize on its balance sheet the funded status of its defined benefit plans. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the defined pension/other postretirement benefit obligation on a plan-by-plan basis. Accrued/prepaid pension or other postretirement plan cost (similar to FAS 87/FAS 106 prior to application of FAS 158): A liability (unfunded accrued plan cost) is recognized if the pension or other postretirement plan expense exceeds amounts the company has contributed to the plan. An asset (prepaid plan cost) is recognized if the pension or other postretirement plan expense is less than amounts the company has contributed to the plan (see discussion of non-admitted assets below). For defined benefit pension plans, an adjustment to reflect the additional minimum liability (AML) may be required (see discussion of AML below). Same as US GAAP with modifications for non-admitted assets (see discussion of non-admitted assets below). Transition options are included in the guidance. Measurement date Fiscal year-end. Fiscal year end, or, if used consistently from year to year, as of a date not more than three months prior to fiscal year end. If the measurement date is prior to the Same as US GAAP. In transitioning to a fiscal year end measurement date, a company remeasures plan assets and 2 pwc
  • 5. HRS Insights Topic US GAAP — accounting standards codification Prior NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Amended NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles financial statement date and an additional minimum liability is required, any contribution to the plan to fund that additional minimum liability prior to the financial statement date may be used to reduce the additional minimum liability recognized in the financial statements. benefit obligations as of the beginning of the fiscal year that the new measurement date provisions are applied. A company uses those new measurements to determine the effects of the measurement date change as of the beginning of the fiscal year that the measurement date provisions are applied. Other approaches allowed under ASC 715 are not permitted under SSAP 102 and SSAP 92. Non-admitted assets N/A under US GAAP. The prepaid asset that results from an excess of the fair value of plan assets over the pension or postretirement benefit obligation is recorded as a non-admitted asset. Any intangible asset offsetting the minimum pension liability (excluding the unamortized transition obligation) is non-admitted and charged to surplus (see Intangible Assets section below). Any prepaid asset resulting from the excess of the fair value of plan assets over the PBO is recorded as a non-admitted asset. In addition, the cost of a participation right of an annuity contract is recorded as a non-admitted asset. Additional minimum liability (AML) FAS 158 eliminated the AML concept included in FAS 87. For defined benefit pension plans, if the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) exceeds the fair value of plan assets, the company shall recognize a liability (including unfunded accrued pension cost) that is at least equal to the unfunded ABO. SSAP 102 eliminated the AML concept included in SSAP 89. Intangible asset (offset to AML) N/A Under SSAP 89, if an AML is recognized, an equal amount is recognized as an intangible asset; however, the intangible cannot exceed unamortized prior service costs (including any unamortized transition obligation). Only the portion of the intangible asset in excess of the unamortized transition obligation is non-admitted. N/A 3 pwc
  • 6. HRS Insights Topic US GAAP — accounting standards codification Prior NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Amended NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles If an intangible asset generated by the AML is recognized, only that portion in excess of the unamortized incremental liability associated with the transition obligation shall be non-admitted. If an additional liability required to be recognized exceeds unrecognized PSC, the excess shall be reported as a component of unassigned funds (surplus), net of any tax benefits that result. When a new determination of the amount of additional liability is made, the related intangible asset and the balance accumulated in unassigned funds (surplus) shall be eliminated or adjusted as necessary. Measurement of benefit obligations The PBO for pension plans and the APBO include obligations for all plan participants and all benefits provided under the plan, whether or not vested. Obligations attributable to nonvested employees are excluded; obligations attributable to partially vested employees are included only to the extent of their vested amounts. Obligations for ancillary benefits (e.g. death and disability benefits) are accrued prior to the date of the triggering event (e.g. date of death or disability) in accordance with FAS 87. Obligations for protected, nonvested benefits and for nonvested, nonqualified benefits prior to retirement when there is no longer a substantial risk of forfeiture are accrued in accordance with FAS 87. Same as US GAAP. Measurement of plan assets In determining the expected return on plan assets and the 10% corridor for gain/loss amortization, a market related value of assets is used. The market related value is either fair value or a calculated value which spreads asset gains and losses over a period not greater than five years. For pension plans: same as US GAAP. For other postretirement benefit plans: In determining the expected return on plan assets and the 10% corridor for gain/loss amortization, the fair value of assets is used. The use of a calculated value is not permitted. In determining the expected return on plan assets and the 10% corridor for gain/loss amortization, the fair value of assets is used. The use of a calculated value is not permitted. Service cost The present value of benefits attributed under the benefit formula to employee service during the current period. The present value of benefits becoming vested during the current period. Same as US GAAP. 4 pwc
  • 7. HRS Insights Topic US GAAP — accounting standards codification Prior NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Amended NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Amortization of net gain or loss Minimum amortization of a net unamortized gain or loss (excluding plan asset gains and losses not yet reflected in market-related value) is the excess of the net unamortized gain or loss over a corridor equal to 10% of the greater of the PBO or APBO and the market-related value of plan assets, divided by the average remaining service period of active plan participants. If all or almost all of a plan's participants are inactive, the amortization period is the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants. Gains and losses that are not recognized immediately as a component of net periodic postretirement benefit cost are recognized as increases or decreases in OCI as they arise. For pensions, same as US GAAP. For other postretirement benefits, same as US GAAP, except that the amortization period is equal to the average life expectancy of retirees and fully vested actives, whether all or almost all of the plan participants are inactive or not. In addition, the corridor is based on the greater of the benefit obligation or the fair value of assets. A calculated value is not permitted. Same as US GAAP, except that the corridor is based on the greater of the benefit obligation or the fair value of assets. A calculated value is not permitted. Gains and losses that are not recognized immediately as a component of net periodic postretirement benefit cost are recognized as increases or decreases in unassigned funds as they arise. Plan amendments Prior service costs are amortized over the average remaining service period (pensions) or average remaining period to full eligibility (other postretirement benefits). If all or almost all of the plan participants are inactive (for pension plans) or fully eligible (for other postretirement plans), the amortization period is the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive or fully eligible plan participants. Prior service costs that are not recognized immediately as a component of net periodic postretirement benefit cost are recognized as increases or decreases in OCI as they arise. Same as US GAAP except that plan amendments are only reflected for vested participants. Note that for other postretirement benefits, the amortization period is equal to the average life expectancy of the company's fully vested and retiree group. Same as US GAAP. In the year of adoption of the new standards, any prior service cost attributable to nonvested employees and recorded in unassigned funds is amortized as a component of expense over the average remaining service period of the nonvested employees who were active at the time of the amendment. Gains and losses that are not recognized immediately as a component of net periodic postretirement benefit cost are recognized as increases or decreases in unassigned funds as they arise. Timing of settlements and curtailments If a settlement occurs, the gain or loss is recognized when the transaction is irrevocable, e.g. when annuities have been purchased or lump sums have been paid. If a settlement occurs and the net result is a loss, the loss is recognized at the time of the settlement. If a settlement occurs and the net result is a gain, the gain is not recognized until the proceeds are Same as US GAAP. 5 pwc
  • 8. HRS Insights Topic US GAAP — accounting standards codification Prior NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Amended NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles If a curtailment occurs and the net result is a loss, the loss is recognized when it is probable that the curtailment will occur and that the effects can be reasonably estimated. If the net result is a gain, the gain is not recognized in earnings until the employees terminate or the plan suspension or amendment is adopted. received by the reporting entity. Similarly, if a curtailment occurs and the net result is a loss, the loss is recognized when it is probable that the curtailment will occur and that the effects can be reasonably estimated. If the net result is a gain, the gain is not recognized in earnings until the employees terminate or the plan suspension or amendment is adopted and the proceeds are received by the reporting entity. Disclosures ASC 715-20 (FAS 132(R)) was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. ASC 715- 20 provides for reduced disclosure requirements for nonpublic entities. Same as US GAAP, except that the ASC 715 -20 disclosure requirements apply to only vested employees. Obligations related to nonvested or employees are disclosed separately. In addition, the reduced disclosure requirements for nonpublic entities under ASC 715-20 do not apply. All companies are required to follow the disclosure requirements included in ASC 715-20-50-1 & 50-2. For pension plans, disclosures relating to OCI in ASC 715-20-50-1 apply to unassigned funds (surplus) on a statutory basis. Other postretirement benefit disclosures relating to OCI in ASC 715- 20-50-1 apply to income on a statutory basis. Same as US GAAP except that the reduced disclosure for non-public entities permitted under US GAAP is not permitted under SAP. Consolidated/holdi ng company plans In a parent-subsidiary arrangement, where the subsidiaries issue separate financials, for each subsidiary's separate financial statements the arrangement should be accounted for as a multiemployer pension plan. Accounting for the postretirement benefit plan as a multiemployer plan requires that a subsidiary's contribution for the period be recognized as net periodic The employees of many reporting entities are eligible for certain postretirement benefits provided by a parent company or holding company. A reporting entity with employees who are eligible for those benefits and is not directly liable for those related obligations shall recognize an expense equal to its allocation of:  postretirement benefits other than pensions earned during the period. A liability shall be established for any such No material changes from SSAP 89 and SSAP 14. 6 pwc
  • 9. HRS Insights Topic US GAAP — accounting standards codification Prior NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles Amended NAIC statements of statutory accounting principles postretirement benefit cost. A liability would be recognized for any contributions due and unpaid. Each subsidiary should provide the disclosures required by ASC 715-80 as well as any related-party disclosures required by ASC 850, Related Party Disclosures. amounts due, but not yet paid.  the required contribution to the pension plan for the period. A liability shall be established for any such contributions due and unpaid. The reporting entity shall disclose in the financial statements that its employees participate in a plan sponsored by the holding company for which the reporting entity has no legal obligation. The amount of the postretirement benefit expense incurred and the allocation methodology utilized by the provider of such benefits shall also be disclosed. If the reporting entity is directly liable for postretirement benefits, then the reporting entity should apply the guidance described in SSAP 14 and SSAP 89. Tax considerations The pension asset or liability that is recognized may result in a temporary difference, as defined in ASC 740, Income Taxes (formerly FAS 109). The deferred tax effects of any temporary differences shall be recognized in income tax expense or benefit for the year and shall be allocated to various financial statement components, including other comprehensive income, pursuant to ASC 740-45 (formerly paragraphs 35–39 of Statement 109) Pension accruals typically are not deductible for tax purposes unless they are funded during the tax year or before the filing of the tax return for the year of accrual. To the extent unfunded, pensions create deductible temporary differences. If pension accounting results in a prepaid asset for SAP purposes, a taxable temporary difference may result. However, the prepaid asset will likely be non-admitted, meaning that the SAP basis is zero. The tax basis is also zero as the tax law does not recognize such an asset. No material difference from current SSAP. 7 pwc
  • 10. HRS Insights Let’s talk For more information, please contact our authors: Ken Stoler, New York (646) 471-5745 ken.stoler@us.pwc.com Debbie Rudin, New York (646) 471-3087 debbie.rudin@us.pwc.com or your regional Human Resource Services professional: Charlie Yovino, Atlanta (678) 419-1330 charles.yovino@us.pwc.com Craig O’Donnell, Boston (617) 530-5400 craig.odonnell@us.pwc.com Pat Meyer, Chicago (312) 298-6229 patrick.meyer@us.pwc.com Terry Richardson, Dallas (214) 999-2549 terrance.f.richardson@us.pwc.com Todd Hoffman, Houston (713) 356-8440 todd.hoffman@us.pwc.com Carrie Duarte, Los Angeles (213) 356-6396 carrie.duarte@us.pwc.com Ed Donovan, New York Metro (646) 471-8855 ed.donovan@us.pwc.com Bruce Clouser, Philadelphia (267) 330-3194 bruce.e.clouser@us.pwc.com Jim Dell, San Francisco (415) 498-6090 jim.dell@us.pwc.com Scott Pollak, San Jose (408) 817-7446 scott.pollak@Saratoga.PwC.com Nik Shah, Washington Metro (703) 918-1208 nik.shah@us.pwc.com 8 pwc