Canvas Commons: Scaling Library Instruction in the LMS
•Als PPTX, PDF herunterladen•
2 gefällt mir•368 views
Presented at Library Instruction West 2016 in Salt Lake City, UT on June 10, 2016.
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Ähnlich wie Canvas Commons: Scaling Library Instruction in the LMS
Ähnlich wie Canvas Commons: Scaling Library Instruction in the LMS (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Canvas Commons: Scaling Library Instruction in the LMS
- 1. Canvas Commons: Scaling Library Instruction in the LMS Francesca Marineo Instructional Design Librarian Nevada State College
- 3. Nevada State College ☁ Located in Henderson, Nevada ☁ Opened in 2002 as the first 4-year institution in the state ☁ Spring 2016 enrollment: 3,500+ ☁ Highly diverse student population
- 4. The Marydean Martin Library ☁ First cloud-based library in Nevada • 1.4 million ebooks and counting! • 2 million physical volumes through partner institutions ☁ Incredible Library Team ☁ Data-driven decision making
- 5. Scaling Library Instruction: A CEP Case Study ☁ First-year experience course ☁ Required library component One-shot ☁ Shift to online instruction • First Library Guide in Canvas • Integrated assessments • Collaboration with Director of CEP • Ongoing project
- 6. Why the Learning Management System? Centrality of the LMS for coursework delivery and class interaction Proactive approach to instruction using available technologies and enabling a 24/7 presence Single online arena to foster intellectual inquiry and empower information-seeking Designated space for academic interchange
- 7. Canvas and the NSC Library
- 8. Canvas Commons ☁ Learning object repository (LOR) ☁ Optional Canvas feature ☁ Alternatives to Canvas: • Blackboard Open Content (formerly xpLor) • Brightspace (D2L) Learning Repository • ANGEL LOR • Open source repositories
- 10. ☁ Fall 2015 Case Study: • 11 total sections (374 total students) • 5 sections imported Library Guide (130 student) • 3 of the 5 sections also had in-person instruction (63 students) CEP Library Guide
- 12. Students who participated in the module achieved higher grades on their research assignment 65.07% 80.61% Did not Participate Participated AVERAGE RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT GRADE BY MODULE PARTICIPATION
- 13. Students who completed more sections of the library module used online library resources more 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 1 2 3 4 ONLINELIBRARYSESSIONS MODULE SECTIONS COMPLETED ONLINE LIBRARY SESSIONS
- 14. Students who used the library more achieved higher grades on their research assignment 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 ResearchGrade Online Library Sessions STUDENT GRADES ON RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT BY ONLINE LIBRARY USE
- 15. Next Steps ☁ Integration into course templates ☁ Additional course-specific guides and assessments ☁ Required participation in CEP Library Guide ☁ 3-Credit CEP for TRIO-SSS ☁ Additional use of Canvas to scale and measure IL
- 16. The College
- 17. Thank You! Francesca Marineo francesca.marineo@nsc.edu Instructional Design Librarian Marydean Martin Library Nevada State College
- 18. Burke, J. J., & Tumbleson, B. E. (2016). Learning Management Systems: Tools for Embedded Librarianship. Library Technology Reports, 52(2). Johnston, N. (2010). Is an online learning module an effective way to develop information literacy skills? Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(3), 207–218. Mery, Y., Newby, J., & Peng, K. (2012). Why one-shot information literacy sessions are not the future of instruction: A case for online credit courses. College & Research Libraries, 73(4), 366–377. Mune, C., Goldman, C., Higgins, S., Eby, L., Chan, E. K., & Crotty, L. (2015). Developing adaptable online information literacy modules for a learning management system. Journal of Library & Information Services In Distance Learning, 9(1-2), 101–118. Southwell, K., & Brook, J. (2004). Embedded assignment guides - Point of need instruction on the web. Georgia Library Quarterly, 41(1), 5–8. Springshare. (2016). Why LibGuides CMS? LTI Integration. Accessed from http://buzz.springshare.com/producthighlights/whylgcms/lti Tumbleson, B. E., & Burke, J. (2013). Embedding librarianship in learning management systems : A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. Chicago, Illinois: Neal-Schuman. Zhang, Q., Goodman, M., & Xie, S. (2015). Integrating library instruction into the course management system for a first year engineering class: An evidence-based study measuring the effectiveness of blended learning on students’ information literacy levels. College & Research Libraries, crl15–692. References & Additional Resources
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Tumbleson, B. E., & Burke, J. (2013). Embedding librarianship in learning management systems : A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. Chicago, Illinois: Neal-Schuman.
- Results: SIGNIFICANT - Results from an independent samples t-test indicate that students who did not participate in the library module (M = .651, SD = .399) scored significantly lower on the research assignment than students who participated in at least one section of the library module (M = .806, SD = .271). The mean difference was significant, t (128) = -2.075, p = .020, r2 = .033.
- Results: SIGNIFICANT - A Spearman correlation analysis between number of library modules completed and number of sessions in the online library revealed that there is a statistically significant weak positive relationship between them, rs = .157, n = 170, p = .02
- Results: SIGNIFICANT - A Spearman correlation for the data revealed that the number of online library sessions and grade on the research assignment were significantly positively related with a moderate relationship (rs = .415, n = 295, p = <.001)