SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 37
COURSE SEMINAR

                            ON


           ROLE OF ORGANIC
         AGRICULTIRE/FARMING

      Speaker                                   Supervisor
Govinda Raj Sedai                            Dr. S. K. Verma
 I.D. No. A 11019                            Assistant lecturer


                    DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY
               INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
                    BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
                             VARANASI
INTRODUCTION
The definition of organic agriculture is a matter of
debate in itself. It has no single definition of its own.
However, all definitions agree that it implies the
application of agronomic, biological and mechanical
methods of production in place of the use of synthetic
chemical inputs. Most definitions also incorporate the
use of several techniques not exclusive to organic
agriculture, as they may be applied in conventional and
low-input production systems as well. These include, in
particular, “better land husbandry” techniques such as
soil-conservation measures, crop rotation and the use of
green manure, instead of slashing and burning.
Basic rules of Organic farming and
 Organic food production
•no use of chemical fertilizers or synthetic
drugs
•no use of genetically modified organisms
•prevention from soil loss and erosion
•promotion of ‘bio diversity’ – support a
range of crops, not a single species
Principles of Organic Agriculture

•The principle of health
•The principle of ecology
•The principle of fairness
•The principle of care
Principles of health
Organic Agriculture should sustain and enhance the health of soil, plant,
animal, human and planet as one and indivisible.

This principle points out that the health of individuals and communities cannot
be separated from the health of ecosystems - healthy soils produce healthy crops
that foster the health of animals and people.

Health is the wholeness and integrity of living systems. It is not simply the
absence of illness, but the maintenance of physical, mental, social and ecological
well-being. Immunity, resilience and regeneration are key characteristics of
health.
The role of organic agriculture, whether in farming, processing, distribution, or
consumption, is to sustain and enhance the health of ecosystems and organisms
from the smallest in the soil to human beings. In particular, organic agriculture is
intended to produce high quality, nutritious food that contributes to preventive
health care and well-being. In view of this, it should avoid the use of fertilizers,
pesticides, animal drugs and food additives that may have adverse health effects.
Principles of ecology
Organic Agriculture should be based on living ecological systems and cycles, work with
them, emulate them and help sustain them.

This principle roots organic agriculture within living ecological systems. It states that
production is to be based on ecological processes, and recycling. Nourishment and well-
being are achieved through the ecology of the specific production environment. For
example, in the case of crops this is the living soil; for animals it is the farm ecosystem; for
fish and marine organisms, the aquatic environment.

Organic farming, pastoral and wild harvest systems should fit the cycles and ecological
balances in nature. These cycles are universal but their operation is site-specific. Organic
management must be adapted to local conditions, ecology, culture and scale. Inputs
should be reduced by reuse, recycling and efficient management of materials and energy
in order to maintain and improve environmental quality and conserve resources.

Organic agriculture should attain ecological balance through the design of farming
systems, establishment of habitats and maintenance of genetic and agricultural diversity.
Those who produce, process, trade, or consume organic products should protect and
benefit the common environment including landscapes, climate, habitats, biodiversity, air
and water.
Principles of fairness
Organic Agriculture should be managed in a precautionary and responsible manner to
protect the health and well-being of current and future generations and the
environment.

Organic agriculture is a living and dynamic system that responds to internal and external
demands and conditions. Practitioners of organic agriculture can enhance efficiency and
increase productivity, but this should not be at the risk of jeopardizing health and well-
being. Consequently, new technologies need to be assessed and existing methods
reviewed. Given the incomplete understanding of ecosystems and agriculture, care must
be taken.

This principle states that precaution and responsibility are the key concerns in
management, development and technology choices in organic agriculture. Science is
necessary to ensure that organic agriculture is healthy, safe and ecologically sound.
However, scientific knowledge alone is not sufficient. Practical experience, accumulated
wisdom and traditional and indigenous knowledge offer valid solutions, tested by time.
Organic agriculture should prevent significant risks by adopting appropriate technologies
and rejecting unpredictable ones, such as genetic engineering. Decisions should reflect
the values and needs of all who might be affected, through transparent and participatory
processes.
Apart from these, basic principles should be
closely followed:
•Sustaining and improvement of the soil
•Realization of nutrient re-cycling (farm, village, region)
•Intensive use of legumes/leguminous trees to provide nitrogen supply
•Biological plant protection through prevention
•Diversity of crop varieties and species grown
•Site and species appropriate animal husbandry
•Prohibition of Genetic Engineering and products thereof
•Maintenance of the surrounding natural landscape (sustainable eco-agro
systems)
•Least possible consumption of non-renewable energy and resources
•Ban on synthetic, chemical fertilizers, plant protection, storage and
ripening means as well as hormones and synthetic growth regulators
(also harmful processing aids in food processing).
Organic Agriculture is not the solution to
all problems in farming sector. I’m
confident that within this century all of
the World’s agriculture will convert to
“ORGANIC”.
                           - Gunar Rund Gren
                             President, IFOAM
Ancient Period
1. Oldest Practice    10000 years ago dating back to Neolithic
                      age by ancient civilization like
                      Mesopotamia, Hwang Ho basin etc.
2. Ramayana           All dead things returned to earth that in
                      nourish soil and life
3. Mahabharata        5500 B.C., Kamadhenu – the cow is role in
                      human life and soil fertility
4. Kautilya           300 B.C., several manures like oil cake and
Arthshastra           excreta of animals
5. Brihad Sanhita     Methods of choosing manures for crops and
                      manuring
6. Rigveda            2500-1500 B.C., green manure, use of dung
                      of goat, sheep, cow etc.               10
 The organic movement was began in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction to
  agriculture’s growing reliance on synthetic fertilizers.
 Sir Albert Howard is widely considered to be the father of Organic farming.
 Rudolf Steiner, a German philosopher, made influential strides in the earliest
  organic theory with his Biodynamic agriculture.
 J. I. Rodale worked in United States.
 Lady Eve Balfour in United Kingdom.
 1980s - Increased Environmental Awareness.
 1990s – Market for organic products has grown at a rapid pace
  averaging 20 – 25 percent / year.
 In 2002, the USDA under National Organic Program(NOP) regulated the
  commercial use of the term ORGANIC.
 2007 – Approximately 306,000 Sq.Km(30.6 million hectares) are farmed
  Organically.
S.N.       Region          Area (ha) % Organic Producers
       Europe             10637127.52     2.23 291451.00
  1
       Northern America    2790162.37     0.72    16659.00
  2
       Latin America       6857610.72     1.12 315889.00
  3
       Africa              1073656.65     0.12
  4                                              540988.00
       Asia                3706279.61     0.26 619439.00
  5
                Total
                            25064836.87    4.45   1784426.00
12000000.00

              10637127.52


10000000.00




 8000000.00

                                                             6857610.72

                                                                                                                                      Area (ha)
 6000000.00                                                                                                        3706279.61         % Organic
                                                                                                                                      Producers




 4000000.00

                                     2790162.37

                                                                                        1073656.65
 2000000.00
                         291451.00                16659.00                  315889.00                  540988.00                 619439.00

                                                                          1.12                                            0.26
                    2.23                                                                        0.12
                                                  0.72

       0.00
                Europe                Northern America          Latin America                Africa                     Asia
Sustainable
           aims
          Organic
         Agriculture
Ecological            Social
  aims                 aims
Organic Agriculture:
               •   Economic security,
               •   Economically viable,
               •   Added value,
               •   Low investment,
Sustainability
               •   Good and constant yields,
    aims •         Make best use of local resources

               •   Good working condition
               •   Fair Trade,
               •   food supply,
               •   Satisfy local needs
  Social       •   Gender balance
               •   Respect the local culture
   aims
               •   Good taste and quality
               •   Balance ecosystem
               •   No chemical pollution
               •   High soil fertility
               •   Clean water
Ecological     •   Biological diversity
   aims        •   Animal friendly husbandry
               •   Conserve the natural resources
               •   Safe products
Material considered to be used in Organic farming
•   In-situ waste/product:
     –   Farm yard manure and urine
     –   Rotted litter of poultry birds
     –   Vermicompost,
     –   Plant residues,
     –   Green manuring
     –   Azolla, BGA, Rhizobium etc.
     –   Organic compost from organic kitchen waste,
     –   Residues of organic mushroom production,
     –   Night soil,
     –   Oil cake
     –   Bio-dynymic mixture
     –   Sheep/goat manure
     –   Pig manure
•   Could be used after with analysis and care takes:
     –    Bio fertilizer Rhizobium, Mycorrhiza etc. from external source
     – Saw dust,
     – Blood -meal, bone-meal
     – FYM, Compost , vermicompost from external sources,
•   Lesser than recommended doses
     –   Limestone,
     –   Grinded rock,
     –   Magnesium
     –   Bodo-mixture, bodo-pest and bodo-paint
Material considered to be used/banded in Organic farming
S.N.   Particulars                              Symbol   Remarks
  1    Chemical pesticides                         ×     Hazardous
  2    Aromatic substances                               Problematic in environment balance
  3    Traps                                             -
  4    Soft soap                                         -
  5    Micro-organism                                    If imported from foreign used with special
                                                         take care
  6    Plant originated extract                          May cause bad impact in environment
  7    Plant and animal originated fat & oils            May cause bad impact in environment
  8    Parasite and parasitoid insects                   May cause harmful effect on indigenous and
                                                         native insects
  9    Mineral oils                                      May cause negative impact in environment
  10   Sulfur                                            May cause negative impact in environment
  11   Mulching from natural sources                     -
  12   Potassium per magnet                              May cause bad impact in environment
  13   Bodo-mixture, bodo-pest and paint                 May cause negative impact in environment

  × - Banded/not to be used,      - used with take care and   - could be used
Material considered to be used/banded in Organic farming
S.N.   Country        No. of farmers          Percent in Total
  1    Germany                     10000
  2    Austria                     20000
  3    Sweden
  4    Finland
  5    Switzerland
  6    Denmark
  7    Italy                       18000
  8    Uganda                          7000

  9    Mexico                      100000
  10
  11
  12
  13
Organic Agriculture:
Integrated
                   farming

                               Integrated
 Integrated
    pest                          weed
                              management
management
                 Organic
                 farming
                               Integrated
  Organic/                       disease
 Biofertilizer                management

                   Crop
                  rotation
NEED OF ORGANIC FARMING
Advantages

              Animals lead                   Soil structure
              happier lives                    is better



                              Organic farming


     More birds
     and insects                                     Less harmful
                                                    to environment
                               No harmful
                               chemicals –
                                healthier?
Disadvantages

                               More
      More                 blemishes on
    expensive                 crops

                 Organic
                 farming



     More farm
                           Smaller yields
      workers
      needed
Table 1. Chemical composition of organic manures
                                     FYM                           Green manure

      Composition        2007-08             2008-09         2007-08          2008-09

                      Rice    wheat        Rice   wheat    Rice    wheat   Rice    wheat

Organic carbon (mg kg-1) 143000 138600 139800 140200 386000 460000 389000 481000

Total N (mg kg-1)     4800    5000         4900   4900    24000    32000   27000   31500

Total P (mg kg-1)     2300    2500         2500   2400    3700     3300    3900    3000

Total K (mg kg-1)     4900    5200         5100   5000    208000   23000   21900   22800

Fe (mg kg-1)          20.85   22.35        21.9    22      74.6    83.2    77.2    80.3

Zn (mg kg-1)          10.6    11.7     12.05      11.9     34.2    36.4    34.8    33.7

Mn (mg kg-1)          38.9    39.6     39.95      40.1     88.2    96.2    90.4    94.8

Cu (mg kg-1)           2.6     2.7         2.79   2.83     8.5      9.2     8.7     8.8

C:N ratio             29.8    27.7         28.5   28.6     16.1    14.4    14.4    15.3
                                             Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
Table 1. Biodiversity on organic farms (global literature review of comparison
studies)

          Taxon              Positive         Negative        No difference


Birds                           7                                    2
Mammals                         2
Butterflies                     1                                    1
Spiders                         7                                    3
Earthworms                      7                 2                  4
Beetles                         13                5                  3
Other arthropods                7                 1                  2
Plants                          13                                   2
Soil microbes                   9                                    8
Total                           66                8                  25
                                                               Hole et al., 2005
Table 2. Some projection on the availability of organic resources for agriculture in India
during 2010-2025
                                         Resources                                 2010         2025
  Generator
  Human population (million)                                                       1120          1300
  Livestock population (million)                                                   537           596
  Food grain production (million t)                                                264           315
  Human excreta (dry) (million t)                                                  18.5          21.5
  Livestock dung (sun dry) (million t)                                             396           426
  Crop residue (million t)                                                         343           496
  Resources (considered tappable)
  Human excreta                                                                     15            17
  Livestock excreta                                                                119           128
  Crop residue excreta                                                             112           162
  Resources (considered potental)
  Human excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O)                                         2.24          2.60
  Livestock excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O)                                     7.00          7.54
  Crop residue excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O)                                  7.10          20.27
  Nutrient( considered tappable) (30% dung, 80% excreta and 33% of crop residue)
  Human excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O)                                         1.80          2.10
  Livestock excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O)                                     2.10          2.26

  Crop residue excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O)                                  2.34          3.39

  Total                                                                            6.24          7.75
                                                                                   Source: Tandon 1997
Table 3. Effect of nutrient combinations and mode of application N, P and K uptake in rice
                                N uptake (kg ha-1)       P uptake (kg ha-1)    K uptake (kg ha-1)
           Treatments
                               2007        2008             2007        2008     2007         2008
  Nutrient combination (N)
  Control                       47.4       47.1             7.5         7.2      69.6         68.7
  Farm Yard Manure (FYM)        68.3       74.6             10.6       11.8      92.9         99.1
  Green manure (GM)             76.0       84.9             11.8       13.3      99.8        108.0
  GM + Biofertilizer (B)        83.7       90.2             13.0       14.0     106.3        112.6
  GM + FYM                      95.8       103.8            14.7       15.9     115.7        120.7
  GM + FYM + B                 105.4       112.5            16.2       17.2     124.9        12805
  Control Vs others
  SEd±                          5.51       4.81             0.86       0.74      5.29        6.10
  CD (P=0.05)                  11.25       9.83             1.75       1.51     10.80        12.45
  Between others
  SEm±                         2.74        2.41             0.43       0.37      2.64        3.05
  CD (P=0.05)                  7.95        6.95             1.24       1.07      7.63        8.81
  Mode of application (M)
  Direct effect                 82.7       93.8             12.6       14.3     102.9        111.2
  Residual effect               69.7       75.5             10.9       11.8      93.3        98.1
  Cumulative effect            105.0       110.3            16.3       17.2     127.5        132.1
  SEm±                          2.13        1.8             0.33       0.29      2.05        2.36
  CD (P=0.05)                   6.16       5.38             0.96       0.83      5.91        6.82
  N×M
  SEm±                         4.77        4.17             0.74       0.64      4.58        5.28
  CD (P=0.05)                  NS          NS               NS         NS        NS          NS
                                                     Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
Table 4. Effect of nutrient combinations and mode of application in
nutrient concentration in Basmati rice grain

                              N, P, K concentration (%)        Micro-nutrient concentration (%)
          Treatments           N          P          K       Fe         Mn          Zn          Cu
                           2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008
Nutrient combination (N)
Control                     1.2   1.18   0.206 0.205 0.212      0.211   34.110   33.770 33.010   33.02   32.65   32.27   13.7   12.97
Farm Yard Manure (FYM)     1.29   1.31   0.229 0.236 0.246      0.249   35.610   35.870 34.560   35.08   34.15   34.43   14.1   14.59
Green manure (GM)          1.32   1.35   0.237 0.244 0.251      0.256   35.800   36.290 34.770   35.34   34.34   34.68   14.1   14.64
GM + Biofertilizer (B)     1.34   1.36   0.239 0.245 0.253      0.258   35.850   36.440 34.860   35.43   34.39   34.71   14.2   14.69
GM + FYM                   1.37   1.39   0.247 0.253 0.259      0.266   36.330   37.020 35.730   36.37   35.09   35.25   14.2   14.84
GM + FYM + B               1.39   1.4    0.250 0.255 0.262      0.267   36.320   37.220 35.980   36.6    35.13   35.43   14.3   14.93
Control Vs others
SEd±                       0.062 0.027 0.010 0.008 0.007        0.006   0.480    0.230   0.290   0.19    0.64    0.55    0.11   0.16
CD (P=0.05)                0.126 0.056 0.021 0.017 0.014        0.013   0.990    0.460   0.600   0.39    1.32    1.11    0.22   0.33
Between others
SEm±                       0.031 0.014   0.01    0.004    0     0.003   0.240     0.11   0.15     0.1    0.32    0.27    0.05   0.08
CD (P=0.05)                0.089 0.039 0.015 0.012 0.010        0.009   0.700    0.330   0.420   0.27    0.93    0.79    0.15   0.23
Mode of application (M)
Direct effect              1.34   1.36   0.237   0.24    0.25   0.26    35.87    36.22   35.51   35.99   34.55   34.83   14.2   14.78
Residual effect             1.3   1.33   0.23    0.24    0.25   0.25    35.49    35.55   33.31   34.33   34.1    34.41   14.1   14.56
Cumulative effect          1.39   1.40   0.25    0.26    0.27   0.27    36.51    37.94   36.73   36.98   35.11   35.46   14.2   14.88
SEm±                       0.024 0.011    0      0.003 0.003    0.002   0.190    0.090   0.110   0.07    0.25    0.21    0.04   0.06
CD (P=0.05)                0.069 0.030   0.01    0.009 0.008    0.007   0.540    0.250   0.330   0.21    0.72    0.61    0.12   0.18


                                                                 Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
Table 5. Effect of nutrient combinations and mode of application on
economy of cultivation of Basmati rice

                             Gross Return     cost of cultivation     Net return
                                                                                       B:C ratio
        Treatment           (×103 Rs. Ha-1)    (×103 Rs. Ha-1)      (×103 Rs. Ha-1)
                             2007     2008     2007        2008     2007      2008    2007 2008
 Nutrient combination (N)
 Control                    49.64    49.85    20.090     21.040     29.550   28.810   1.500   1.400
 Farm Yard Manure (FYM)     66.86    72.67    25.770     27.060     41.090   45.620   1.600   1.700
 Green manure (GM)          71.66    78.98    22.410     23.460     49.250   55.520   2.200   2.400
 GM + Biofertilizer (B)     79.54    83.47    22.520     23.570     57.020   59.890   2.500   2.500
 GM + FYM                   87.65    93.07    41.490     43.510     46.170   49.560   1.100   1.100
 GM + FYM + B               95.79    100.16   41.600     43.620     54.190   56.550   1.300   1.300
 Control Vs others
 SEd±                        5.710    3.550                          5.710    3.550   0.320 0.150
 CD (P=0.05)                11.660    7.250                         11.660    7.250   0.660 0.300
 Between others
 SEm±                       2.860     1.780                         2.860     1.780   0.160 0.070
 CD (P=0.05)                8.250     5.130                         8.25      5.130   0.470 0.21
 Mode of application (M)
 Direct effect              77.76     86.74   36.090      36.09      41.67    48.89    1.2     1.3
 Residual effect            67.34     71.40    20.09      20.09     47.250    50.36    2.4     2.4
 Cumulative effect          95.8      98.88    36.85      36.09      59.71    61.03    1.7     1.6
 SEm±                       2.210     1.380                          2.210    1.380   0.13    0.060
 CD (P=0.05)                6.390     3.970                          6.390    3.970   0.36    0.160
 N×M
 SEm±                        4.95     3.080                         4.950     3.08    0.280 0.130
 CD (P=0.05)                  NS       8.88                          NS       8.880   0.810 0.36
                                                             Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
Certification
  A procedure by which a third party gives
  written assurance that a product, process or
  services is in conformity with certain
  standards.
• Certification Body

• Inspector

• Operator (farmers. Processor and applicant)
Certification Process:
Steps of certification process
• Request for Certification,
• Applicant’s screening from Certification Body and send forms
   for applicant,
• Applicant’s fill up form and prepare all document and return to
   Certification Body,
• CB assess potential eligibility (Again screening),
• CB assigns organic inspector for site visit,
• Onsite visit report to CB,
• Review on report and takes decision,
• CB notifies applicant
• Certification (Yes or No)
• Annual certification renewal
Conclusion:
 Organic farming intensifies farm-internal processes like biological activities,
  recycling of livestock and crop waste, enhanced biodiversity as well as
  nitrogen fixation and improve phosphorus availability by symbiosis.
 Organic farming is relevant mitigation and adoption option for climate
  change.
 Organic farming is viable solution for smallholder farmers in developing
  countries.
 Organic farming build up soil health and conserves soil water and organic
  matter.
• The world currently produces double the amount of food required to feed
  everyone; still around 1 billion people suffer from hunger, and another
  billion are malnourished
• The problem of hunger is mostly due to poor distribution systems and
  inadequate production in the poorest communities
• 50% of the world’s hungry are in fact small holder farmers, who suffer from
  lack of extension services and access to resources, unjust trade conditions,
  erosion of their agricultural biodiversity and climate change
• Much greater support of small holder producers is required, as they produce
  70% of the world’s food. Strengthening small holder farmers is the key to
  increasing access to food and food security
• A United Nations study has found that organic agriculture increased yields in
  Africa by over 100% and that organic systems have higher yields under
  conditions of climatic extremes
• Organic systems are highly suitable for increasing productivity of traditional
  small holder and subsistence systems
• Greater investment in research and extension of affordable, and resilient
  organic systems for small holder farmers is required
Conclusion:
 The government of India seems to be committed for promoting organic
 farming in the country. Several pieces of policies and strategies are
 formulated to promote organic farming. But, these policies and strategies
 are scattered and simply inadequate. For this purpose, a consolidated
 policy and a clear set of legislative provisions are required. Nature has
 gifted Nepal with plenty of production niches suitable for organic farming
 of various agricultural commodities. However, it encompasses several
 challenges in order to make national product competitive in the domestic
 and international market. On the one hand policies and capacities on
 production technologies of organic farming are inadequate and on the
 other hand the developed technologies and products are not being
 delivered properly in Nepal. So, under the given circumstances, Nepal has
 to reform its policies and make organic farming friendly, so that the virgin
 areas can be protected from the introduction of chemical inputs. Many
 actors including government organizations, NGOs, private sector and
 farmers should be involved in different steps of organic agriculture
 promotion and certification. Then only the nation can prosper with the
 means of healthy people.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch (6)

Agrirobot presentation by George Adamides
Agrirobot presentation by George AdamidesAgrirobot presentation by George Adamides
Agrirobot presentation by George Adamides
 
Agrorobot final seminar 26-03-2012
Agrorobot final seminar 26-03-2012Agrorobot final seminar 26-03-2012
Agrorobot final seminar 26-03-2012
 
Agriculture Robot
Agriculture RobotAgriculture Robot
Agriculture Robot
 
Agricultural Robotics
Agricultural RoboticsAgricultural Robotics
Agricultural Robotics
 
Agricultural robot
Agricultural robotAgricultural robot
Agricultural robot
 
Robotics project ppt
Robotics project pptRobotics project ppt
Robotics project ppt
 

Ähnlich wie My course seminar

organicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdf
organicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdforganicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdf
organicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdf
sayedsefatullahsayed1
 
Halberg organic chemistry agriculture ppt
Halberg organic chemistry agriculture pptHalberg organic chemistry agriculture ppt
Halberg organic chemistry agriculture ppt
GborKovcs46
 

Ähnlich wie My course seminar (20)

organic farming prospects and constraints
organic farming prospects and constraintsorganic farming prospects and constraints
organic farming prospects and constraints
 
organic farming prospects and constraints
organic farming prospects and constraintsorganic farming prospects and constraints
organic farming prospects and constraints
 
Organic farming concept as pects and prospects
Organic farming concept as pects and prospectsOrganic farming concept as pects and prospects
Organic farming concept as pects and prospects
 
AGRON 601 (Organic farming).pptxsssssssssssssssssssssss
AGRON 601 (Organic farming).pptxsssssssssssssssssssssssAGRON 601 (Organic farming).pptxsssssssssssssssssssssss
AGRON 601 (Organic farming).pptxsssssssssssssssssssssss
 
My course seminar
My course seminarMy course seminar
My course seminar
 
Organic Farming.ppt
Organic Farming.pptOrganic Farming.ppt
Organic Farming.ppt
 
Rajesh(Organic Farmin Presentation)
Rajesh(Organic Farmin Presentation)Rajesh(Organic Farmin Presentation)
Rajesh(Organic Farmin Presentation)
 
Organic Farming for Crop Improvement and Sustainable Agriculture in the Era o...
Organic Farming for Crop Improvement and Sustainable Agriculture in the Era o...Organic Farming for Crop Improvement and Sustainable Agriculture in the Era o...
Organic Farming for Crop Improvement and Sustainable Agriculture in the Era o...
 
organicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdf
organicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdforganicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdf
organicfarmingjosh-150811081448-lva1-app6892 (1).pdf
 
Organic farming
Organic farming Organic farming
Organic farming
 
Organic farming for livelihood security of farmers in india
Organic farming for livelihood security of farmers  in indiaOrganic farming for livelihood security of farmers  in india
Organic farming for livelihood security of farmers in india
 
Halberg.ppt
Halberg.pptHalberg.ppt
Halberg.ppt
 
Halberg.ppt
Halberg.pptHalberg.ppt
Halberg.ppt
 
Halberg.ppt
Halberg.pptHalberg.ppt
Halberg.ppt
 
Halberg organic chemistry agriculture ppt
Halberg organic chemistry agriculture pptHalberg organic chemistry agriculture ppt
Halberg organic chemistry agriculture ppt
 
Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25
Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25
Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25
 
Amrut Mitti - Solution based on diverse agro - ecological
Amrut Mitti - Solution based on diverse agro - ecological Amrut Mitti - Solution based on diverse agro - ecological
Amrut Mitti - Solution based on diverse agro - ecological
 
Climate change and organic agri A Lecture By Allah Dad Khan
Climate change and organic agri A Lecture By Allah Dad Khan Climate change and organic agri A Lecture By Allah Dad Khan
Climate change and organic agri A Lecture By Allah Dad Khan
 
Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25
Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25
Organic Farming L Tabafunda Aug25
 
A critical assessment of organic farming and food
A critical assessment of organic farming and foodA critical assessment of organic farming and food
A critical assessment of organic farming and food
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxOn_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxHMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptxWellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
 
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
 
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptxREMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
 
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptxExploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 

My course seminar

  • 1. COURSE SEMINAR ON ROLE OF ORGANIC AGRICULTIRE/FARMING Speaker Supervisor Govinda Raj Sedai Dr. S. K. Verma I.D. No. A 11019 Assistant lecturer DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY VARANASI
  • 2. INTRODUCTION The definition of organic agriculture is a matter of debate in itself. It has no single definition of its own. However, all definitions agree that it implies the application of agronomic, biological and mechanical methods of production in place of the use of synthetic chemical inputs. Most definitions also incorporate the use of several techniques not exclusive to organic agriculture, as they may be applied in conventional and low-input production systems as well. These include, in particular, “better land husbandry” techniques such as soil-conservation measures, crop rotation and the use of green manure, instead of slashing and burning.
  • 3. Basic rules of Organic farming and Organic food production •no use of chemical fertilizers or synthetic drugs •no use of genetically modified organisms •prevention from soil loss and erosion •promotion of ‘bio diversity’ – support a range of crops, not a single species
  • 4. Principles of Organic Agriculture •The principle of health •The principle of ecology •The principle of fairness •The principle of care
  • 5. Principles of health Organic Agriculture should sustain and enhance the health of soil, plant, animal, human and planet as one and indivisible. This principle points out that the health of individuals and communities cannot be separated from the health of ecosystems - healthy soils produce healthy crops that foster the health of animals and people. Health is the wholeness and integrity of living systems. It is not simply the absence of illness, but the maintenance of physical, mental, social and ecological well-being. Immunity, resilience and regeneration are key characteristics of health. The role of organic agriculture, whether in farming, processing, distribution, or consumption, is to sustain and enhance the health of ecosystems and organisms from the smallest in the soil to human beings. In particular, organic agriculture is intended to produce high quality, nutritious food that contributes to preventive health care and well-being. In view of this, it should avoid the use of fertilizers, pesticides, animal drugs and food additives that may have adverse health effects.
  • 6. Principles of ecology Organic Agriculture should be based on living ecological systems and cycles, work with them, emulate them and help sustain them. This principle roots organic agriculture within living ecological systems. It states that production is to be based on ecological processes, and recycling. Nourishment and well- being are achieved through the ecology of the specific production environment. For example, in the case of crops this is the living soil; for animals it is the farm ecosystem; for fish and marine organisms, the aquatic environment. Organic farming, pastoral and wild harvest systems should fit the cycles and ecological balances in nature. These cycles are universal but their operation is site-specific. Organic management must be adapted to local conditions, ecology, culture and scale. Inputs should be reduced by reuse, recycling and efficient management of materials and energy in order to maintain and improve environmental quality and conserve resources. Organic agriculture should attain ecological balance through the design of farming systems, establishment of habitats and maintenance of genetic and agricultural diversity. Those who produce, process, trade, or consume organic products should protect and benefit the common environment including landscapes, climate, habitats, biodiversity, air and water.
  • 7. Principles of fairness Organic Agriculture should be managed in a precautionary and responsible manner to protect the health and well-being of current and future generations and the environment. Organic agriculture is a living and dynamic system that responds to internal and external demands and conditions. Practitioners of organic agriculture can enhance efficiency and increase productivity, but this should not be at the risk of jeopardizing health and well- being. Consequently, new technologies need to be assessed and existing methods reviewed. Given the incomplete understanding of ecosystems and agriculture, care must be taken. This principle states that precaution and responsibility are the key concerns in management, development and technology choices in organic agriculture. Science is necessary to ensure that organic agriculture is healthy, safe and ecologically sound. However, scientific knowledge alone is not sufficient. Practical experience, accumulated wisdom and traditional and indigenous knowledge offer valid solutions, tested by time. Organic agriculture should prevent significant risks by adopting appropriate technologies and rejecting unpredictable ones, such as genetic engineering. Decisions should reflect the values and needs of all who might be affected, through transparent and participatory processes.
  • 8. Apart from these, basic principles should be closely followed: •Sustaining and improvement of the soil •Realization of nutrient re-cycling (farm, village, region) •Intensive use of legumes/leguminous trees to provide nitrogen supply •Biological plant protection through prevention •Diversity of crop varieties and species grown •Site and species appropriate animal husbandry •Prohibition of Genetic Engineering and products thereof •Maintenance of the surrounding natural landscape (sustainable eco-agro systems) •Least possible consumption of non-renewable energy and resources •Ban on synthetic, chemical fertilizers, plant protection, storage and ripening means as well as hormones and synthetic growth regulators (also harmful processing aids in food processing).
  • 9. Organic Agriculture is not the solution to all problems in farming sector. I’m confident that within this century all of the World’s agriculture will convert to “ORGANIC”. - Gunar Rund Gren President, IFOAM
  • 10. Ancient Period 1. Oldest Practice 10000 years ago dating back to Neolithic age by ancient civilization like Mesopotamia, Hwang Ho basin etc. 2. Ramayana All dead things returned to earth that in nourish soil and life 3. Mahabharata 5500 B.C., Kamadhenu – the cow is role in human life and soil fertility 4. Kautilya 300 B.C., several manures like oil cake and Arthshastra excreta of animals 5. Brihad Sanhita Methods of choosing manures for crops and manuring 6. Rigveda 2500-1500 B.C., green manure, use of dung of goat, sheep, cow etc. 10
  • 11.  The organic movement was began in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction to agriculture’s growing reliance on synthetic fertilizers.  Sir Albert Howard is widely considered to be the father of Organic farming.  Rudolf Steiner, a German philosopher, made influential strides in the earliest organic theory with his Biodynamic agriculture.  J. I. Rodale worked in United States.  Lady Eve Balfour in United Kingdom.  1980s - Increased Environmental Awareness.  1990s – Market for organic products has grown at a rapid pace averaging 20 – 25 percent / year.  In 2002, the USDA under National Organic Program(NOP) regulated the commercial use of the term ORGANIC.  2007 – Approximately 306,000 Sq.Km(30.6 million hectares) are farmed Organically.
  • 12. S.N. Region Area (ha) % Organic Producers Europe 10637127.52 2.23 291451.00 1 Northern America 2790162.37 0.72 16659.00 2 Latin America 6857610.72 1.12 315889.00 3 Africa 1073656.65 0.12 4 540988.00 Asia 3706279.61 0.26 619439.00 5 Total 25064836.87 4.45 1784426.00
  • 13. 12000000.00 10637127.52 10000000.00 8000000.00 6857610.72 Area (ha) 6000000.00 3706279.61 % Organic Producers 4000000.00 2790162.37 1073656.65 2000000.00 291451.00 16659.00 315889.00 540988.00 619439.00 1.12 0.26 2.23 0.12 0.72 0.00 Europe Northern America Latin America Africa Asia
  • 14. Sustainable aims Organic Agriculture Ecological Social aims aims
  • 15. Organic Agriculture: • Economic security, • Economically viable, • Added value, • Low investment, Sustainability • Good and constant yields, aims • Make best use of local resources • Good working condition • Fair Trade, • food supply, • Satisfy local needs Social • Gender balance • Respect the local culture aims • Good taste and quality • Balance ecosystem • No chemical pollution • High soil fertility • Clean water Ecological • Biological diversity aims • Animal friendly husbandry • Conserve the natural resources • Safe products
  • 16. Material considered to be used in Organic farming • In-situ waste/product: – Farm yard manure and urine – Rotted litter of poultry birds – Vermicompost, – Plant residues, – Green manuring – Azolla, BGA, Rhizobium etc. – Organic compost from organic kitchen waste, – Residues of organic mushroom production, – Night soil, – Oil cake – Bio-dynymic mixture – Sheep/goat manure – Pig manure • Could be used after with analysis and care takes: – Bio fertilizer Rhizobium, Mycorrhiza etc. from external source – Saw dust, – Blood -meal, bone-meal – FYM, Compost , vermicompost from external sources, • Lesser than recommended doses – Limestone, – Grinded rock, – Magnesium – Bodo-mixture, bodo-pest and bodo-paint
  • 17. Material considered to be used/banded in Organic farming S.N. Particulars Symbol Remarks 1 Chemical pesticides × Hazardous 2 Aromatic substances Problematic in environment balance 3 Traps - 4 Soft soap - 5 Micro-organism If imported from foreign used with special take care 6 Plant originated extract May cause bad impact in environment 7 Plant and animal originated fat & oils May cause bad impact in environment 8 Parasite and parasitoid insects May cause harmful effect on indigenous and native insects 9 Mineral oils May cause negative impact in environment 10 Sulfur May cause negative impact in environment 11 Mulching from natural sources - 12 Potassium per magnet May cause bad impact in environment 13 Bodo-mixture, bodo-pest and paint May cause negative impact in environment × - Banded/not to be used, - used with take care and - could be used
  • 18. Material considered to be used/banded in Organic farming S.N. Country No. of farmers Percent in Total 1 Germany 10000 2 Austria 20000 3 Sweden 4 Finland 5 Switzerland 6 Denmark 7 Italy 18000 8 Uganda 7000 9 Mexico 100000 10 11 12 13
  • 20. Integrated farming Integrated Integrated pest weed management management Organic farming Integrated Organic/ disease Biofertilizer management Crop rotation
  • 21. NEED OF ORGANIC FARMING
  • 22. Advantages Animals lead Soil structure happier lives is better Organic farming More birds and insects Less harmful to environment No harmful chemicals – healthier?
  • 23. Disadvantages More More blemishes on expensive crops Organic farming More farm Smaller yields workers needed
  • 24. Table 1. Chemical composition of organic manures FYM Green manure Composition 2007-08 2008-09 2007-08 2008-09 Rice wheat Rice wheat Rice wheat Rice wheat Organic carbon (mg kg-1) 143000 138600 139800 140200 386000 460000 389000 481000 Total N (mg kg-1) 4800 5000 4900 4900 24000 32000 27000 31500 Total P (mg kg-1) 2300 2500 2500 2400 3700 3300 3900 3000 Total K (mg kg-1) 4900 5200 5100 5000 208000 23000 21900 22800 Fe (mg kg-1) 20.85 22.35 21.9 22 74.6 83.2 77.2 80.3 Zn (mg kg-1) 10.6 11.7 12.05 11.9 34.2 36.4 34.8 33.7 Mn (mg kg-1) 38.9 39.6 39.95 40.1 88.2 96.2 90.4 94.8 Cu (mg kg-1) 2.6 2.7 2.79 2.83 8.5 9.2 8.7 8.8 C:N ratio 29.8 27.7 28.5 28.6 16.1 14.4 14.4 15.3 Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
  • 25. Table 1. Biodiversity on organic farms (global literature review of comparison studies) Taxon Positive Negative No difference Birds 7 2 Mammals 2 Butterflies 1 1 Spiders 7 3 Earthworms 7 2 4 Beetles 13 5 3 Other arthropods 7 1 2 Plants 13 2 Soil microbes 9 8 Total 66 8 25 Hole et al., 2005
  • 26. Table 2. Some projection on the availability of organic resources for agriculture in India during 2010-2025 Resources 2010 2025 Generator Human population (million) 1120 1300 Livestock population (million) 537 596 Food grain production (million t) 264 315 Human excreta (dry) (million t) 18.5 21.5 Livestock dung (sun dry) (million t) 396 426 Crop residue (million t) 343 496 Resources (considered tappable) Human excreta 15 17 Livestock excreta 119 128 Crop residue excreta 112 162 Resources (considered potental) Human excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O) 2.24 2.60 Livestock excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O) 7.00 7.54 Crop residue excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O) 7.10 20.27 Nutrient( considered tappable) (30% dung, 80% excreta and 33% of crop residue) Human excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O) 1.80 2.10 Livestock excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O) 2.10 2.26 Crop residue excreta (million t N + P2O5 + K2O) 2.34 3.39 Total 6.24 7.75 Source: Tandon 1997
  • 27. Table 3. Effect of nutrient combinations and mode of application N, P and K uptake in rice N uptake (kg ha-1) P uptake (kg ha-1) K uptake (kg ha-1) Treatments 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 Nutrient combination (N) Control 47.4 47.1 7.5 7.2 69.6 68.7 Farm Yard Manure (FYM) 68.3 74.6 10.6 11.8 92.9 99.1 Green manure (GM) 76.0 84.9 11.8 13.3 99.8 108.0 GM + Biofertilizer (B) 83.7 90.2 13.0 14.0 106.3 112.6 GM + FYM 95.8 103.8 14.7 15.9 115.7 120.7 GM + FYM + B 105.4 112.5 16.2 17.2 124.9 12805 Control Vs others SEd± 5.51 4.81 0.86 0.74 5.29 6.10 CD (P=0.05) 11.25 9.83 1.75 1.51 10.80 12.45 Between others SEm± 2.74 2.41 0.43 0.37 2.64 3.05 CD (P=0.05) 7.95 6.95 1.24 1.07 7.63 8.81 Mode of application (M) Direct effect 82.7 93.8 12.6 14.3 102.9 111.2 Residual effect 69.7 75.5 10.9 11.8 93.3 98.1 Cumulative effect 105.0 110.3 16.3 17.2 127.5 132.1 SEm± 2.13 1.8 0.33 0.29 2.05 2.36 CD (P=0.05) 6.16 5.38 0.96 0.83 5.91 6.82 N×M SEm± 4.77 4.17 0.74 0.64 4.58 5.28 CD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
  • 28. Table 4. Effect of nutrient combinations and mode of application in nutrient concentration in Basmati rice grain N, P, K concentration (%) Micro-nutrient concentration (%) Treatments N P K Fe Mn Zn Cu 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 Nutrient combination (N) Control 1.2 1.18 0.206 0.205 0.212 0.211 34.110 33.770 33.010 33.02 32.65 32.27 13.7 12.97 Farm Yard Manure (FYM) 1.29 1.31 0.229 0.236 0.246 0.249 35.610 35.870 34.560 35.08 34.15 34.43 14.1 14.59 Green manure (GM) 1.32 1.35 0.237 0.244 0.251 0.256 35.800 36.290 34.770 35.34 34.34 34.68 14.1 14.64 GM + Biofertilizer (B) 1.34 1.36 0.239 0.245 0.253 0.258 35.850 36.440 34.860 35.43 34.39 34.71 14.2 14.69 GM + FYM 1.37 1.39 0.247 0.253 0.259 0.266 36.330 37.020 35.730 36.37 35.09 35.25 14.2 14.84 GM + FYM + B 1.39 1.4 0.250 0.255 0.262 0.267 36.320 37.220 35.980 36.6 35.13 35.43 14.3 14.93 Control Vs others SEd± 0.062 0.027 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.480 0.230 0.290 0.19 0.64 0.55 0.11 0.16 CD (P=0.05) 0.126 0.056 0.021 0.017 0.014 0.013 0.990 0.460 0.600 0.39 1.32 1.11 0.22 0.33 Between others SEm± 0.031 0.014 0.01 0.004 0 0.003 0.240 0.11 0.15 0.1 0.32 0.27 0.05 0.08 CD (P=0.05) 0.089 0.039 0.015 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.700 0.330 0.420 0.27 0.93 0.79 0.15 0.23 Mode of application (M) Direct effect 1.34 1.36 0.237 0.24 0.25 0.26 35.87 36.22 35.51 35.99 34.55 34.83 14.2 14.78 Residual effect 1.3 1.33 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.25 35.49 35.55 33.31 34.33 34.1 34.41 14.1 14.56 Cumulative effect 1.39 1.40 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.27 36.51 37.94 36.73 36.98 35.11 35.46 14.2 14.88 SEm± 0.024 0.011 0 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.190 0.090 0.110 0.07 0.25 0.21 0.04 0.06 CD (P=0.05) 0.069 0.030 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.540 0.250 0.330 0.21 0.72 0.61 0.12 0.18 Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
  • 29. Table 5. Effect of nutrient combinations and mode of application on economy of cultivation of Basmati rice Gross Return cost of cultivation Net return B:C ratio Treatment (×103 Rs. Ha-1) (×103 Rs. Ha-1) (×103 Rs. Ha-1) 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 Nutrient combination (N) Control 49.64 49.85 20.090 21.040 29.550 28.810 1.500 1.400 Farm Yard Manure (FYM) 66.86 72.67 25.770 27.060 41.090 45.620 1.600 1.700 Green manure (GM) 71.66 78.98 22.410 23.460 49.250 55.520 2.200 2.400 GM + Biofertilizer (B) 79.54 83.47 22.520 23.570 57.020 59.890 2.500 2.500 GM + FYM 87.65 93.07 41.490 43.510 46.170 49.560 1.100 1.100 GM + FYM + B 95.79 100.16 41.600 43.620 54.190 56.550 1.300 1.300 Control Vs others SEd± 5.710 3.550 5.710 3.550 0.320 0.150 CD (P=0.05) 11.660 7.250 11.660 7.250 0.660 0.300 Between others SEm± 2.860 1.780 2.860 1.780 0.160 0.070 CD (P=0.05) 8.250 5.130 8.25 5.130 0.470 0.21 Mode of application (M) Direct effect 77.76 86.74 36.090 36.09 41.67 48.89 1.2 1.3 Residual effect 67.34 71.40 20.09 20.09 47.250 50.36 2.4 2.4 Cumulative effect 95.8 98.88 36.85 36.09 59.71 61.03 1.7 1.6 SEm± 2.210 1.380 2.210 1.380 0.13 0.060 CD (P=0.05) 6.390 3.970 6.390 3.970 0.36 0.160 N×M SEm± 4.95 3.080 4.950 3.08 0.280 0.130 CD (P=0.05) NS 8.88 NS 8.880 0.810 0.36 Source: Moolam Ram et al. 2011
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33. Certification A procedure by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process or services is in conformity with certain standards. • Certification Body • Inspector • Operator (farmers. Processor and applicant)
  • 34. Certification Process: Steps of certification process • Request for Certification, • Applicant’s screening from Certification Body and send forms for applicant, • Applicant’s fill up form and prepare all document and return to Certification Body, • CB assess potential eligibility (Again screening), • CB assigns organic inspector for site visit, • Onsite visit report to CB, • Review on report and takes decision, • CB notifies applicant • Certification (Yes or No) • Annual certification renewal
  • 35. Conclusion:  Organic farming intensifies farm-internal processes like biological activities, recycling of livestock and crop waste, enhanced biodiversity as well as nitrogen fixation and improve phosphorus availability by symbiosis.  Organic farming is relevant mitigation and adoption option for climate change.  Organic farming is viable solution for smallholder farmers in developing countries.  Organic farming build up soil health and conserves soil water and organic matter.
  • 36. • The world currently produces double the amount of food required to feed everyone; still around 1 billion people suffer from hunger, and another billion are malnourished • The problem of hunger is mostly due to poor distribution systems and inadequate production in the poorest communities • 50% of the world’s hungry are in fact small holder farmers, who suffer from lack of extension services and access to resources, unjust trade conditions, erosion of their agricultural biodiversity and climate change • Much greater support of small holder producers is required, as they produce 70% of the world’s food. Strengthening small holder farmers is the key to increasing access to food and food security • A United Nations study has found that organic agriculture increased yields in Africa by over 100% and that organic systems have higher yields under conditions of climatic extremes • Organic systems are highly suitable for increasing productivity of traditional small holder and subsistence systems • Greater investment in research and extension of affordable, and resilient organic systems for small holder farmers is required
  • 37. Conclusion: The government of India seems to be committed for promoting organic farming in the country. Several pieces of policies and strategies are formulated to promote organic farming. But, these policies and strategies are scattered and simply inadequate. For this purpose, a consolidated policy and a clear set of legislative provisions are required. Nature has gifted Nepal with plenty of production niches suitable for organic farming of various agricultural commodities. However, it encompasses several challenges in order to make national product competitive in the domestic and international market. On the one hand policies and capacities on production technologies of organic farming are inadequate and on the other hand the developed technologies and products are not being delivered properly in Nepal. So, under the given circumstances, Nepal has to reform its policies and make organic farming friendly, so that the virgin areas can be protected from the introduction of chemical inputs. Many actors including government organizations, NGOs, private sector and farmers should be involved in different steps of organic agriculture promotion and certification. Then only the nation can prosper with the means of healthy people.