Seminar presentation at Preventing Overdiagnosis 2015 conference in Washington DC 9/1/15 by Gary Schwitzer, Publisher, HealthNewsReview.org & Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Minnesota School of Public Health
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Majestic â 9332606886 â Call Me For Genuine S...
Â
Role of the media in preventing or promoting overdiagnosis
1. Role of the media in preventing
or promoting overdiagnosis
Gary Schwitzer
Adjunct Associate Professor
University of Minnesota School of Public Health
and Publisher
2.
3. Outline of this session
⢠Background on HealthNewsReview.org
⢠Painting a big picture â mosaic of examples of
media messages promoting overdiagnosis â
and a few messages that try to prevent it
⢠Discussion: Your ideas about how to address
the media tsunami
4.
5. ⢠ABL =
⢠accidental bowel leakage. Ad for new Butterfly Body Liners that
fit discreetly between the buttocks.
⢠BBS =
⢠bashful bladder syndrome â or paruresis â or bashful kidneys,
mental cloggery, stage fright, pee fright, urophobia, pee-shyness,
slow dribbles, creeping pee-pee, public piss syndrome, shy
bladder syndrome. And, yes, antidepressants are sometimes
prescribed
⢠ED =
⢠erectile dysfunction or impotence. That was the easy one.
⢠EIB =
⢠exercise-induced bronchospasm.
⢠ES caused by SWD or OSA =
⢠excessive sleepiness caused by shift work disorder or obstructive
sleep apnea. Ads for Nuvigil for ES - a federally-controlled
substance in prescription drug form
6. ⢠GAD =
⢠generalized anxiety disorder. Yep, antidepressants.
⢠HSDD =
⢠hypoactive sexual desire disorder or not in the
mood tonight. Yep, antidepressants again.
⢠PE =
⢠premature ejaculation
⢠PMDD =
⢠premenstrual dysphoric disorder
⢠SAD =
⢠social anxiety disorder. Yep, antidepressants again.
7. ⢠9.5 years
⢠>2055 story reviews
⢠>50 news release reviews
⢠>2150 blog posts
⢠The only systematic review and feedback mechanism for
health care media messengers in the U.S.
⢠Modeled after a pioneering Australian effort â now shelved
⢠We receive funding from the Laura & John Arnold Foundation
8. We review health care media messages:
⢠Journalism â that sometimes
looks more like advertising
⢠Advertising
⢠Public relations
⢠Marketing
⢠Journal policies
9. ⢠14 MDs
⢠6 PhDs
⢠13 journalists/science writers
⢠5 communication scholars and/or
academic public information officers
⢠4 public health grad students
⢠3 women with breast cancer (one w/PhD,
two with Masterâs degrees)
Every story* is
analyzed by 3
reviewers, each
applying the same
10 criteria
As of April 1, weâre also reviewing health care news
releases
10. ⢠HealthNewsReview.org reviews news stories
that include claims about interventions:
treatments, tests, products, procedures
⢠We regularly check:
Boston Globe
Los Angeles Times
New York Times
Philadelphia Inquirer
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post
Associated Press
Bloomberg News
Websites of ABC, CBS, CNN,
Fox, NBC
NPR health & science page
HealthDay
Reuters Health
Vox.com
Slate.com
FiveThirtyEight.com
BuzzFeed.com
Websites of TIME, Newsweek,
U.S. News & World Report
11. Our criteria: Does the story âŚ
⢠Discuss the total cost?
⢠Discuss how often benefits occur?
⢠Discuss how often harms occur?
⢠Evaluate the quality of the evidence?
⢠Discuss alternative choices?
⢠Avoid disease-mongering?
⢠Establish the novelty of the approach?
⢠Establish the availability of the approach?
⢠Include an independent perspective?
⢠Explore conflict of interest in sources?
69% ď¨
66% ď¨
64% ď¨
61% ď¨
56% ď¨
Percent
unsatisfactory
after 2,055
story reviews
12. Most common flaw:
Conveying certainty
that doesnât exist
⢠Exaggerating effect size â relative not absolute data
⢠Using causal language to describe observational studies
⢠Idolatry of the surrogate: Failing to explain limitations of
surrogate markers/endpoints
⢠Tyranny of the anecdote: telling success stories but rarely
profiling dropouts, dissatisfied, those who choose conservative
route or lifestyle change instead of treatment
⢠Single source stories with no independent perspective
⢠Failing to independently analyze quality of evidence
14. Although the harm isnât intentional,
it is very real
⢠Whips âworried wellâ into a frenzy, making people
anxious about things that will never bother them
⢠Raises false expectations about health care system
⢠Promotes undue demand for unproven technologies
which may do more harm than good
⢠Distracts from the important health care delivery
and health care policy issues that deserve attention
This is avoidable harm.
15. Infoxication ⢠Information intoxication
⢠Like trying to get a drink from a
firehose
⢠Like a giant tsunami washing over
the American public every day
⢠Health care marketing messages
⢠DTC drug ad disease mongering
⢠News & Talk shows
⢠Journals competing for public attention
⢠Medical center/industry news releases
⢠Editorial cartoons
⢠Patient advocacy groups
⢠Social media messages
16. Drivers of overdiagnosis
Technological changes detecting ever smaller âabnormalitiesâ
Commercial and professional vested interests
Conflicted panels producing expanded disease definitions and writing
guidelines
Legal incentives that punish underdiagnosis but not overdiagnosis
Health system incentives favouring more tests and treatments
Cultural beliefs that more is better; faith in early detection unmodified
by its risks
BMJ. 2012 May 28;344:e3502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3502.
Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy.
Moynihan R, Doust J, Henry D.
17. Media messages promoting overdiagnosis
in womenâs health issues
⢠Menopause
â Cognitive decline
â Vaginal atrophy (âEnd the
Silent Sufferingâ ads)
â CNN: âA new study shows
beyond a doubt that
menopause, not the natural
aging process, is responsible for
a sharp increase in cholesterol
levels.â So when did menopause
stop being part of natural
aging?
⢠Female sexual dysfunction
â including news about An
extra 0.7 "satisfying sexual
events" per month
⢠Female orgasmic disorder
⢠Breast cancer screening confusion
⢠Celebrity breast CA news: Dr. Holly
Phillips, CBS NY â after Christina
Applegate diagnosis/surgery: âWhatâs
most important is to screen, so as long as
you get in for screening, Iâm happyâŚ.
generally, we start home breast exam at
age 20. I suggest every month, at the
same time of the month, examine your
breasts at home and get into your doctor
for a breast exam at least every three
years, earlier if you can.â
⢠Breast reduction surgery â NY Daily
News let plastic surgeon get away
w/saying: âThe pain that women with
large breasts can have has been
compared to when someone gets
metastasized cancer of the spine.â
18. more Womenâs health issues
⢠Aging : NYT twice in a week
â âNever Too Old for
Plastic Surgeryâ
â and âFighting Cleavage
Wrinklesâ
⢠Plastic surgery âfixâ for
resting bitch face
⢠Overactive bladder ads
⢠Thyroid â âStart having
hormone levels screened
when youâre 35â â Womenâs
Health magazine
⢠Osteopenia:
â Washington Post blogger:
âGleeâ was pretty darned
great last night, eh? I was so
wowed by Gwyneth
Paltrowâs singing and also
with her dancing. Paltrowâs
dance performances were
particularly impressive to
me in light of her recent
diagnosis of osteopenia, a
thinning of the bones that
can lead to osteoporosis.â
21. In 2009 after the USPSTF
mammography recommendations,
the editors of the Annals of Internal
Medicine referred to a âmedia
cacophonyâ ---
âConfusion, politics, conflicted
experts, anecdote, and emotion ruled
front pages, airwaves, the Internet,
and dinner-table conversations.â
22. Battle for hearts and minds of womenâŚand of journalists
âŚon mammography & many other issues
23. Impact on journalists may have been seen
in one recent week in imbalanced news
⢠Many stories about NEJM paper about
International Agency for Research on Cancer
breast CA screening recommendations â
stories that often read âBreast screening
reduces risk of death by 40%â
⢠Almost no mainstream news media stories
about JAMA Surgery paper suggesting surgery
overdone for âlow-gradeâ DCIS
25. Perfect smile, perfect skin, perfect hair
Thatâs what the CBS
Early Show promotes.
So if you have fine
lines, wrinkles, eye
dark circles, acne, age
spots â CBS tells you
that âAll can be easily
treated to enhance
your overall look in the
new year, prevent signs
of aging for the long-
term, and increase
your self-esteem.â
26.
27. Among the questionable advisories from the Post:
â˘Telling men in their 30s to sign up for complete physicalsâ
â˘Telling men in their 40s to get complete physical every 2 yrs
Telling men in their 40s to start skin cancer screening.
20s, 30s, 40s, 50sâŚâ
Tips for Men in 30s, 40s, 50s
⢠EKG in 30s
⢠âMen should visit their doctors annuallyâ
⢠Men in 50s âshould be aware they they
need prostate cancer screeningâ
28. National Cancer Institute:
⢠about 8% of men will develop cancer of the prostate between
their 50th and 70th birthdays.
⢠And the lifetime risk of dying from prostate cancer, according to
the American Cancer Society, is more like 1 in 36.
This is what such campaigns tend to do â use the scariest numbers
to âheighten awareness.â
29. We wrote:
Such promotions might help more men if they
spent more time discussing the poor quality of
shared decision-making that takes place around
prostate cancer issues. The DECISIONS survey
found that âmost prostate cancer screening
decisions did not meet criteria for shared
decision making because subjects did not
receive balanced discussions of decision
consequences, had limited knowledge, and were
not routinely asked for their preferences.â
36. Menâs health issues
In 2010, The German drug giant Bayer settled complaints by
three states that it had deceptively used the fear of prostate
cancer to sell One A Day vitamins without proof the pills could
prevent prostate cancer. Illinoisâ Attorney General decried Bayer
for trying to increase One A Day sales by âdeceptively leveraging
fear of prostate cancer and relied on a promotional campaign
called âStrike Out Prostate Cancerâ that enlisted Major League
Baseball as a promotional partner. That effort included
billboards, print and broadcast ads, and testimonials from
baseball players.â
45. We provide you with the opportunity to appreciate and better
understand the inner intricacies of parts of your body such as your
spine, your joints or your pelvis through an MRI scan.
Are you puzzled by why you have been having sinus pain, back pain
or knee pain? Are you tired of ongoing treatments that waste your
time and money? Are you curious about what is really happening
inside you? An MRI-based health screening can help get you on the
right path to appropriate treatment and a healthier life.
46. $299 Laser Toenail Fungus Treatment
$50 MRI scan for headache prevention screening
$35 for one Colon HydroTherapy Session
49. âhope to persuade state legislators to mandate the heart
exams for all students entering middle school in Texas.â
50. Gupta was shown being wheeled into a CT scanner to
undergo a coronary artery calcium scan. The statement was
made â unchallenged - âUnless you do the imaging and
advanced testing, you are really playing Russian roulette with
your life.â
51. "I'm not generally a big fan of direct-to-consumer TV
ads," says Dr. Mark Buchfuhrer. "However, for this
particular disorder, I think they've done a great
service by spending most of the time identifying the
problem."
But in the process, Glaxo also identified a market
and began introducing Americans to a problem
many people didn't realize they had, or had never
mentioned to their physicians.
52. K-Mart blue light special â free aneurysm screening at
900 K-mart pharmacies, sponsored by Medtronic and
3 vascular surgery professional groups
53.
54.
55. Reuters special report on esophageal cancer :
Cancer screening feeds overdiagnosis debate
56. Television news âteasesâ
Teases â those TV news set-up lines that tell you whatâs âstill to comeâ
after the next commercial â are soimportant that a popular TV news
industry website posted a âHow To Tease Health Storiesâ tip. Itâs worth
nothing that the column was entitled âMarketing Matters.â
âWhen teasing these medical breakthrough stories, remember that the
story is about the results of the study, not the technical specifics of the
research. If the story is about a breakthrough in birth defects, show
healthy kids playing, not researchers. If the story is about a
breakthrough in bone density, show people playing tennis or walking
with a cane. Donât focus on the dull clinical study, focus on the how this
breakthrough may affect real life. Analyze the research story and look
for its potential benefits down the road. The story isnât about
cholesterol levels, itâs about fewer heart attacks and living longer. The
story isnât about prenatal blood allergies, itâs about happy families with
smiling healthy children.â
57. No acknowledgement that just 2 months earlier Victor
Montori of the Mayo Clinic and John Yudkin of University
College London wrote in The BMJ, âThe epidemic of pre-
diabetes: the medicine and the politics.â
Harms from overdiagnosisâA label of pre-diabetes bring problems
with self image, insurance, and employment as well as the burdens
and costs of healthcare and drug side effects
A diagnosis of pre-diabetes does not mean that you will develop
diabetes. In fact, of 100 people like you, fewer than 50 are likely to
develop diabetes in the next 10 years
USA Today:
âPre-diabetes rates fuel national health crisis.â
58. How could this happen?
The USA Today story uses an American Diabetes
Association spokesman as a key source. He is
quoted saying:
âWeâve proven (pre-diabetes) is an intervention
time,â said Matthew Petersen, the associationâs
managing director of medical information and
professional engagement. âItâs a call to action.â
59. Fear - DCIS
Online comment:
âI am one of thousands of women who have been HARMED with OVER
diagnosis and OVER treatment of DCIS thanks to a mammogram.
Thankfully I took the time to investigate this problem and got an
expert 2nd pathology opinion and said NO to mastectomy, radiation
therapy and tamoxifenâŚ.all were being pushed heavily⌠after a core
needle biopsy and 3 lumpectomies (which did not get clean
margins)âŚâŚall of these procedures are very invasive and the
emotional toll is even worse. Then come all the billsâŚvery
stressfulâŚand the docs just want to prescribe Xanax! Nobody really
understands what the harms truly meanâŚunless you live through it.
We must find a better solution than mammograms as they find too
many NON cancers and miss too many aggressive cancers.â
âBreast Cancer Screening: Let Evidence Trump Fearâ
â Health Affairs blog by Shannon Brownlee (Lown),
Lisa Simpson (Academy Health)
60. Dr. Richard Lehman â
BMJ journal review blog
⢠On precision medicine:
âthe immense information load threatens to
overwhelm every personâbe they healthy, ill,
medical, or technicalâwith data that leads to
nothing but more data-seeking and more anxiety.
âŚThe latest way to make the luckiest humans in
history anxious during their short stay on Earth.â
Confusion -
Anxiety
61. JOSH BILLINGS (PEN NAME OF HUMORIST
HENRY WHEELER SHAW, 1818 â 1885)
âThe trouble with
people is not that they
don't know, but that
they know so much that
ain't so. âŚ
I honestly believe it is
better to know nothing
than to know what ainât
so.â
Confusion -
Anxiety
62.
63.
64. In order to drown out the cacophony
and not add to itâŚwe need humor
65. The editors of the Annals of
Internal âŚnot even in the urinal ---
âConfusion, politics, conflicted
experts, anecdote, and emotion ruled
front pages, airwaves, the Internet,
and dinner-table conversations.â
We are flooded and thereâs no escapeâŚ.
66. Dr. Willet Whitmore
Sloan Kettering urology chair >30 years
âIs cure possible in those for
whom it is necessary?
And is cure necessary in those for
whom it is possible?â
67. âThe current state of prostate cancer may not be
good medicine but it sure is good business.â
âThere are more people making a living from
prostate cancer than there are dying from it.â
âThe patient may not be dead but he wishes he
was.â
68. More Whitmore wit
âTell me what you want to hear and Iâll refer you
to someone who will recommend it.â
âWhen results are good, we tend to say, âThatâs
a good treatment.â When treatment fails, we
shake our head and say, âThatâs a bad cancer.â â
âLetâs try to replace heated opinion with cold
facts.â