Instructions for the elaboration of the poster and the flyer of the exhibition

1. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR TEACHERS.
Below you will find my work proposal for a small project entitled " We carry on an exhibition!".
It is a cooperative work whose final product will be the poster and the leaflet of an exhibition on
one of the artistic vanguards.
To arrive at the final product, the students must prepare a dossier with what they have learned
about the artistic avant-garde they have chosen and with their proposal for the exhibition.
They must exhibit their final product before the class group.
As for the evaluation, to evaluate the progress, the students will work directly in the Drive with
what will be able to control who works and when.
I have also made three rubrics, one to evaluate the written dossier, another for the final project
and, finally, one for the oral presentation.

2. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
WORK PROPOSAL
In a prestigious art gallery, they are organizing an exhibition about one of the historical avant-
gardes that we have studied in class, but they still do not know what to do. Can you help them?
The job proposal is as follows: in groups of 4 students, you must work on one of the proposed
avant-gardes, perform a search and complete a dossier in which it appears:
• The historical context.
• General characteristics.
• Authors and important works.
You should also make a proposal about which authors and what works of these authors should
exhibit in the art gallery.
The final product is double: you must make the poster and the leaflet of the exhibition, from
what appears in your dossier. The leaflet must be written in Catalan, Spanish and English. On
the last day you will have to present your product to the class group.
You will work directly in the Drive, with a folder shared with me in which there must be the
dossier, the poster and the leaflet. For the accomplishment of the work you will have three
sessions of classroom and we will use two sessions to present your final products.
It is not necessary to remember that the dossier must have, cover, index, body and bibliography
/ webography. It must be numbered, and the paragraphs must be justified. The dossier must
have at least 10 pages and must have images with its corresponding image footer (we can not
forget that it is an art work).

3. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
RUBRIC OF WRITTEN WORK
GROUP MEMBERS GRADE GROUP
Evaluation
indicators
Beginning
1
Developing
2
Accomplished
3
Excellent
4
SCORE
Title The title and the subtitle do not
fit anything in the subject of the
work.
The work has no title and / or
subtitle.
The title and the subtitle do not
entirely fit the subject of the
work.
It has a title and a subtitle quite
adequate for the subject of the
work.
It has a title and a subtitle that
is very suitable for the subject of
work.
The title is persuasive and the
subtitle accurately describes
the topic of the work.
Table of
contents
(index)
The table of contents does not
reflect the sections of the work.
There is no table of contents.
The table of contents does not
reflect all sections of the work
and / or is not duly edited.
The table of contents reflects all
the sections of the work,
ordered and, numbered but not
correctly hierarchized.
The table is duly edited: it
appears the justified page
number.
The table of contents reflects all
the sections of the work,
correctly sorted, numbered and
hierarchical
The table is duly edited: it
appears the justified page
number.
Introduction There is no introduction. The introduction does not
correctly place the reader on
the subject.
There is an introduction that
situates the reader in the
subject.
Methodology The various actions that have
been performed one by one are
not listed: interview,
documentary consultation,
fieldwork, experiments,
surveys, visualization of audio-
visuals, ...
The various actions that have
been done one by one are
listed: interview, documentary
consultation, field work,
experiments, surveys,
visualization of audio-visuals, ...
The various actions carried out
one by one are listed and
explained: interview,
documentary consultation, field
work, experiments, surveys,
visualization of audio-visuals, ...
The various actions carried out
one by one are documented,
explained and documented:
interview, documentary
consultation, fieldwork,
experiments, surveys,
visualization of audio-visuals, ...

4. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
Analysis /
results
The information, the
collected data and / or
results are not commented
and / or are not analysed.
The analysis is not
complemented.
The information, the
collected data and / or
results are discussed, but
they are not analysed.
The analysis is
complemented with: graphs,
tables, images, plans,
citations ...
The information, the
collected data and / or the
results are discussed and
commented in a little argued
way.
The analysis is
complemented with: graphs,
tables, images, plans,
citations ...
The information, the
collected data and / or the
results are analysed and
commented.
The analysis is
complemented with: graphs,
tables, images, plans,
citations ...
Conclusions Conclusions are not included
or are not suitable for work.
The work includes some
conclusions that show the
fundamental aspects of the
work.
The work includes some
conclusions that comprise
the fundamental aspects of
the work and raise new
questions (open new ways of
research).
Documentary
sources
The documentary sources
are not cited.
The documentary sources
are cited but typologies are
not distinguished.
Almost all documentary
sources are cited,
distinguishing between
books, magazines, web
pages, etc.
They cite all documentary
sources distinguishing
between books, magazines,
web pages, etc.
Formal
aspects
The general presentation of
the work is incorrect.
The general presentation of
the work is not correct.
The general presentation of
the work is good.
The general presentation of
the work is excellent.
TOTAL SCORE

5. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
RUBRIC OF POSTER AND LEAFTLET
GROUP MEMBERS GRADE GROUP
Evaluation
indicators
Beginning
1
Developing
2
Accomplished
3
Excellent
4
SCORE
Content Support details and information
are not clear or are not related
to the topic.
Support details and information
are related, but several key
aspects are not supported.
Support details and information
are related, but a key aspect is
without support.
Relevant content, giving quality
details that provide information
that goes beyond the obvious
and predictable.
Organization
of
information
The images do not have the
necessary dimensions, they are
disproportionate, unclear and
do not support the message.
Some images are not clear and
well-proportioned and do not
support the message.
Some images support and
represent the message and
have the necessary dimensions
according to the poster and the
leaflet.
All the images support and fully
represent the message and
have the necessary dimensions
according to the poster and the
leaflet.
Iconographic
language
The information is in disorder
and its reading is not easy.
Information is organized but it is
not easy reading the poster and
leaflet.
The information is well
organized and it is easy to read
the poster and the leaflet.
The information is very well
organized and has a detailed
and it is easy to read order.
Format The format is not suitable for
the indicated dimensions, it
lacks appropriate colours and is
not visually appealing.
The format is not appropriate to
the indicated dimensions,
although it is showy.
The format is suitable for the
dimensions indicated, although
it is colourful.
The format is visibly attractive,
according to the necessary
dimensions.
Presentation
of the
product
Incomplete, boring Use of
few computer tools or badly
used.
Little mastery of the subject.
Clear, but disordered and
incomplete information.
Well organized, creative and
well-expressed. Use of
powerful computer tools,
security in the exhibition.
Very well organized, creative
and well-expressed. The use
of many computer tools, very
good exposure, catches
attention
TOTAL SCORE

6. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF AN ORAL PRESENTATION
GROUP MEMBERS
(Check the box that corresponds to the student who exposes)
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
SUBJECT
A. ORGANIZATION OF THE PRESENTATION
The ideas are neatly
organized
Well-structured and tidy Acceptable, but with
some faults
Disorganized
There is an introduction,
a body of work and
conclusions
Yes Unclear No
Capacity for synthesis:
the most significant
aspects have been
selected
A lot Enough Little
Express rigor and
objectivity
A lot Enough Little
Score (2,5)
points
B. ADEQUATION OF THE COMMUNICATIVE CONTEXT AND QUALITY OF THE CONTENT
Show Knowledge of the
subject (rigor,
objectivity and level)
Well suited
Acceptable, but with
faults or errors
Unsuitable
The ideas are presented
with depth, details and
examples
Essential information.
Excellent knowledge
Basic theme
information, but with
errors
Minimum content and
errors
Degree of formality Well suited Acceptable Unsuitable
Express rigor, clarity and
precision
Well explained and
understandable
Unclear
It is not understood
Define words or
concepts that may be
new
Yes Little No
Score (2,5)
points

7. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
C. LINGUISTIC CORRECTION
Language adapts to the
situation and is the
subject matter
Well suited
Acceptable, but with
faults or errors
Unsuitable (Imprecisions,
barbarisms, serious
errors ...)
Morphosyntax:
concordances, structure
of sentences, complete
sentences ...
Well suited With some errors Unsuitable
Pronunciation Well suited With some errors Unsuitable
Score (2,5)
points
D. COMMUNICATIVE EFFICACY
Provides information
convincingly Very convincing Fair Little convincing
Speech fluid, agile, with
rhythm and with the
appropriate pauses
A lot Enough Little
Volume, tone and voice
modulation Well suited Acceptable Unsuitable
Adaptation of visual
support A lot Enough Little
Organization and clarity
of the visual
presentation
Well suited Acceptable Unsuitable
If questions are
formulated answers are
...
Suitable and accurate Acceptable
They do not answer
what they are asking
Score (2,5)
points
FINAL MARK
OBSERVATIONS