SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 39
SEMANTICS
INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY , ISLAMABD

             Group 1
    Huma    Hafeez
    Kinza
     Ghafoor
    Huma Aslam
    Ayesha
    Sumaira Bibi
   “Semantics” comes from the Greek semantikos
    which means to show or give signs.
 Semantics can be applied to different kinds of
  symbol systems, such as computer languages
  and similar coding systems.
 It is a wide subject within the general study of
  language
   Semantics is the study of meaning.
   An understanding of semantics is essential to
    the study of language acquisition (how
    language users acquire a sense of meaning, as
    speakers and writers, listeners and readers)
    and of language change (how meanings alter
    over time). It is important for understanding
    language in social contexts, as these are likely
    to affect meaning, and for understanding
    varieties of English and effects of style. It is
    thus one of the most fundamental concepts in
    linguistics
 The study of semantics includes the study of
  how meaning is
  constructed, interpreted, clarified, obscured, ill
  ustrated, simplified negotiated, contradicted
  and paraphrased.
 In general, however, semantics generally refers
  to how meaning is conveyed through the
  symbols of a written language.semantics is the
  "study of the meaning of a language".
   Additionally, it is concerned with the
    conceptual meaning and not the associative
    meaning. The conceptual meaning is what a
    word in fact denotes, as for example Friday the
    13th is a day between Thursday the 12th and
    Saturday the 14th, and that is the conceptual
    meaning of the phrase Friday the 13 th. Yet, for
    many people the idea of that day brings to mind
    thoughts of bad luck and misfortune, which is
    the associative meaning.
Associative
 meaning




              WORD
EXAMPLE

 2.When one first reads the word “crash,” for
  example, a car accident may leap to mind.
  However, the term can also be used to discuss
  the sound that is created when a pair of large
  symbols are brought together in a piece of
  music, or how waves break against a rocky
  coast.
 The meaning of words is analyzed in several
  different ways in order to account for as many
  aspects of meaning as possible. First of all,
  words are analyzed in terms of their semantic
  features that is basic elements which enable
  the differentiation of meaning of words.
ELEMENTS OF SEMANTICS
   There are many different aspects of
    semantics, which are all very interesting. Just think
    of the many ways that words, phrases and
    sentences aquire meaning. Some words have
    actual entites to which they refer, such as chair.
    This word refers to a collective idea of all the chairs
    in existence. Other words have less exact meaning
    and may vary within the minds of speakers, such as
    love. This word can mean many
   I love my mom.
   I love chocolate cake.
   I love my husband.
   I love Paris.
   Each of these examples show a different contextual
    meaning of the word love
ROLE OF SEMANTICS IN
          LANGUAGE:
 Semantics in language determines the
  relationship between signifiers and what they
  signify. Although images and body language
  can be included as signifiers in a wider study of
  semantics, linguistic semantics deals strictly
  with words and their meanings. Semantics is a
  subfield of linguistics specializing in the study
  of meaning.
 Signifiers have multiple levels of meaning:

 The simplest level, also known as the first
  order of signification, is the denotation of a
  word.
  Denotation refers to a strictly literal
  understanding, and the object referred to is known
  as the denotata.
 For example:
 The noun phrase “brown bear” signifies a large
  omnivorous mammal known scientifically as the
  ursus arctos.
 Various cultural or emotional meanings attached to
  a word provide one or more deeper levels of
  meaning. These subjective meanings are known as
  connotations. For example:
 A camper might hear “brown bear” with a
  connotation of fear and panic. On the other
  hand, “brown bear” might mean
  friendship, comfort, and security for a child who
  plays and sleeps with a stuffed animal.
MONTAGUE GRAMMAR:
   The field of formal semantics, or model
    theoretic semantics, was pioneered by
    philosopher and mathematician Richard
    Montague in the mid twentieth century.
    Montague showed how all sentences could be
    broken down into subjects and predicates.
    These parts could be compared to
    mathematical concepts, particularly those in
    the branch of mathematics called typed
    lambda calculi, in order to evaluate its
    meaning. This theory is also known as
    Montague grammar.
 Although Montague‟s theory of semantics in
  language is one of the first and most commonly
  accepted, various philosophers have created
  other systems.
 For example, the theory of truth-conditional
  semantics was developed by Donald Davidson
  shortly after Montague published his work on
  formal semantics. Truth-conditional semantics
  evaluates the truth of a sentence by looking to
  specific, real world examples. Other theories
  include conceptual, lexical, and computational
  semantics…… semantics.
AGENT, THEME, INSTRUMENT, EXPERIENCER:
 Semantic roles describe the way in which
  words are used in sentences and the functions
  they fulfill. Thus, the entity that performs an
  action is known as an agent, while the entity
  involved in an action is called the theme. When
  an agent uses an entity in order to do
  something this entity is called an instrument.
 However, when a person in a sentence does
  not perform any action, but only has a
  perception, state of feeling then the role is
  described as experiencer
   Finally there are roles connected with motion
    or position of entities. So, the location is where
    an entity is, the source is the initial position of
    the entity, the place where it moves from and
    the goal is where the entity moves to.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORDS:

   One other issue investigated by semantics is
    the relationship between words, some of which
    are known to almost every language user,
    others very abstract and vague for a common
    speaker.
SYNONYMS:
 Synonym and antonym are forms of Greek
  nouns which mean, respectively, “same name”
  and “opposed (or different) name”. Synonyms
  have an identical reference meaning, but since
  they have differing connotations, they can
  never be truly synonymous.
 Synonyms are two words with very similar,
  almost identical meaning, such as buy and
  purchase, or cab and taxi. In some cases
  however, although the meaning seems nearly
  identical there is a difference in the word usage
  or the level of formality and therefore the
  words can not always be substituted.
ANTONYMS:

 The relationship between words is the
  case when two words have opposite
  meanings, the words such as
  male/female, old/new, interesting/boring
  are antonyms.
 Antonyms are divided into gradable and
  non-gradable antonyms.
 Gradable antonyms are opposites along a scale
  in that when someone says „I am not high‟ it
  does not necessarily mean „I am short‟.
 Non-gradable antonyms do not present such
  flexibility: when we say „I am married‟ the only
  antonym available in this sentence would be „I
  am single‟.
 True and false may show a clearer contrast.
  Clear either/or conditions are expressed
  by complementary antonyms as, open/closed,
  dead/alive, on/off.
   Another kind (not really opposites at all) are
    pairs which go together, and represent two
    sides of a relation: these are relational
    antonyms. Examples would
    be husband/wife, borrow/lend, murderer/victim,
    plaintiff/defendant.
HYPONYMS:
   Sometimes the meaning of one word is
    included in the meaning of another, broader
    term. Then the relationship between words can
    be described as hyponymy as in the case of
    words: vegetable and carrot. A carrot is
    necessarily a vegetable, therefore the meaning
    of the word vegetable is included in the word
    carrot, so carrot is a hyponym of vegetable. In
    this relation the word vegetable is the
    superordinte (higher level term) of the word
    carrot. The relationship of hyponymy and
    superordination can be illustrated by the
    following diagram:
   Hyponymy is an inclusive relationship where
    some lexemes are co-hyponyms of another that
    includes them.
    As cutlery includes knife, fork, spoon (but
    not teacup) these are co-hyponyms of the parent
    or super ordinating term. This traditional term
    denotes a grouping similar to a semantic field.
    So cod, guppy, salmon and trout are hyponyms
    for fish.
   David Crystal points out that this is a linguistic,
    not a real-world, relationship - so it varies from
    one language to another. In English potato is a
    hyponym of vegetable but in German the
    lexeme Gemüse does not
    include Kartoffel (potato).
HOMOPHONY:

 Homonyms    are different lexemes with the
  same form (written, spoken or both).
 Homophones are words which have
  different written forms, but the same
  pronunciation such as: right/write,
  to/too/two, bear/bare. Homophones are
  often mistaken for homonyms, but
  homonyms are words which have the same
  written or spoken forms and unrelated
  meanings.
 For example:
 Bat (flying creature) and bat (used in
  baseball), race (contest) and race (ethnic
  group).
POLYSEMY:
   Polysemy (or polysemia) is an intimidating
    compound noun for a basic language feature. The
    name comes from Greek poly (many)
    and semy (to do with meaning, as in semantics).
    Polysemy is also
    called radiation or multiplication.
   For example:
   Paper comes from Greek papyrus. Originally it
    referred to writing material made from the
    papyrus reeds of the Nile, later to other writing
    materials, and now to things such as government
    documents, scientific reports, family archives or
    newspapers.
   Another example could be Head: head as a part
    of body; mind, or mental ability; a person in
    charge.
METONYMY:
 Metonymy    is based on close
 connection of certain entities in
 everyday experience. The
 connection can be that of
 container-content, whole-part, or
 others. It is clearly visible in the
 following example „he drank the
 whole bottle‟ when it is obvious that
 he did not drink the container, but
 the content of the bottle.
DENOTATION:

 This is the core or central meaning of a word or
  lexeme, as far as it can be described in a
  dictionary. It is therefore sometimes known as
 the cognitive or referential meaning. It is
  possible to think of lexical items that have a
  more or less fixed denotation (sun, denoting
  the nearest star, perhaps) but this is rare.
CONNOTATION:

 Connotation     is connected with psychology
    and culture, as it means the
    personal or emotional associations aroused
    by words. When these associations are
    widespread and become established by
    common usage, a new denotation is
    recorded in dictionaries. A possible
    example of such change would be vicious.
    Originally derived from vice, it meant
    “extremely wicked”. In modern British
    usage it is commonly used to mean “fierce”,
    as in the brown rat is a vicious animal.

COLLOCATION:

 Some words are most commonly found paired
  with other words, to create a semantic unit or
  lexeme. These pairs are known as collocations.
  They are very helpful in establishing the
  meanings of the words in the pair.
 For Example:

 Play is likely to be followed by film, mag,
  series.It may be collocated with actor,
  director & merchant but is less likely to be
  followed by customer, operative or minister.
FIXED EXPRESSIONS:


 When  words become grouped in almost
  predictable ways these are fixed
  expressions.
 For Example:

 Jewel in the crown, desirable residence,
  criminal mastermind, world of work,
  address the issues, I put it to you.
PROTOTYPE THEORY:


   Prototype theory helped in explaining the meaning
    of a certain word not in terms of its features but in
    terms of resemblanceto the clearest examplar.
   For Example:
   If we take an example of Bird then we will
    understand it that dove, pigeon, hen, parrot fall in
    this category, not according to its features that
    which has feathers or wings.
   Native speakers of english might wonder that
    ostrich and penguin are hyponyms of birds, but we
    are sure that sparrow and pigeon are birds so they
    are prototype.
SEMANTIC FIELDS:

   In studying the lexicon of English (or any language)
    we may group together lexemes which inter-
    relate, in the sense that we need them to define or
    describe each other.
   For Example:
   We can see how such lexemes as
    cat, feline, moggy, puss, kitten, tom, queen and
    miaow occupy the same semantic field. We can also
    see that some lexemes will occupy many fields:
    noise will appear in semantic fields for
    acoustics, pain or discomfort and electronics.
    Although such fields are not clear-cut and
    coherent, they are akin to the kind of groupings
    children make for themselves in learning a
    language. An entertaining way to see how we
    organize the lexicon for ourselves is to play word-
    association games.
SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Cohesion, Coherence and Textuality
Cohesion, Coherence and TextualityCohesion, Coherence and Textuality
Cohesion, Coherence and TextualityDr. Mohsin Khan
 
Sense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsSense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsAfuza Shara
 
Lexical Relations in Semantic
Lexical Relations in SemanticLexical Relations in Semantic
Lexical Relations in SemanticAyu Monita
 
Lecture 2 sentence structure constituents
Lecture 2 sentence structure constituentsLecture 2 sentence structure constituents
Lecture 2 sentence structure constituentsssuser1f22f9
 
semantics and pragmatics (1)
semantics and pragmatics (1)semantics and pragmatics (1)
semantics and pragmatics (1)ramazan demirtas
 
Semantics: Seven types of meaning
Semantics: Seven types of meaningSemantics: Seven types of meaning
Semantics: Seven types of meaningMiftadia Laula
 
Transformational generative grammar
Transformational generative grammarTransformational generative grammar
Transformational generative grammarAliImran376
 
Transformational Grammar by: Noam Chomsky
Transformational Grammar by: Noam ChomskyTransformational Grammar by: Noam Chomsky
Transformational Grammar by: Noam ChomskyShiela May Claro
 
Semantics chapter 2 saeed
Semantics chapter 2 saeedSemantics chapter 2 saeed
Semantics chapter 2 saeedpuri15
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Semantics presentation
Semantics presentationSemantics presentation
Semantics presentation
 
An introduction to semantics
An introduction to semanticsAn introduction to semantics
An introduction to semantics
 
Cohesion, Coherence and Textuality
Cohesion, Coherence and TextualityCohesion, Coherence and Textuality
Cohesion, Coherence and Textuality
 
Types of meaning
Types of meaningTypes of meaning
Types of meaning
 
Deixis
DeixisDeixis
Deixis
 
Antonymy
AntonymyAntonymy
Antonymy
 
Sense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsSense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & Semantics
 
Semantic vs Pragmatics
Semantic vs PragmaticsSemantic vs Pragmatics
Semantic vs Pragmatics
 
Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
Lexical Relations in Semantic
Lexical Relations in SemanticLexical Relations in Semantic
Lexical Relations in Semantic
 
Lecture 2 sentence structure constituents
Lecture 2 sentence structure constituentsLecture 2 sentence structure constituents
Lecture 2 sentence structure constituents
 
Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
semantics and pragmatics (1)
semantics and pragmatics (1)semantics and pragmatics (1)
semantics and pragmatics (1)
 
Semantic roles and semantic features
Semantic roles and semantic featuresSemantic roles and semantic features
Semantic roles and semantic features
 
Semantics: Seven types of meaning
Semantics: Seven types of meaningSemantics: Seven types of meaning
Semantics: Seven types of meaning
 
saussure
saussuresaussure
saussure
 
Componential-Analysis.pptx
Componential-Analysis.pptxComponential-Analysis.pptx
Componential-Analysis.pptx
 
Transformational generative grammar
Transformational generative grammarTransformational generative grammar
Transformational generative grammar
 
Transformational Grammar by: Noam Chomsky
Transformational Grammar by: Noam ChomskyTransformational Grammar by: Noam Chomsky
Transformational Grammar by: Noam Chomsky
 
Semantics chapter 2 saeed
Semantics chapter 2 saeedSemantics chapter 2 saeed
Semantics chapter 2 saeed
 

Andere mochten auch

Pragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationPragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationMehwish Nazar
 
السادس الاعدادي اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية
السادس الاعدادي  اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية السادس الاعدادي  اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية
السادس الاعدادي اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية Online
 
sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...
sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...
sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...Hifza Kiyani
 
"Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a...
"Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a..."Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a...
"Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a...tayyabaways
 
Sentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaning
Sentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaningSentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaning
Sentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaningHifza Kiyani
 
English phonology
English phonologyEnglish phonology
English phonologyLia Janah
 
Morphology
MorphologyMorphology
MorphologyIzaham
 
Session 3 english phonology
Session 3 english phonologySession 3 english phonology
Session 3 english phonologyrmsutton
 
English phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_morocco
English phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_moroccoEnglish phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_morocco
English phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_moroccoRednef68 Rednef68
 
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTS
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTSSEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTS
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTSMusfera Nara Vadia
 
1. introduction to semantics
1. introduction to semantics1. introduction to semantics
1. introduction to semanticsAsmaa Alzelibany
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
Pragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationPragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentation
 
السادس الاعدادي اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية
السادس الاعدادي  اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية السادس الاعدادي  اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية
السادس الاعدادي اساسيات قواعد اللغة العربية
 
sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...
sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...
sentence meaning is different from speaker's meaning.-news headlines from dif...
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
 
"Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a...
"Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a..."Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a...
"Gender Differences Relating to Hyperstar Promotion, Convenience, low price a...
 
Sentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaning
Sentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaningSentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaning
Sentence meaning is different from speaker’s meaning
 
Semantic Roles
Semantic RolesSemantic Roles
Semantic Roles
 
English phonology
English phonologyEnglish phonology
English phonology
 
English Phonology, I Bim
English Phonology, I BimEnglish Phonology, I Bim
English Phonology, I Bim
 
Phonology
PhonologyPhonology
Phonology
 
Morphology
MorphologyMorphology
Morphology
 
Session 3 english phonology
Session 3 english phonologySession 3 english phonology
Session 3 english phonology
 
Semantic relation among words
Semantic relation among wordsSemantic relation among words
Semantic relation among words
 
English phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_morocco
English phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_moroccoEnglish phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_morocco
English phonetics redouane boulguid ensa_safi_morocco
 
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTS
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTSSEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTS
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTS
 
Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
1. introduction to semantics
1. introduction to semantics1. introduction to semantics
1. introduction to semantics
 
Semantics: Meanings of Language
Semantics: Meanings of LanguageSemantics: Meanings of Language
Semantics: Meanings of Language
 

Ähnlich wie SEMANTICS

Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)Erick Mwacha
 
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaningHina Honey
 
APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...
APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...
APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...Fatima Gul
 
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copyWeek 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copyDr. Russell Rodrigo
 
Semantics [Report in Language Study]
Semantics [Report in Language Study]Semantics [Report in Language Study]
Semantics [Report in Language Study]Jhoanna Lyn
 
The Dimension of Meaning - Semantics
The Dimension of Meaning - SemanticsThe Dimension of Meaning - Semantics
The Dimension of Meaning - SemanticsSofiyana Danistha
 
An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...
An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...
An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...Alexander Decker
 
cours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptx
cours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptxcours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptx
cours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptxDjellad
 
Describing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag University
Describing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag UniversityDescribing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag University
Describing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag UniversityUludag University
 
31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.ppt
31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.ppt31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.ppt
31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.pptAzizbekUsmonov3
 

Ähnlich wie SEMANTICS (20)

Linguistics5
Linguistics5         Linguistics5
Linguistics5
 
Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)
 
Word Meaning
Word MeaningWord Meaning
Word Meaning
 
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
 
Semantic
SemanticSemantic
Semantic
 
APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...
APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...
APPLICATION OF DIMENSIONS OF MEANING ON JAMES JOYCE’S A PORTRAIT OF ARTIST AS...
 
Morphology
MorphologyMorphology
Morphology
 
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copyWeek 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
 
Semantics [Report in Language Study]
Semantics [Report in Language Study]Semantics [Report in Language Study]
Semantics [Report in Language Study]
 
#Semantic#
#Semantic# #Semantic#
#Semantic#
 
The Dimension of Meaning - Semantics
The Dimension of Meaning - SemanticsThe Dimension of Meaning - Semantics
The Dimension of Meaning - Semantics
 
Semantics lecture 2
Semantics   lecture 2Semantics   lecture 2
Semantics lecture 2
 
An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...
An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...
An in depth analysis of the manifestation of emotions and ideas through simil...
 
Semantics introduction
Semantics introductionSemantics introduction
Semantics introduction
 
Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
Semantic
SemanticSemantic
Semantic
 
cours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptx
cours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptxcours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptx
cours 2 word senses and vhhhhgpolysemy .pptx
 
Describing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag University
Describing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag UniversityDescribing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag University
Describing Language- by AYLİN AYDIN, Uludag University
 
31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.ppt
31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.ppt31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.ppt
31199_Lecture 5 lexical expressive means.ppt
 
Lexemes
LexemesLexemes
Lexemes
 

Mehr von Hameel Khan

‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...
‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...
‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...Hameel Khan
 
SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)
SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)
SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)Hameel Khan
 
Esp course design for teachers
Esp course design for teachersEsp course design for teachers
Esp course design for teachersHameel Khan
 
ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS
ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS
ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS Hameel Khan
 
Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11
Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11
Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11Hameel Khan
 
AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'
AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'
AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'Hameel Khan
 
lakoff theory and its application
lakoff theory and its applicationlakoff theory and its application
lakoff theory and its applicationHameel Khan
 
Orientalism maimoona
Orientalism maimoonaOrientalism maimoona
Orientalism maimoonaHameel Khan
 
Final orientalism huma
Final orientalism humaFinal orientalism huma
Final orientalism humaHameel Khan
 
TEFL LESSON PLAN
TEFL LESSON PLAN TEFL LESSON PLAN
TEFL LESSON PLAN Hameel Khan
 
LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"
LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"
LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"Hameel Khan
 
BRAND LAUNCH PLAN
BRAND LAUNCH PLAN BRAND LAUNCH PLAN
BRAND LAUNCH PLAN Hameel Khan
 
lack off theory a dolls house
lack off theory a dolls houselack off theory a dolls house
lack off theory a dolls houseHameel Khan
 
code switching - code mixing
code switching - code mixingcode switching - code mixing
code switching - code mixingHameel Khan
 
APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION
APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION
APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION Hameel Khan
 
Edwad said orientalism
Edwad said orientalism Edwad said orientalism
Edwad said orientalism Hameel Khan
 
WRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIES
WRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIESWRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIES
WRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIESHameel Khan
 
Post modernism and islam
Post modernism and islamPost modernism and islam
Post modernism and islamHameel Khan
 
RENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATION
RENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATIONRENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATION
RENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATIONHameel Khan
 

Mehr von Hameel Khan (20)

‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...
‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...
‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRAN...
 
SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)
SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)
SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF MOVIE ARGO (RESEARCH PAPER)
 
Esp course design for teachers
Esp course design for teachersEsp course design for teachers
Esp course design for teachers
 
ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS
ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS
ESP COURSE DESIGN FOR GOVERNMENT TEACHERS
 
Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11
Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11
Research paper ISLAMOPHOBIA AND MEDIA STUDIES SINCE 9/11
 
AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'
AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'
AMONG THE BELEIVERS 'INDONESIA'
 
lakoff theory and its application
lakoff theory and its applicationlakoff theory and its application
lakoff theory and its application
 
Orientalism
OrientalismOrientalism
Orientalism
 
Orientalism maimoona
Orientalism maimoonaOrientalism maimoona
Orientalism maimoona
 
Final orientalism huma
Final orientalism humaFinal orientalism huma
Final orientalism huma
 
TEFL LESSON PLAN
TEFL LESSON PLAN TEFL LESSON PLAN
TEFL LESSON PLAN
 
LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"
LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"
LEXICAL RELATIONS AND ITS APPLICATION ON "THE KITE"
 
BRAND LAUNCH PLAN
BRAND LAUNCH PLAN BRAND LAUNCH PLAN
BRAND LAUNCH PLAN
 
lack off theory a dolls house
lack off theory a dolls houselack off theory a dolls house
lack off theory a dolls house
 
code switching - code mixing
code switching - code mixingcode switching - code mixing
code switching - code mixing
 
APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION
APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION
APPLICATION OF LEXICAL RELATION
 
Edwad said orientalism
Edwad said orientalism Edwad said orientalism
Edwad said orientalism
 
WRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIES
WRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIESWRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIES
WRITING SKILL THROUGH SHORT STORIES
 
Post modernism and islam
Post modernism and islamPost modernism and islam
Post modernism and islam
 
RENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATION
RENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATIONRENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATION
RENAISSANCE COMPLETE PRESENTATION
 

SEMANTICS

  • 2. INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY , ISLAMABD Group 1 Huma Hafeez Kinza Ghafoor Huma Aslam Ayesha Sumaira Bibi
  • 3. “Semantics” comes from the Greek semantikos which means to show or give signs.
  • 4.  Semantics can be applied to different kinds of symbol systems, such as computer languages and similar coding systems.  It is a wide subject within the general study of language
  • 5. Semantics is the study of meaning.
  • 6. An understanding of semantics is essential to the study of language acquisition (how language users acquire a sense of meaning, as speakers and writers, listeners and readers) and of language change (how meanings alter over time). It is important for understanding language in social contexts, as these are likely to affect meaning, and for understanding varieties of English and effects of style. It is thus one of the most fundamental concepts in linguistics
  • 7.  The study of semantics includes the study of how meaning is constructed, interpreted, clarified, obscured, ill ustrated, simplified negotiated, contradicted and paraphrased.  In general, however, semantics generally refers to how meaning is conveyed through the symbols of a written language.semantics is the "study of the meaning of a language".
  • 8. Additionally, it is concerned with the conceptual meaning and not the associative meaning. The conceptual meaning is what a word in fact denotes, as for example Friday the 13th is a day between Thursday the 12th and Saturday the 14th, and that is the conceptual meaning of the phrase Friday the 13 th. Yet, for many people the idea of that day brings to mind thoughts of bad luck and misfortune, which is the associative meaning.
  • 10. EXAMPLE  2.When one first reads the word “crash,” for example, a car accident may leap to mind. However, the term can also be used to discuss the sound that is created when a pair of large symbols are brought together in a piece of music, or how waves break against a rocky coast.  The meaning of words is analyzed in several different ways in order to account for as many aspects of meaning as possible. First of all, words are analyzed in terms of their semantic features that is basic elements which enable the differentiation of meaning of words.
  • 11. ELEMENTS OF SEMANTICS  There are many different aspects of semantics, which are all very interesting. Just think of the many ways that words, phrases and sentences aquire meaning. Some words have actual entites to which they refer, such as chair. This word refers to a collective idea of all the chairs in existence. Other words have less exact meaning and may vary within the minds of speakers, such as love. This word can mean many  I love my mom.  I love chocolate cake.  I love my husband.  I love Paris.  Each of these examples show a different contextual meaning of the word love
  • 12. ROLE OF SEMANTICS IN LANGUAGE:  Semantics in language determines the relationship between signifiers and what they signify. Although images and body language can be included as signifiers in a wider study of semantics, linguistic semantics deals strictly with words and their meanings. Semantics is a subfield of linguistics specializing in the study of meaning.  Signifiers have multiple levels of meaning:  The simplest level, also known as the first order of signification, is the denotation of a word.
  • 13.  Denotation refers to a strictly literal understanding, and the object referred to is known as the denotata.  For example:  The noun phrase “brown bear” signifies a large omnivorous mammal known scientifically as the ursus arctos.  Various cultural or emotional meanings attached to a word provide one or more deeper levels of meaning. These subjective meanings are known as connotations. For example:  A camper might hear “brown bear” with a connotation of fear and panic. On the other hand, “brown bear” might mean friendship, comfort, and security for a child who plays and sleeps with a stuffed animal.
  • 14. MONTAGUE GRAMMAR:  The field of formal semantics, or model theoretic semantics, was pioneered by philosopher and mathematician Richard Montague in the mid twentieth century. Montague showed how all sentences could be broken down into subjects and predicates. These parts could be compared to mathematical concepts, particularly those in the branch of mathematics called typed lambda calculi, in order to evaluate its meaning. This theory is also known as Montague grammar.
  • 15.  Although Montague‟s theory of semantics in language is one of the first and most commonly accepted, various philosophers have created other systems.  For example, the theory of truth-conditional semantics was developed by Donald Davidson shortly after Montague published his work on formal semantics. Truth-conditional semantics evaluates the truth of a sentence by looking to specific, real world examples. Other theories include conceptual, lexical, and computational semantics…… semantics.
  • 16. AGENT, THEME, INSTRUMENT, EXPERIENCER:  Semantic roles describe the way in which words are used in sentences and the functions they fulfill. Thus, the entity that performs an action is known as an agent, while the entity involved in an action is called the theme. When an agent uses an entity in order to do something this entity is called an instrument.  However, when a person in a sentence does not perform any action, but only has a perception, state of feeling then the role is described as experiencer
  • 17. Finally there are roles connected with motion or position of entities. So, the location is where an entity is, the source is the initial position of the entity, the place where it moves from and the goal is where the entity moves to.
  • 18. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORDS:  One other issue investigated by semantics is the relationship between words, some of which are known to almost every language user, others very abstract and vague for a common speaker.
  • 19. SYNONYMS:  Synonym and antonym are forms of Greek nouns which mean, respectively, “same name” and “opposed (or different) name”. Synonyms have an identical reference meaning, but since they have differing connotations, they can never be truly synonymous.  Synonyms are two words with very similar, almost identical meaning, such as buy and purchase, or cab and taxi. In some cases however, although the meaning seems nearly identical there is a difference in the word usage or the level of formality and therefore the words can not always be substituted.
  • 20. ANTONYMS:  The relationship between words is the case when two words have opposite meanings, the words such as male/female, old/new, interesting/boring are antonyms.  Antonyms are divided into gradable and non-gradable antonyms.
  • 21.  Gradable antonyms are opposites along a scale in that when someone says „I am not high‟ it does not necessarily mean „I am short‟.  Non-gradable antonyms do not present such flexibility: when we say „I am married‟ the only antonym available in this sentence would be „I am single‟.  True and false may show a clearer contrast. Clear either/or conditions are expressed by complementary antonyms as, open/closed, dead/alive, on/off.
  • 22. Another kind (not really opposites at all) are pairs which go together, and represent two sides of a relation: these are relational antonyms. Examples would be husband/wife, borrow/lend, murderer/victim, plaintiff/defendant.
  • 23. HYPONYMS:  Sometimes the meaning of one word is included in the meaning of another, broader term. Then the relationship between words can be described as hyponymy as in the case of words: vegetable and carrot. A carrot is necessarily a vegetable, therefore the meaning of the word vegetable is included in the word carrot, so carrot is a hyponym of vegetable. In this relation the word vegetable is the superordinte (higher level term) of the word carrot. The relationship of hyponymy and superordination can be illustrated by the following diagram:
  • 24. Hyponymy is an inclusive relationship where some lexemes are co-hyponyms of another that includes them.  As cutlery includes knife, fork, spoon (but not teacup) these are co-hyponyms of the parent or super ordinating term. This traditional term denotes a grouping similar to a semantic field. So cod, guppy, salmon and trout are hyponyms for fish.  David Crystal points out that this is a linguistic, not a real-world, relationship - so it varies from one language to another. In English potato is a hyponym of vegetable but in German the lexeme Gemüse does not include Kartoffel (potato).
  • 25. HOMOPHONY:  Homonyms are different lexemes with the same form (written, spoken or both).  Homophones are words which have different written forms, but the same pronunciation such as: right/write, to/too/two, bear/bare. Homophones are often mistaken for homonyms, but homonyms are words which have the same written or spoken forms and unrelated meanings.  For example:  Bat (flying creature) and bat (used in baseball), race (contest) and race (ethnic group).
  • 26. POLYSEMY:  Polysemy (or polysemia) is an intimidating compound noun for a basic language feature. The name comes from Greek poly (many) and semy (to do with meaning, as in semantics). Polysemy is also called radiation or multiplication.  For example:  Paper comes from Greek papyrus. Originally it referred to writing material made from the papyrus reeds of the Nile, later to other writing materials, and now to things such as government documents, scientific reports, family archives or newspapers.  Another example could be Head: head as a part of body; mind, or mental ability; a person in charge.
  • 27. METONYMY:  Metonymy is based on close connection of certain entities in everyday experience. The connection can be that of container-content, whole-part, or others. It is clearly visible in the following example „he drank the whole bottle‟ when it is obvious that he did not drink the container, but the content of the bottle.
  • 28. DENOTATION:  This is the core or central meaning of a word or lexeme, as far as it can be described in a dictionary. It is therefore sometimes known as  the cognitive or referential meaning. It is possible to think of lexical items that have a more or less fixed denotation (sun, denoting the nearest star, perhaps) but this is rare.
  • 29. CONNOTATION:  Connotation is connected with psychology and culture, as it means the personal or emotional associations aroused by words. When these associations are widespread and become established by common usage, a new denotation is recorded in dictionaries. A possible example of such change would be vicious. Originally derived from vice, it meant “extremely wicked”. In modern British usage it is commonly used to mean “fierce”, as in the brown rat is a vicious animal. 
  • 30. COLLOCATION:  Some words are most commonly found paired with other words, to create a semantic unit or lexeme. These pairs are known as collocations. They are very helpful in establishing the meanings of the words in the pair.  For Example:  Play is likely to be followed by film, mag, series.It may be collocated with actor, director & merchant but is less likely to be followed by customer, operative or minister.
  • 31. FIXED EXPRESSIONS:  When words become grouped in almost predictable ways these are fixed expressions.  For Example:  Jewel in the crown, desirable residence, criminal mastermind, world of work, address the issues, I put it to you.
  • 32.
  • 33. PROTOTYPE THEORY:  Prototype theory helped in explaining the meaning of a certain word not in terms of its features but in terms of resemblanceto the clearest examplar.  For Example:  If we take an example of Bird then we will understand it that dove, pigeon, hen, parrot fall in this category, not according to its features that which has feathers or wings.  Native speakers of english might wonder that ostrich and penguin are hyponyms of birds, but we are sure that sparrow and pigeon are birds so they are prototype.
  • 34. SEMANTIC FIELDS:  In studying the lexicon of English (or any language) we may group together lexemes which inter- relate, in the sense that we need them to define or describe each other.  For Example:  We can see how such lexemes as cat, feline, moggy, puss, kitten, tom, queen and miaow occupy the same semantic field. We can also see that some lexemes will occupy many fields: noise will appear in semantic fields for acoustics, pain or discomfort and electronics. Although such fields are not clear-cut and coherent, they are akin to the kind of groupings children make for themselves in learning a language. An entertaining way to see how we organize the lexicon for ourselves is to play word- association games.