2. 2
Name of School : Manicani national high school
School ID : 313516
School Head : MARIA CLARIZA P. RIVERAL
Position/Designation: Assistant School PrincipalII
No. of Teachers : 11
No. of Classes : 4
Enrolment : 192
10. NUMBER OF LEARNERS PROVIDED
WITH LEARNING RESOURCES
10
Number of Learners
Provided with Learning
Resources
G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL
45 50 43 54 192
Total Enrollment 45 50 43 54 192
Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
11. NUMBER OF LEARNERS PROVIDED
WITH LEARNING RESOURCES
11
Number of Learners
Provided with Learning
Resources
G7 G8 G9 G10 TOTAL
45 50 43 54 192
Total Enrollment 45 50 43 54 192
Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
12. 12
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
(BETTER ACCESS TO QUALITY EDUCATION)
Performance
Indicators:
Number of audio video materials for quality assurance within Q1
Number of quality assured audio video materials this Q1
Key Stage: Grade Seven to Grade Ten
Performance
Gap:
Only two (3) audio video materials for quality assurance were developed.
No quality-assured audio video materials were developed.
Key Practices: Regular monitoring of learners especially those struggling ones.
ICT: Maintain accessibility of computers and other gadgets for teachers’ use.
Materials &
Equipment
Learning materials are sufficient for the learners and audio-video materials were utilized for
learners’ consumption.
TA and
Supervision:
The school head provides technical assistance to teachers regarding WHLP and ILMP, as
well as in the crafting of Parallel and Summative Tests.
External
Factors:
Active GPTA Officers and parents and supportive BLGU Officials.
13. 13
STRENGTHS
Competent and dedicated
school personnel
Sufficient number of printing
equipment.
WEAKNESSES
Lack of technical skills in
video editing among
teachers.
Lack of audio and video
recording equipment and
gadgets
Supportive Stakeholders
Supportive school head on
the production of audio-video
materials.
OPPORTUNITIES
Time constraint in the
production of audio-video
materials.
Lack of job opportunities in
the locality.
THREATS
SWOT ANALYSIS
14. 14
STRATEGIC OPTIONS
STRATEGIC OPTIONS
CAPACITY TO
IMPLEMENT
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE
NEEDED
EXPECTED TA
PROVIDERS
School-Based INSET on Video Editing
of an AV Production
Capable Resource Speaker
on Video Editing
District Technical
Editors
Home Visitations to students who
are at risk of dropping out and/or
transferring out.
Capable N/A N/A
19. TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT
(SECOND GRADING)
19
Tracking of
Quarterly
Assessment (1st
Grading)
Grade
Level
Average
Computed
Grades for the
Quarter (Grade
Sheet/Form 138)
Mathematics Grade 7 83.40
Grade 8 83.60
Grade 9 83.00
Grade 10 82.52
AVERAGE 83.13
Filipino Grade 7 84.20
Grade 8 84.78
Grade 9 84.48
Grade 10 82.55
AVERAGE 84.00
Tracking of
Quarterly
Assessment (1st
Grading)
Grade
Level
Average
Computed
Grades for the
Quarter (Grade
Sheet/Form 138)
English Grade 7 81.02
Grade 8 85.65
Grade 9 84.02
Grade 10 85.81
AVERAGE 84.13
Science Grade 7 81.32
Grade 8 84.18
Grade 9 82.30
Grade 10 82.77
AVERAGE 82.64
20. TRACKING OF QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT
(SECOND GRADING)
20
Tracking of
Quarterly
Assessment (1st
Grading)
Grade
Level
Average
Computed
Grades for the
Quarter (Grade
Sheet/Form 138)
MAPEH Grade 7 85.31
Grade 8 84.14
Grade 9 86.00
Grade 10 83.37
AVERAGE 84.71
ESP Grade 7 83.82
Grade 8 86.62
Grade 9 85.34
Grade 10 84.72
AVERAGE 85.13
Tracking of
Quarterly
Assessment (1st
Grading)
Grade
Level
Average
Computed
Grades for the
Quarter (Grade
Sheet/Form 138)
Aral. Pan. Grade 7 84.95
Grade 8 82.98
Grade 9 82.26
Grade 10 82.54
AVERAGE 83.18
TLE Grade 7 85.95
Grade 8 85.66
Grade 9 86.00
Grade 10 83.72
AVERAGE 85.33
21. 21
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS (QUALITY)
Performance
Indicators:
Percentage of learner who did not meet expectation within the quarter
Percentage of learners belonging to Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) grade range within the quarter
Percentage of non-numerates
Key Stage: Grade Seven to Grade Ten
Performance
Gap:
0.52% of Grades 7 to 10 learners did not meet expectations in all learning areas.
8.92% of Grades 7 to 10 learners belong to the Fairly Satisfactory (75-79) grade range.
17.19%% of Grades 7 to 10 are Non-numerates.
Key Practices: TA provision to teachers on Curriculum and Assessment.
Monitoring of Project CUENTA
Learning &
Development:
Conduct of SLAC on contextualizing performance tasks and construction of Assessments.
ICT: Support and encourage the use of social media to supplement the Modular Distance
Learning.
TA and
Supervision:
Regular supervision/monitoring of construction of parallel tests and summative tests.
External
Factors:
Some parents as facilitators of learning at home has no knowledge at all on the content and
pedagogy of lessons stated in the modules.
22. 22
STRENGTHS
Distribution of LAS or
module ratio is 1:1.
Learners can access
teachers for questions
through social media
group chats.
WEAKNESSES
Irregular monitoring of the
learners due to
overlapping of teachers
tasks.
Presence of slow readers.
Availability of Support
system in the community
and at home.
Donations of stakeholders.
OPPORTUNITIES
Incapability of parents to
buy gadgets.
Weak network signal in
some barangays.
Some parents/pupils
cannot return back
modules on time.
THREATS
SWOT ANALYSIS
23. 23
STRATEGIC OPTIONS
STRATEGIC OPTIONS
CAPACITY TO
IMPLEMENT
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE
NEEDED
EXPECTED TA
PROVIDERS
Community-based Numeracy
Learning Sessions
Capable Volunteer Tutors Community
Volunteers
Home Visitations to Learners who
are unable to submit outputs
Capable N/A N/A
25. STATUS ON THE PROVISION OF
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION
25
IS Provider
Number of IS
Provided
Modality
School Head 11 Face-to-Face
26. STATUS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
CAPABILITY BUILDINGS
26
CBs
Total Number of CBs
conducted
School LAC Sessions 1
INSET on:
Content and Pedagogy 1
Assessment
Contextualization of LRs
Learning Delivery
Program/System Implementation 1
27. STATUS ON THE MOOE UTILIZATION
IN THE QUARTER
27
Total Amount
Downloaded
Total amount
Liquidated
% of
Liquidation
111,388.00 109,879.02 98.65%
28. STATUS ON STAKEHOLDERS’ DONATION
28
SERVICES ENGAGED:
Clearing of School Ground
Repair and Maintenance of
School Infrastructures
Total Cash
Donation
Total Amount of In
Kind Donation
Converted to Cash
₱ 8,740.00 ₱ 960.00
29. SMEA RESULT BASED ON LCP
29
Physical Accomplishment Financial Accomplishment
Quarter
Physical Targets
Actual
Accomplishm
ent
% of
Accomplish
ment
Financial
Target
Amount Utilized
% of
Utilization
20 20 100% ₱ 109,879.00 ₱ 109,879.00 100%