Weitere Ă€hnliche Inhalte Ăhnlich wie Personalisation Versus Privacy (20) KĂŒrzlich hochgeladen (20) Personalisation Versus Privacy2. Not new area of study, but still an emergent issueâŠ
âData and information sovereignty is
the next big consumer issueâ
Demos 2012
âFar from being a quaint 20th Century idea⊠the
latent demand for privacy has never been greaterâ
Deloitte Data Nation 2013
âPersonal data represents an emerging asset
class, potentially every bit as valuable as other
assets such as traded goods, gold or oilâ
World Economic Forum 2012
âAll are endorsing that key data should be released
back to consumers⊠This is the way the world is going
and the UK is currently leading the charge.â
Launch of midata initiative
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
3. What previous studies have told usâŠ
âą 70-90% concerned with use of their (online) informationâŠ
âą But itâs not uniform - segments of population:
Privacy
unconcerned
Privacy
fundamentalists
10%
Enthusiastic sharers
8%
Value hunters
26%
19%
20%
64%
Pragmatists
Non-sharers
30%
22%
Sceptics
Privacy pragmatists
âą Depends on situation, and is moderated by trust: and trust
encouraged by previous experience, brand and transparency
Source: Westin 1991 and Harris Interactive 2003, and Demos 2012
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
4. Whatever you doâŠ
If you found out
a company you
Failing safe or losing my personal data
Failing to keepto keep safe or losing my
are a customer
personal data
with was doing
Selling anonymousanonymous data to other
Selling data about customers about
any of the
companies
customers to other companies
following, which
if any, would
Exploiting overseas workers
Exploiting overseas workers
make you
seriously
Charging higher prices than
Charging higher prices than competitors
consider not
competitors
using this
company
Damaging the environment
Damaging the environment
again?
Paying senior executives a large
bonus/salary
Paying senior executives a large bonus/salary
Base: 1,036 British adults 15+, 30 March â 5 April 2012
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
70%
56%
53%
51%
49%
40%
Source: Deloitte/Ipsos MORI
6. The survey
âą 20 countries*
âą Using Ipsosâ Global @dvisor online panel: representative of more affluent,
connected population in developing countries
âą Only includes those aged 16-64, 16,000 interviews in total, fieldwork October 1st
and October 15th 2013
*Some questions not asked in China
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
7. Overall trade-off on online privacy/personalisation
â clear hierarchy between countriesâŠ
Which comes
closest to your
own opinionâŠ
A. I am happy sharing
information about
online activities so that I
get personalised
services/relevant
recommendations
B. I would rather keep
information and online
activities private even if
I do not get
personalised services
and relevant
recommendations
Agree more with:
A
B
1
India
46%
29%
2
Brazil
44%
32%
3
China
38%
24%
4
Italy
37%
46%
5
Russia
33%
41%
T
Total
26%
52%
6
the US
25%
57%
7
Great Britain
23%
62%
8
Spain
23%
62%
9
Canada
21%
59%
10
Australia
20%
60%
11
Germany
19%
60%
12
France
19%
68%
13
Sweden
11%
69%
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
9. How information used â benefits and safeguards
Donât mind/am comfortable/happy with companiesâŠ
70%
using information about
I don't mind companies using information
me such as my location
about me provided automatically when I go
online such and what Iand what been
as my location have I have
been browsing online
browsing
60%
50%
40%
making profits from using
I am comfortable providing information about
myself to companies who are online in return
information about me if it
for personalised services and products
benefits me too
using information
I don't mindcollected about me as
companies using information
collected aboutas it's anonymised
long me as long as it's
anonymised and can't be linked back to me
and can't be linked back
to me
30%
20%
10%
0%
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
10. Hierarchy in type of information and activities
We are now
% Happy for information to be used
going to show
you some
30%
âŠrecommending products
A website recommending products you might
different
based on your past purchases
be interested in based on your past purchases
29%
scenarios
about how
âŠmaking recommendations
32%
A is
informationwebsite making recommendations about
based on things you have
products you might be interested in based on
usedâŠ
looked at on their site
things you have looked at on their site
31%
a websiteâŠ
âŠmaking recommendations
A website making recommendations about
based on things based on
products you might be interested inyou have
looked at on other websites
things you have looked at on otherwebsites
24%
14%
âŠmaking recommendations
A website making recommendations about
based on the location of your
products you might be interested in based on
Global
mobile phone/you
Total the location of your mobile phone/you
17%
12%
Great
Britain
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
11. Hierarchy in types of organisationâŠ
To what
extent, if at all,
do you
personally
trust the
following to
use the
information
they have
about you in
the right way?
% Great deal / Fair amount
Public sector healthcare providers
45%
41%
Banks
45%
32%
31%
Supermarkets
38%
Private sector healthcare providers
28%
31%
Credit card companies
24%
31%
Insurance companies
17%
25%
Telecommunications companies
Media companies
Foreign governments
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
33%
31%
Your national government
Social media sites
Global
Total
Great
Britain
34%
17%
20%
12%
19%
11%
15%
10%
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
12. But no one view
â and number of
contradictionsâŠ
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
13. Inconsistency in stated attitudes â many quite
explainableâŠ
34% of those who say comfortable providing information
for recommendations have been irritated by
recommendationsâŠ
38% of those who say not concerned about privacy
online say they do mind companies using information
about themâŠ
71% of those who are happy to share personal
information with companies and brands that they like are
concerned about how information collected about them is
being used by companies
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
14. Contradictions between attitudes and what we doâŠ
âŠnearly half say willing to pay for extra privacyâŠ
I am willing
to pay
extra for a
service or
product to
keep my
details
private
Total
45%
46%
Great Britain
34%
52%
Agree
Disagree
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
15. âŠbut less than a quarter have increased the privacy
settings on their computerâŠ
Increased
privacy
settings on
browser
In Britain, 74%
of those who
say willing to
pay havenât
increased their
privacy settings
Total
23%
77%
Great Britain
23%
77%
Agree
Disagree
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
16. How many really fully read terms and conditions?
I often don't
bother fully
reading
terms and
conditions on
a website
before
accepting
them
1
Canada
71%
26%
2
Australia
69%
26%
3
Great Britain
67%
28%
4
Italy
67%
29%
5
China
66%
28%
6
France
66%
32%
T
Total
63%
33%
7
the US
62%
34%
8
Germany
59%
37%
9
Russia
58%
38%
10
Sweden
57%
36%
11
Spain
55%
41%
12
Brazil
53%
40%
13
India
53%
43%
Agree
Disagree
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
17. Evidence suggests otherwiseâŠ
$1000 reward in EULA: 3000 downloads and
4 months before first person claimed (0.03%)
âImmortal soul clauseâ: 88% signed up
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
18. Is it any wonder?
âWould rather readâŠ
58%
12%
Source: Which, 2012; Skandia, 2011
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
19. Concerns about
surveillance sets a
toneâŠ
âŠalthough only 20%
say itâs a top reason
for increased
privacy concerns
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
20. Trying to unpick views of government surveillanceâŠ
0 - completely
unacceptable
Four types
of activity
1
2
3
Two
scenarios
A real/immediate threat of terrorist attack
Combat crime
4
5
6
7
8
Two target
groups
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
You personally
Anyone (impersonal)
9
10 - completely
acceptable
21. Looking first at CRIMEâŠ
Please indicate
how acceptable
or not you would
find it if the
government in
COUNTRY was
allowed to do the
following things
to combat
crime without
their/your
consent?
MonitorâŠ.
% saying completely unacceptable
Anyoneâs
Your
Phone calls
47%
Phone calls
41%
Texts
46%
Texts
40%
Email
45%
Email
39%
Internet
41%
Internet
37%
Global
Total
Great
Britain
Base: 1,001 GB Adults, online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
45%
41%
45%
41%
46%
40%
40%
35%
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
22. When asking about a TERRORIST THREATâŠ
Please indicate
how acceptable or
not you would find
it if the government
in COUNTRY was
allowed to do the
following things to
deal with a real
and immediate
threat of a
terrorist attack
without their/your
consent?
MonitorâŠ
% saying completely unacceptable
Phone calls
51%
Phone calls
39%
Texts
51%
Texts
Email
Internet
Global
Total
Great
Britain
Base: 1,001 GB Adults, online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Anyoneâs
Your
39%
38%
36%
49%
Email
44%
Internet
24%
18%
24%
18%
25%
18%
22%
18%
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey
23. Conclusions
ââŠpeople are fearful of sharing their data largely because companies and
government havenât been good at clearly explaining how they use it.â
The Data Dialogue, Demos 2012
Suspicion and concern high, knowledge and action low â and concern
increases for many as told more: transparency needs to increase, but weak
incentive to be first mover, and unpredictable implications for trust
âWhen asked, we tend not to want our personal information to be used and
manipulated without our consent, the chance to correct it or to limit its
accessibility; yet every day we make decisions and choices that suggest we
ultimately donât care or know enough.â
Demos 2008
Smart defaults â use what we know about people to default into more
appropriate options (incl. âpersonalising privacyâ) â will concern someâŠ
More positivelyâŠ
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
24. People see the potential in âsmart disclosureââŠ
I would like to
have access to the
data that
companies hold
Total
about me, as it
could really help
me make better
decisions â for
example about
how I spend my
Great Britain
money
71%
22%
74%
17%
Agree
Disagree
Base: 16,167 adults across 20 countries (1,000 GB), online, 1-15 October 2013, data is weighted.
© Ipsos MORI / Kingâs College London
Source: Ipsos Global Trends Survey