The Secret Sauce to Information Architecture for SharePoint. This presentation discusses challenges, strategy, and techniques for creating appropriate information architecture for your SharePoint or Office 365 Sites environment.
DC SPUG Feb 2015 The Secret Sauce to Information Architecture
1. Perfecting Information Architecture (IA):
Exposing the Secret Sauce for Success
Jill Hannemann, Practice Director for SharePoint Advisory
Services
Portal Solutions
February 2, 2015 1
3. About Portal Solutions
We deliver Digital Workplace
Products and Solutions that
help organizations share
what they know and find
what they need by
connecting people, data, and
content.
3
4. What are we going to talk about today?
1. Information Architecture Challenges
2. Secret Sauce for Successful Information
Architecture
3. Information Architecture Best Practices
• Metadata Case Study
4
9. People try to develop their own folder structures. A folder-based
organization doesn’t scale. 9
10. To find content online we need to be speaking the same language. And
that language is called Taxonomy and Metadata. 10
11. Some of the facts…
• Unstructured content = 80% or more of all content
• Need to add structure to make it useful
• Information is about meaning, semantics
• Search is about semantics, not technology
• Can’t Google do it?
• Link Algorithm – human act of meaning
• Doesn’t work in enterprise
• 1,000’s of editors adding meaning
• New technology makes it possible – Text Analytics
11
16. Metadata Applied to Documents
16
Audience
• Internal
• Executives
• Managers
• External
• Suppliers
• Customers
• Partners
Metadata
Topics
• Employee Services
• Compensation
• Retirement
• Insurance
• Further Education
• Support Services
• Infrastructure
• Supplies
• Products and Services
• Finance and Budget
Title
Author
Department
Audience
Topic
17. Metadata per Document Type
Presentations
Forms
Policies
Title
Sub-header
Presenter's Name
Presenter's Title
Date
Classification
Title
Name
Date
Job Title
Department #
Entity
Classification
Title
Policy Number
Department
Last Updated
Classification
METADATA
17
18. IA DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
• Information Architecture (IA)
Secret Sauce for Successful IA
(Navigation, Search, Taxonomy, and Metadata)
Key Ingredients
18
19. IA’s Key Ingredients
Key Ingredients
• Taxonomy and Metadata:
• End user focus
• Think creatively when designing it
• Use simple words based on the organization’s language
• Site Navigation:
• A flatter taxonomy structure with maximum 3 levels
deep
• At least 5 sub-categories per category, but no more than
15
• Avoid overlap between content or duplication of
content
• Search:
• Flexible and dynamic search approach that allows easy
sort and filter based on metadata
• Document Management:
• Content types and classification
• Filtering, searching within libraries and lists
19
25. Building IA: Where to start
• Assessing your needs
• Redesigning…
• Site map?
• Navigation?
• Department site?
• Team site?
• Library/List?
• Audience size will correlate with
your approach
25
Site Map/Nav
Sites
Libraries
Level of Complexity
27. Authentication
The Importance of Content in your Company
27
RecordTemporary
TypeofContent
Instant Message
E-Mail
Social
Team SitesOnline Storage
Intranet
Document/Record Management
Individual Team Enterprise
Audience
32. User Centered Design
32
Optimizing SharePoint to be designed around how users can, want, or need to
use it, rather than forcing them to change their behavior to accommodate it.
33. Taxonomy Build-Out Start
Legacy shared drive folder names and filenames as source of terms
Good as source of terms, not as source of structure
33
Legacy nested folder hierarchy New faceted metadata
To gather and group similar documents
together
To refine and narrower a search by specific
criteria
Designed by person who is uploading and
storing documents for personal use
Designed to help all members of an
enterprise find documents
A document can go into only one folder A document can be assigned multiple
metadata terms
A folder can be located within only one
parent folder
A metadata term may display “under” more
than one metadata facet
May become quite deep e.g. 6-7 levels Not so deep, usually only 2-3 levels
Folder names at deeper levels can become
long and complex
Term names stay simple, since they are
intended to be used in combination
34. A couple rules…One of these things is not like the other…
Maintain consistent degree of generality in
sibling categories. 34
37. Why Card Sorting?
• Card Sorting is a UX research method that seeks to understand how
users mentally classify information and determine what labels best
summarize the contents of that classification.
• Card Sorting can be done to generate labels and categorization
structures, and it can be done to validate them. The best use of card
sorting is the former.
38. Card Sorting Exercise Types
• Open card sorting allows participants to create and name their own categories. Using the
open card sorting method allows you to see how participants mentally classify the cards and
what terms they use as categories.
• Closed card sorting allows you to set and name your categories. This helps you evaluate if
the category names you set provides an effective way of organizing content.
• Hybrid card sorting is a mix of the open and closed card sorting methods. You can set
predetermined categories, but if a participant cannot find a suitable category to sort a card,
you can allow participants to create their own category during the survey.
38
39. Variations on Running the Sort
• Moderated (Facilitated, or focus groups/workshop)
• Facilitator can ask questions
• Leverage a cross organizational group to elicit feedback
• Unmoderated (No context, or online survey)
• No context in the sort
• Users sort based on their interpretation of the cards and categories only
• These can mix and matched based on the project’s needs. The best
case would be to do a few moderated and the rest unmoderated.
39
41. Tips to Pick Cards for Card Sorting
• The card labels should be meaningful to the
participants.
• Never include only existing content. Use
your research and understanding of
business objectives to consider future
content.
• Don’t introduce bias in your cards by using
overly descriptive titles.
• Ensure your cards are exhaustive enough to
get a broad overview but not so exhaustive
that the card sort is tough to complete.
• Meet with the project team to validate your
cards.
• Never include stakeholders/project team in
your card sort with other users.
41
42. Card Sorting Exercise Steps
1. Identify and label the cards (approx. 50).
2. Ask users to sort the cards in the order that makes
sense to them.
42
43. Card Sorting Exercise Steps
1. Identify and label the cards (approx. 50).
2. Ask users to sort the cards in the order that makes
sense to them.
3. Once the results are in, analyze the data and
identify any similarities using visuals and statistics.
43
51. Taxonomy Workshops and Focus Groups
• 1-2 days of guided discussions to define taxonomy, metadata, and related terms
consistently.
• Create a “Starter Taxonomy” and initial metadata strategy.
51
52. Taxonomy Workshops and Focus Groups
Target Audience
• Cross-organizational group
of subject matter experts
and project owners from key
business units
• Max. 12-15 attendees
52
55. Best Practices for Information Architecture
Facilitate cross-
organizational taxonomy
sessions
Identify all possible
audiences
Refine and validate the
taxonomy through various
iterations
Implement a change
management strategy Have a clear plan to
build your site
55
56. Best Practices for Information Architecture
Gain Management
Support
Map Legacy Data to
New Taxonomies for
Content Migration
Communicate the
Evolving Nature of
Taxonomy
Identify Metadata for
Documents
Content Governance
56
57. Final Thoughts
• What are your company’s main Information Architecture needs?
• Are you or your colleagues struggling to find content in your
company’s Intranet?
• What card sorting methodology could you use in your organization to
help improve content categorization? Online card sort? A workshop?
57
60. Case Study
• 2,000-employee company in the health care industry, a
highly regulated field.
• Frequent records inspections from global regulatory
agencies.
60
61. Business Case Details
• Project Scope: Design and implement a pointer system in
SharePoint 2010 for multiple electronic and hard copy
document repositories related to different products.
• Project Timeframe
Requirements Design Implementation Support
Nov 2013 – Feb 2014 Feb 2014 – Aug 2014
61
62. Business Case
• Disparate databases applications, file shares
• Electronic and hard copy records
• Records search could take weeks or months!
The Challenge
• Short project timeframe (audit from a Regulatory
Agency)
• Limited Resources (SMEs)
The Project
Constraints
• Taxonomy/Metadata Workshops
• Metadata analysis from existing repositories
• SharePoint 2010 Best Practices
The Methodology
• SharePoint 2010 Records Search System
• Metadata, Managed Metadata, Content Types
• Advanced Search, Search Refiners
The Solution
62
64. Project Scope
• SharePoint-based document records search system
• Central metadata-based source of document records
• A pointer system to multiple document repositories
Document Records
Search System
- Record Title
- Record Type
- Date
- Author
64
69. Managed Metadata: Term store, Term Sets
and Terms
• Example: Document Types hierarchy and synonyms.
69
70. SharePoint 2010 Search Features
• List - Sort and Filter features
• List - Managed Metadata Navigation feature
• List - Key Filters feature
• Basic Search
• Advanced Search
• Refiners in the Search Results Page
70
71. Search: List - Sort and Filter features
• Example: Ability to sort the “Title” column in ascending or descending order, or to
filter by individual document title.
71
72. Search: List - Managed Metadata Navigation
• The Managed Metadata is configured to filter
two of the most important Managed Metadata
fields : Document Type and CTD Section.
72
73. Search: List - Key Filters feature
• Four Key Filters help users look
for content in the Document
Records list.
1. Document Approval Date
2. Document Effective Date
3. Document Type
4. Section Number
73
74. Search: Advanced Search
• Search for content based on specific metadata values (Properties).
Section Number
Document Type
FMC Code
Jurisdiction
Market
Molecule
Product Name
Receiving Site
Regions
Sending Site
Site Ownership
Test Methods
Trade Name
74
75. Search: Refiners in the Search Results Page
• Refiners assist users in finding the specific document records they are looking for
75
Hinweis der Redaktion
We are Knowledge Management and Taxonomy specialists, and as you can imagine, we love organizing “stuff” Whether it is stuff at home, or information at work. Categorizing content. Identifying metadata. Helping organizations design systems that allow them to find the information they are looking for.
Adam Edit
Clients come to us when they feel overwhelmed in their email inbox where it seems that it is the only tool their team is using to communicate information, they are buried in their inboxes trying to track what version of a file attachment is right or wrong. Their employees are frustrated with the inability to find a resource to help them to do their jobs or a past work product that would jump start their tasks. They end up being embarrassed when someone send the wrong version of a proposal or the wrong work product that erodes the customer or employees confidence. Often their employees feel dis-engaged and not connected.
Of all the people we meet with, we find that we a great fit for only about half of those organizations. And it those cases, we can deliver dramatic results.
We don’t know if we are a good fit for you but if addressing those issues is something that is important to you, we should try to find out more about the issues and impacts
Some of my clients often express their frustration with Search:
“Search doesn’t work”
“I can’t find what I’m looking for”
IA is a relevant topic for almost every organization.
Site navigation, multiple content sources, where to go?
We may be looking for very specific content. That one piece of content that could be a document or a customer record. But how can we easily find it among the vast amount of content that exists on our organizations?
We found this cartoon and thought that it described pretty well what I was going to present today!
“As they say, the devil is in the details”
Shoes by size, color, style…
So, what are the key ingredients that will help you develop a successful IA?
IA consists of your site navigation, search, taxonomy and metadata.
Shared drive folders were the primary source of terms. Other sources included stakeholder interviews and a taxonomy start created internally, but not according to standards (thus used as a source of terms, not structure)