SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 15
Purpose: To prepare standardize solution of sodium hydroxide and to determine the
concentration of unknown sulfuric acid solution.

Data and Calculations: This experiment is divided into two parts (Part A and Part B). In the first
part of experiment, the standardize solution of sodium hydroxide is
prepared by titrating it with base Potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP).
The indicator Phenolphthalein is used to determine that whether titration
is complete or not.

PART A:
Standardization of a Sodium Hydroxide solution
NaOH Sample Code = O
Trial 1
Mass of KHP transferred = 0.42 g
Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 22.50 mL
Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol
No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass
= 0.42 g / 204.22 g/mol
= 0.0021 moles
Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume
= [0.0021 mol / {(22.50 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100
= 4.4 M

Trial 2
Mass of KHP transferred = 0.4139 g
Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 22.80 mL
Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol
No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass
= 0.4139 g / 204.22 g/mol
= 0.0020267 moles
Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume
= [0.0020267 mol / {(22.80 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100
= 4.24 M

Trial 3
Mass of KHP transferred = 0.4239 g
Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 23.10 mL
Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol
No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass
= 0.4239 g / 204.22 g/mol
= 0.0020757 moles
Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume
= [0.0020757 mol / {(23.10 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100
= 4.32 M

Trial 4
Mass of KHP transferred = 0.4311 g
Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 22.60 mL
Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol
No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass
= 0.4311 g / 204.22 g/mol
= 0.0021109 moles
Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume
= [0.0021109 mol / {(22.60 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100
= 4.43 M

Table:
Trail 1
Mass weighing bottle +
KHP (g)
Mass empty weighing bottle
(g)
Mass of KHP transferred
(g)
Initial volume of burette, Vi
(mL)
Final Volume of burette,
Vf(mL)
Volume of NaOH used
(mL)

Trial 2

Trial 3

Trial 4

11.561

11.6217

11.6113

11.6329

11.1461

11.2078

11.1874

11.2018

0.4200

0.4139

0.4239

0.4311

4.30

6.30

10.1

33.20

26.80

29.10

33.20

55.80

22.50

22.80

23.10

22.60
Concentration of NaOH
(moles/L)

4.4

4.24

4.32

Average concentration of NaOH = [4.4 M + 4.24 M + 4.32 M + 4.43 M] / 4
= 4.35 M
1. % Difference between Trial 1 and Trail 2 = [4.24 M / 4.4 M] * 100 %
= 96.3 %
Difference = (100 – 96.3) %
= 3.7 %
2. % Difference between Trial 2 and Trail 3 = [4.24 M / 4.32 M] * 100 %
= 98.1 %
Difference = (100 – 98.1) %
= 1.9 %
3. % Difference between Trial 3 and Trail 4 = [4.32 M / 4.43 M] * 100 %
= 97.5 %
Difference = (100 – 97.5) %
= 2.5 %

4.43
Observations:
KHP is white color crystals and has definite shape.
NaOH is clear and transparent solution with no color.
In the first trial, after adding 90 drops of NaOH solution there was repeatedly appearance
and disappearance of light pink color.
When the whole solution of KHP and water get titrated then, the color of solution
becomes light pink and it stays permanently.
The same color changes happen with the next three trials.
Concentration of NaOH was almost similar for every trials.

PART B:
Concentration of Sulfuric Acid solution
H2SO4 Sample Code = 34

Trial 1:
Volume diluted acid = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 14.39 mL

H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq)

2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq)

Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M
No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used)
= 4.35 M * (14.39 / 1000) L
= 0.0626 moles
No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0626 mol / 2
= 0.0313 moles

Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000)
= 0.0313 mol / (25 / 1000) L
= 1.2 M

Trial 2:
Volume diluted acid = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 13.51 mL

H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq)

2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq)

Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M
No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used)
= 4.35 M * (13.51 / 1000) L
= 0.0588 moles
No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0588 mol / 2
= 0.0294 moles

Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000)
= 0.0294 mol / (25 / 1000) L
= 1.2 M

Trial 3:
Volume diluted acid = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 14.10 mL

H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq)

2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq)

Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M
No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used)
= 4.35 M * (14.10 / 1000) L
= 0.0613 moles
No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0613 mol / 2
= 0.0307 moles

Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000)
= 0.0307 mol / (25 / 1000) L
= 1.2 M

Trial 4:
Volume diluted acid = 25 mL
Volume of NaOH used = 14.20 mL

H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq)

2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq)

Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M
No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used)
= 4.35 M * (14.20 / 1000) L
= 0.0618 moles
No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0618 mol / 2
= 0.0309 moles
Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000)
= 0.0309 mol / (25 / 1000) L
= 1.2 M

% Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 %
= 100 %
Difference = (100 – 100) %
=0%

% Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 %
= 100 %
Difference = (100 – 100) %
=0%

% Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 %
= 100 %
Difference = (100 – 100) %
=0%

% Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 %
= 100 %
Difference = (100 – 100) %
=0%
Table 2:
Trail 1
Volume diluted acid
titrated (mL)
Initial Volume of burette,
Vi (mL)
Final Volume of burette, Vf
(mL)
Volume NaOH used (mL)
Concentration Of Sulfuric
Acid

Trail 2

Trial 3

Trial 4

25

25

25

25

2.41

17.20

8.50

22.60

16.94

30.71

22.60

36.80

14.39

13.51

14.10

14.20

1.2 M

1.2 M

1.2 M

1.2 M

Observations:
The H2SO4 is colorless and transparent liquid.
The NaOH solution is colorless, odorless and transparent liquid.
While doing the first trail, there were continuous appearance and disappearance of light
pink color.
After adding 10 mL of NaOH solution the pink color starts appearing.
At certain volume the light pink color appeared, indicating that titration is done.
The indictor phenolphthalein has no color and there was no specific odor of reagent.
Discussion: Average concentration of NaOH solution was 4.35 M. There are many sources of
error in this experiment as we got some percentage differences in the two different
trials. For the Trial 1 and Trial 2, the percentage difference is 3.7 % which is
significant difference to be noted. This percentage difference could occur due to
many reasons such as not measuring the KHP properly as we got 0.42 g for first trial
and 0.4139 g for second trial of KHP for performing titration but it is more than
required value as per literature value is concerned (0.40 g). The almost same
percentagedifference occurs for next two trials (1.9 % and 2.5 %). The KHP is
always 99.9 % pure, so the titration should give perfect results (Lab Manual). The
other possible errors was due to the disturbance on the shelf by other students where
analytical balance is placed in balance room, as it cause variability in the values in
weight of KHP. In Part B of experiment, the average concentration of sulfuric was
found to be 1.2 M and there was 100 % titration of both reagent (NaOH and H2SO4).
This 100 % results comes due to significant figures, if significant figures would not
be concerned then there would be error of 1.0 % to 2.0 % in every two trials. There
was identical difference of volume of NaOH used to titrate the acid for each trial due
to some possible errors. The possible errors in this Part of experiment were same as
for Part A, as the process is followed in the same way.

The most significant error could occur by not shaking the flask properly while adding
sodium hydroxide solution and not recognizing the pink color on the instant it appears
and adding the NaOH solution vigorously into the sulfuric acid.
Questions:
The 10 mL volumetric pipette is rinse 2 or 5 times to make sure there is no bubble inside
because air bubble can cause error in the measurement of concentration because the
actual volume of unknown will be less.
The accuracy and precision for both sets of experiment was almost same as there were
percentage difference of concentrations lies only in 2 % to 4 %. The endpoints of titration
for each set of trails in both cases (Part A and Part B) were almost same but there is little
difference in volume of NaOH used which cause errors in accuracy and precision of
experiment.
Using the analytical balance is really careful job as it is most accurate weighing machine
with accuracy of 0.0004 g (Lab Manual) and we need to be précised using the balance but
some few disturbance can cause big error such as disturbance other students on the shelf
it is placed on and not reading the balance properly and taking measurements fastly.
Using Volumetric glassware is other method to be more accurate in experiment but there
are some possible random error while reading the values such as not reading the lower
meniscus of liquid cause error and not removing the air bubble from the burette and using
the beaker in place graduated cylinder in case of volume as graduated cylinder is more
accurate as compared to beaker (0.02 g) (Lab Manual).

Sources of Experimental Error include:
The Analytical balance could give wrong reading because of the disturbance due to other
students on the shelf it is placed on. Also, taking the reading rapidly and not considering
the reading when balance display gets steady.
The possible error can occur using wrong glassware like using beaker instead of
graduated cylinder.
The error could occur while taking reading through graduated cylinder and not
considering the lower meniscus of liquid.
The air bubble in burette can cause error in the true value of NaOH used.
Few drops of liquid remain in burette and volumetric pipette which causes the error.
Not shaking the flask properly while adding the NaOH solution.
Adding the NaOH solution vigorously into the flask.
Not recognizing the pink color instantly as it appears.
Adding the more drops of indicator as needed (2 or 3 drops).
The biggest error occur due to leaking of NaOH solution form burette, we lost 4 drops
during every one trial and it cause the significant error in reading the volume of NaOH
used.
There is water left after washing the glass wares which can cause the error.

This lab could be improved by improving the method of drying the graduated cylinder and
beaker before filling it with the NaOH solution. The glassware could be dried by small amount
of acetone. Any acetone could be removed by evaporation. Finally, the experimenter should
remove the clinging droplets to the neck of burette and volumetric pipette by using Kim Wipe.

Conclusion: After careful consideration of all the results and all the possible concentration, it is
concluded that the average concentration of NaOH (sample code O) was 4.35 M and
average concentration of H2SO4 (sample code 34) was 1.2 M.
References:
Lab manual:
Koczanski, Krystyna; Xidos, James D. CHEM 1300 Laboratory Manual; UMSU Copy
Centre: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2013, pp 16.
Book with authors:
Olmested, John III; Williams, Gerg; Burk, Robert C. Chemsitry, Ist Canadian ed.; John
Wiley and Sons Ltd: Mississauga, Canada, 2010, pp 399 – 406.
CHEM 1300
Experiment 4
Standardization of Acids and Bases Using Titrations

Date of experiment: 10/25/2013
Date of submission:10/29/2013

Room no.:240
Rotation: 1
Friday morning

Locker number: 111

Name: KaranvirsinghSidhu
Student number: SIDKD1303
Chemistry Lab Report on standardization of acid and bases.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Acid base titration
Acid base titrationAcid base titration
Acid base titration
Student
 
Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)
Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)
Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)
Student
 
Acid base titration (1)
Acid base titration (1)Acid base titration (1)
Acid base titration (1)
Student
 
Titration Lab Report
Titration Lab ReportTitration Lab Report
Titration Lab Report
Artur
 
Lab report lipid
Lab report lipidLab report lipid
Lab report lipid
Umi Biee
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Acid base titration
Acid base titrationAcid base titration
Acid base titration
 
Mohr method
Mohr methodMohr method
Mohr method
 
Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)
Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)
Acidbasetitrationsupdated (1)
 
Acid base titration (1)
Acid base titration (1)Acid base titration (1)
Acid base titration (1)
 
Estimation of sodium bicarbonate and carbonate in mixture
Estimation of sodium bicarbonate and carbonate in mixtureEstimation of sodium bicarbonate and carbonate in mixture
Estimation of sodium bicarbonate and carbonate in mixture
 
Titration Lab Report
Titration Lab ReportTitration Lab Report
Titration Lab Report
 
Titrations
TitrationsTitrations
Titrations
 
Simple distillation
Simple distillation  Simple distillation
Simple distillation
 
NaOH Standardization
NaOH StandardizationNaOH Standardization
NaOH Standardization
 
Sodium hydroxide preparation and standardization
Sodium hydroxide preparation and standardizationSodium hydroxide preparation and standardization
Sodium hydroxide preparation and standardization
 
GC lab report
GC lab reportGC lab report
GC lab report
 
Alcohol content determination
Alcohol content determinationAlcohol content determination
Alcohol content determination
 
Lab report lipid
Lab report lipidLab report lipid
Lab report lipid
 
E4 iodine value
E4 iodine valueE4 iodine value
E4 iodine value
 
HCL Standardization
HCL StandardizationHCL Standardization
HCL Standardization
 
Preparation of solutions
Preparation of solutionsPreparation of solutions
Preparation of solutions
 
Gravimetric method of analysis
Gravimetric method of analysis Gravimetric method of analysis
Gravimetric method of analysis
 
solutions and their concentrations in Analytical chemistry by Azad Alshatteri
solutions and their concentrations in Analytical chemistry by Azad Alshatterisolutions and their concentrations in Analytical chemistry by Azad Alshatteri
solutions and their concentrations in Analytical chemistry by Azad Alshatteri
 
Synthesis of Chloropentaamminecobalt(iii) chloride
Synthesis of Chloropentaamminecobalt(iii) chlorideSynthesis of Chloropentaamminecobalt(iii) chloride
Synthesis of Chloropentaamminecobalt(iii) chloride
 
Chemistry Lab Report 1
Chemistry Lab Report 1Chemistry Lab Report 1
Chemistry Lab Report 1
 

Ähnlich wie Chemistry Lab Report on standardization of acid and bases.

Comparison of the acidity of fruit juices
Comparison of the acidity of fruit juicesComparison of the acidity of fruit juices
Comparison of the acidity of fruit juices
adusmmangao
 

Ähnlich wie Chemistry Lab Report on standardization of acid and bases. (20)

lab manual final
 lab manual final lab manual final
lab manual final
 
lab manual MANIK
lab manual  MANIKlab manual  MANIK
lab manual MANIK
 
Physical Pharmacy-I Lab MANIK
Physical Pharmacy-I Lab MANIKPhysical Pharmacy-I Lab MANIK
Physical Pharmacy-I Lab MANIK
 
Determination of acidity of water
Determination of acidity of waterDetermination of acidity of water
Determination of acidity of water
 
acidity.pdf
acidity.pdfacidity.pdf
acidity.pdf
 
Maam queen 3
Maam queen 3Maam queen 3
Maam queen 3
 
IB Chemistry Titration Techniques and IA on Titration
IB Chemistry Titration Techniques and IA on TitrationIB Chemistry Titration Techniques and IA on Titration
IB Chemistry Titration Techniques and IA on Titration
 
P h calculations
P h calculationsP h calculations
P h calculations
 
Exp 4
Exp  4Exp  4
Exp 4
 
Department of biochemistry cell ad molecular biology (1)
Department of biochemistry cell ad   molecular biology (1)Department of biochemistry cell ad   molecular biology (1)
Department of biochemistry cell ad molecular biology (1)
 
Pharmaceutical analysis II (Practical) MANIK up
Pharmaceutical analysis II (Practical) MANIK upPharmaceutical analysis II (Practical) MANIK up
Pharmaceutical analysis II (Practical) MANIK up
 
Comparison of the acidity of fruit juices
Comparison of the acidity of fruit juicesComparison of the acidity of fruit juices
Comparison of the acidity of fruit juices
 
Titrations-step-by-step-TES.pptx
Titrations-step-by-step-TES.pptxTitrations-step-by-step-TES.pptx
Titrations-step-by-step-TES.pptx
 
Chemistry Volumetric analysis_ Titration
Chemistry Volumetric analysis_ TitrationChemistry Volumetric analysis_ Titration
Chemistry Volumetric analysis_ Titration
 
Volumetric analysis-Solution stoichiometry
Volumetric analysis-Solution stoichiometryVolumetric analysis-Solution stoichiometry
Volumetric analysis-Solution stoichiometry
 
lab 2 food 4260.docx
lab 2 food 4260.docxlab 2 food 4260.docx
lab 2 food 4260.docx
 
Molarity and dilution
Molarity and dilutionMolarity and dilution
Molarity and dilution
 
Alkalinity of given water sample.pdf
Alkalinity of given water sample.pdfAlkalinity of given water sample.pdf
Alkalinity of given water sample.pdf
 
How to write laboratory report (journal)
How to write  laboratory report (journal)How to write  laboratory report (journal)
How to write laboratory report (journal)
 
eelt lab 2 report.docx
eelt lab 2 report.docxeelt lab 2 report.docx
eelt lab 2 report.docx
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
KarakKing
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
AnaAcapella
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Interdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptx
Interdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptxInterdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptx
Interdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptx
 
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptxGoogle Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
 
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
 
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
 
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student briefSpatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
 

Chemistry Lab Report on standardization of acid and bases.

  • 1. Purpose: To prepare standardize solution of sodium hydroxide and to determine the concentration of unknown sulfuric acid solution. Data and Calculations: This experiment is divided into two parts (Part A and Part B). In the first part of experiment, the standardize solution of sodium hydroxide is prepared by titrating it with base Potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). The indicator Phenolphthalein is used to determine that whether titration is complete or not. PART A: Standardization of a Sodium Hydroxide solution NaOH Sample Code = O Trial 1 Mass of KHP transferred = 0.42 g Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL Volume of NaOH used = 22.50 mL Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass = 0.42 g / 204.22 g/mol = 0.0021 moles
  • 2. Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume = [0.0021 mol / {(22.50 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100 = 4.4 M Trial 2 Mass of KHP transferred = 0.4139 g Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL Volume of NaOH used = 22.80 mL Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass = 0.4139 g / 204.22 g/mol = 0.0020267 moles Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume = [0.0020267 mol / {(22.80 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100 = 4.24 M Trial 3 Mass of KHP transferred = 0.4239 g Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL Volume of NaOH used = 23.10 mL Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass = 0.4239 g / 204.22 g/mol = 0.0020757 moles Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume
  • 3. = [0.0020757 mol / {(23.10 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100 = 4.32 M Trial 4 Mass of KHP transferred = 0.4311 g Volume of Distilled water = 25 mL Volume of NaOH used = 22.60 mL Molar mass of KHP = 204.22 g/mol No. of moles of KHP = Mass of KHP used / Molar mass = 0.4311 g / 204.22 g/mol = 0.0021109 moles Concentration of NaOH = No. of moles / Volume = [0.0021109 mol / {(22.60 + 25) / 1000} L] * 100 = 4.43 M Table: Trail 1 Mass weighing bottle + KHP (g) Mass empty weighing bottle (g) Mass of KHP transferred (g) Initial volume of burette, Vi (mL) Final Volume of burette, Vf(mL) Volume of NaOH used (mL) Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 11.561 11.6217 11.6113 11.6329 11.1461 11.2078 11.1874 11.2018 0.4200 0.4139 0.4239 0.4311 4.30 6.30 10.1 33.20 26.80 29.10 33.20 55.80 22.50 22.80 23.10 22.60
  • 4. Concentration of NaOH (moles/L) 4.4 4.24 4.32 Average concentration of NaOH = [4.4 M + 4.24 M + 4.32 M + 4.43 M] / 4 = 4.35 M 1. % Difference between Trial 1 and Trail 2 = [4.24 M / 4.4 M] * 100 % = 96.3 % Difference = (100 – 96.3) % = 3.7 % 2. % Difference between Trial 2 and Trail 3 = [4.24 M / 4.32 M] * 100 % = 98.1 % Difference = (100 – 98.1) % = 1.9 % 3. % Difference between Trial 3 and Trail 4 = [4.32 M / 4.43 M] * 100 % = 97.5 % Difference = (100 – 97.5) % = 2.5 % 4.43
  • 5. Observations: KHP is white color crystals and has definite shape. NaOH is clear and transparent solution with no color. In the first trial, after adding 90 drops of NaOH solution there was repeatedly appearance and disappearance of light pink color. When the whole solution of KHP and water get titrated then, the color of solution becomes light pink and it stays permanently. The same color changes happen with the next three trials. Concentration of NaOH was almost similar for every trials. PART B: Concentration of Sulfuric Acid solution H2SO4 Sample Code = 34 Trial 1: Volume diluted acid = 25 mL Volume of NaOH used = 14.39 mL H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq) 2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq) Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used) = 4.35 M * (14.39 / 1000) L = 0.0626 moles
  • 6. No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0626 mol / 2 = 0.0313 moles Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000) = 0.0313 mol / (25 / 1000) L = 1.2 M Trial 2: Volume diluted acid = 25 mL Volume of NaOH used = 13.51 mL H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq) 2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq) Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used) = 4.35 M * (13.51 / 1000) L = 0.0588 moles No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0588 mol / 2 = 0.0294 moles Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000) = 0.0294 mol / (25 / 1000) L = 1.2 M Trial 3: Volume diluted acid = 25 mL
  • 7. Volume of NaOH used = 14.10 mL H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq) 2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq) Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used) = 4.35 M * (14.10 / 1000) L = 0.0613 moles No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0613 mol / 2 = 0.0307 moles Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000) = 0.0307 mol / (25 / 1000) L = 1.2 M Trial 4: Volume diluted acid = 25 mL Volume of NaOH used = 14.20 mL H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq) 2H2O (l) + 2Na2SO4 (aq) Average concentration of NaOH = 4.35 M No. of moles of NaOH = (Average concentration of NaOH) * (Volume of NaOH used) = 4.35 M * (14.20 / 1000) L = 0.0618 moles No. of moles of H2SO4 = 0.0618 mol / 2 = 0.0309 moles
  • 8. Concentration of H2SO4 = No. of moles / (volume of diluted acid / 1000) = 0.0309 mol / (25 / 1000) L = 1.2 M % Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 % = 100 % Difference = (100 – 100) % =0% % Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 % = 100 % Difference = (100 – 100) % =0% % Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 % = 100 % Difference = (100 – 100) % =0% % Difference between Trail 1 and Trail 2 = [1.2 M / 1.2 M] * 100 % = 100 %
  • 9. Difference = (100 – 100) % =0% Table 2: Trail 1 Volume diluted acid titrated (mL) Initial Volume of burette, Vi (mL) Final Volume of burette, Vf (mL) Volume NaOH used (mL) Concentration Of Sulfuric Acid Trail 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 25 25 25 25 2.41 17.20 8.50 22.60 16.94 30.71 22.60 36.80 14.39 13.51 14.10 14.20 1.2 M 1.2 M 1.2 M 1.2 M Observations: The H2SO4 is colorless and transparent liquid. The NaOH solution is colorless, odorless and transparent liquid. While doing the first trail, there were continuous appearance and disappearance of light pink color. After adding 10 mL of NaOH solution the pink color starts appearing. At certain volume the light pink color appeared, indicating that titration is done. The indictor phenolphthalein has no color and there was no specific odor of reagent.
  • 10. Discussion: Average concentration of NaOH solution was 4.35 M. There are many sources of error in this experiment as we got some percentage differences in the two different trials. For the Trial 1 and Trial 2, the percentage difference is 3.7 % which is significant difference to be noted. This percentage difference could occur due to many reasons such as not measuring the KHP properly as we got 0.42 g for first trial and 0.4139 g for second trial of KHP for performing titration but it is more than required value as per literature value is concerned (0.40 g). The almost same percentagedifference occurs for next two trials (1.9 % and 2.5 %). The KHP is always 99.9 % pure, so the titration should give perfect results (Lab Manual). The other possible errors was due to the disturbance on the shelf by other students where analytical balance is placed in balance room, as it cause variability in the values in weight of KHP. In Part B of experiment, the average concentration of sulfuric was found to be 1.2 M and there was 100 % titration of both reagent (NaOH and H2SO4). This 100 % results comes due to significant figures, if significant figures would not be concerned then there would be error of 1.0 % to 2.0 % in every two trials. There was identical difference of volume of NaOH used to titrate the acid for each trial due to some possible errors. The possible errors in this Part of experiment were same as for Part A, as the process is followed in the same way. The most significant error could occur by not shaking the flask properly while adding sodium hydroxide solution and not recognizing the pink color on the instant it appears and adding the NaOH solution vigorously into the sulfuric acid. Questions:
  • 11. The 10 mL volumetric pipette is rinse 2 or 5 times to make sure there is no bubble inside because air bubble can cause error in the measurement of concentration because the actual volume of unknown will be less. The accuracy and precision for both sets of experiment was almost same as there were percentage difference of concentrations lies only in 2 % to 4 %. The endpoints of titration for each set of trails in both cases (Part A and Part B) were almost same but there is little difference in volume of NaOH used which cause errors in accuracy and precision of experiment. Using the analytical balance is really careful job as it is most accurate weighing machine with accuracy of 0.0004 g (Lab Manual) and we need to be précised using the balance but some few disturbance can cause big error such as disturbance other students on the shelf it is placed on and not reading the balance properly and taking measurements fastly. Using Volumetric glassware is other method to be more accurate in experiment but there are some possible random error while reading the values such as not reading the lower meniscus of liquid cause error and not removing the air bubble from the burette and using the beaker in place graduated cylinder in case of volume as graduated cylinder is more accurate as compared to beaker (0.02 g) (Lab Manual). Sources of Experimental Error include: The Analytical balance could give wrong reading because of the disturbance due to other students on the shelf it is placed on. Also, taking the reading rapidly and not considering the reading when balance display gets steady. The possible error can occur using wrong glassware like using beaker instead of graduated cylinder.
  • 12. The error could occur while taking reading through graduated cylinder and not considering the lower meniscus of liquid. The air bubble in burette can cause error in the true value of NaOH used. Few drops of liquid remain in burette and volumetric pipette which causes the error. Not shaking the flask properly while adding the NaOH solution. Adding the NaOH solution vigorously into the flask. Not recognizing the pink color instantly as it appears. Adding the more drops of indicator as needed (2 or 3 drops). The biggest error occur due to leaking of NaOH solution form burette, we lost 4 drops during every one trial and it cause the significant error in reading the volume of NaOH used. There is water left after washing the glass wares which can cause the error. This lab could be improved by improving the method of drying the graduated cylinder and beaker before filling it with the NaOH solution. The glassware could be dried by small amount of acetone. Any acetone could be removed by evaporation. Finally, the experimenter should remove the clinging droplets to the neck of burette and volumetric pipette by using Kim Wipe. Conclusion: After careful consideration of all the results and all the possible concentration, it is concluded that the average concentration of NaOH (sample code O) was 4.35 M and average concentration of H2SO4 (sample code 34) was 1.2 M.
  • 13. References: Lab manual: Koczanski, Krystyna; Xidos, James D. CHEM 1300 Laboratory Manual; UMSU Copy Centre: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2013, pp 16. Book with authors: Olmested, John III; Williams, Gerg; Burk, Robert C. Chemsitry, Ist Canadian ed.; John Wiley and Sons Ltd: Mississauga, Canada, 2010, pp 399 – 406.
  • 14. CHEM 1300 Experiment 4 Standardization of Acids and Bases Using Titrations Date of experiment: 10/25/2013 Date of submission:10/29/2013 Room no.:240 Rotation: 1 Friday morning Locker number: 111 Name: KaranvirsinghSidhu Student number: SIDKD1303