IDRC14-Bouchon-Matrics
•
0 gefällt mir•735 views
5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Ähnlich wie IDRC14-Bouchon-Matrics
Ähnlich wie IDRC14-Bouchon-Matrics (20)
Mehr von Global Risk Forum GRFDavos
Mehr von Global Risk Forum GRFDavos (20)
IDRC14-Bouchon-Matrics
- 1. Enhancing emergency management collaboration between CI operators: towards a comprehensive Information Sharing Protocol 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org P. Trucco1, A. Vaezi2, D. Masi3, S. Bouchon 4 1Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy 2McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. 3Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy. 4Risk Governance Solutions S.r.l., Busto Arsizio, Italy.
- 2. CI disruptions & Emergency management 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org • CI disruptions very seldom considered in EM • In case of CI disruptions, there is a need: – To understand what is happening – To know who is involved – To be updated about the actions taken
- 3. Emergency Information Sharing Protocols 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org • Emergency Information Sharing Protocols (EISP) – Involve relevant stakeholders – Have a common Operational picture – Common situation awareness – Joint decision making in case of emergency • Limitations of current EISP – Limited scope – Not fully standardized – Do not include CI operators needs
- 4. The MATRICS Project 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org • Scope & Research Objectives of the MATRICS Project – Funded by the Italian Ministry of education and Research – Aims at proposing a new EISP to be used for operational information exchange among CIOs and between CIOs and first responders during the emergency management phase
- 5. 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org Methodology Step 1- Development of a High-level Ontology Literature Review Review of Lombardy Civil protection Action-log Book Step 2- Integration of Existing Standards Step 3- Development of a low-level ontology Analysis of end users-requirements Step 4- Test case study Review of existing EISP standards
- 6. 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org A critical review of existing EISPs Acronym Name Reference NIEM National Information Exchange Model https://www.niem.gov/ http://release.niem.gov/niem/3.0/ http://release.niem.gov/niem/domains/infrastructureProtection/3.0/infrastructureProtection.x sd EDXL Emergency Data Exchange Language https://www.oasis-open.org/standards EDXL-CAP: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/CAP-v1.2-os.html EDXL-DE: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-de/v2.0/edxl-de-v2.0.html EDXL-RM: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-rm/v1.0/EDXL-RM-SPEC-V1.0.html EDXL-HAVE: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/v1.0/errata/edxl-have-v1.0-os-errata- os.html CWML Cyclone Warning Markup Language http://www.nicta.com.au/ http://www.nicta.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/8645/CWML-10.pdf TWML Tsunami Warning Markup Language http://www.nicta.com.au/ http://www.nicta.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/7567/TsunamiWarningML-V10.pdf PFIF People Finder Interchange Format http://zesty.ca/ http://zesty.ca/pfif/1.4/ W3C EIIF W3C Emergency Information Interoperability Frameworks http://www.w3.org http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/eiif/XGR-Framework-20090806/ RM-OA Reference Model for the ORCHESTRA Architecture http://www.eu-orchestra.org/ http://www.eu-orchestra.org/TUs/RMOA/en/html/Unit2_learningObject1.html MIP The Multilateral Interoperability Program https://mipsite.lsec.dnd.ca/ https://mipsite.lsec.dnd.ca/Public%20Document%20Library/MIM-Information_Sheet.pdf TSO Tactical Situation Object https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42411/CWA_15931-1.pdf
- 7. 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org The high-level ontology
- 8. 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org The low-level Ontology
- 9. 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org The low-level Ontology
- 10. TEST CASE APPLICATION 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org • Scenario: heavy snowfall scenario impacting on a large regional area in northern Italy
- 11. Added value for the Post 2015 Framework for 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org Disaster Risk Reduction • How did your work support the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action: – Improve EM related to CI disruptions – Enhance stakeholder collaboration – Towards standardized EISP • From your perspective what are the main gaps, needs and further steps to be addressed in the Post 2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in – Research: standardization, end users requirements, information sharing – Education & Training: involve new types of stakeholders (e.g.population) in EM – Implementation & Practice: – Policy:
- 12. 5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 ‘Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice‘ • 24-28 August 2014 • Davos • Switzerland www.grforum.org • Thank you for your attention! sara.bouchon@riskgovernancesolutions.eu
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Introduce to main results of a applied research project conducted with colleagues from Politechnics of Milan Objective: to improve EM related to CI disruptions Main assumption: information sharing is key
- = information is the critical resource! CI operator not involved in EM procedures. keep info for themselves while some of them could be of interest for the other operators; e.g. in case of blackout some mobile phones antennas have an autonomy of around 2 hours. need to know how long the blackout will last. = need to be included in EM protocols
- systems to share information with restricted access to relevant stakeholders. Everyone can communicate to the system information relevant (e.g. electricity operator about the network situation, time it will take to repair damages, etc.) so that everyone share the same common operationnal picture. allows taking actions and update others about the actions taken to the view to improve EM They do not cover the whole set of information and their relationships or they are too general (e.g. alert pahse or risk management in general) They are not fully standardized with respect to syntax, terminology, and semantics to cover the practices of stakeholders different from first responders They are designed on the basis of the needs of first responders and Civil protection, but the needs of Critical Infrastructure Operators (CIOs) have been neglected
- = have an information sharing system defining who need to be involved (ci operators, emergency management, support services, e.g. meteo), what type of information is exchanged,when, why and how. e.g. ci operators have to update other stakeholders about their situation and times of recovery every 2 hours; emergency management authorities need to communicate to the population every 30 minutes about the situation, etc.
- a high-level ontology clarifying the fundamental concepts needed in emergencies has been developed the existing ISPs have been reviewed, with a particular focus on their performance with respect to the fundamental concepts of the high-level ontology a low-level ontology has been developed which integrates the most suited elements of the existing ISPs for the corresponding scopes of the high-level ontology the complete ISP has been applied in a case study
- Test: scenario of past accident (heavy snowfall) Validation of type of messages, type of information, usability of the system Limits: prototype. not yet included in existing management system so seen as additional work! Test: analysing the sequence of events, the information needed for the proper management of the emergency, and the matching between the needed information and the information provided by the ontology The test demonstrated how the proposed ISP does overcome the limitations of the existing ISPs because it covers the whole set of needed information and it proposed standardized syntax, terminology, and semantics by selecting the most appropriate portions of existing IPSs to cover specific information contents