3. Index
11/25/2014 3
1. Project Type & Location
2. Client & Project Details
3. Project Process : Challenges & Execution
4. Project Process : Duration, Inputs, Output
5. Quality Process
6. Project Outputs
4. 11/25/2014 4
Project : Creation of BIM Models with LOD-300 for a park in California : 1. Architecture
2. Structure
3. MEP
Location : California, US
Project Type & Location
5. 11/25/2014 5
Client Profile
• Client is a giant construction company headquartered in Chicago.
• It is into construction management services since 60+ years.
• It undertakes different categories of projects & have strong client base starting from small private firms to
large Government sectors. Their unique & flexible construction management system ensures quality
outcome of the project regardless of its nature & size.
Project Detail
• The project was to create Architectural, Structural & MEP BIM Models for their new
upcoming park to be build up in California.
• Hi-Tech’s scope of work was to provide client BIM models with LOD-300.
Client & Project Details
6. 11/25/2014 6
Project Process
Challenges
• The client provided us inputs like hand drawn sketches, conceptual sketches, pdf files etc. First thing to
do was to understand inputs in different forms through proper & effective client communication.
• The important task was to add on the creativity to the project to give it an excellent architectural
look.
• So to build new architectural models & to coordinate it with other disciplines like structural & MEP was
difficult sometimes.
Execution
• The inputs available with us were in the form of hand drawn & conceptual sketches, pdf files, which
we were to convert into intelligent BIM models using Revit.
• Next step was to create BIM models with different disciplines like Architectural, Structural & MEP which
was successfully accomplished as per client’s requirement in the form of 3D Revit Models.
• Finally after that we started to look into the coordination between the models, so called Clash
Detection with the help of Navisworks & were successful in scrutinizing all the clashes.
• The build up of architectural objects from concepts helped the client to give it a unique architectural
look.
• As same technical team was dedicated for the project, the client was really satisfied for smoother
communication & coordination which further reduced overall time & cost as well.
7. 11/25/2014 7
Project Duration
• The project lasted for a period of about 6 weeks
Inputs Received :
• PDF files, hand drawn & conceptual sketches
Outputs Delivered :
• BIM models with following disciplines:
1) Architecture
2) Structure
3) MEP
Software :
• Revit
• Navisworks
Project Process
8. 11/25/2014 8
Quality Process Organization Quality
Standards, Quality
Documents & earlier
project reference
Quality Planning for
each project
Prepare
List of Quality
Parameters
Prepare
Responsibility
Matrix [RACI
Chart]
Prepare
Quality
Register
Prepare a
Preliminary Quality
List
1st Level – Self QC
2nd Level – Peer QC
3rd Level – Random Audit by Quality Manager
Update Quality register & if necessary update Quality List/ Quality Parameter
List
If any changes recommended by client
a. Part of SoW (Scope of Work): Iteration in above process
b. Any new changes included in SOW: Start
Engineering Change Management Process
Prepare a Final
Quality List
Project In
Quotation
Sample
Project
Customer
Feedback
Actual Project
Execution
Quality Check
Customer
Feedback
Final Delivery
16. 11/25/2014 16
T H A N K Y O U
L O C A T I O N S :
Hi-Tech House
Nr. Gurukul Tower,
Gurukul,
A h m e d a b a d,
Gujarat, India.
5th Floor, Commerce House – IV,
100 Ft. Road,
Prahladnagar,
A h m e d a b a d,
Gujarat, India.
43-A, E Block, 3rd Floor,
Cochin Special Economic Zone
Kakkanad,
Kochi,
Kerala, India.
Bhushan Avsatthi
Associate Director
Architecture Engineering Construction
