This document discusses different models of evaluation, including the four-level model, utilization-focused evaluation, and expertise/accreditation approaches. The four-level model includes responsive evaluation, goal-free evaluation, adversary/judicial approaches, and consumer-oriented approaches. Utilization-focused evaluation is based on the principle that an evaluation should be judged on its usefulness to intended users by engaging them in the process. Expertise/accreditation approaches rely on professional expertise to evaluate institutions, programs, products, and activities through formal review systems, informal reviews, or ad hoc panel and individual reviews.
1. TEST DEVELOPMENT AND
EVALUATION (6462)
DIFFERENT MODELS OF EVALUATION AND THEIR
IMPLICATIONS
Department of Secondary Teacher Education
ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE UNIT
After studying this unit, the students will have ability to demonstrate.
• define what evaluation is.
• understand the evaluation as a whole process.
• delineate various stages of evaluation.
• to implement any type of evaluation.
• determining when and where to use various evaluation models and
approaches
• report the results of evaluation
3. 9.1 THE FOUR-LEVEL MODEL
9.1.1 Responsive Evaluation
This approach calls for evaluators to be responsive to the information needs of various
audiences or stakeholders.
9.1.2 Goal-Free Evaluation
This approach focuses on the actual outcomes rather than the intended outcomes of a
program.
9.1.3 Adversary/Judicial Approaches
These approaches adapt the legal paradigm to program evaluation. Thus, two teams of
evaluators representing two views of the program’s effects argue their cases based on
the evidence (data) collected.
9.1.4 Consumer-Oriented Approaches
Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Developed by Scriven. It helps in inform decisions on
what to purchase or trade. This approach judge the quality of something, establish
value, merit or worth of a product.
4. 9.2 UTILIZATION-FOCUSED EVALUATION
➢ Utilization-Focused Evaluation (UFE), developed by Michael Quinn Patton, is an approach
based on the principle that an evaluation should be judged on its usefulness to its intended
users.
➢ Utilization-focused evaluation is highly personal and situational. The evaluation facilitator
develops a working relationship with intended users to help them determine what kind of
evaluation they need.
➢ Utilization-focused evaluation does not depend on or advocate any particular evaluation
content, model, method, theory, or even use. Rather, it is a process for helping primary intended
users select the most appropriate content, model, methods, theory, and uses for their particular
situation.
➢ In considering the rich and varied menu of evaluation, utilization-focused evaluation can
include any evaluative purpose (formative, summative, developmental), any kind of data
(quantitative, qualitative, mixed),
5. 9.3 ELEMENTS OF UFE
Utilization-Focused Evaluation has two essential elements.
• The primary intended users of the evaluation must be clearly identified and personally
engaged at the beginning of the evaluation process to ensure that their primary intended
uses can be identified.
• Evaluators must ensure that these intended uses of the evaluation by the primary
intended users guide all other decisions that are made about the evaluation process.
7. 9.5 EXPERTISE/ACCREDITATION APPROACHES
It is the oldest type of formal evaluation. It relies on professional expertise to
judge the quality of following things;
✓ An institution,
✓ Program,
✓ Product,
✓ Activity
Types of Expertise-Oriented Evaluations
Following are the types of expertise-oriented evaluation.
• Formal review system
• Informal review system
• Ad hoc panel review
• Ad hoc individual review
8. 9.5.1 Formal Review System
• The structure or organization established to conduct periodic reviews of educational endeavors,
• Published standards,
• Pre-specified schedule,
• Opinions of several experts
• Impact on status of that which is reviewed
9.5.2 Informal Review
The informal system of review used primarily for evaluations that lack published standards or follow a
specified review schedule. It use the multiple reviewers status of those being reviewed is affected by results.
9.5.3 Ad Hoc Panel Reviews
Ad hoc panel reviews occur at irregular intervals when circumstances demand. These reviews not related to
institutionalized evaluation or standards. Usually one-shot evaluations prompted by a particular, time-bound
need for evaluative information.
9.5.4 Ad Hoc Individual Reviews
Ad hoc individual reviews, Review of any entity by an individual selected for his/her expertise. This review
use usually to judge value or make recommendations
Types of Expertise-Oriented Evaluations
9.
10.
11.
12. Department of Secondary Teacher Education
ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD
Dr. Hina Jalal
hinansari23@gmail.com