Suche senden
Hochladen
Anatomy of A Manuscript
•
Als PPT, PDF herunterladen
•
1 gefällt mir
•
493 views
H
HSLUofM
Folgen
Scientific Writing Series Session Two
Weniger lesen
Mehr lesen
Bildung
Gesundheit & Medizin
Melden
Teilen
Melden
Teilen
1 von 24
Jetzt herunterladen
Empfohlen
Scientific Writing Series Session Four
Responding to Reviewer's Comments
Responding to Reviewer's Comments
HSLUofM
Comments by peer reviewers and journal editors are meant to help authors improve their manuscript. Follow the three golden rules when responding to reviewer comments.
How to respond to comments by peer reviewers
How to respond to comments by peer reviewers
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
Presentació realitzada per Ana Marušić en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
The peer review process
The peer review process
Universitat de Barcelona - Facultat d’Informació i Mitjans Audiovisuals
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05
Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05
Wouter Gerritsma
Peer review is the most widely accepted model for setting a threshold of published scholarly material. With the move to digital publishing, it has come under attack with suggestions that it is 'broken', overloading reviewers and possibly no longer fit for purpose. This presentation discusses the challenges for peer review and some emerging new models. Ultimately, we may need to take a step back to ask what peer review is for and how these aims can best be achieved. Video available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YMla0Uc5ZE&x-yt-ts=1422327029&x-yt-cl=84838260
Approaches to Peer Review
Approaches to Peer Review
Martyn Rittman
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
What Is Peer Review?
What Is Peer Review?
Jerry Stovall
Lecture 32: Open Peer Review
Lecture 32: Open Peer Review
Jessica Laccetti
Medical manuscript writing is a document that depicts the research done by the researcher. It should be accurate, complete, precise, and provide unambiguous information. https://www.cognibrain.com/medical-manuscript-all-you-need-to-know-about/
Medical Manuscript Writing
Medical Manuscript Writing
Cognibrain Healthcare
Empfohlen
Scientific Writing Series Session Four
Responding to Reviewer's Comments
Responding to Reviewer's Comments
HSLUofM
Comments by peer reviewers and journal editors are meant to help authors improve their manuscript. Follow the three golden rules when responding to reviewer comments.
How to respond to comments by peer reviewers
How to respond to comments by peer reviewers
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
Presentació realitzada per Ana Marušić en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
The peer review process
The peer review process
Universitat de Barcelona - Facultat d’Informació i Mitjans Audiovisuals
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05
Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05
Wouter Gerritsma
Peer review is the most widely accepted model for setting a threshold of published scholarly material. With the move to digital publishing, it has come under attack with suggestions that it is 'broken', overloading reviewers and possibly no longer fit for purpose. This presentation discusses the challenges for peer review and some emerging new models. Ultimately, we may need to take a step back to ask what peer review is for and how these aims can best be achieved. Video available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YMla0Uc5ZE&x-yt-ts=1422327029&x-yt-cl=84838260
Approaches to Peer Review
Approaches to Peer Review
Martyn Rittman
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
What Is Peer Review?
What Is Peer Review?
Jerry Stovall
Lecture 32: Open Peer Review
Lecture 32: Open Peer Review
Jessica Laccetti
Medical manuscript writing is a document that depicts the research done by the researcher. It should be accurate, complete, precise, and provide unambiguous information. https://www.cognibrain.com/medical-manuscript-all-you-need-to-know-about/
Medical Manuscript Writing
Medical Manuscript Writing
Cognibrain Healthcare
Science is ever evolving, and replication studies and negative findings play a major role in helping science grow. But journals are not always open to publishing these. What role do replication studies play in scientific discovery? And how does publishing negative results help further the cause of science? View this presentation to learn more.
Learn more about replication studies and negative results
Learn more about replication studies and negative results
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
An introduction to citation analysis, looking at Web of Science and Scopus.
Bang those robots’ heads together!
Bang those robots’ heads together!
Lancaster University Library
How to survive peer review
How to survive peer review
How to survive peer review
Khalid Mahmood
Learn about the range of tools/metrics that you can use to help understand the influence of your research.
More than your h index
More than your h index
Lancaster University Library
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)
KidneyOrgRu
Dr.Eddy explains the basics of publishing in English language journals, sharing knowledge he has built over years of experience as a researcher. He writes about important aspects of journal publication. Read Dr.Eddy’s tips on how to publish successfully.
Most common reasons for journal rejections
Most common reasons for journal rejections
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
is a truly special teacher is very wise and sees tomorrow in every student’s eyes
HCS 465 GUIDE Education Planning--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Education Planning--hcs465guide.com
WindyMiller18
An overview of the publication process and the process of writing
How and when to publish
How and when to publish
Roger Watson
is a truly special teacher is very wise and sees tomorrow in every student’s eyes
HCS 465 GUIDE Introduction Education--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Introduction Education--hcs465guide.com
agathachristie284
This is the presentation of the faculty development programme on writing for research purposes and using Mendeley for reference management.
Research writing & Reference Management using Mendely
Research writing & Reference Management using Mendely
vijay kumar
2015 was a busy year for the academic publishing world, with many trend-setting practices, significant discoveries, and innovations. Editage Insights spoke to several experts from the publishing industry to know their thoughts about these trends. Here, we bring you extracts of the knowledge they shared to help you get first-hand advice on academic publication.
Academic publishing advice from industry experts
Academic publishing advice from industry experts
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
NUR 151 Research Tuesday class
NUR 151 Research Tuesday class
Danielle Carlock
A presentation given during the orientation day (Sept 11, 2011) for UQUDENT students to go through the different learning resources at Umm Al-Qura University.
Searching Umm Al-Qura University Digital Library
Searching Umm Al-Qura University Digital Library
Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Dentistry
Dealing with Journal Rejection
[Enago] Dealing with Journal Rejection
[Enago] Dealing with Journal Rejection
sejin cheon
Publication bias refers to a phenomenon in scientific reporting whereby authors are more likely to submit and journal editors are more likely to publish studies with “positive” results (i.e. results showing a significant finding) than studies with “negative” (i.e. supporting the null hypothesis) or unsupportive results. Due to such a bias, important—albeit negative—results (e.g., a study showing that a new treatment is ineffective) may never reach the larger scientific community.
Publication and reporting biases and how they impact publication of research
Publication and reporting biases and how they impact publication of research
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
EBD Course: Lecture 4 Secondary Sources
EBD Course: Lecture 4 Secondary Sources
Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Dentistry
In an interview with Dr. Jing Zhu, Associate Editor of the Biotechnology Journal, we’ve uncovered what authors in Asia Pacific can do to submit better manuscripts. Learn more about her answers and remedies on the following points: • Tips on choosing the right journal • What to include in a cover letter • Resources in Authors Guidelines • Writing an “attractive” title • Importance of double-checking
Pre-submission guide for manuscripts
Pre-submission guide for manuscripts
Wiley
Common mistakes in presenting manuscripts to scientific journals
Common mistakes in presenting manuscripts to scientific journals
Fredy RS Gutierrez
Given in Dublin July 2017 at International Network for Doctoral Education in Nursing
Inden 2017: Publishing tips and future directions
Inden 2017: Publishing tips and future directions
Roger Watson
Ideas for initiating and promoting research in healthcare establishments.
How to Initiate and Promote Research in Health V1
How to Initiate and Promote Research in Health V1
Imad Hassan
Scientific Writing Series Seminar Session
Tackling The Writing Process
Tackling The Writing Process
HSLUofM
How to Conduct a Literature Review Searching references in medical journalism Saeid Safari, Anesthesiologist, Editorial Manager of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine www.anesthpain.com drsafari.s@gmail.com
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
Saeid Safari
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Science is ever evolving, and replication studies and negative findings play a major role in helping science grow. But journals are not always open to publishing these. What role do replication studies play in scientific discovery? And how does publishing negative results help further the cause of science? View this presentation to learn more.
Learn more about replication studies and negative results
Learn more about replication studies and negative results
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
An introduction to citation analysis, looking at Web of Science and Scopus.
Bang those robots’ heads together!
Bang those robots’ heads together!
Lancaster University Library
How to survive peer review
How to survive peer review
How to survive peer review
Khalid Mahmood
Learn about the range of tools/metrics that you can use to help understand the influence of your research.
More than your h index
More than your h index
Lancaster University Library
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)
KidneyOrgRu
Dr.Eddy explains the basics of publishing in English language journals, sharing knowledge he has built over years of experience as a researcher. He writes about important aspects of journal publication. Read Dr.Eddy’s tips on how to publish successfully.
Most common reasons for journal rejections
Most common reasons for journal rejections
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
is a truly special teacher is very wise and sees tomorrow in every student’s eyes
HCS 465 GUIDE Education Planning--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Education Planning--hcs465guide.com
WindyMiller18
An overview of the publication process and the process of writing
How and when to publish
How and when to publish
Roger Watson
is a truly special teacher is very wise and sees tomorrow in every student’s eyes
HCS 465 GUIDE Introduction Education--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Introduction Education--hcs465guide.com
agathachristie284
This is the presentation of the faculty development programme on writing for research purposes and using Mendeley for reference management.
Research writing & Reference Management using Mendely
Research writing & Reference Management using Mendely
vijay kumar
2015 was a busy year for the academic publishing world, with many trend-setting practices, significant discoveries, and innovations. Editage Insights spoke to several experts from the publishing industry to know their thoughts about these trends. Here, we bring you extracts of the knowledge they shared to help you get first-hand advice on academic publication.
Academic publishing advice from industry experts
Academic publishing advice from industry experts
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
NUR 151 Research Tuesday class
NUR 151 Research Tuesday class
Danielle Carlock
A presentation given during the orientation day (Sept 11, 2011) for UQUDENT students to go through the different learning resources at Umm Al-Qura University.
Searching Umm Al-Qura University Digital Library
Searching Umm Al-Qura University Digital Library
Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Dentistry
Dealing with Journal Rejection
[Enago] Dealing with Journal Rejection
[Enago] Dealing with Journal Rejection
sejin cheon
Publication bias refers to a phenomenon in scientific reporting whereby authors are more likely to submit and journal editors are more likely to publish studies with “positive” results (i.e. results showing a significant finding) than studies with “negative” (i.e. supporting the null hypothesis) or unsupportive results. Due to such a bias, important—albeit negative—results (e.g., a study showing that a new treatment is ineffective) may never reach the larger scientific community.
Publication and reporting biases and how they impact publication of research
Publication and reporting biases and how they impact publication of research
Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
EBD Course: Lecture 4 Secondary Sources
EBD Course: Lecture 4 Secondary Sources
Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Dentistry
In an interview with Dr. Jing Zhu, Associate Editor of the Biotechnology Journal, we’ve uncovered what authors in Asia Pacific can do to submit better manuscripts. Learn more about her answers and remedies on the following points: • Tips on choosing the right journal • What to include in a cover letter • Resources in Authors Guidelines • Writing an “attractive” title • Importance of double-checking
Pre-submission guide for manuscripts
Pre-submission guide for manuscripts
Wiley
Common mistakes in presenting manuscripts to scientific journals
Common mistakes in presenting manuscripts to scientific journals
Fredy RS Gutierrez
Given in Dublin July 2017 at International Network for Doctoral Education in Nursing
Inden 2017: Publishing tips and future directions
Inden 2017: Publishing tips and future directions
Roger Watson
Ideas for initiating and promoting research in healthcare establishments.
How to Initiate and Promote Research in Health V1
How to Initiate and Promote Research in Health V1
Imad Hassan
Was ist angesagt?
(20)
Learn more about replication studies and negative results
Learn more about replication studies and negative results
Bang those robots’ heads together!
Bang those robots’ heads together!
How to survive peer review
How to survive peer review
More than your h index
More than your h index
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)
Most common reasons for journal rejections
Most common reasons for journal rejections
HCS 465 GUIDE Education Planning--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Education Planning--hcs465guide.com
How and when to publish
How and when to publish
HCS 465 GUIDE Introduction Education--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Introduction Education--hcs465guide.com
Research writing & Reference Management using Mendely
Research writing & Reference Management using Mendely
Academic publishing advice from industry experts
Academic publishing advice from industry experts
NUR 151 Research Tuesday class
NUR 151 Research Tuesday class
Searching Umm Al-Qura University Digital Library
Searching Umm Al-Qura University Digital Library
[Enago] Dealing with Journal Rejection
[Enago] Dealing with Journal Rejection
Publication and reporting biases and how they impact publication of research
Publication and reporting biases and how they impact publication of research
EBD Course: Lecture 4 Secondary Sources
EBD Course: Lecture 4 Secondary Sources
Pre-submission guide for manuscripts
Pre-submission guide for manuscripts
Common mistakes in presenting manuscripts to scientific journals
Common mistakes in presenting manuscripts to scientific journals
Inden 2017: Publishing tips and future directions
Inden 2017: Publishing tips and future directions
How to Initiate and Promote Research in Health V1
How to Initiate and Promote Research in Health V1
Ähnlich wie Anatomy of A Manuscript
Scientific Writing Series Seminar Session
Tackling The Writing Process
Tackling The Writing Process
HSLUofM
How to Conduct a Literature Review Searching references in medical journalism Saeid Safari, Anesthesiologist, Editorial Manager of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine www.anesthpain.com drsafari.s@gmail.com
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
Saeid Safari
How to Conduct a Literature Review
How to Conduct a Literature Review
Robin Featherstone
is a truly special teacher is very wise and sees tomorrow in every student’s eyes
HCS 465 GUIDE Inspiring Innovation--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Inspiring Innovation--hcs465guide.com
KeatonJennings107
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
Formulating a literature review
Formulating a literature review
Lynn Hendricks
For more course tutorials visit www.newtonhelp.com HCS 465 Assignment Week 1 Research Process and Methods Research the common steps to the research process used in health care research. Review steps covered in Understanding and Conducting Research in the Health Sciences this Assignment Week,
Hcs 465 Future Our Mission/newtonhelp.com
Hcs 465 Future Our Mission/newtonhelp.com
amaranthbeg19
Lecture
How to Conduct a Systematic Search
How to Conduct a Systematic Search
Robin Featherstone
How to Write an Abstract
How to Write an Abstract
yudhis97
Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Design an individualized, patient-centered concept map, based upon the best available evidence for treating a patient's specific health, economic, and cultural needs. Does not design an individualized, patient- centered concept map based on the best available evidence for treating a patient's specific health, economic, and cultural needs. Designs a patient-centered concept map, but the map is not well individualized to treat a specific patient's health, economic, or cultural needs. Designs an individualized, patient-centered concept map based on the best available evidence for treating a patient's specific health, economic, and cultural needs. Designs an individualized, patient- centered concept map based on the best available evidence for treating a patient's specific health, economic, and cultural needs. Outcomes for each diagnosis are aligned and complementary. Analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle. Does not analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle. Attempts to analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle. Analyzes the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle. Analyzes the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle. Identifies unanswered questions or areas of uncertainty where further information could improve the analysis. Apply strategies for communicating with the patient and their family in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Does not develop a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Develops a strategy for communicating with patients and their families that falls short of being ethical, culturally sensitive, or inclusive. Applies strategies for communicating with the patient and their family in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Applies strategies for communicating with the patient and their family in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Notes specific ways in which the communication strategies promote honest communication, facilitate sharing only information that is permitted under data privacy rules, and help to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to your patient and their family, regard.
Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map Scoring GuideC.docx
Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map Scoring GuideC.docx
pauline234567
NUR 440 Critique Guidelines and Rubric Overview: When caring for patients it is essential that as a nurse you are using evidence-based practice. In order to identify what is best practice, you must be able to read research critically. Terminology used in research can be difficult to interpret and understand; therefore securing a solid foundation is essential to the success of identifying and implementing current best practice. What is a critique? It is a professional analysis of the weaknesses and strengths of a particular piece of research. A critique may be done for a variety of purposes: acting as an expert reviewer to assess whether this research paper should be published; providing helpful comments on a work before it is submitted for publication; or, as in the case here, as a learning experience for emerging scholars to practice their developing research skills. Prompt: Choose one of the two provided articles located in the module Reading and Resources folder. Start by filling out the provided worksheet. Then, using the worksheet as your guide, write a critique to dig deeper into each section and identify the specific examples of each element (e.g., what is the research question? Does the author justify the importance of the research? In the case of a literature review, has the author examined the relevant literature?). Elaborate on each section and evaluate it for its strengths and limitations. Be sure to identify your chosen article and address the following critical elements: Critique o Purpose and Research Question: What is the research question? Does the author justify the importance of the research? o Design and Methods: What design and methods were used? Are they rigorous and systematic? o Validity and Reliability: Is the study valid and reliable? (For qualitative research, this section of your critique should consider the study’s trustworthiness and rigor.) o Findings and Conclusions: Are the conclusions reasonable given the findings? Evaluation: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research article? Do you agree with the author’s conclusions? Why or why not? Did the author succeed or fail in the purpose of the study? Recommend areas for improvement or suggest direction for future research. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 1–2 page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one- inch margins, and in APA format. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Critique Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes examples from the article and an insightful discussion of validity and reliability or trustworthiness and rigor where applicable Critiques each section identified above and elaborates by using content from the course; includes a discussion of validity and reliability or trustworthiness and rigor where applicable Briefly critiques most of the sections ...
NUR 440 Critique Guidelines and Rubric Overview When .docx
NUR 440 Critique Guidelines and Rubric Overview When .docx
vannagoforth
Faculty development session given at the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario on Jan 19, 2010
How to Conduct a Literature Search
How to Conduct a Literature Search
Robin Featherstone
This presentation was designed for students studying the Introduction to Communication Disorders paper at Massey University, New Zealand. It focuses on the assignment requirements and gives advice on structure, style and referencing.
2014 271150 communication disorders writing workshop 1
2014 271150 communication disorders writing workshop 1
Martin McMorrow
How to Prepare for Journal Club Helpful tips for residents and fellows to make a good journal club presentation
How to-prepare-for-journal-club2016
How to-prepare-for-journal-club2016
Ramin Nazari M.D
Graduate Student Workshop presented at the University of Western Ontario on March 11, 2010
Literature Reviews For The Health Sciences March 2010
Literature Reviews For The Health Sciences March 2010
Robin Featherstone
How to write good abstract
How to write good abstract
zaihasriah
Please see the video Video on Coding: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRL4PF2u9XA DIRECTIONS The first step of the EBP process is to develop a question from the nursing practice problem of interest. Select a practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient and identify the clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT statement in your selected practice problem area of interest, which is applicable to your proposed capstone project. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). Conduct a literature search to locate research articles focused on your selected practice problem of interest. This literature search should include both quantitative and qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your practice problem. Select six peer-reviewed research articles which will be utilized through the next 5 weeks as reference sources. Be sure that some of the articles use qualitative research and that some use quantitative research. Create a reference list in which the six articles are listed. Beneath each reference include the article's abstract. The completed assignment should have a title page and a reference list with abstracts. Suggestions for locating qualitative and quantitative research articles from credible sources: 1. Use a library database such as CINAHL Complete for your search. 2. Using the advanced search page check the box beside "Research Article" in the "Limit Your Results" section. 3. When setting up the search you can type your topic in the top box, then add quantitative or qualitative as a search term in one of the lower boxes. Research articles often are described as qualitative or quantitative. To narrow/broaden your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example: Diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. RUBRIC PICOT Statement and Literature Search 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 83.00% 4 Good 94.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 80.0 %Content 20.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included. PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. PICOT statement describes .
Please see the videoVideo on Codinghttpswww.youtube.com.docx
Please see the videoVideo on Codinghttpswww.youtube.com.docx
mattjtoni51554
Running head: RESEARCH TYPES 1 Title of PaperStudent NameWalden University Class Number, Section Number, Class Name Date of Submission SEE PAGE 5 Title of Paper Introduction to topic that gives the audience and idea of what you will be discussing in the paper. This should be a brief paragraph that provides an overview of the key points that will be addressed. This section should be concluded with a purpose statement. The purpose of this paper is …consider the intent of the application and list all requirements. Research Methodologies Discuss the attributes of quantitative and qualitative research methods and compare/contrast the type of information you can obtain from both types of research. Make sure you are referencing the course learning materials as well as some external references. You should have a minimum of three course learning resource references and two credible external references. Remember that web sites are only considered credible if they end in .gov, .edu, or .org. Advantages and Disadvantages Discuss the reality that there are advantages and disadvantages to both types of research. Quantitative Research Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative research. When is it helpful and when is it not helpful. Consider things like type of information that you are seeking, ethics, time needed to complete, etc. Qualitative Research Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative research. When is it helpful and when is it not helpful. Consider things like type of information that you are seeking, ethics, time needed to complete, etc. Also, make sure you address the argument that qualitative research is not real science. Is this true? Why or why not? What value does qualitative research have in nursing practice? Summary Write a one paragraph summary of the main points of the paper. This is not an area for adding new information. That should be in the body of your paper. Do not forget to appropriately cite in references in this section too. This is a good place to pull in your course learning resources again. References Last name, X. (Year of publication). Name of online article. Source. Retrieved from http:// www.nameofwebsite.com Last name, X. X. (Year of publication). Name of book here. City, State Initial: Publisher. Last name, X. X. (Year of publication). Name of journal article: Capitalize only letters after punctuation marks. The Journal of Whatever, Volume (Number), Page-Page. doi: number if available. Last name, X. X. (Year of publication). Name of journal article: Capitalize only letters after punctuation marks. The Journal of Whatever, Volume (Number), Page-Page. doi: number if available. Last name, X. X. (Year of publication). Name of journal article: Capitalize only letters after punctuation marks. The Journal of Whatever, Volume (Number), Page-Page. doi: number if available. Last name, X. X. (Year of publication) ...
Running head RESEARCH TYPES .docx
Running head RESEARCH TYPES .docx
toltonkendal
#35538 Topic: Week 10: Weighing the Evidence Number of Pages: 1 (Double Spaced) Number of sources: 3 Writing Style: APA Type of document: Dissertation Chapter - Discussion Academic Level:Master Category: Nursing Language Style: English (U.S.) Order Instructions: ATTACHED Please follow the instructions of the discussion. Included the text book Polick & Beck (2017) in the references.I attached the order 3335318 that is needed to complete this work. When conducting original research, the final step researchers must complete is weighing the evidence and interpreting the meanings of their data, statistics, and analyses. This is the culmination of the research process in which all of the research methods and designs can be synthesized into a meaningful conclusion. In this stage, researchers should formulate explanations for what their data indicates, determine whether the data answer their initial research question, identify areas of uncertainty, and consider directions for further research. In this Discussion, you focus on one of the research articles that you identified for Part 2 of the Course Project (Literature Review). You then explore the process of how the researchers generated conclusions based on their data, consider other possible interpretations of their data, and formulate ideas for further research. To prepare: -Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on how researchers find meaning in their data and generate sound conclusions. Pay particular attention to Table 2 in the article, “Study Design in Medical Research.” -Revisit the 5 articles that you identified in Part 2 of the Course Project(order 3335318). Select one to consider for the purpose of this Discussion. -Read sections of the chosen article where the data is presented, analyzed, and interpreted for meaning. What reasoning process did the researchers use to formulate their conclusions? What explanation did they give to support their conclusions? Were there any weaknesses in their analysis or conclusions? Consider possible alternate conclusions that the researchers could have drawn based on their data. -Examine the findings that the article presents and consider how well they addressed the researcher’s initial question(s). -What additional research could be done to build on these findings and gain a fuller understanding of the question? Required Readings Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Review Chapter 2, Fig. 2.1 Chapter 29, “Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-analysis, Metasynthesis, and Mixed Studies Review” This chapter focuses on the different types of systematic reviews. The chapter discusses the advantages of this type of analysis and the steps for conducting a meta-analysis or metasynthesis. Dingle, P. (2011). Statin statistics: Lies and deception. Positive Health, 180, 1. Retrieved from the.
#35538 Topic Week 10 Weighing the EvidenceNumber of Pages 1 .docx
#35538 Topic Week 10 Weighing the EvidenceNumber of Pages 1 .docx
AASTHA76
how to write a scientific paper
How2write
How2write
Aya Mohamed
Patient Education Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Explain the appropriate use of a medication. Does not explain the appropriate use of a medication. Explains the use of a medication, but the explanation is inaccurate or not appropriate for the medication. Explains the appropriate use of a medication. Explains the appropriate use of a medication and the importance of following the instructions in terms of quality patient outcomes. Identify specific factors that may affect the efficacy of a medication. Does not identify specific factors that may affect the efficacy of a medication. Lists factors that may affect a medication, but the list is incomplete or does not relate to the efficacy of the medication. Identifies specific factors that may affect the efficacy of a medication. Explains how specific factors may affect the efficacy of a medication. Describe possible chemical reactions, side effects, or other negative reactions a patient may experience from a medication. Does not describe possible chemical reactions, side effects, or other negative reactions a patient may experience from a medication. Lists possible chemical reactions, side effects, or other negative reactions a patient may experience from a medication. Describes possible chemical reactions, side effects, or other negative reactions a patient may experience from a medication. Describes possible chemical reactions, side effects, or other negative reactions a patient may experience from a medication and explains the actions a patient should take. Explain correct handling, storage, and disposal of a medication. Does not explain correct handling, storage, and disposal of a medication. Explains handling, storage, and disposal of a medication, but the explanation is inaccurate or incomplete. Explains correct handling, storage, and disposal of a medication. Explains correct handling, storage, and disposal of a medication and includes a brief rationale of why these instructions are important. Explain how a patient education tool promotes patient safety related to pharmacology. Does not explain how a patient education tool promotes patient safety related to pharmacology. Explains the use of a patient education tool but does not associate the tool with patient safety. Explains how a patient education tool promotes patient safety related to pharmacology. Explains how a patient education tool promotes patient safety related to pharmacology and how the tool benefits both patients and nurses. Explain how a patient education tool adheres to the principles and practices of cultural competence. Does not explain how a patient education tool adheres to the principles and practices of cultural competence. Explains how a patient education tool adheres to the principles and practices of cultural competence, but the explanation is missing key elements. Explains how a patient education tool adheres to the principles and practices of cultural competence. Explains how ...
Patient Education Scoring GuideCRITERIANON-PERFORMANCEBASIC.docx
Patient Education Scoring GuideCRITERIANON-PERFORMANCEBASIC.docx
karlhennesey
Ähnlich wie Anatomy of A Manuscript
(20)
Tackling The Writing Process
Tackling The Writing Process
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
How to Conduct a Literature Review
How to Conduct a Literature Review
HCS 465 GUIDE Inspiring Innovation--hcs465guide.com
HCS 465 GUIDE Inspiring Innovation--hcs465guide.com
Formulating a literature review
Formulating a literature review
Hcs 465 Future Our Mission/newtonhelp.com
Hcs 465 Future Our Mission/newtonhelp.com
How to Conduct a Systematic Search
How to Conduct a Systematic Search
How to Write an Abstract
How to Write an Abstract
Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map Scoring GuideC.docx
Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map Scoring GuideC.docx
NUR 440 Critique Guidelines and Rubric Overview When .docx
NUR 440 Critique Guidelines and Rubric Overview When .docx
How to Conduct a Literature Search
How to Conduct a Literature Search
2014 271150 communication disorders writing workshop 1
2014 271150 communication disorders writing workshop 1
How to-prepare-for-journal-club2016
How to-prepare-for-journal-club2016
Literature Reviews For The Health Sciences March 2010
Literature Reviews For The Health Sciences March 2010
How to write good abstract
How to write good abstract
Please see the videoVideo on Codinghttpswww.youtube.com.docx
Please see the videoVideo on Codinghttpswww.youtube.com.docx
Running head RESEARCH TYPES .docx
Running head RESEARCH TYPES .docx
#35538 Topic Week 10 Weighing the EvidenceNumber of Pages 1 .docx
#35538 Topic Week 10 Weighing the EvidenceNumber of Pages 1 .docx
How2write
How2write
Patient Education Scoring GuideCRITERIANON-PERFORMANCEBASIC.docx
Patient Education Scoring GuideCRITERIANON-PERFORMANCEBASIC.docx
Kürzlich hochgeladen
General introduction about Microwave assisted reactions.
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
Maksud Ahmed
Students will get the knowledge of the following: - meaning of Pharmaceutical sales representative (PSR) - purpose of detailing, training & supervision - norms of customer calls - motivating, evaluating, compensation and future aspects of PSR
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
VishalSingh1417
38 K-12 educators from North Carolina public schools
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
Mebane Rash
Spell
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
AnaAcapella
SGK
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges •This presentation gives an overall view of education in 21st century and how it is facilitated by the integration of ICT. •It also gives a detailed explanation of the challenges faced in ICT-based education and further elaborates the strategies that can help in overcoming the challenges.
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
AreebaZafar22
Mehran University Newsletter is a Quarterly Publication from Public Relations Office
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro
test
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
The pricing and discounting feature is very essential for Odoo POS. Global discount is actually a discount that will apply to the entire order. And it indicates that the discount is applied to every item in the order, regardless of how much each item costs separately. This slide will show how to manage global discounts in odoo 17 POS.
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
Celine George
https://app.box.com/s/7hlvjxjalkrik7fb082xx3jk7xd7liz3
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
Mixin classes are helpful for developers to extend the models. Using these classes helps to modify fields, methods and other functionalities of models without directly changing the base models. This slide will show how to extend models using mixin classes in odoo 17.
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Celine George
Basic Civil Engineering notes first year Notes Building notes Selection of site for Building Layout of a Building What is Burjis, Mutam Building Bye laws Basic Concept of sunlight ventilation in building National Building Code of India Set back or building line Types of Buildings Floor Space Index (F.S.I) Institutional Vs Educational Building Components & function Sills, Lintels, Cantilever Doors, Windows and Ventilators Types of Foundation AND THEIR USES Plinth Area Shallow and Deep Foundation Super Built-up & carpet area Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R) RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete RCC VS PCC
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Denish Jangid
process recording format
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PoojaSen20
Klinik_ Apotek Onlin 085657271886 Solusi Menggugurkan Masalah Kehamilan Anda Jual Obat Aborsi Asli KLINIK ABORSI TERPEECAYA _ Jual Obat Aborsi Cytotec Misoprostol Asli 100% Ampuh Hanya 3 Jam Langsung Gugur || OBAT PENGGUGUR KANDUNGAN AMPUH MANJUR OBAT ABORSI OLINE" APOTIK Jual Obat Cytotec, Gastrul, Gynecoside Asli Ampuh. JUAL ” Obat Aborsi Tuntas | Obat Aborsi Manjur | Obat Aborsi Ampuh | Obat Penggugur Janin | Obat Pencegah Kehamilan | Obat Pelancar Haid | Obat terlambat Bulan | Ciri Obat Aborsi Asli | Obat Telat Bulan | Pil Aborsi Asli | Cara Menggugurkan Konten | Cara Aborsi Tuntas | Harga Obat Aborsi Asli | Pil Aborsi | Jual Obat Aborsi Cytotec | Cara Aborsi Sendiri | Cara Aborsi Usia 1 Bulan | Cara Aborsi Usia 2 Tahun | Cara Aborsi Usia 3 Bulan | Obat Aborsi Usia 4 Bulan | Cara Abrasi Usia 5 Bulan | Cara Menggugurkan Konten | Kandungan Obat Penggugur | Cara Menghitung Usia Konten | Cara Mengatasi Terlambat Bulan | Penjual Obat Aborsi Asli | Obat Aborsi Garansi | Kandungan Obat Peluntur | Obat Telat Datang Bulan | Obat Telat Haid | Obat Aborsi Paling Murah | Klinik Jual Obat Aborsi | Jual Pil Cytotec | Apotik Jual Obat Aborsi | Kandungan Dokter Abrasi | Cara Aborsi Cepat | Jual Obat Aborsi Bergaransi | Jual Obat Cytotec Asli | Obat Aborsi Aman Manjur | Obat Misoprostol Cytotec Asli. "APA ITU ABORSI" “Aborsi Adalah dengan membendung hormon yang di perlukan untuk mempertahankan kehamilan yaitu hormon progesteron, karena hormon ini dibendung, maka jalur kehamilan mulai membuka dan leher rahim menjadi melunak,sehingga mengeluarkan darah yang merupakan tanda bahwa obat telah bekerja || maksimal 1 jam obat diminum || PENJELASAN OBAT ABORSI USIA 1 _7 BULAN Pada usia kandungan ini, pasien akan merasakan sakit yang sedikit tidak berlebihan || sekitar 1 jam ||. namun hanya akan terjadi pada saatdarah keluar merupakan pertanda menstruasi. Hal ini dikarenakan pada usiakandungan 3 bulan,janin sudah terbentuk sebesar kepalan tangan orang dewasa. Cara kerja obat aborsi : JUAL OBAT ABORSI AMPUH dosis 3 bulan secara umum sama dengan cara kerja || DOSIS OBAT ABORSI 2 bulan”, hanya berbedanya selain mengisolasijanin juga menghancurkan janin dengan formula methotrexate dikandungdidalamnya. Formula methotrexate ini sangat ampuh untuk menghancurkan janinmenjadi serpihan-serpihan kecil akan sangat berguna pada saat dikeluarkan nanti. APA ALASAN WANITA MELAKUKAN ABORSI? Aborsi di lakukan wanita hamil baik yang sudah menikah maupun belum menikah dengan berbagai alasan , akan tetapi alasan yang utama adalah alasan-alasan non medis (termasuk aborsi sendiri / di sengaja/ buatan] MELAYANI PEMESANAN OBAT ABORSI SETIAP HARI, SIAP KIRIM KESELURUH KOTA BESAR DI INDONESIA DAN LUAR NEGERI. HUBUNGI PEMESANAN LEBIH NYAMAN VIA WA/: 085657271886
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
ZurliaSoop
Python notes for Unit 1 Avanthi PG College
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Ramakrishna Reddy Bijjam
Students will get the knowledge of : - meaning of marketing channel - channel design, channel members - selection of appropriate channel, channel conflicts - physical distribution management and its importance
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
VishalSingh1417
https://medicaleducationelearning.blogspot.com/2024/02/using-micro-scholarship-to-incentivize.html
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Poh-Sun Goh
Wednesday 20 March 2024, 09:30-15:30.
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Jisc
Explore the world of IT certification with CompTIA. Discover how the CompTIA Security+ Book SY0-701 can elevate your cybersecurity expertise and open doors to new career opportunities. This PDF provides essential insights into the CompTIA Security+ certification, guiding you through exam preparation and showcasing the benefits of becoming CompTIA-certified. Download now to embark on your journey to IT excellence with CompTIA.
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
bronxfugly43
An introduction on the challenges that face food testing labs.
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Sherif Taha
Kürzlich hochgeladen
(20)
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Anatomy of A Manuscript
1.
Anatomy of a
Manuscript Office of Clinical Research Presented by: Kenny Fountain, PhD candidate, Department of Rhetoric Mary Knatterud, PhD, Department of Surgery Liz Fine, MLIS, Bio-Medical Library April 20, 2007
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Office of Clinical
Research
12.
Office of Clinical
Research
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Jetzt herunterladen