The document discusses the legality of daily fantasy sports games. It provides context on the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) and how it explicitly excludes fantasy sports games from being considered unlawful internet gambling. However, the New York Attorney General sent cease and desist letters to DraftKings and FanDuel in 2015, arguing that daily fantasy sports games constitute illegal gambling under New York state law due to the ability to wager on short-term outcomes rather than through a season-long contest. The future of daily fantasy sports remains unclear as the industry continues legal battles over whether these games should be considered a form of legal gambling or illegal sports betting.
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Legality of Fantasy Sports Games
1. Are Daily Fantasy
Sports Games
Legal?
Warsaw Sports Marketing
Center Undergraduate
Program Manager /
Instructor Mini-Lecture
Joshua Gordon, JD, MA
2. February 1, 2006 letter addressed to Members of Congress
and written by then-General Counsels of the NFL, MLB,
NBA and NCAA as well as the then-Deputy Commissioner
of the NHL. That letter asked Congress to pass the UIGEA
“in order to preserve the integrity of our respective
sports.” It further stated, “[a]llowing rampant sports
gambling can cause a cynical and suspicious
perception of athletic events, in place of the traditional
American values they should represent.” Near its
conclusion, the letter reads, “[t]he Unlawful Internet
Gambling Enforcement Act does not change the law with
respect to what is currently legal and illegal, but it adds
important and workable enforcement tools that will
prevent . . . illegal Internet gambling transactions even
when the websites are operated offshore.”
UIGEA
3. 31 USC 5361 Unlawful Internet Gambling
Enforcement Act (UIGEA) explicitly
states that it shall be considered
“unlawful internet gambling” when a
person stakes or risks something of
value upon the outcome of a sporting
event. Critical exclusions include
participation in any fantasy sports game.
4. Section 1(E)(ix)(II) of the UIGEA requires
that “[a]ll winning outcomes reflect the
relative knowledge and skill of the
participants and are determined
predominantly by accumulated statistical
results of the performance of individuals
(athletes in the case of sports events) in
multiple real-world sporting or other
events.”
5.
6. In a report released in early
April 2015, Star Fantasy
Leagues in conjunction with
Gaming Laboratories
International revealed that a
skilled player won roughly
70% of the time in Star
Fantasy Leagues’ daily fantasy
sports “salary cap”
competitions over the course
of an NFL season.
7. On an Opening Day game
between the Washington
Nationals and New York Mets,
MLB Commissioner Rob
Manfred provided his position
on sports gambling and
fantasy sports. “The
difference is one’s legal and
one is not,” said Manfred.
“It’s a pretty definitive line.”
8. DraftKings employee
Ethan Haskell reportedly
won $350,000 on a $25
bet on FanDuel, resulting
in accusations that
Haskell had, in effect,
engaged in insider
trading from a data leak
around certain NFL stats
and lineups.
Source:
http://www.adweek.com/news/techn
ology/draftkings-and-fanduel-ban-
staffers-playing-fantasy-football-
money-167434
10. 11/9/15 NY AG Eric
Schneiderman
Cease and Desist
letter saying games
constituted illegal
gambling under
state law
“a person engages in gambling when he
stakes or risks something of value upon
the outcome of a contest of chance or a
future contingent event not under his
control or influence.”
“ Daily Fantasy Sports are creating the
same public health and economic
concerns as other forms of gambling,
including addiction. Finally, FanDuel’s
advertisements seriously mislead New
York citizens about their prospects of
winning.”
13. How DFS differs from traditional fantasy sports? (NY AG argument)
Traditional Fantasy Sports
• traditional conduct a competitive draft
• compete over the course of a long season
• repeatedly adjust their teams
• play for bragging rights or side wagers
• host sites receive most of their revenue from administrative fees and
advertising
DFS
• sites hosting DFS are in active and full control of the wagering
• set prizes, control relevant variables, and profit directly from the
wagering
• designed for instant gratification, stressing easy game play and no long-
term strategy
Fantasy sports games must:
prohibit participants from controlling “fantasy teams” of only athletes from one professional or amateur organization;
inform participants of all prizes and awards in advance of the fantasy games;
establish all prizes and awards in advance of the fantasy games;
refrain from tying the value of prizes and awards to the number of participants or the amount of fees paid by the participants
refrain from tying the outcome of the fantasy sports games to the score, point-spread or performances of any single real-world team or combination of teams; and
refrain from tying the outcome to being solely based on a single performance of an individual athlete in any single real-world sporting or other event.
The six aforementioned parameters are precise, concise and largely lack overbreadth or vagueness. However, there remains one additional requirement, which by its nature leaves the entire analysis open to interpretation.
Hundreds of millions of dollars in venture capital
DraftKings & FanDuel
Investors include NBC Sports, Time Warner, ESPN, Disney, NBA, MLB, Comcast, Robert Kraft, Jerry Jones
DraftKings valuation at roughly $1B
28/32 NFL teams have advertising deals with with one of the two DFS leaders (AdWeek 10/7/15)
MLB and MLBPA prohibits its players from participating in playing fantasy sports for any type of prize (Rule 21 of CBA)
http://www.forbes.com/sites/darrenheitner/2015/04/13/is-the-legality-of-fantasy-sports-a-sure-bet/
started as investigation into employee misconduct and use of proprietary information and shifted to review of operations and business model
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/11/sports/football/draftkings-fanduel-new-york-attorney-general-tells-fantasy-sites-to-stop-taking-bets-in-new-york.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
“Certain structural aspects of DFS make it especially dangerous, including the quick rate of play, the large jackpots, and the false perception that it is eminently winnable. “
The state laws prevent residents of Montana, Louisiana, Washington, Iowa, Nevada, and Arizona from playing daily fantasy games on DraftKings.com and FanDuel.com. Yahoo.com is virtually identical to DraftKings & FanDuel in terms of state eligibility; the only difference at this time is that Yahoo also prevents Florida residents from playing.
https://www.dailyfantasycafe.com/academy/undergraduate/is-daily-fantasy-sports-legal
$100 Million on TV ads in September
http://adage.com/article/media/draftkings-fanduel-spe/300658/
Closer to poker? “a small number of professional gamblers profit at the expense of casual players”
top 1% of FanDuel’s winners receive the vast majority of the winnings
“According to documents attached to Schneiderman’s lawsuit, the company collected $25.67 million in entry fees from the state in 2014, and after paying out prizes it had $2.58 million in revenue there. That’s more than in any other state except California, where DraftKings had $3.45 million in revenue, according to the document. Those figures are expected to be much larger this year.”
“Schneiderman also referenced messages DraftKings chief executive Jason Robins posted on the Reddit.com forum several years ago in which he suggested DraftKings operates in the “gambling space’’ and said the company’s revenue model is “identical to a casino[’s].’’”