1. Reward and Recognition
What do people want from work?
What sort of reward systems can organisations
develop?
What is the difference between reward and
recognition?
What can we learn from motivational theories about
reward?
1
2. What people want from work is dependent on:
Age e.g. ‘older worker’
Circumstances e.g. current needs
Values e.g. to do ‘good’ rather than $
Social needs e.g. acceptance
Cultural influences e.g. ‘golden generation’
2
4. Rewards and the skills crisis
Lowest unemployment rate in the OECD – ‘full
employment’
Ageing population
Falling birth rate
‘Brain-drain’
Immigration policies (politicians and the election)
Competitors e.g. Australia are doing much better.
Why would skilled immigrants want to come here?
Do we need them?
4
5. Attracting skilled immigrants
How do we look as a nation?
What do we offer?
What do they bring (why do we need them anyway)
Do we welcome them?
Do we want them?
What do we do in terms of immigration policies to
attract skilled immigrants?
5
6. To refresh your memories: theories
of motivation
Theories of motivation need to explain:
1. Why an individual decides to join an organisation
2. Why he or she decides to stay or leave
3. Why the individual decides to perform at the level required by the
organisation or decides not to put in the effort required.
6
7. Three Sets of Motivation Theories
Content theories (Maslow, ERG, Herzberg etc)
Process theories (Adams, Vroom, etc)
Behaviour modification (Skinner)
7
8. Content Theories
Concerned with the content of the work itself e.g
was it challenging?
How work could be ‘enriched’ to provide more
satisfaction
Led to attempts to re-design work; job enlargement,
rotation and ‘enrichment’
8
9. Content theories of motivation
Needs hierarchy ERG Motivator−hygiene McClelland’s
theory theory theory learned needs
Self- Need for
actualisation achievement
Growth Motivators
Need for
Esteem
power
Need for
Belongingness Relatedness
affiliation
Safety Hygienes
Existence
Physiological
9
10. Process theories
Concerned with individual decision-making, why
individuals decide to put in or withhold effort.
Why?
Equitable outcomes
Commensurate reward
10
11. Expectancy theory of motivation
E-to-P P-to-O Outcomes
expectancy expectancy and valences
Outcome 1
+ or -
Outcome 2
Effort Performance + or -
Outcome 3
+ or -
11
12. Equity theory
Outcome/input ratio
inputs − what employee contributes (eg skill)
outcomes − what employees receive (eg pay)
Comparison other
person/people with whom we compare ratio
not easily identifiable
Equity evaluation
compare outcome/input ratio with the comparison
other
12
13. Overreward vs underreward inequity
Comparison
You
other
Outcomes
Overreward Outcomes
inequity
Inputs Inputs
Underreward Outcomes
inequity Outcomes
Inputs Inputs
13
14. Designing effective Reward Systems
Rewards must be:
Perceived as fair
Timely
Of a significant magnitude to motivate
Individualised
Current
14
15. Types of reward schemes
Merit schemes
Pay for Performance schemes
‘behaviour that appears to lead to positive
consequences will be repeated.’
Does this approach increase motivation?
Does it rely on externally mediated rewards rather
than a system in which individuals can be motivated
by their jobs?
15
16. Why do merit pay systems often fail?
Is it because the theoretically base is not strong or
the schemes are not well implemented my
managers?
16
17. (cont)
1. Pay is not perceived to be related to Job
Performance
Lawler: ‘employees do not see the relationship
between their hard work and the rated
performance.’
Why?
The rewards e.g. share options take too long to
come
Unrealistic goals
Secrecy surrounding annual increase
17
18. Performance ratings are seen as
biased
Can mangers make objective distinctions between
good and bad performance?
In theory, based on ‘objective’ measures but…
Somebody – your superior – has to implement the
plan
18
19. Rewards are not Viewed as Rewards
A pay increase might be meant to say ‘you are well
regarded’ but might send another message’ you are
only average’
Message about inequity in the company
Worsened by secrecy
Performance reviews too far apart to have effect
Do we need to keep changing the merit plan to ‘fit’
with changes in the environment e.g. inflation
What about under-performers?
19
20. Trust and openness about merit
increases is low.
‘You need a good PA system’
Good human relations climate
Explain the reasons for increases
Need an open climate for it to work
20
21. Organisation view money as the primary
motivator ignoring the importance of the job itself
Detracts from the job itself
Motivate intrinsically
Merit pay takes external focus
Overlooks the value and importance of the job itself
Back to job re-design
21
22. Making a merit pay system work
Openness and trust are the basics
Supervisors need to be trained in rating and
feedback techniques
Components of annual pay should be clearly and
openly specific – so that merit forms an average for
distribution
Need to customise to needs and individuals
Don’t overlook other rewards
22
23. Making it work
Good preformance measures – what do we mean
by ‘high performance’?
Better communication about the systems; how it
works, what will be delivered
Better delivery systems – make clear the
relationship between performance and pay
Managerial behaviour – negative perception of
connection between pay and performance
23
24. Membership/seniority-based rewards
Fixed wages, seniority increases
Advantages
guaranteed wages may attract job applicants
seniority-based rewards reduce turnover
Disadvantages
don’t motivate job performance
discourage poor performers from leaving
may act as ‘golden handcuff’
Too limited
24
25. Skill-based rewards
Pay increases with skill or competencies acquired
or demonstrated
Skill-based pay
pay increases with skill modules learned
Advantages
more flexible work force, better quality, consistent with
employability
Disadvantages
potentially subjective, higher training costs
25
26. Status-based rewards
Include perks e.g. company car
Advantages
job evaluation tries to maintain pay equity
motivate competition for promotions
Disadvantages
employees exaggerate duties, hoard resources
create psychological distance across hierarchy
inconsistent with flatter organisations
26
28. Do we want individuals to reach
‘high’ levels of performance?
What does performance depend on?
Performance is a function of Motivation x Ability x
Opportunity
P = (f) M X A X O
28
29. Based on Expectancy-theory; effort,
performance and reward
Makes sense (?) but . . we have to:
1. Agree on what we mean by performance e.g. for
a child-minder
2. Agree how we will assess individual performance
3. Agree how we are going to reward individual
performance
29
30. Improving performance?
Performance is a {f} of Motivation x Ability x
Opportunity
What do we mean by the performance of waiter or
waitress?
What would we mean by a high performing retail
sales assistant?
How can a geriatric nurse improve her or his
performance?
Do organisations really want ‘high performance’ or
‘adequate performance’?
Do many jobs have within them the scope to
‘improve ‘ performance?
30
31. Performance-reward problems
Shift attention away from motivation of job itself to
extrinsic rewards
Create a psychological distance with reward giver
Discourage risk taking
Used as quick fix
But more importantly . . .
31
33. But we reward individuals while talking
teams
Performance assessment invariably
individually-based e.g. PA
On which individuals are rewarded
But organisations stress team work!
So why not more team-based rewards?
Difficult to assess e.g. equity
Difficult to administer
Cost
33
34. Team and organisational rewards
Gainsharing plans
based on cost reductions and increased labour
efficiency
Employee Share Ownership Programme e.g. The
Warehouse
employees own company shares
Share options e.g. senior management
right to purchase company shares at a future date at
a predetermined price
Profit sharing e.g. Mainfreight
employees receive share of profits
34
35. Job design
Assigning tasks to a job, including the
interdependency of those tasks with other jobs
Technology has a great influence on the design of
jobs (technological determinism)
Taylorist/Fordist design
Employability affects job design
35
36. Evaluating job specialisation
Advantages Disadvantages
Basically greater efficiency Job boredom
Less time changing tasks Discontentment pay
Lower training costs Lower quality?
Job mastered quickly Lower motivation
Better person-job matching
Lower costs
Greater control over quality
36
37. Job characteristics model (Hackman &
Lawler)
Core job Critical
characteristics psychological Outcomes
states
Skill variety Work
motivation
Task identity Meaningfulness
Task significance Growth
satisfaction
Autonomy Responsibility General
satisfaction
Feedback Knowledge Work
from job of results effectiveness
Individual
differences
37
38. Job rotation vs job enlargement
Job rotation
Job 1 Job 2 Job 3
Operate camera Operate sound Report story
Job enlargement
Job 1 Job 2 Job 3
Operate camera Operate camera Operate camera
Operate sound Operate sound Operate sound
Report story Report story Report story
38
40. Major obstacles to job design
Difficult to accurately measure job characteristics
Cost effectiveness
Resistance to change
skilled workers
union
supervisors
Problem finding optimal level of enrichment and
specialisation
Maintaining ‘enrichment’
Concerns about the validity of the theoretical base
Over-taken by speed of technological change
40
41. Some major practical difficulties
What do we mean by ‘performance’?
How can we fairly ‘measure’ performance?
How will we relate ’performance’ with appropriate
reward?
Intrinsic recognition or
Extrinsic reward
Major issues:
Establishing, testing, and maintaining system
Cost effectiveness of such a system e.g. BHP
41
42. Conclusion
Difficult to apply motivational theories in practice
Lots of failures e.g. Volvos JE programmes
Selective use of profit sharing, P-f-P, skill-based
reward systems
Always the question of size and resources
How do NZ SME go about motivating and rewarding
their employees?
‘Family-feel’
‘culture’
Informal
42