GHME 2013 Conference
Session: Verbal Autopsy
Date: June 18 2013
Presenter: Andrea Stewart
Institute:
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), University of Washington
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Assessing verbal autopsy as a complement to vital registration
1. Assessing verbal autopsy as a
complement to vital registration
A data-driven simulation study
Andrea Stewart, Post-Bachelor Fellow
June 18, 2013
2. Presentation outline
• Uses of verbal autopsy (VA)
• Potential uses of new VA methods
• Creation of a simulation of incomplete vital registration (VR)
complemented with VA estimates
2
3. Presentation outline
• Uses of verbal autopsy (VA)
• Potential uses of new VA methods
• Creation of a simulation of incomplete vital registration (VR)
complemented with VA estimates
3
5. Presentation outline
• Uses of Verbal Autopsy (VA)
• Potential uses of new VA methods
• Creation of a simulation of incomplete vital registration (VR)
complemented with VA estimates
5
6. Advancements in VA science
• Automated methods for
collection and analysis
• Less time
• Fewer resources
• More accurate
6
Could we use VA in
routine national data
collection?
7. Presentation outline
• Uses of Verbal Autopsy (VA)
• Potential uses of new VA methods
• Creation of a simulation of incomplete vital registration (VR)
complemented with VA estimates
7
8. Simulation setting – the data
• Need data that has:
o VR estimates (death certificates)
o VA estimates (analyzed by Tariff)
o Known cause of death (based on stringent diagnostic
criteria)
8
9. Population Health Metrics Research
Consortium gold standards
9
VA Tariff method
results
Death certificate
Gold standard
diagnosis
1,288 VAs from Morelos, Mexico
x 500 test data sets of varying cause composition
12. Simulation setting – the data
•
12
Deaths in facility Deaths out of facility
622 observations with:
Death certificate
Verbal autopsy
Gold-standard diagnosis
666 observations with:
Death certificate
Verbal autopsy
Gold-standard diagnosis
13. Simulation setting – incomplete vital registration
13
Deaths in facility Deaths out of facility
Use death
certificate data for
60%
Use death certificate
data for 10%
No death certificate
No death certificate
Deaths in facility Deaths out of facility
Gold-standard
diagnosis
Gold-standard
diagnosis
vs.
14. Simulation setting – add VA estimates
14
vs.
Deaths in facility Deaths out of facility
Use death
certificate data for
60%
Use death certificate
data for 10%
Use verbal autopsy
data for remaining
90%
Use verbal autopsy
data for remaining
40%
Deaths in facility Deaths out of facility
Gold-standard
diagnosis
Gold-standard
diagnosis
15. Simulation setting
• Do this for each of the simulated scenarios
o 0%-100% deaths with DC in facility
o 0%-100% deaths with DC out of facility
• Calculate change in CSMF accuracy for each scenario
15
21. Conclusion
In this preliminary simulation environment, adding
VA estimates to incomplete VR scenarios
improved CSMF accuracy much of the time.
21
22. Future directions
• Update simulation environment to better reflect specific VR
coverage scenarios
• Re-analyze the VAs assigned to “out of facility,” dropping
questions determined to be related to “health care
experience”
22
My name is Andrea Stewart and the focus of my presentation will be assessing the use of verbal autopsy data as a complement to incomplete vital registration data. The method we have employed to examine this topic is what we call a “data-driven simulation,” using data that already exists to estimate the outcome of a hypothetical situation.
Research studies in populations without access to health facilities, where people are dying at home, unrecordedPaper instrumentsLocal physicians read & assigned CoDs to the VAs
-Researchers in the field of Verbal Autopsy have developed methods for collecting and analyzing VAs that require less time and fewer resources, and are more accurate than physician certification.-It has been proposed that these new methods can transform VA from a research tool into one that can be used to augment cause of death estimates in situations with incomplete vital registrationIf we assume that vital registration systems are incomplete, adding VA to routine national data collection may change our cause of death estimates.How can we estimatethe effects of adding VA topopulation estimates of causes of death?
Want to create a simulation environment where we can compare incomplete vital registration systems to vital registration systems with VA, and then validate each scenario where we know the true underlying causes of death for that population.
The Population Health Metrics research Consortium collected data from Mexico which linked “Gold standard” stringent clinical diagnoses from hospital records with Verbal Autopsies and Death Certificate information for 1,288 adult deaths in Morelos and Mexico City.The PHMRC study also included 500 resamples of the 1,288 observations so that we have 500 separate data sets with different CSMFs, so we are not relying on the cause composition of just the 1,288 deaths.
In a case where we are looking at population-estimates, we use what are called Cause Specific Mortality Fractions, which are the estimates of the proportion of deaths occurring for each cause of death in a population.When we have an predicted distribution of CSMFs, and a true distribution of CSMFs, we can calculate the accuracy of the predicted CSMFs by calculating 1-the sum of the absolute errors, divided by the maximum possible errorIn this case, we want to calculate accuracy of CSMFs from an incomplete VR system and the accuracy of CSMFs from a VR system with VA estimates added in.When we have two measures of accuracy for the same scenario, we can calculate the percent change in accuracy relative to the CSMF accuracy of the incomplete scenario.
All of the PHMRC deaths occurred in health facilities. To make our simulation more robust, to simulate in and out of facility deaths, we used the mortality registries from the state of Morelos for the year 2010 to calculate the probabilities by age, sex and cause of death of a death occurring in a health facility.We can then use these probabilities to redistribute our 1,288 facility deaths to be in or out of facility based on their age, sex and cause of death
We then divide them into in facility and out of facility deaths, assigning based on the probabilities calculated using the Morelos probabilities
From here, we can simulate different levels of vital registration coverage, where we use the death certificate assigned cause of death for only a proportion of the population. We calculate the population CSMF accuracy in this situation.
From here, we can simulate different levels of vital registration coverage, where we use the death certificate assigned cause of death for only a proportion of the population. We calculate the population CSMF accuracy in this situation.
We didn’t do this for just this scenario, where 60 of facility deaths are counted and 10 of facility deaths are counted. We did this 100 times, cycling from 0 to 100 by 10’s for coverage both in and out of health facilities, calculating the change in accuracy each time.
Now, the values in the colored cells represent the percent change in CSMF accuracy that we saw when adding Verbal Autopsy estimates to the incomplete scenario. The different scenarios are reflected in the numbers in first row and first column of this table.
To walk through the same example that we saw before, along the top column, we see the different percentages of out of facility deaths that receive death certificates. In our example, 10 of out-of-facility deaths received death certificates, which is represented in the highlighted column
Also in our example, we specified that 60% of deaths occurring in facility would receive a death certificate, and the remainder would be filled in with VA data. The highlighted row is specifying that scenario.
When we look at where the row and column intersect, we see a value of 12.7. This represents the percent increase in CSMF accuracy that came from adding VA estimates in this scenario.
When we step back and examine all of the values on the table, we see that in almost every situation of incomplete VR coverage, adding VA to the estimates has a positive effect on the accuracy of the CSMF estimates for the population.
In conclusion, these are preliminary results that are meant to show that augmenting incomplete CSMF estimates with CSMF estimates from VA may improve the accuracy of population-level cause of death estimates.There are many ways that this method could be improved to better reflect more specific VR coverage scenarios.