SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 2
RFA Procedure for SNG/MTT

In step 10 you are required to submit a request for action (RFA) once you have significant reason to believe
the players are cheating.

They include a summary, trap request, and RFA. Please include these items as a part of your investigation
notes.

This particular recommendation will include the following:

    1. A brief point form summary outlining the evidence you have found that flags the players as
         potential cheaters. Here’s an example that I have taken from one of Mike’s cases:

             •    Players lives in the same city and even the same street.
             •    Many player-to-player transfers between players.
             •    Have played in 23 tournaments together prior to 2357504: one SNG (site crashed), one
                  MTT (did not share any tables)
             •    Player GEEAR may well have multiple accounts, which will be dealt with as a separate
                  issue.
             •    Chat during tournament between two players once 4 handed could be considered
                  collusion against TwisterSister.
             •    Players have shared the same Neteller processor account numbers.

    2.   A Trap Request: Please include any serial numbers from your serial relationship excel sheet that
         you would like me to trap.

    3. A recommendation for action for the disbursement of any funds from the cheaters to victimized
         players using a matrix. Here’s an example for a Single Table SnG:

RFA for Tournament #123456

TOURNAMENT         PLAYER         ORIGINAL          ADJUSTED         FUNDS         FUNDS
  NUMBER            NAME        PLACING/CASH         PLACING          LOSS         GAINED
   123456        RobertaRenna        1st               Last           -$100
                 Lawrence Ng         2nd               Last            -$60
                 JonathanL           3rd                1st                          +$60
                 MoZhang             4th                2nd                          +$60
                 TomGreen            5th                3rd                          +$40



You will notice a couple of things here.

    •    Whenever you do an RFA for a single table SnG the funds loss must always equal the funds
         gained. If you are going to disqualify someone from a tournament and forfeit all their winnings,
         all their winnings have to go to another player. The balance must be zero.

    •    If you notice, 3rd place receives only +$40. That’s because they initially won $40 for 3rd and 1st
         place pays a total of $100. Therefore they will only receive a $60 credit. All other players below
         him did not make the money and thus receive the full prize money.

    •    Both players RobertaRenna and Lawrence Ng have adjusted placings for last. If the players are
         disqualified, they will always receive last place.
Rfa for sn gmtt

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von FrankSobotka

Credit card and payment processor descriptors
Credit card and payment processor descriptorsCredit card and payment processor descriptors
Credit card and payment processor descriptorsFrankSobotka
 
Chargeback repayment
Chargeback repaymentChargeback repayment
Chargeback repaymentFrankSobotka
 
5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)
5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)
5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)FrankSobotka
 
5.17 requesting a seizure or deposit
5.17 requesting a seizure or deposit5.17 requesting a seizure or deposit
5.17 requesting a seizure or depositFrankSobotka
 
5.16.5 hoax fund transfers
5.16.5 hoax fund transfers5.16.5 hoax fund transfers
5.16.5 hoax fund transfersFrankSobotka
 
5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emails
5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emails5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emails
5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emailsFrankSobotka
 
5.16.1 handling a new hoax site
5.16.1 handling a new hoax site5.16.1 handling a new hoax site
5.16.1 handling a new hoax siteFrankSobotka
 
5.15.3.6 collusion tournament cases
5.15.3.6 collusion tournament cases5.15.3.6 collusion tournament cases
5.15.3.6 collusion tournament casesFrankSobotka
 
5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game cases
5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game cases5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game cases
5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game casesFrankSobotka
 
5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring games
5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring games5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring games
5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring gamesFrankSobotka
 
5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash games
5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash games5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash games
5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash gamesFrankSobotka
 
5.2.13 fire pay deactivations reactivations
5.2.13 fire pay deactivations   reactivations5.2.13 fire pay deactivations   reactivations
5.2.13 fire pay deactivations reactivationsFrankSobotka
 
5.2.5 sending fraud templates
5.2.5 sending fraud templates5.2.5 sending fraud templates
5.2.5 sending fraud templatesFrankSobotka
 
5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumping
5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumping5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumping
5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumpingFrankSobotka
 
Disputed credit card charges
Disputed credit card chargesDisputed credit card charges
Disputed credit card chargesFrankSobotka
 
Toc fraud policy and procedure manual
Toc   fraud policy and procedure manualToc   fraud policy and procedure manual
Toc fraud policy and procedure manualFrankSobotka
 
Templates for kana
Templates for kanaTemplates for kana
Templates for kanaFrankSobotka
 

Mehr von FrankSobotka (20)

Credit card and payment processor descriptors
Credit card and payment processor descriptorsCredit card and payment processor descriptors
Credit card and payment processor descriptors
 
Chargeback repayment
Chargeback repaymentChargeback repayment
Chargeback repayment
 
5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)
5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)
5.17.1 fraud batch processing tool (fbt)
 
5.17 requesting a seizure or deposit
5.17 requesting a seizure or deposit5.17 requesting a seizure or deposit
5.17 requesting a seizure or deposit
 
5.16.5 hoax fund transfers
5.16.5 hoax fund transfers5.16.5 hoax fund transfers
5.16.5 hoax fund transfers
 
5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emails
5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emails5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emails
5.16.4 initial response for hoax related emails
 
5.16.1 handling a new hoax site
5.16.1 handling a new hoax site5.16.1 handling a new hoax site
5.16.1 handling a new hoax site
 
5.15.3.6 collusion tournament cases
5.15.3.6 collusion tournament cases5.15.3.6 collusion tournament cases
5.15.3.6 collusion tournament cases
 
5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game cases
5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game cases5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game cases
5.15.3.4 collusion live cash game cases
 
5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring games
5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring games5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring games
5.15.3.2 chat cheating claims in ring games
 
5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash games
5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash games5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash games
5.15.3.1 chat cheaters in live cash games
 
5.2.13 fire pay deactivations reactivations
5.2.13 fire pay deactivations   reactivations5.2.13 fire pay deactivations   reactivations
5.2.13 fire pay deactivations reactivations
 
5.2.5 sending fraud templates
5.2.5 sending fraud templates5.2.5 sending fraud templates
5.2.5 sending fraud templates
 
5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumping
5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumping5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumping
5.2.3.1 non fraudulent chip dumping
 
Disputed credit card charges
Disputed credit card chargesDisputed credit card charges
Disputed credit card charges
 
5.2.1 red alerts
5.2.1 red alerts5.2.1 red alerts
5.2.1 red alerts
 
Toc fraud policy and procedure manual
Toc   fraud policy and procedure manualToc   fraud policy and procedure manual
Toc fraud policy and procedure manual
 
Templates for kana
Templates for kanaTemplates for kana
Templates for kana
 
Templates
TemplatesTemplates
Templates
 
Sn gmtt
Sn gmttSn gmtt
Sn gmtt
 

Rfa for sn gmtt

  • 1. RFA Procedure for SNG/MTT In step 10 you are required to submit a request for action (RFA) once you have significant reason to believe the players are cheating. They include a summary, trap request, and RFA. Please include these items as a part of your investigation notes. This particular recommendation will include the following: 1. A brief point form summary outlining the evidence you have found that flags the players as potential cheaters. Here’s an example that I have taken from one of Mike’s cases: • Players lives in the same city and even the same street. • Many player-to-player transfers between players. • Have played in 23 tournaments together prior to 2357504: one SNG (site crashed), one MTT (did not share any tables) • Player GEEAR may well have multiple accounts, which will be dealt with as a separate issue. • Chat during tournament between two players once 4 handed could be considered collusion against TwisterSister. • Players have shared the same Neteller processor account numbers. 2. A Trap Request: Please include any serial numbers from your serial relationship excel sheet that you would like me to trap. 3. A recommendation for action for the disbursement of any funds from the cheaters to victimized players using a matrix. Here’s an example for a Single Table SnG: RFA for Tournament #123456 TOURNAMENT PLAYER ORIGINAL ADJUSTED FUNDS FUNDS NUMBER NAME PLACING/CASH PLACING LOSS GAINED 123456 RobertaRenna 1st Last -$100 Lawrence Ng 2nd Last -$60 JonathanL 3rd 1st +$60 MoZhang 4th 2nd +$60 TomGreen 5th 3rd +$40 You will notice a couple of things here. • Whenever you do an RFA for a single table SnG the funds loss must always equal the funds gained. If you are going to disqualify someone from a tournament and forfeit all their winnings, all their winnings have to go to another player. The balance must be zero. • If you notice, 3rd place receives only +$40. That’s because they initially won $40 for 3rd and 1st place pays a total of $100. Therefore they will only receive a $60 credit. All other players below him did not make the money and thus receive the full prize money. • Both players RobertaRenna and Lawrence Ng have adjusted placings for last. If the players are disqualified, they will always receive last place.