2. What if we all live in the
matrix?
(or why “Humankind cannot bear very much reality” – T.S.
Eliot)
3. Making the World a Better Place through
Technology
• Further democratizing business and institutions
• Connecting people
• Improve health, even cure death
• Save the environment
• Make the world safer for everyone
• Reduce inequality
5. The promise of Technology
(according to believers)
Technology shall make humans and society smarter,
better, richer, longer-living, and ultimately happier; it will
eliminate disease, hunger, war, and generally every
other plague to humanity.
6. Is this just an empty promise?
After all, we’ve been here before... (end of 19th century, but more
generally…)
10. The promise under fire
• Twitter and the Arab Summer
• WhatsApp/Facebook and fake news
• Data privacy and their use for nefarious purposes
• 3D printing, now used to create weapons
• Google Earth, used for terrorist attacks (Mumbai 2008)
• Amplification of social vices
11. Maybe Techno-Religion is the ONE
•After all, who can deny human progress?
•Stephen Pinker, Hans Rosling
•Kurzweil’s proposed law
13. Two Problems with this paradigm
Problem 1: Definition of Progress: Knowledge/
Prosperity vs. Ethics
Problem 2: View of Time: history develops in cycles
of alternating order and chaos.
14. Technology is simply a tool in human hands
• Elif Shafak and 40 Rules of Love
• Technology and science progress in a cumulative manner, but
human nature does not.
• Science and technology on their own cannot bring about any
kind of drastic change in society. Only people can do that.
15. But it is much more powerful…
• The existence of religions is evidence that humans are
“hackable animals” (Yuval Harari)
• The traditional religions or ideologies like fascism and
communism take a very heavy-handed approach to hacking
people.
• Techno-religion promises tailor-made solutions to hacking
humans by targeting the message down to the individual.
16. While on the Ethics front…
• “if there is anything unique about the human animal it is that it
has the ability to grow knowledge at an accelerating rate
while being chronically incapable of learning from
experience. Science and technology are cumulative, whereas
ethics and politics deal with recurring dilemmas” – John Gray,
philosopher
• Faith in the better future? NOT – progress is a myth; conflict and
violence are an inherent part of human society; civilizations
collapse, usually violently; world peace not possible.
17. Human Progress – the Ethics paradigm
(or Star Wars vs. Star Trek)
PROGRESS
TIME
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100
18. Time defined by Cycles of Violence
• The ancient view of history and time: growth and fall of
civilizations
• Main culprit? Human Nature (as we found out earlier)
• Aristotel’s view of history
• Walter Scheidel’s Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: War, Natural
Disaster, Famine, and Plague.
19. Conclusion
• We do live in a matrix of our own doing - there’s a Neo in every cycle not as a bug, but as a
feature of the system.
• I would like to hope that there is a self-improving, evolutionary mechanism that allows us to
register tiny, micro steps towards a better, more virtuous life for each of us and for humanity as
a whole.
• “The work of reducing local conflicts inspires us with the confidence that one day it will also be
possible to solve global conflicts. A foolish hope, but sometimes you have to lie by example…
making people believe that a particular proposition may be transformed into a universal
proposition.” Umberto Ecco, “Some Reflections on War and Peace”
20. Human Progress – updated Ethics
paradigm
PROGRESS
TIME
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100