RI Rotaract Committee Report Année 2002-2003

1. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
Report of the
2002-03 RI Rotaract Committee
August – November 2002
*****************************
The 2002-03 RI Rotaract Committee discussed issues via correspondence in August – November
2002.
COMMITTEE:
Chairman: Barry J. McConville, Rotary Club of Padstow, Australia
Vice-Chairman: Philly Karani, Rotary Club of Poona Downtown, India
Members: Donald B. Arnheim, Rotary Club of Pittsburgh, USA
Burkhart Hagen, Rotary Club of Herzogtum Larenburg-Moelln, Germany
Antonio Hallage, Rotary Club of Curitiba-Leste, Brazil
Dong-Joon Lee, Rotary Club of Staten Island, USA
Murray Mylechreest, Rotary Club of Worcester, England
Wilfredo L. Segovia, Rotary Club of Makati Central, Philippines
Gabriela V. Gaut, Rotaract Club of Caballito, Argentina
Bernard Loutfi, Rotaract Club of Beirut, Lebanon
Navin K. Manchery-Valliappan, Rotaract Club of Capitol City –
Washington D.C., USA
Hervé Piglowski, Rotaract Club of Montpellier, France
Ae-Kyung (Grace) Suh, Rotaract Club of Seoul South West, Korea
David A. Tabaro, Rotaract Club of Mengo, Uganda
Liaison Director: Frank C. Collins, Jr., Rotary Club of East Hartford, USA
Responses were received from committee chairman McConville and committee members
Arnheim, Hagen, Hallage, Mylechreest, Segovia, Gaut, Piglowski and Tabaro.
Staff liaisons to the committee are Billy Jo Baker, Program Coordinator, Community Programs
and Christine Wellner, Supervisor, Community Programs.
AGENDA:
The agenda prepared by the committee chairman provided a basis for the following topics for
discussion:
I. 2003 Rotaract Preconvention Meeting
II. Rotaract Video
III. The Internet and Electronic Resources

2. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
IV. The Rotaract Image
V. Rotary and Rotaract – Partners in Service
VI. District Rotaract Representatives

3. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
I. 2003 Rotaract Preconvention Meeting
Statement: This year’s Rotaract Preconvention Meeting will be held 30-31 May 2003 in
Brisbane, Australia, just prior to the Rotary International Convention. The RI Rotaract
Committee has traditionally been active in creating an agenda for this meeting. This
committee discussed the meeting agenda including topics, formats, timing, and guest
speakers. A preliminary meeting agenda was formatted based on the suggestions made.
Committee members considered topics of importance to Rotaractors for inclusion in the
meeting agenda. Committee members agreed that topics of concern for Rotaractors today are
membership development, their relationship with their sponsoring Rotary club(s), promotion
of the Rotaract program, maintaining a relevant updated program, funding, working with
other youth organizations, the Rotary Foundation, and maintaining accurate club records.
Several different formats for the meeting were recommended by the committee. One
member suggested including a plenary session with an inspirational speaker. Another
member proposed a daily goal setting session at breakfast. Further suggestions included
workshops with question and answer sessions, interactive sessions led by facilitators with a
planned agenda, and presentations made by Rotaractors. Microphones strategically placed
throughout each session in order for participants to easily respond were highly
recommended. Committee members suggested that one and a half hours be allotted for lunch
breaks to allow for more social interaction.
In an effort to utilize time most effectively, committee members suggested limiting each
speech or presentation to thirty minutes. Extra time would be allotted for the audience to
respond. Committee members advised that presenters familiarize themselves with the
audiovisual equipment prior to their presentation and utilize handouts for a smoothly run
session. Committee members reviewed the benefit of inviting other youth organization
leaders to participate in the Rotaract Preconvention Meeting.
The committee reiterated the importance of the RI President’s appearance at the Rotaract
Preconvention Meeting. They expressed interest in inviting the President-elect to address the
group as well. Committee members discussed inviting well-spoken Rotaract professionals
from specific occupations to introduce and lead workshops.
The committee will continue to further develop and finalize a program agenda for the
Rotaract Preconvention Meeting. They will work with the RI President for approval prior to
implementation and distribution.

4. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
II. Rotaract Video
Statement: Rotarians and Rotaractors have expressed interest in producing an informational
and promotional Rotaract video. The Rotaract Committee considered the need for RI to
produce a video for the Rotaract program. Half of the responding committee members were
in favor while half were opposed to the production of a Rotaract video.
Committee members in favor of producing a video noted that a Rotaract video has been
requested several times over the years but has never been delivered. They stated that a video
would allow prospective and current Rotaractors to experience the international aspect of the
program. The video could address a wide audience including Rotarians considering
sponsoring a Rotaract club, Interactors and others considering joining a Rotaract club, and
members of the media. The committee considered that describing the basic organizational
structure, the Four Avenues of Service, and international aspects of the program were
important elements to a Rotaract video. Additionally, the history of Rotaract, goals and
objectives of the program, Rotaract project examples, and scenes from the International
Preconvention Meeting, club meetings and social gatherings would enhance the video.
It was suggested that RI reduce costs by using current video footage in use by multidistrict
Rotaract information organizations (MDIOs). One member recommended two separate
videos – one aimed at potential and current Rotaractors and the other for a Rotarian audience.
It was advised that a wider audience would be reached if voices of all nationalities were
incorporated and numerous translations were available. The video could also be produced in
a format that would allow it to be downloaded or viewed from the Web site.
The committee members that opposed the production of a video shared many reasons why
creating one would be unfavorable. They advised that such a tool is expensive; there will be
little chance to regain the cost of its production through sales. Videos become outdated
quickly and the expense to revitalize such a video in years to come would be a further
expense. These committee members maintain that Rotaractors are creative individuals who
are able to develop their own promotional materials. They suggested that MDIOs should
share their video footage directly with clubs and districts. Committee members noted that
some Rotaractors prefer presenting computer presentations and furthermore, clubs in rural
areas may not have access to video equipment.
Because the committee was divided on the issue, it recommends the Board request the 2003-
04 RI Rotaract Committee to reconsider the need for a Rotaract video. The committee will
seek further opinion from participants at the 2003 Rotaract Preconvention Meeting and share
the findings with the 2003-04 RI Rotaract Committee.
The committee recommends that the Board adopt the following:
DECISION: The Board

5. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
1. requests the 2003-04 RI Rotaract Committee discuss the need for a Rotaract video for
report to the Board at its February 2004 meeting.

6. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
III. The Internet and Electronic Resources
Statement: The committee discussed the Internet and other electronic resources for the
Rotaract program. Committee members were in strong agreement with the utilization and
further development of the Internet as a major communication tool for Rotaractors. The
effectiveness with which many clubs and districts already use electronic media for
newsletters, information and commentary were noted. The collective expertise in this area
among Rotaractors was viewed as a means of enhancing Rotary and Rotaract relationships
through offering practical assistance to less computer savvy Rotary club members. With this
in mind, the committee discussed improvements, additions and continuity of the Internet and
electronic tools available to Rotaract clubs.
The Internet at the club and district level
Several Internet tools have proved useful at the club and district level and the committee
advised their continuance. This committee established a group communication system
through Yahoo! Groups (at www.yahoo.com) whereby each member received a copy of any
email directed to the email address RotaractCommittee@yahoogroups.com. This feature
allowed for easy communication between all committee members and could be replicated by
clubs and districts to enhance their internal communication. To help put such ideas into
practice, the committee discussed the benefit of encouraging clubs to appoint an Internet
communications officer.
Committee members discussed a proposal sent by the Rotary Club of Dunwoody (Georgia,
USA), included here as appendix III-a. The Rotary Club of Dunwoody is one of many
Rotary clubs that participate in the Georgia Rotary Student Program (GRSP). This district
program sponsors approximately eighty-five national and international college students (from
approximately 60 countries) to study in Georgia for one year. The Rotary club proposed the
creation of a cyber Rotaract club to involve GRSP students and alumni. It would differ from
a traditional Rotaract club in that its members would not reside within the locality of their
sponsoring Rotary club or each other. These international members would be able to meet
via electronic communication only.
Committee members looked favorably upon the proposal, especially in light of the Cyber
Clubs Pilot Project. At its June 2002 meeting, the Board noted the potential for membership
growth by using new technology to fulfill the Object of Rotary and appeal to new
demographic groups that otherwise cannot participate in traditional Rotary clubs. The
approved plan requires twenty Rotary clubs to submit proposals for their participation prior
to the implementation of the pilot program; Rotary clubs are still in the process of gathering
interest. Committee members suggested that if a cyber Rotary club can participate in a pilot
period, then logically cyber Rotaract clubs should also be permitted to conduct a pilot.
The Internet at the international level
Committee members suggested various improvements to the Internet tools already provided
at the international level. Both the Global Rotaract Information Center (www.rotaract.org)
and RI’s Web site (www.rotary.org) should contain all RI Rotaract documents available for

7. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
download. Volunteers that maintain the Global Rotaract Information Center should update
and improve the Web site to provide better access to the necessary Rotaract materials needed
in various languages. The committee discussed creating a worldwide Rotaract project
database to be established on the Global Rotaract Information Center. It was noted that a
similar database, called the Community Projects Database, is already available on RI’s Web
site. It contains project examples from Rotary, Rotaract, and Interact clubs and is
consistently updated by RI staff.
Other suggestions were made to add to the variety of resources already available on the RI
Web site. One committee member proposed that district Rotaract representatives (DRRs) log
on to their own special Web site, or extranet, through the Rotary Business Portal (similar to
Web sites maintained for district governors and governors-elect) at regular intervals to
provide personal contact information, respond to surveys, update Rotaract club information,
and receive general news and updates from Rotary International. Committee members
recommended that the Rotaract newsletter, Rotaract News, continue to be offered
electronically. The prompt and effective service offered by RI through this resource is
valued and applauded by committee members.
The committee mentioned that while many Rotaractors have access to the Internet, it should
be noted that there are still clubs in rural areas that do not have the required equipment or
services to access the Internet.
Electronic Resources
Recommendations were discussed by the committee to enhance current Rotaract materials
produced by RI by providing them in a high-tech, electronic format. The Worldwide
Rotaract Directory could be produced in CD-ROM format for easy distribution and use. The
first CD-ROM edition of this directory will be produced for the 2003-04 Rotary year.
The committee recommends that the Board adopt the following:
DECISION: The Board
1. encourages each Rotaract club and district to appoint an Internet communications officer;
2. approves the implementation plan for a three year Cyber Rotaract Club pilot project as
proposed by the Rotary Club of Dunwoody, included as Appendix III-a;
3. requests the General Secretary to create an extranet for use by district Rotaract
representatives;

8. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
IV. The Rotaract Image
Statement: Committee members acknowledged the progression of youth lifestyles and
interests over the thirty-four years since the Rotaract program’s inception. The committee
wished to review the future direction of the Rotaract program in order to provide a more
relevant, socially responsible, and coherent organization recognized for its excellence in
service and respected for its status as a full partner in the Rotary vision.
Two areas of concern immediately surfaced when discussing the Rotaract program image:
the lack of understanding and appreciation by Rotarians about the program and the lack of
appreciation and understanding by the community regarding the tremendous impact of
Rotaract clubs.
Committee members agreed that Rotaractors feel they are not understood or appreciated by
Rotarians. They are concerned that the Rotaract program does not receive proper recognition
at the annual International Convention; the RI president does not mention the program when
addressing Rotarians, and the program is not represented during the plenary sessions at
Convention. Further, these committee members indicated that many Rotary clubs tend to
overlook their responsibilities as “partners-in-service” by ignoring the Rotaract clubs they
sponsor or taking a more paternalistic approach to the relationship.
The lack of appreciation and understanding by the community is apparent by deficient local
promotion and media attention for the clubs. Committee members claimed this problem
stems from the clubs’ lack of financing and professional experience. Enthusiasm and
dedication are not enough to “sell” the Rotaract message to the community. A committee
member suggested the Rotaract program should be perceived as an effective service
organization in its own right, and not as a subset of another organization.
Several members commented on their concern for attracting and retaining new members.
Reports of declining interest in Rotaract activities were obtained from more developed
countries while less developed countries of the Rotary world see growth and extension in the
program. Dedicated and responsible ongoing training of members would develop both a
unity of purpose and better camaraderie for all clubs. Thirty-four years of community
service, lasting friendships among members, and fellowship all need to be promoted as the
positive key elements contributing to the success of Rotaract clubs. Committee members
expressed thoughts on changing and rebuilding the program as follows:
Improving promotion
In order to better promote the Rotaract program locally, Rotaractors need to highlight the
strengths of the program. Volunteerism is a key concept of Rotaract that is often
overlooked. Importance should be placed on the voluntary contributions of individuals
and groups in aiding the less advantaged in the community and internationally. There are
many differences between Rotaract and other organizations that should be highlighted
including: organizing community service projects, participating in an international
network, receiving professional and leadership training, partnering with Rotary clubs,

9. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
accessing RI programs, fostering friendship and fun, and including membership to all
within the age limits.
Rotary Action
Better understanding of the potential for mutual support of service projects between
Rotary and Rotaract clubs will help each gain respect for the other’s position within the
community. Rotary clubs could enhance the Rotaract image by: inviting appropriate
officers to PETS and district assemblies; recognizing DRRs at official functions; inviting
Rotaractors to participate at district conferences; inviting the DRR to join official club
visits; setting up visitation rosters between clubs; establishing a DRR fund on Rotary
district budget; or ensuring Rotary district trainer provides Rotaract training. The
committee agreed that Rotary clubs should play the role of a mentor to their Rotaract
club, as opposed to dictating the clubs activities. The committee emphasized the
importance of decision 88 of the November 1996 meeting of the RI Board of Directors;
"The Board encourages all incoming governors-nominee to provide adequate training to
their incoming Rotaract club presidents and, where appropriate, to include such training
as part of the program of the Rotary district assembly".
Rotaract Action
Committee members suggested that Rotaractors can improve the Rotaract program by:
establishing effective orientation for new members, developing district projects for more
extensive publicity, strengthening communication between clubs through the Internet,
appointing a public relations/promotions chair within the club, electing officers at the
same time Rotary club elect their officers, conducting action planning meetings or
establishing a Rotaract business plan, and establishing good working relationships
between larger and smaller Rotaract clubs.
Rotary International Action
Committee members stressed the importance of the cooperation between Rotary
International and Rotaract clubs. Suggestions for improving the program may require
setting long-term goals and schedules. The committee reaffirms its support for decision
177, of February 2002, encouraging future presidents to develop a Presidential Citation
specifically for Rotaractors.
The Rotaract program is passing through a time of reassessment in light of many
attitudinal changes within society. The committee expressed concern with the difficulty
of exploring the issues presented from around the world through a meeting by
correspondence. With matters of declining membership, disbanded clubs, relationships
and promotions, the committee stresses the importance of a fully convened and staff-supported
meeting for this committee.
The committee recommends that the Board adopt the following:
DECISION: The Board

10. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
1. encourages Rotaract clubs to improve promotion of the Rotaract program by highlighting
aspects of the program such as voluntary contributions, community and international
service, partnership with Rotary clubs, and professional and leadership development
activities when giving information on the program to the community or the media.
2. reaffirms decision 88 at its November 1996 meeting, encouraging all incoming
governors-elect to provide adequate training to their incoming Rotaract club presidents
and, where appropriate, to include such training as part of the program of the Rotary
district assembly;
3. reaffirms decision 177 at its February 2002 meeting, encouraging future presidents to
consider scheduling the Rotaract Committee to meet;
4. requests the 2003-04 RI Rotaract Committee discuss the need for revision to the current
Standard Rotaract Club Constitution and Bylaws.

11. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
V. Rotary and Rotaract – Partners-in-Service
In discussing the Rotaract image, committee members mentioned how the development of a
positive image of Rotaract could occur through better relationships between the Rotary club
and the Rotaract club it sponsors. Discussions on this relationship surface at Rotaract
conferences and training sessions. In contrast, the committee noted the subject receives little
attention in Rotary gatherings. The committee recommended ways to strengthen the
relationship between the two partners. Reducing conference fees for Rotaractors attending
Rotary functions, encouraging joint projects, and including Rotaractors in Rotary training
sessions were among several suggestions made by the committee. Encouraging close contact
between the district governor and DRR, inviting Ambassadorial Scholars, Youth Exchange
students, and RYLA participants to meetings, and allocating time at a Rotary district
conference for Rotaract meetings or presentations were also recommended. Committee
members suggested that Rotary clubs visit each Rotaract club, participate in the development
of Rotaract business plans, and encourage other Rotary clubs to sponsor a Rotaract club.
Although the progression from Interact to Rotaract to Rotary is ideal, committee members
noted minimal practical application of this concept in their own districts. Rotaractors
anticipate joining Rotary on attaining the 30-year age limit, but in reality this occurs
infrequently. Factors stopping Rotaractors from joining Rotary clubs at age 31 include a
perceived age difference between Rotarians and Rotaractors, the lack of appeal of Rotary
clubs activities, cost factors, and the lack of invitation to join. Some Rotary clubs do not
accept female members, thereby barring the logical progression for female Rotaractors to
Rotary. According to committee members, a growing group of Rotaractors considered the
formation of “New Generations” Rotary clubs the answer to some of these barriers.
The committee reinforced how Rotary clubs could benefit from membership of past
Rotaractors. Rotaractors already appreciate the Service Above Self concept. They are
familiar with Rotary goals and ideals, and as a result require little orientation or training. If
open to former Rotaractors, Rotary clubs will have a constant source of prospective
members. Past Rotaractors bring new ideas, more dynamic approaches, and a broader
outlook to Rotary, while undertaking new challenges and responsibilities. The gesture of
inviting former Rotaractors to partake in Rotary club membership reinforces the “family” of
Rotary. The committee applauded the Board of Directors' decision 177, taken at their June
2002 meeting, encouraging Rotary clubs to waive club dues and admission fees for members
under the age of 35.

12. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
VI. District Rotaract Representatives and Training
Statement: The committee recognized the importance of district-level leadership training for
DRRs. In districts where Rotaract training regularly occurs, it is usually over a 2-4 day
period and is provided by various Rotary, Rotaract and professional presenters. However,
not all DRRs receive adequate training prior to their inductions. The main reasons appear to
be lack of funding, training expertise, and Rotary clubs’ knowledge of their role in
supporting such ventures.
The committee discussed several steps toward effective DRR training including: encouraging
the district governor to incorporate funding for DRR training in the district budget,
encouraging the creation of a universal zone training structure, providing interactive training
tools for DRRs via a CD-ROM, and encouraging the election of DRRs earlier in the year to
allow for adequate training time. It was also proposed that DRR and club officer-training
manuals be written and presented on CD-ROM.
The committee recommended including the following topics in an effective DRR training
session: conflict resolution, holding productive meetings, public speaking skills, creating
new Rotaract clubs, and creating a district budget. The committee agreed that the current
version of the District Rotaract Representatives’ Training Manual is well directed toward
effective training. Suggested improvements include adding a chapter on Rotaract history and
case studies; explaining the responsibilities and expectations of the DRR, district officers,
and district Rotaract chair; and providing examples of successful promotional tools. The
committee is concerned that the manual does not reach the DRR-elect in sufficient time for
proper usage.
The committee reported that many Rotarians do not know or fully appreciate the title
“District Rotaract Representative”. As a part of the Rotary family, these district leaders
should have acceptable recognition of their role. Rotarians respect and acknowledge the
status of a district governor; this status inspires development of leadership skills through club
and district programs and gives one an esteemed position within the community. This role is
similar to the elected Rotaract leader (DRR) who works in a role with district responsibilities
and committee commitments. The present title does not imply the same degree of status as
that of district governor. The committee recommended that the Board reconsider decision 75
of November 2001 attached as appendix VI-a, which maintained the name "district Rotaract
representative" instead of changing it to "district Rotaract governor." Considering the
concern for the relationship between Rotarians and Rotaractors expressed elsewhere in this
report, it seems judicious to consider ways in which the emphasis on partnership can be
explored realistically. This reassessment of the title would be one method of recognizing the
community value of the DRR role.
The committee recommends that the Board adopt the following:
DECISION: The Board

13. Directors’ Meeting Exhibit C-6
February 2003
1. encourages district governors to incorporate funding for district Rotaract representative
training in the district budget;
2. encourages Rotaract districts to hold district Rotaract representative elections by January
of the previous Rotary year to allow for adequate training time;
3. requests the General Secretary to provide Rotaract training materials on a CD-ROM for
district Rotaract representatives and include $2,000 in the 2003-04 and future budgets for
this resource;
4. requests the General Secretary provide copies of training materials to district Rotaract
leaders by April of the Rotary year prior to taking office.
5. rescinds decision 75, November 2001 regarding maintaining the designation of "district
Rotaract representative (DRR)" and agrees to change the title to "district Rotaract
governor."
A true record.
______________________________
Barry J. McConville
Chairman
2002-03 RI Rotaract Committee
______________________________
Billy Jo Baker
Staff Liaison to Committee
Program Coordinator, Community Programs
______________________________
Christine Wellner
Staff Liaison to Committee
Supervisor, Community Programs

14. Appendix III-a
FORMATION OF A CYBER ROTARACT CLUB
Assumption:
The current method of tracking alumni of various Rotary programs, e.g. Ambassadorial Scholars and
Group Study Exchange, is difficult to maintain. As a result, Rotary is not leveraging these programs to
attract future Rotarians. This is also true in the State of Georgia where the Georgia Rotary Student
Program (GRSP) exists. A new operational model needs to be developed so that we can maintain current
contact information for alumni of these Rotary and GRSP programs. This will help Rotary and GRSP
keep the alumni informed, keep them focused on Rotary, offer a reason to participate in meaningful
Rotary service programs, be an advocate for GRSP, and eventually become Rotarians. This would put
Rotary in a better position to attract the alumni as future Rotarians.
Recommendation:
Create a pilot cyber Rotaract club. The GRSP has a "captive" group in the State of Georgia for one
school term. This group of approximately 85 students could easily be harnessed while together in
Georgia to form a worldwide cyber Rotaract club. The current class of 2002-2003, and subsequent
classes during the "Cyber Rotary Clubs Pilot Project" period 2002-2008, could be in a pilot cyber
Rotaract club project. These GRSP classes average 80 plus students, are together in Georgia for one year,
and then go home to approximately 60 countries.
Requirements & Action Plan:
· Rotary International approve GRSP alumni, along with a sponsoring Rotary Club, establishing a
pilot cyber Rotaract club with members from a wide range of countries worldwide, at the
February, 2003 Board Meeting.
· GRSP endorse GRSP alumni, along with a sponsoring Rotary Club, establishing a pilot a cyber
Rotaract club with members from a wide range of countries worldwide, at the January, 2003
Board Meeting.
· A State of Georgia Rotary Club agrees to sponsor the cyber Rotaract Club by January, 2003.
· Develop a meaningful Rotary and GRSP focus for the proposed cyber Rotaract Club by January,
2003. Some of these web based items could be:
o "Stay together' through current web site contact information
o Post 'news' of member activities/accomplishments
o Participate in one or more Rotary service projects per year
o Share examples of Service Above Self in their home countries.
o Adopt a goal of a Class 'gift' to GRSP at the end of 4 years (not necessarily monetary)
· Develop a funding plan for the cyber Rotaract club:
· One proposal is that each State of Georgia Rotary Club hosting a student would pay that student's
"dues" for 4 years (total $100). This would pay the RI chartering fee of $50, website hosting and
maintenance, and fund club projects.

15. Appendix III-a
· The GRSP class of 2002-2003 would opt for and join the proposed cyber Rotaract Club prior to
leaving in May, 2003 for their home countries.
· The sponsoring Rotary Club monitor the pilot cyber Rotaract Club and report to Rotary
International and GRSP periodically throughout the pilot period.
Fred Brandt
President, Dunwoody Rotary Club

16. Appendix VI-a
75. Proposal to Change the Title of “District Rotaract Representative” to “Rotaract District
Governor”
Statement: At its February 2000 meeting, the Board received a report from the RI Rotaract Committee
which requested it to consider changing the title of the Rotaractor elected to oversee the development of
the district-level Rotaract program from “district Rotaract representative” to “district Rotaract
governor.” In decision 306, February 2000, the Board decided against making such a change. Citing
ongoing confusion regarding the title, Director Collins asked the Board to reconsider its previous
decision.
DECISION: The Board does not agree to change the title of the Rotaractor elected to oversee the
district-level Rotaract program from “district Rotaract representative” to “Rotaract district governor.”