1. Global Utmaning and Iddri,
Swedish Embassy in Paris, October 27,
2010
An International
Climate Investment
Community
- preparing a post-Cancún agenda
to break the political deadlock
2. Why a new European
initiative?
1. The political deadlock in the UN-
process
2. Copenhagen left the business
community ”confused about…the
wider…economic implications”
3. ”The green race” – Asian
competition
3. The political deadlock
- no global treaty in sight
in spite of twenty years of
climate negotiations
- US, China et al are not ready to
agree
4. The investors’ dilemma
- Copenhagen left the business
community ”confused”
-”a stable global carbon price is
neccessary to form the cornerstone
of any successful policy in the
longer term” (IEA)
- still, no global CO2-price in sight
5. ”The green race”
- EU presently the leader in clean tech
export
- Asian countries determined
to win the race
6. Emerging consensus *)
on energy and security
- an energy revolution is needed to tackle
climate change
- reduced global pressure on oil is needed
- a low carbon future is a powerful tool for
economic modernization
*) International Energy Agency, World Bank, EU Commission, Major Economies
Forum, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, European Climate
Foundation
7. Investing in a low carbon
future
- the policy dilemma:
Two main avenues:
- more subsidies?
- or a CO2 price to level the
playing field?
8. A technology neutral CO2
price
The aim:
levelling the playing field between fossil
technologies and low carbon technologies
The level:
- the present CO2 price 15 € a ton is
”subsidised”,
at least 40 Euro/ton is needed by 2020
The effect:
”Pricing carbon .. is the optimal way of
both generating carbon-finance resources
9. Three reasons for
a technology neutral CO2
price
- business and consumers, not
governments, will choose
technologies
- will create clear long term
expectations
for investment
- will bring revenues
for the greening of the tax systems
11. The basic elements
- reforming European emission
trading
- national tax reforms, less tax on
labour, more tax on carbon
- stringent European standards,
stimulating global standards for
energy efficiency
12. - a complementary approach
to the UNFCCC-process, not an
alternative approach
- more flexible, more ambitious
- Sharing opportunites
rather than sharing burdens
- similar initiatives exist, could be
integrated
A concept – not a
blueprint
13. A post Cancún strategy
Input to discussions
among European and likeminded
countries
after COP 16 in Cancun
- some key issues addressed, not all
- to be discussed in Paris, Stockholm,
Beijing, London, Berlin and
Washington
17. Development of the Swedish CO2 tax
general level and industry level
from 2008 industry outside EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Carbon tax (euro/tonne) Carbon tax, industry level (euro/tonne)
General level for 2010 level in figure