The perfect elevator pitch, business presentation, and TED-style talk, taught by the author of Thank You for Arguing at a one-day persuasion workshop, Rhetoric Summer School in Finland, June 2014.
1. 1. Remove anger from arguments
2. Create a persuasive image
3. Make your audience receptive
4. Learn to make a presentation
5. Spur collaboration through
questions
6. Redefine issues
7. Learn identity strategy
8. Solve American mysteries
Skills
3. Rhetoric Types
Type Topic Tense
Forensic Blame Past
Demonstrative Values Present
Deliberative Choices Future
4. gottman.com
“YOU ARE ALWAYS…”
“KNOW WHAT YOUR PROBLEM IS?”
“I CAN’T EVEN TRUST YOU TO…”
Happily married couples argue as much
as unhappy ones. But the unhappy
couples tend to use the past and
present tenses.
7. Logos = Audience’s beliefs &
expectations
Pathos = Audience’s mood
Ethos = Audience’s view of you
Audience
8. • Arguments are not won on
points.
• The audience is all important.
• To remove anger, switch to the
future.
• Offer choices.
(Hint: In committees, speak last.)
Takeaways
24. Caring: What they want
Craft: “That depends”
Cause: Their greater good
Audience
25. Caring: What they want
Craft: “That depends”
Cause: Their greater good
Talk a business student into a poetry class.
26. • Talk about the audience’s
advantage
• Show how you don’t benefit
• Share your audience’s values
• Argue from a shared identity
• Create a common cause
Takeaways
33. a) Problem (the pain)
b) Solution (the cure)
c) Call to Action
Elevator Pitch: Key Elements
34. 1. Identifier: Who you are, what
you do
2. Pain: problem affecting
audience
3. Value Proposition : solution in
form of work/product
4. Validation: facts, examples,
statistics
Elevator Pitch: Outline
35. I am a persuasion consultant.
I create strategies to deal with a growing
problem: resistance to science. For
example, more and more parents refuse to
vaccinate their children. National
epidemics loom.
Identifier
Pain Statement
36. My strategies combine marketing
principles with persuasion theory to
change the conversation—and minds—at
low cost. I created a national strategy,
scripts, and a training program for
pediatricians to talk parents into
vaccinating their children. Similarly, the
same tools can help your organization
change the conversation on climate
change.
Value Proposition
37. Pediatricians using my methods show a
success rate among skeptical parents of
70% over the methods they had been
using. The results are being published in a
major medical journal.
Let me send you the link to my site. If we
can set up a meeting within the next
couple of weeks, I’d be willing to sketch
out a strategy for you at no charge. What’s
your email?
Validation
Call to Action
38. 1. Identifier
2. Pain Statement
3. Value Proposition
4. Validation
5. Call to action
Outline your own elevator pitch.
39. 1. Introduction (elevator speech)
2. Narration (story)
3. Division (the other side)
4. Refutation
5. Peroration (summary or
ending)
Cicero’s Outline
49. 1. Leave comfort zone
2. Receive the mission
3. Face obstacles/enemies
4. Setback
5. Climax: charge!
6. Victory
7. Moral
Hero Quest (“Arc”)
50. 1. Leave comfort zone
2. Receive the mission
3. Face obstacles/enemies
4. Setback
5. Climax: charge!
6. Victory
7. Moral
Describe your career or work as a hero journey.
51. • Story removes counter-
arguments.
• Create a hero who personifies
audience’s values.
• Create a hero quest.
• Invite audience to join the
quest.
Takeaways
52. 1. Introduction (elevator speech)
2. Narration (story)
3. Division (the other side)
4. Refutation
5. Peroration (summary or
ending)
Cicero’s Outline
53. Two-sided argument:
• Less effective if audience agrees.
• Immunization effect.
• Must be rebutted immediately.
Division
Daniel O’Keefe, meta-analysis of 45 argument comparisons,
Communication Yearbook, vol. 22
54. 1. Introduction (elevator speech)
2. Narration (story)
3. Division (the other side)
4. Refutation
5. Peroration (summary or
ending)
Cicero’s Outline
55. • Summary
• Call to action (simple, easy, first
step)
• Vision (“I have a dream”)
• Emotion
Peroration (Ending)
56. 1. Summary
2. Call to Action
3. Vision
4. Emotion
Outline your own peroration.
58. Ethos, then Logos, then Pathos
(Character, Logic, Emotion)
Use Division only if audience is
skeptical or will hear opposing
view later.
Cicero’s Outline Takeaways
59. 1. Threat (pain statement)
2. Solution (value proposition)
3. Story
4. Evidence
5. Call to Action
Presenter Outline
60. 1. Threat (pain statement)
2. Solution (value proposition)
3. Story
4. Evidence
5. Call to Action
Threat
64. 1. Threat (pain statement)
2. Solution (value proposition)
3. Story
4. Evidence
5. Call to Action
Threat
65. Get audience involved: Ask for
solutions.
“Turn to the person next to you.
Discuss what should be done about
body odor.”
Solution
66. 1. Threat (pain statement)
2. Solution (value proposition)
3. Story
4. Evidence
5. Call to Action
Threat
67. Get audience involved:
Ask, “What would you do?”
“What would you do if you had a chance
to stop Kony? Wouldn’t you use all the
resources you had?”
Story
Ads calling for self-prophecies increase compliance.
68. 1. “Support the Cancer Society.”
2. “Ask yourself: Will you support
the Cancer Society?”
Story
Version 1: 31% response rate
Version 2: 52% response rate
69. 1. Threat (pain statement)
2. Solution (value proposition)
3. Story
4. Evidence
5. Call to Action
Threat
70. • Does not work if audience is
resistant.
Evidence
71. Al Gore turned climate change
into a cause of the American
left. Republicans suddenly
stopped believing in the facts
and data.
72. • Does not work if audience is
resistant.
• Use evidence to validate you.
Evidence
73. • Does not work if audience is
resistant.
• Use evidence to validate you.
• Precise numbers seem more
accurate than round numbers.
Hint: include sources.
Evidence
74. If you are obese, your risk of getting
heart disease is much greater.
If you are obese, your risk of getting
heart disease is more than a third
greater.
If you are obese, your risk of getting
heart disease is 42% greater.
More than one-third do not understand percentages! (2002
German study)
75. Get audience involved:
Ask for reasons.
“Think of five reasons why rhetoric
should be required in every school.
You’ll find it easy.”
Call to Action
Audiences asked to provide easy reasons for buying a product
rated the product higher. (1997 German study)
76. Get audience involved:
Ask them to imagine the
outcome.
“Imagine what Finland will be like when
every student knows the art of
persuasion. Can you picture it?”
Call to Action
Customers asked to imagine life with TV cable—saving money,
spending more time with family—were twice as likely to subscribe.
(1982 American study)
77. Make the action immediate, easy,
and low risk.
Call to Action
Persuasion scores of ads with easy action steps 19% higher than
those without.
78. • Present a novel threat.
• Get audience involvement. Ask:
solutions, what they would do,
imagine outcome, reasons for action.
• Use evidence only with supportive
audiences, and mostly to validate
you.
• Make action immediate, easy, low
risk.
Presenter Outline Takeaways
82. I got these questions from a terrific book. It doesn’t come
out until March, but I got to read this book in galley and I
think it’s going to be huge. Warren Berger spent two years
interviewing the most creative and successful people,
asking them what questions they ask. He figured that a lot of
great things come not from knowing the answers but from
asking the right questions. And he found that the most
successful basically asked three: Why? What if? and How?
83. You ever hear of Van Phillips? You certainly know his invention, which
came our of those three questions. In 1976, Van was a 21-year-old
college student who lost his leg in a freak waterskiing accident. Doctors
fitted him with a pink foot attached to an aluminum tube. Phillips asked
the Why question: “If they can put a man on the moon, why can’t they
make a decent foot?” He switched his college to Northwestern, where
they have the best prosthetics education in the world. And he spent ten
years trying to develop a better foot. He asked the What If question:
“What if I can design a foot that’s superior to the human foot? How
could you do that? And so he studied the biomechanics of animals like
the cheetah.
84. And he came up with the Flex Foot. These
days, Philllips is asking why the Flex Foot has
to be so expensive. What if it would be made
available to victims of land mines in poorer
nations? How can he make it cheaper?
85. In my conversations with the author of A More
Beautiful Question, Warren Berger, I I asked
him, Why limit these three questions to
creativity? What if the questions applied to
persuasion as well? How could they be used
to create an atmosphere of collaboration,
instead of hostility, in an argument? And it
really works.
91. Turn weak points into
strong.
Redefinition
One of the best ways to do this is to take the aspects of a
proposal that seem the weakest to you, and see if you can
turn them into your greatest assets.
92. One of my clients is the smallest Ivy League
university. To compete with other institutions,
I helped it turned turn its size into an asset
by having fundraisers refer to its “agility.”
103. Personalize the issue:
My son is graduated from a top
college. And he still isn’t ready
for the world.
Framing
104. Switch to the future:
The question is not what colleges have
done wrong. The question is how we’re
going to prepare students for the
challenges to come.
Framing
108. The DVD workout P90X used the same identity
strategy. While other workouts claimed they
were easy. P90X said the opposite: That only
the toughest could do it. It’s now the bestselling
workout in the world.
109. I used a similar strategy with U.S. military
vaccinators. Instead of getting soldiers to
forget their smallpox scars, I urged turning
the scars into badges of honor with a
110. For America’s largest healthcare
provider, we used identity strategy and
changed the terms. “Vaccination” is now
called “protection.” Mothers want to
protect their babies at all cost.
111. Appeal to the audience’s best sense of
self.
Noble adventurer
Extreme-sports lover
Self-sacrificing soldier
Good mother
Identity Takeaway
112. Name an irrational political stand.
Now describe it using identity theory.
Can you suggest a “cure”?
113. 1. Remove anger from arguments
2. Create a persuasive image
3. Make your audience receptive
4. Learn to make a presentation
5. Spur collaboration through
questions
6. Redefine issues
7. Learn identity strategy
Skills
So I want you to repeat them after me. Ready? Loud as you can. Why?
I got these questions from a terrific book. It doesn’t come out until March, but I got to read this book in galley and I think it’s going to be huge. Warren Berger spent two years interviewing the most creative and successful people, asking them what questions they ask. He figured that a lot of great things come not from knowing the answers but from asking the right questions. And he found that the most successful basically asked three: Why? What if? and How?
You ever hear of Van Phillips? You certainly know his invention, which came our of those three questions. In 1976, Van was a 21-year-old college student who lost his leg in a freak waterskiing accident. Doctors fitted him with a pink foot attached to an aluminum tube. Phillips asked the Why question: “If they can put a man on the moon, why can’t they make a decent foot?” He switched his college to Northwestern, where they have the best prosthetics education in the world. And he spent ten years trying to develop a better foot. He asked the What If question: “What if I can design a foot that’s superior to the human foot? How could you do that? And so he studied the biomechanics of animals like the cheetah.
And he came up with the Flex Foot. These days, Philllips is asking why the Flex Foot has to be so expensive. What if it would be made available to victims of land mines in poorer nations? How can he make it cheaper?
In my conversations with the author of A More Beautiful Question, Warren Berger, I I asked him, Why limit these three questions to creativity? What if the questions applied to persuasion as well? How could they be used to create an atmosphere of collaboration, instead of hostility, in an argument? And it really works.
And he came up with the Flex Foot. These days, Philllips is asking why the Flex Foot has to be so expensive. What if it would be made available to victims of land mines in poorer nations? How can he make it cheaper?
In my conversations with the author of A More Beautiful Question, Warren Berger, I I asked him, Why limit these three questions to creativity? What if the questions applied to persuasion as well? How could they be used to create an atmosphere of collaboration, instead of hostility, in an argument? And it really works.
And he came up with the Flex Foot. These days, Philllips is asking why the Flex Foot has to be so expensive. What if it would be made available to victims of land mines in poorer nations? How can he make it cheaper?
In my conversations with the author of A More Beautiful Question, Warren Berger, I I asked him, Why limit these three questions to creativity? What if the questions applied to persuasion as well? How could they be used to create an atmosphere of collaboration, instead of hostility, in an argument? And it really works.
One of the best ways to do this is to take the aspects of a proposal that seem the weakest to you, and see if you can turn them into your greatest assets.
Because of that small size, and the lack of graduate programs in areas like the humanities, we have to be more innovative. As a result, we ARE more innovative! And the Society of Fellows will be one great example of such innovation.
I spend a lot of time with my clients on advantageous language. Note that we don’t get stuck on tradition here. We sort of brush against it, acknowledge it, by talking about rising global issues. This is about the future, about the edge of discovery—which doesn’t mean abandoning the past.
One thing to keep in mind, when we’re talking about your audience’s beliefs and expectations, is that extremely wealthy people rarely talk of investments as a metaphor. Investments offer a return to the person who risked the money. So calling the Society of Fellows an investment would be a bad idea. The same is true in politics. Calling social programs an investment—even when those programs save money in the long run—doesn’t work with people who actually invest. Instead, I focus on efficiency and maximizing the dollar.
Notice the phrase “robust churn.” Again, this turns a weakness into a strength. Fellows leave after two years. They go someplace else. Well, this just keeps things fresh. Also, after they leave, these scholars form a global hub with Dartmouth loyalties. This isn’t about training scholars who leave us. This is about networking. It’s an efficient way of putting Dartmouth in the center of the intellectual universe.