SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 14
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
Formulation (G1) Preparation (G2) Plan, Authorize, Execute Components Closure (G5)
PROGRAM DEFINITION PROGRAM DELIVERY PROGRAM CLOSURE
PROGRAM
PHASE GATE LIFECYCLE
Strategy
Deployment
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
GATE 2
PROGRAM PREPARATION
Formulation (G1) Preparation (G2) Plan, Authorize, Execute Components Closure (G5)
PROGRAM DEFINITION PROGRAM DELIVERY PROGRAM CLOSURE
Gate 2
60 Min Presentation
Strategy
Deployment
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
-
1. Scope and Prioritization
2. Organizational Structure
3. Component Management Plan
4. User Requirements
5. Benefits Register
6. Program Roadmap
7. Financial Picture
8. Human Resource Staffing Plan
9. Risk Management Plan
10. Communications Plan
3
Approval Required
Review, Recommend Change
Approval Required
Approval Required
Approval Required
Review, Recommend Change
Approval Required
Review, Recommend Change
Approval Required
ExpectationsDocuments for Review
G2
Documents and Approval Expectations
Approval Required
Program Execution Plan
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
SCOPE AND PRIORITIZATION
4
I. VISION (REVISED)
[A one-sentence statement describing long-term desired change
resulting from this effort. What issue/opportunity will this
program provide the site?]
II. SCOPE (FINAL)
[Provide high level Scope Statement that will be used for all future
P3MO data collection]
IV. OUT OF SCOPE
[What is excluded from the scope of this project.]
[Program/Breakthrough Title]
[Project
Component 1]
[Project
Component 2]
[Project
Component 3]
[Project
Component 4]
[Project
Component 5]
III. COMPONENTS Approved - In Execution Not Approved Yet
Phase 2Phase 1
# Key Success Factors
1 (ex: High Level Sponsorship)
2
(Ex: Unified program governance with a High level of
involvement from all Business Partners and shared objectives
with business leaders)
3 (ex: Change management Program)
[REVISED FROM GATE 1]
V. PRIMARY BENEFITS (FINAL)
# Benefit Category Program Objective/Outcome to Realize Benefit
1
[Insert Primary
benefit categories
located on right. Ex:
Cost of Goods]
[Insert the Program Objective that must be
accomplished to demonstrate contribution to this
Benefit Category – Desired End State or Outcome]
2
[Insert Secondary
benefit category
located on right]
[Insert the Program Objective that must be
accomplished to demonstrate contribution to this
Benefit Category – Desired End State or Outcome]
3
[Insert Other key
benefit category
located on right]
[Insert the Program Objective that must be
accomplished to demonstrate contribution to this
Benefit Category – Desired End State or Outcome]
[benefit Driver –>]
FEASIBILITY
ATTRACTIVENESS
[SCORE]
[SCORE]
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
6
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
VI. STEERING COMMITTEE [REVISED]
[Insert Comments]
VII. CORE TEAM
Role Dept Name Primary Responsibilities
Sponsor [dept] [Name]
PgM [dept] [Name]
Lead End User [dept] [Name]
[other] [dept] [Name]
[other] [dept] [Name]
Role Dept Name Primary Responsibilities
Sponsor [dept] [Name]
PgM [dept] [Name]
Lead End User [dept] [Name]
[other] [dept] [Name]
[other] [dept] [Name]
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
Operate
as a
Network
Supply
Product
Reliably
Drive
Adapt-
ability
[Process] [#] [#] [#]
8
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
COMPONENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
VIII. PROCESS TO INITIATE, TERMINATE, AND TRANSITION COMPONENTS
INITIATE: [This section describes the process and the criteria the board follows to initiate new components to be part of the program]
[Example:
• New or Unapproved Components: Any new or previously unapproved components/projects must present their Gate 1’s and 2s to the full
Portfolio Council to be included in the program’s scope].
• Approved Components: The Program Steering Committee will have the authority to approve supporting Gate 1 and Gate 2’s for ALL
components/projects listed in this Program’s Gate 2 Program Execution Plan.
• Note: All components will be required to submit Gate 1s (Business Cases) and Gate 2 (PEPs and URSs) to the P3MO for Program Archive.
CANCEL / TERMINATE COMPONENTS: [This section describes the process and the criteria the board follows to terminate approved components]
[Example:
• Impacting Benefit Delivery: Program Steering Committee with have the authority to terminate ANY components listed in this Program’s
Gate 2 that don’t impact the program’s ability to deliver on the expected benefits
• Not Impacting Benefit Delivery: All terminations that impact the program’s ability to deliver on the expected benefits must be approved
the Portfolio Council. Also, the Program Steering Committee will notify the P3MO and Key Program Stakeholders.
TRANSITION: [This section describes the process and the criteria the board follows to transition components when the work is complete and
benefits have been realized.]
[Example:
• Completed Requirements: Program Steering Committee with have the authority to transition ANY components using the P3MO closeout
process, once they feel they have achieved the scope and transition plan.
• Escalation: All transitions must be escalated to the P3MO and Key Program Stakeholders. Additionally, the P3MO will notify the Portfolio
Council via needed levels of urgency.]
• Note: All components will be required to submit Gate 5s (Closeout Docs) to the P3MO for Program Archive.
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
[USER REQUIREMENTS]
<Comments>
# Category Requirement User Acceptance Criteria for Transition into Operations Due Date
1 Functionality <process, integration, standard> [Expected Transition state – What does “done” look like?]
2 Technical <material, utility, other technical> [Expected Transition state – What does done look like?]
3 Usability
<ease of Use, Documentation,
Impact>
[Expected Transition state – What does done look like?]
4 Performance
<availability, responsiveness,
reliability, Capability, scalability,
validation>
[Expected Transition state – What does done look like?]
5 Regulatory <Pharmaceutical, legal, Safety> [Expected Transition state – What does done look like?]
IX. USER REQUIREMENTS (PROVIDED BY LEAD END USER)
10
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
13
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
BENEFITS REGISTER
#
Benefit
Category or
Type
Benefit to be
delivered
(SMART)
Component(s)
contributing to
Benefit
Measurement
Method
Benefit
Owner
KPI
Baseline
KPI
Target
Full
realizatio
n date
Yr1
Yr2
Yr3
Yr4
1
[Ex:
Headcount]
[Example:
Save 150
man-hours in
QC Lab by
2016]
• [Project X]
• [Project y]
• [Project z]
[ex: QC
Method Testing
Standard
Process
Assessment]
[Name,
Dept]
[Ex:
500hrs}
[Ex:350hrs] [date]
100
%
2 [Ex: Yield]
[Example:
Increase Yield
by 30% in
Suite 1 by
2017]
• [Project X]
• [Project y]
• [Project z]
[What is
the
baseline
that the
site is at
now]
[KPI Target
to achieve
success]
[date] 40%
100
%
3
[Ex:
Capacity]
[Example:
Increase
Capacity by
30% in Suite 2
by 2017]
• [Project X]
• [Project y]
• [Project z]
[What is
the
baseline
that the
site is at
now]
[What is
the KPI
Target to
achieve
success]
[date] 20% 40%
100
%
X. BENEFITS REGISTER
SLIDE MUST BE PREPARED IN COLLABORATION WITH FINANCE.
[EXPANDED FROM GATE 1]
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
17
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
PROGRAM ROADMAP AND
PHASE GATE SCHEDULE
XIII. PROGRAM ROADMAP PROGRAM KICKOFF: [DATE] CLOSE: [DATE]
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
CRITICAL PATH
PROJECTS
[PROJECT 1] [PROJECT 2] [PROJECT 3]
[PHASE 1]
[PHASE 2]
[PHASE 1]
ENABLING
PROJECTS
[PROJECT 4]
[PHASE 2]
[PROJECT 6]
[PROJECT 7]
[PROJECT 5]
ENABLING
PROJECTS
CRITICAL PATH
PROJECTS
[PROJECT 11]
[PROJECT 13]
[PROJECT 12]
1 2 3
[Milestone] [Milestone] [Milestone]
[Benefit
Delivered
at
end of
Phase 1]
[PROJECT 8] [PROJECT 9] [PROJECT 10]4 5 6
[Milestone] [Milestone] [Milestone]
[Benefit
Delivered
at
end of
Phase 2]
XII. PHASE GATE SCHEDULE
Benefit Delivery (G3)
Council Approves Request for Phase 2 of Execution [Start – End Date]
Closure (G5)
Transition to Benefit Sustainment Phase
[Target Date]
[EXPANDED FROM GATE 1]
Schedu
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
20
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS
(~80% ACCURACY)
SLIDE MUST BE PREPARED IN COLLABORATION WITH FINANCE.
Total Cost / Annual Spend [Year 1] [Year 2] [Year 3] [Year 4]
CapEx $$ $$ $$ $$
OpEx $$ $$ $$ $$
IX. FINANCIAL PLAN
Total Savings [Year 1] [Year 2] [Year 3] [Year 4] [Year 5]
Savings per Year $$ $$
X. FUNDING ROADMAP (AED)
[Year 1] [Year 2]
Project OpEx CapEx LRP Year Phased Funding Req'd
Last Gate
Completed
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
[Project 1] $XX $XX N/A
Yes:
Phase 1 - $X QX201X
Phase 2 - $X QX201X
Gate 0
AED
Approval
[date]
[Project 2] $XX $XX 201X None
AED Approval
[date]
[Project 3] $XX $XX 201X
AED
Approval
[date]
[Project 4] $XX $XX 201X
AED Approval
[date]
[Project 5] $XX $XX 201X
AED Approval
[date]
Total
CapEx
Total
OpEx
$$ $$ $$
Total
Savings
Max 1-Year
Savings
$$ $$NPV
[EXPANDED FROM GATE 1]
AED Approval needed
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
21
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
HUMAN RESOURCE
STAFFING PLAN
ROLE DEPT NAME Responsibilities
QX
YR
QX
YR
QX
YR
QX
YR
Avg
LOE %
Total
Hrs
Mgr
Approve
(Y, N)
Known
conflicting
priorities
Sponsor
Accountable for the business case. Ensures
robust drivers for investing resources in this
initiative, and ensures the drivers remain
robust throughout the initiative’s lifecycle.
[LOE
% or
Hrs]
[LOE
% or
Hrs]
[LOE
% or
Hrs]
[LOE
% or
Hrs]
[50%]
[180
hrs]
PM/PgM
Accountable for the planning and execution of
the initiative, as well as identifying and
escalating field conditions that can impact the
business case.
Lead End User
Accountable for ensuring the end products are
fit for purpose. Will incorporate the future
state delivered by this initiative into their
business as usual operations.
PM – Proj 1
PM – Proj 2
PM – Proj 3
PM – Proj 4
PM – Proj 5
SME
<Team
Member>
<Team
Member>
<Team
Member>
Avg FTE’s Per Qtr
XI. HUMAN RESOURCES
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
RISK MGT PLAN
Risk Strategy: The Program initial risk assessment is above. This will be actively managed throughout the program execution phase. A clear
communication path has been established for all risks – program and project specific. These risks will be reported bi-weekly through the PMO
reporting tool by the L3 and L2 scheduler and responsible PMs, reviewed and escalated to the Program Manager and Sponsor as applicable,
via the mechanism detailed below.
• The risk owners and work stream leads will monitor risks and mitigation plans associated with their Level 3 schedules. The status updates,
identification of new risks, and trending of recurring risks will be monitored by the program controls team through updates to the PMO
reporting tool.
• The Program leadership and steering committee will monitor and mitigate risks that impact adherence to the Level 2 schedule or those
risks that impact multiple workstreams (e.g. resource challenges).
Risks will be escalated in the following order:
• Level 3 Risks will be managed through the PM (as appropriate)
• Level 2 Risks will be managed by the Program leadership team (weekly meeting)
• Level 2 Risks that cannot be managed by the Program Leadership team will be escalated to Program Steering (biweekly meeting).
• Level 2 Risks that cannot be managed by the Program Steering Committee will be escalated to the Program Sponsor (biweekly meeting).
XII. RISK REGISTER
# Type of Risk Benefit At Risk Potential Impact Prob Sev Recommended Mitigation
1
[project dependency,
Resources, Schedule, Cost,
Scope, Benefit, Quality]
[Describe how these add
Risk to delivery of the
intended benefits]
[project dependency,
Resources, Schedule,
Cost, Scope, Benefit,
Quality]
[rating] [rating]
[List any how your project will mitigate these
challenges]
2
3
4
5
[EXPANDED FROM GATE 1]
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
23
# Topic Expected Outcome Target Audience Forum Frequency Responsible Actions Target Date
1 [Performance Reporting]
[What result
do we want
from this
communicatio
n?]
[Intended
recipient of
communication
(Site, SLT,
Managers, HR,
etc)]
[What method
of
communication
will we use?
(Allston Today,
EMT, Town Hall,
SLT, etc)]
[What will be
the
frequency]
Who is
responsible
[What
actions are
required to
prepare this]
[Message
Delivery
Date]
2 [Risks and Escalations]
3 [Change Requests]
4 [Key Decisions]
5 [Training]
6 [Knowledge Repository]
7 [Processes]
8
[Policies and Policy
Updates]
9 [Tools]
10 [Organizational Updates]
11
[Voice of Customer
Feedback or Input]
GATE 2 – PREPARATION
COMMUNICATIONS PLAN
XIII. COMMUNICATION PLAN
SPONSOR: [NAME]
PGM: [NAME]
PROG # [INSERT #]
PROGRAM: [NAME]
+QDCI:
[SELECT
DRIVERS]
-
1. Scope and Prioritization
2. Program Organizational Structure
3. Component Management Plan
4. User Requirements
5. Benefits Register
6. Program Roadmap
7. Financial Requirements
8. Human Resource Staffing Plan
9. Risk Management Plan
10. Communications Plan
24
Gate DecisionDocuments Reviewed
G2
Approval
Status
• Approval: Benefit proposed is worth
resources needed to execute
• Return: Return to this Gate with more
information or different options before
proceeding
• Cancelled: No further effort on this
initiative will be made; work and resources
stoppage
Program Execution Plan
Approved More Info Required Not Approved
Approved More Info Required Not Approved
Approved More Info Required Not Approved
Approved More Info Required Not Approved
Approved More Info Required Not Approved
Cancelled
G0 - Approved
Return
Approved More Info Required Not Approved
Approved More Info Required Not Approved
Approved More Info Required Not Approved

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Project Closure Report
Project Closure ReportProject Closure Report
Project Closure Report
Adam Edwards
 
Change management plan
Change management planChange management plan
Change management plan
dutchy49
 
SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01
SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01
SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01
Steven Leahy
 
Progress control
Progress controlProgress control
Progress control
ashamarsha
 
Project Execution and PM Elements
Project Execution and PM ElementsProject Execution and PM Elements
Project Execution and PM Elements
haroldtaylor1113
 

Was ist angesagt? (18)

Project Execution Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Execution Powerpoint Presentation SlidesProject Execution Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Execution Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
Project Closure Report
Project Closure ReportProject Closure Report
Project Closure Report
 
Project management processes Groups
Project management processes GroupsProject management processes Groups
Project management processes Groups
 
Project manager project-plan-template-cm
Project manager project-plan-template-cmProject manager project-plan-template-cm
Project manager project-plan-template-cm
 
04 project integration management
04  project integration management04  project integration management
04 project integration management
 
Final Project Closing
Final Project ClosingFinal Project Closing
Final Project Closing
 
Project Scope Managemen Final Megat
Project Scope Managemen Final MegatProject Scope Managemen Final Megat
Project Scope Managemen Final Megat
 
Project management plan
Project management planProject management plan
Project management plan
 
Pep
PepPep
Pep
 
New Media Management - Project plan
New Media Management - Project planNew Media Management - Project plan
New Media Management - Project plan
 
Change management plan
Change management planChange management plan
Change management plan
 
Pmp t09 project_execution_plan_rev_a
Pmp t09 project_execution_plan_rev_aPmp t09 project_execution_plan_rev_a
Pmp t09 project_execution_plan_rev_a
 
SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01
SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01
SLeahy - Unit 5 Assignment - IT599-01
 
Progress control
Progress controlProgress control
Progress control
 
Project closure template v3.0
Project closure template v3.0Project closure template v3.0
Project closure template v3.0
 
behavioural science groups
behavioural science groupsbehavioural science groups
behavioural science groups
 
Project Execution and PM Elements
Project Execution and PM ElementsProject Execution and PM Elements
Project Execution and PM Elements
 
Risk response planning
Risk response planningRisk response planning
Risk response planning
 

Andere mochten auch

Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016
Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016
Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016
Jeff Jvancich
 
Program Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEAN
Program Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEANProgram Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEAN
Program Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEAN
Jen Braly, PgMP, PMP
 
Downloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management Webinar
Downloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management WebinarDownloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management Webinar
Downloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management Webinar
Think For A Change
 
Project Risk assesment matrix
Project Risk assesment matrixProject Risk assesment matrix
Project Risk assesment matrix
Kashif Mastan
 
Project Implementation Process
Project Implementation ProcessProject Implementation Process
Project Implementation Process
eklaksh
 
Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...
Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...
Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...
TURKI , PMP
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016
Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016
Jeff Jvancich Resume 2016
 
Pivots and Slicers_v5
Pivots and Slicers_v5Pivots and Slicers_v5
Pivots and Slicers_v5
 
Ias sl atrack-guard tour monitoring ver1
Ias sl atrack-guard tour monitoring ver1Ias sl atrack-guard tour monitoring ver1
Ias sl atrack-guard tour monitoring ver1
 
Program Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEAN
Program Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEANProgram Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEAN
Program Dashboards and Scorecards_CLEAN
 
PMO_OneRingDB_CLEAN
PMO_OneRingDB_CLEANPMO_OneRingDB_CLEAN
PMO_OneRingDB_CLEAN
 
Downloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management Webinar
Downloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management WebinarDownloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management Webinar
Downloadable Slide Presentation from the Innovation Portfolio Management Webinar
 
Project management _ cheat sheet _no1
Project management _ cheat sheet _no1Project management _ cheat sheet _no1
Project management _ cheat sheet _no1
 
Project Risk assesment matrix
Project Risk assesment matrixProject Risk assesment matrix
Project Risk assesment matrix
 
Risk assesment template
Risk assesment templateRisk assesment template
Risk assesment template
 
Product Management Stage-Gate Process (Sample)
Product Management Stage-Gate Process (Sample)Product Management Stage-Gate Process (Sample)
Product Management Stage-Gate Process (Sample)
 
Program Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd Edition
Program Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd EditionProgram Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd Edition
Program Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd Edition
 
Program Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd Edition - Simplified Version
Program Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd Edition - Simplified VersionProgram Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd Edition - Simplified Version
Program Management Processes Flow in English - 3rd Edition - Simplified Version
 
Best Practices - Project Management & Implementation
Best Practices - Project Management & ImplementationBest Practices - Project Management & Implementation
Best Practices - Project Management & Implementation
 
Project Implementation Process
Project Implementation ProcessProject Implementation Process
Project Implementation Process
 
Project governance
Project governanceProject governance
Project governance
 
Project Implementation
Project ImplementationProject Implementation
Project Implementation
 
Learning pmp formulas the easy way
Learning pmp formulas the easy wayLearning pmp formulas the easy way
Learning pmp formulas the easy way
 
Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...
Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...
Free PMP notes,Free PMP Study Material,Free PMP Chapter wise notes,PMP Exam N...
 
PMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in English
PMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in EnglishPMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in English
PMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in English
 
PMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in English - Simplified Version
PMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in English - Simplified VersionPMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in English - Simplified Version
PMBOK® Guide 5th edition Processes Flow in English - Simplified Version
 

Ähnlich wie G2_Program Phase Gate Template_CLEAN

Supporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructions
Supporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructionsSupporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructions
Supporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructions
usha raj
 
[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx
[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx
[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx
danielfoster65629
 
BRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentation
BRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentationBRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentation
BRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentation
Kyle D. Gearhart
 
Gonzales.matthew
Gonzales.matthewGonzales.matthew
Gonzales.matthew
NASAPMC
 
Production Deployment of the New Integrator Project C.docx
Production Deployment of the New Integrator  Project C.docxProduction Deployment of the New Integrator  Project C.docx
Production Deployment of the New Integrator Project C.docx
briancrawford30935
 

Ähnlich wie G2_Program Phase Gate Template_CLEAN (20)

project-charter-template (9 pages).docx
project-charter-template (9 pages).docxproject-charter-template (9 pages).docx
project-charter-template (9 pages).docx
 
Supporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructions
Supporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructionsSupporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructions
Supporting schedule-management-plan-template-with-instructions
 
Software development plan template
Software development plan templateSoftware development plan template
Software development plan template
 
Softwaredevelopmentplantemplate 170323125907
Softwaredevelopmentplantemplate 170323125907Softwaredevelopmentplantemplate 170323125907
Softwaredevelopmentplantemplate 170323125907
 
[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx
[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx
[Insert System Name (Acronym)]Security Categorization Moderat.docx
 
The Case for Project Management Software
The Case for Project Management SoftwareThe Case for Project Management Software
The Case for Project Management Software
 
BRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentation
BRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentationBRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentation
BRQ_PortfolioMgmt BRQPresentation
 
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
 
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
 
Gonzales.matthew
Gonzales.matthewGonzales.matthew
Gonzales.matthew
 
Project Management Methodology for Site Launches
Project Management Methodology for Site LaunchesProject Management Methodology for Site Launches
Project Management Methodology for Site Launches
 
Production Deployment of the New Integrator Project C.docx
Production Deployment of the New Integrator  Project C.docxProduction Deployment of the New Integrator  Project C.docx
Production Deployment of the New Integrator Project C.docx
 
Tables Presentation Refinery Overhauling
Tables Presentation Refinery OverhaulingTables Presentation Refinery Overhauling
Tables Presentation Refinery Overhauling
 
PM process groups and processes
PM process groups and processesPM process groups and processes
PM process groups and processes
 
Project charter template
Project charter templateProject charter template
Project charter template
 
D07 Project Charter
D07 Project CharterD07 Project Charter
D07 Project Charter
 
CMMI.ppt
CMMI.pptCMMI.ppt
CMMI.ppt
 
PM-Project Closing-UiTM Project
PM-Project Closing-UiTM ProjectPM-Project Closing-UiTM Project
PM-Project Closing-UiTM Project
 
15 Deliv template
15 Deliv template15 Deliv template
15 Deliv template
 
IMP IMS overview
IMP IMS overviewIMP IMS overview
IMP IMS overview
 

G2_Program Phase Gate Template_CLEAN

  • 1. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] Formulation (G1) Preparation (G2) Plan, Authorize, Execute Components Closure (G5) PROGRAM DEFINITION PROGRAM DELIVERY PROGRAM CLOSURE PROGRAM PHASE GATE LIFECYCLE Strategy Deployment
  • 2. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] GATE 2 PROGRAM PREPARATION Formulation (G1) Preparation (G2) Plan, Authorize, Execute Components Closure (G5) PROGRAM DEFINITION PROGRAM DELIVERY PROGRAM CLOSURE Gate 2 60 Min Presentation Strategy Deployment
  • 3. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] - 1. Scope and Prioritization 2. Organizational Structure 3. Component Management Plan 4. User Requirements 5. Benefits Register 6. Program Roadmap 7. Financial Picture 8. Human Resource Staffing Plan 9. Risk Management Plan 10. Communications Plan 3 Approval Required Review, Recommend Change Approval Required Approval Required Approval Required Review, Recommend Change Approval Required Review, Recommend Change Approval Required ExpectationsDocuments for Review G2 Documents and Approval Expectations Approval Required Program Execution Plan
  • 4. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] GATE 2 – PREPARATION SCOPE AND PRIORITIZATION 4 I. VISION (REVISED) [A one-sentence statement describing long-term desired change resulting from this effort. What issue/opportunity will this program provide the site?] II. SCOPE (FINAL) [Provide high level Scope Statement that will be used for all future P3MO data collection] IV. OUT OF SCOPE [What is excluded from the scope of this project.] [Program/Breakthrough Title] [Project Component 1] [Project Component 2] [Project Component 3] [Project Component 4] [Project Component 5] III. COMPONENTS Approved - In Execution Not Approved Yet Phase 2Phase 1 # Key Success Factors 1 (ex: High Level Sponsorship) 2 (Ex: Unified program governance with a High level of involvement from all Business Partners and shared objectives with business leaders) 3 (ex: Change management Program) [REVISED FROM GATE 1] V. PRIMARY BENEFITS (FINAL) # Benefit Category Program Objective/Outcome to Realize Benefit 1 [Insert Primary benefit categories located on right. Ex: Cost of Goods] [Insert the Program Objective that must be accomplished to demonstrate contribution to this Benefit Category – Desired End State or Outcome] 2 [Insert Secondary benefit category located on right] [Insert the Program Objective that must be accomplished to demonstrate contribution to this Benefit Category – Desired End State or Outcome] 3 [Insert Other key benefit category located on right] [Insert the Program Objective that must be accomplished to demonstrate contribution to this Benefit Category – Desired End State or Outcome] [benefit Driver –>] FEASIBILITY ATTRACTIVENESS [SCORE] [SCORE]
  • 5. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] 6 GATE 2 – PREPARATION ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE VI. STEERING COMMITTEE [REVISED] [Insert Comments] VII. CORE TEAM Role Dept Name Primary Responsibilities Sponsor [dept] [Name] PgM [dept] [Name] Lead End User [dept] [Name] [other] [dept] [Name] [other] [dept] [Name] Role Dept Name Primary Responsibilities Sponsor [dept] [Name] PgM [dept] [Name] Lead End User [dept] [Name] [other] [dept] [Name] [other] [dept] [Name]
  • 6. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] Operate as a Network Supply Product Reliably Drive Adapt- ability [Process] [#] [#] [#] 8 GATE 2 – PREPARATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PLAN VIII. PROCESS TO INITIATE, TERMINATE, AND TRANSITION COMPONENTS INITIATE: [This section describes the process and the criteria the board follows to initiate new components to be part of the program] [Example: • New or Unapproved Components: Any new or previously unapproved components/projects must present their Gate 1’s and 2s to the full Portfolio Council to be included in the program’s scope]. • Approved Components: The Program Steering Committee will have the authority to approve supporting Gate 1 and Gate 2’s for ALL components/projects listed in this Program’s Gate 2 Program Execution Plan. • Note: All components will be required to submit Gate 1s (Business Cases) and Gate 2 (PEPs and URSs) to the P3MO for Program Archive. CANCEL / TERMINATE COMPONENTS: [This section describes the process and the criteria the board follows to terminate approved components] [Example: • Impacting Benefit Delivery: Program Steering Committee with have the authority to terminate ANY components listed in this Program’s Gate 2 that don’t impact the program’s ability to deliver on the expected benefits • Not Impacting Benefit Delivery: All terminations that impact the program’s ability to deliver on the expected benefits must be approved the Portfolio Council. Also, the Program Steering Committee will notify the P3MO and Key Program Stakeholders. TRANSITION: [This section describes the process and the criteria the board follows to transition components when the work is complete and benefits have been realized.] [Example: • Completed Requirements: Program Steering Committee with have the authority to transition ANY components using the P3MO closeout process, once they feel they have achieved the scope and transition plan. • Escalation: All transitions must be escalated to the P3MO and Key Program Stakeholders. Additionally, the P3MO will notify the Portfolio Council via needed levels of urgency.] • Note: All components will be required to submit Gate 5s (Closeout Docs) to the P3MO for Program Archive.
  • 7. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] GATE 2 – PREPARATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS [USER REQUIREMENTS] <Comments> # Category Requirement User Acceptance Criteria for Transition into Operations Due Date 1 Functionality <process, integration, standard> [Expected Transition state – What does “done” look like?] 2 Technical <material, utility, other technical> [Expected Transition state – What does done look like?] 3 Usability <ease of Use, Documentation, Impact> [Expected Transition state – What does done look like?] 4 Performance <availability, responsiveness, reliability, Capability, scalability, validation> [Expected Transition state – What does done look like?] 5 Regulatory <Pharmaceutical, legal, Safety> [Expected Transition state – What does done look like?] IX. USER REQUIREMENTS (PROVIDED BY LEAD END USER) 10
  • 8. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] 13 GATE 2 – PREPARATION BENEFITS REGISTER # Benefit Category or Type Benefit to be delivered (SMART) Component(s) contributing to Benefit Measurement Method Benefit Owner KPI Baseline KPI Target Full realizatio n date Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 1 [Ex: Headcount] [Example: Save 150 man-hours in QC Lab by 2016] • [Project X] • [Project y] • [Project z] [ex: QC Method Testing Standard Process Assessment] [Name, Dept] [Ex: 500hrs} [Ex:350hrs] [date] 100 % 2 [Ex: Yield] [Example: Increase Yield by 30% in Suite 1 by 2017] • [Project X] • [Project y] • [Project z] [What is the baseline that the site is at now] [KPI Target to achieve success] [date] 40% 100 % 3 [Ex: Capacity] [Example: Increase Capacity by 30% in Suite 2 by 2017] • [Project X] • [Project y] • [Project z] [What is the baseline that the site is at now] [What is the KPI Target to achieve success] [date] 20% 40% 100 % X. BENEFITS REGISTER SLIDE MUST BE PREPARED IN COLLABORATION WITH FINANCE. [EXPANDED FROM GATE 1]
  • 9. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] 17 GATE 2 – PREPARATION PROGRAM ROADMAP AND PHASE GATE SCHEDULE XIII. PROGRAM ROADMAP PROGRAM KICKOFF: [DATE] CLOSE: [DATE] 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 CRITICAL PATH PROJECTS [PROJECT 1] [PROJECT 2] [PROJECT 3] [PHASE 1] [PHASE 2] [PHASE 1] ENABLING PROJECTS [PROJECT 4] [PHASE 2] [PROJECT 6] [PROJECT 7] [PROJECT 5] ENABLING PROJECTS CRITICAL PATH PROJECTS [PROJECT 11] [PROJECT 13] [PROJECT 12] 1 2 3 [Milestone] [Milestone] [Milestone] [Benefit Delivered at end of Phase 1] [PROJECT 8] [PROJECT 9] [PROJECT 10]4 5 6 [Milestone] [Milestone] [Milestone] [Benefit Delivered at end of Phase 2] XII. PHASE GATE SCHEDULE Benefit Delivery (G3) Council Approves Request for Phase 2 of Execution [Start – End Date] Closure (G5) Transition to Benefit Sustainment Phase [Target Date] [EXPANDED FROM GATE 1] Schedu
  • 10. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] 20 GATE 2 – PREPARATION FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS (~80% ACCURACY) SLIDE MUST BE PREPARED IN COLLABORATION WITH FINANCE. Total Cost / Annual Spend [Year 1] [Year 2] [Year 3] [Year 4] CapEx $$ $$ $$ $$ OpEx $$ $$ $$ $$ IX. FINANCIAL PLAN Total Savings [Year 1] [Year 2] [Year 3] [Year 4] [Year 5] Savings per Year $$ $$ X. FUNDING ROADMAP (AED) [Year 1] [Year 2] Project OpEx CapEx LRP Year Phased Funding Req'd Last Gate Completed Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 [Project 1] $XX $XX N/A Yes: Phase 1 - $X QX201X Phase 2 - $X QX201X Gate 0 AED Approval [date] [Project 2] $XX $XX 201X None AED Approval [date] [Project 3] $XX $XX 201X AED Approval [date] [Project 4] $XX $XX 201X AED Approval [date] [Project 5] $XX $XX 201X AED Approval [date] Total CapEx Total OpEx $$ $$ $$ Total Savings Max 1-Year Savings $$ $$NPV [EXPANDED FROM GATE 1] AED Approval needed
  • 11. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] 21 GATE 2 – PREPARATION HUMAN RESOURCE STAFFING PLAN ROLE DEPT NAME Responsibilities QX YR QX YR QX YR QX YR Avg LOE % Total Hrs Mgr Approve (Y, N) Known conflicting priorities Sponsor Accountable for the business case. Ensures robust drivers for investing resources in this initiative, and ensures the drivers remain robust throughout the initiative’s lifecycle. [LOE % or Hrs] [LOE % or Hrs] [LOE % or Hrs] [LOE % or Hrs] [50%] [180 hrs] PM/PgM Accountable for the planning and execution of the initiative, as well as identifying and escalating field conditions that can impact the business case. Lead End User Accountable for ensuring the end products are fit for purpose. Will incorporate the future state delivered by this initiative into their business as usual operations. PM – Proj 1 PM – Proj 2 PM – Proj 3 PM – Proj 4 PM – Proj 5 SME <Team Member> <Team Member> <Team Member> Avg FTE’s Per Qtr XI. HUMAN RESOURCES
  • 12. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] GATE 2 – PREPARATION RISK MGT PLAN Risk Strategy: The Program initial risk assessment is above. This will be actively managed throughout the program execution phase. A clear communication path has been established for all risks – program and project specific. These risks will be reported bi-weekly through the PMO reporting tool by the L3 and L2 scheduler and responsible PMs, reviewed and escalated to the Program Manager and Sponsor as applicable, via the mechanism detailed below. • The risk owners and work stream leads will monitor risks and mitigation plans associated with their Level 3 schedules. The status updates, identification of new risks, and trending of recurring risks will be monitored by the program controls team through updates to the PMO reporting tool. • The Program leadership and steering committee will monitor and mitigate risks that impact adherence to the Level 2 schedule or those risks that impact multiple workstreams (e.g. resource challenges). Risks will be escalated in the following order: • Level 3 Risks will be managed through the PM (as appropriate) • Level 2 Risks will be managed by the Program leadership team (weekly meeting) • Level 2 Risks that cannot be managed by the Program Leadership team will be escalated to Program Steering (biweekly meeting). • Level 2 Risks that cannot be managed by the Program Steering Committee will be escalated to the Program Sponsor (biweekly meeting). XII. RISK REGISTER # Type of Risk Benefit At Risk Potential Impact Prob Sev Recommended Mitigation 1 [project dependency, Resources, Schedule, Cost, Scope, Benefit, Quality] [Describe how these add Risk to delivery of the intended benefits] [project dependency, Resources, Schedule, Cost, Scope, Benefit, Quality] [rating] [rating] [List any how your project will mitigate these challenges] 2 3 4 5 [EXPANDED FROM GATE 1]
  • 13. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] 23 # Topic Expected Outcome Target Audience Forum Frequency Responsible Actions Target Date 1 [Performance Reporting] [What result do we want from this communicatio n?] [Intended recipient of communication (Site, SLT, Managers, HR, etc)] [What method of communication will we use? (Allston Today, EMT, Town Hall, SLT, etc)] [What will be the frequency] Who is responsible [What actions are required to prepare this] [Message Delivery Date] 2 [Risks and Escalations] 3 [Change Requests] 4 [Key Decisions] 5 [Training] 6 [Knowledge Repository] 7 [Processes] 8 [Policies and Policy Updates] 9 [Tools] 10 [Organizational Updates] 11 [Voice of Customer Feedback or Input] GATE 2 – PREPARATION COMMUNICATIONS PLAN XIII. COMMUNICATION PLAN
  • 14. SPONSOR: [NAME] PGM: [NAME] PROG # [INSERT #] PROGRAM: [NAME] +QDCI: [SELECT DRIVERS] - 1. Scope and Prioritization 2. Program Organizational Structure 3. Component Management Plan 4. User Requirements 5. Benefits Register 6. Program Roadmap 7. Financial Requirements 8. Human Resource Staffing Plan 9. Risk Management Plan 10. Communications Plan 24 Gate DecisionDocuments Reviewed G2 Approval Status • Approval: Benefit proposed is worth resources needed to execute • Return: Return to this Gate with more information or different options before proceeding • Cancelled: No further effort on this initiative will be made; work and resources stoppage Program Execution Plan Approved More Info Required Not Approved Approved More Info Required Not Approved Approved More Info Required Not Approved Approved More Info Required Not Approved Approved More Info Required Not Approved Cancelled G0 - Approved Return Approved More Info Required Not Approved Approved More Info Required Not Approved Approved More Info Required Not Approved