1. Which is true about me?
Played on the basketball team at
Vanderbilt University
Appeared on a national television show
to discuss research
Received an award for research
showing ways to improve medical care
2. My Favorite Leader….
In smalls groups of 3; each person
thinks about and shares the following
Describe the leader you most admire.
Who is the person?
What were his or her actions?
How did followers react?
This can be a close leader or someone you
have observed from a distance.
3. Great Man Leaders
Source of Power
Organizational Position
Physical Characteristics
Leader Behaviors
Threats, Intimidation, Punishment
Follower Reactions
Fear-based Compliance
Dislike of Leader
Works for
Short-term results
Extreme situations
4. Transactional Leaders
Source of Power
Position Power
Ability to Reward
Leader Behaviors
Making Deals, presenting incentives
Negotiating, bargaining
Follower Reactions
Calculative Compliance
Works for
Short-term compliance
Specific, mundane tasks
5. Transformational Leaders
Source of Power
Referent Power, Personal Power
Vision
Leader Behaviors
Communication and Stories
Relationship Building, Inspirational Appeals
Follower Reactions
Commitment
Works for
Crisis situations
Facilitates change
6. Empowering Leaders
Source of Power
Referent Power, Personal Power
Expertise, particularly of followers
Leader Behaviors
Modeling, Directed Participation, Confidence
Building
Rational Persuasion
Follower Reactions
Initial fear
Ownership
Works for
Long-term situations
Creative tasks
7. A leader is best
When people barely know he exists,
Not so good when people obey and
acclaim him,
Worse when they despise him.
But of a leader, who talks little,
When his work is done, his aim fulfilled,
They will say:
We Did it ourselves.
Lao Tzu
9. A Key to Teams
Team leadership should be tailored to
fit the follower reaction that is desired
Start with the end in mind and work back to
identify appropriate leadership behavior
1
10. Leadership’s Effect on Teams
Overpowering Leadership
Leader Behaviors:
Coercion, Reinforcement, Punishment,
Autocratic Decision Making, Structuring
Team Reactions:
Compliance, Conformance, Skepticism
Outcome:
Submissive Teams--Teams that acquiesce
to leader control
Powerless Leadership
Leader Behaviors:
Intermittent Structuring, Enforcing of
Sanctions, Psychological Distancing
Team Reactions:
Lack of Direction, Power Struggles
Outcome:
Alienated Teams--Teams and leaders
struggle for control
Power Building Leadership
Leader Behaviors:
Guidance, Encouragement, Delegation,
Reinforcement, Culture Building
Team Reactions:
Learning, Skill Development
Outcome:
Self-managing teams--Teams control
how work is done
Empowered Leadership
Leader Behaviors:
Modeling, Boundary Spanning,
Assisting
Team Reactions:
Self-direction, Ownership
Outcome:
Self-leading teams--Teams control
what work is and how it is done.
LEADER POWER ORIENTATION DemocraticAutocratic
LEADERINVOLVEMENTPassiveActive
12. Types of Teams
Authority Differentiation
Is one person a leader or is the authority
shared among members?
Skill Differentiation
Does each team member have a unique
skill set?
Temporal Stability
How long will the team members work
together?
13. Matching Leadership to
Teams
Strong-Man Transactional Transformational Empowering
High Authority Differentiation
Short Time Frames
Low Authority Differentiation
Long Time Frames
Skill Differentiation?
Aversive
Directive
Critical nature of highest skill High expertise for followers
Clear Goals
Experienced Leaders
Vague Goals
Development Emphasis
14. A Key to Teams
Team-level autonomy should fit the
situation
Higher autonomy is needed when
conditions are uncertain and outcomes
need to be creative
2
Individual and team-level autonomy are not equivalent.
15. The Big Picture
There are many different types of leadership
and each has the potential to create very
different outcomes
Remember leadership should match the team
in terms of
Authority differentiation
Skill differentiation
Temporal stability
Day 1
Hinweis der Redaktion
Ask if more self-leadership is always desirable.
The answer of course is that it depends. Here we find that it depends once again on the nature of the tasks. This is from the same study of teams. We found that self-leadership was helpful when teams had creative tasks. This allowed them to arrive at unique solutions and to adapt to changes. It was not helpful when teams had routine tasks. In essence the best method had already been determined, so it made little sense to have rogue teams. Self-leadership also created interteam coordination problems.