SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 20
AGENDA ITEM 3.6
WOMEN’S ACCESS TO LAND
African Commission on Agriculture Statistics / Commission africaine des statistiques agricoles,
Entebbe, Uganda, 13 - 17 Nov 2017
SDG GOAL, TARGET & INDICATOR
Indicator 5.a.1
“(a) Percentage of people with ownership or
secure rights over agricultural land (out of total
agricultural population), by sex; and
(b) Share of women among owners or rights-
bearers of agricultural land, by type of tenure”
Indicator 5.a.2
“Proportion of countries where the
legal framework (including customary
law) guarantees women’s equal rights
to land ownership and/or control”.
Achieve gender equality and empower
all women and girls
Target 5.a
“undertake reforms to give women equal rights to economic resources, as well as access
to ownership and control over land and other forms of property, financial services,
inheritance and natural resources, in accordance with national laws”
INDICATOR FORMULA
Indicator 5.a.1 is divided in two sub-indicators:
Part (a) measures the prevalence of people with ownership or secure rights
over agricultural land, disaggregated by sex:
𝑛𝑜. 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
, by sex
Part (b) focusses on the gender parity measuring the extent to which women
are disadvantaged in ownership / rights over ag land
𝑛𝑜.𝑤𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑
INDICATOR OVERVIEW
Indicator 5.a.1 officially endorsed by the 47th Session of the UN Statistical
Commission, March 2016
Custodianship: FAO. UNSD and UNWOMEN acting as contributing agencies
Methodological work: led by the Evidence and Data for Gender Equality
(EDGE) project, a joint initiative of UNSD and UN Women, in collaboration
with the Asian Development Bank, FAO and WB.
Piloting: 7 Pilot studies provided recommendations on critical aspects of
the methodology, such as the interview setting, the minimum set of
questions, adaptation to different survey designs.
Initially classified as Tier III indicator. Thanks to the considerable
methodological work undertaken and to the finalization of a data
collection protocol, 5.a.1 has been upgraded to the Tier II group at the 5th
IAEG-SDG (March, 2017)
INDICATOR OVERVIEW
 Why agricultural land and not any land? Ag land is a key input in developing
countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are
necessarily based on the agricultural sector.
 Why agricultural population? Tenure rights over agricultural land are
particularly relevant for individuals whose livelihood relies on agriculture.
Therefore, the target population of the indicator (denominator) is the adult
agricultural population
• In the context of 5.a.1, household operating land and/or raising and tending
animals are the reference population for this indicator (denominator)
SOURCES
National Household Surveys: Living Standard Measurement Surveys
(LSMS); Living Conditions Surveys; Multipurpose Surveys; Household
Budget Surveys (HBS); Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS); Multiple
Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS). Why?
• Cover the entire population, including households with wage
agricultural labourers.
• Flexible and conducted regularly by countries
Alternatively, agricultural surveys can be used.
National Statistical Offices (NSOs) are strongly recommended to collect
self-reported data rather than proxy data – ie., to ask individuals about
what they hold, not about what other household members hold.
The number of household members to interview depends on the
objectives of the surveys and resources available: either one randomly
selected adult household member, or all household members.
METHODOLOGY
• Individuals may have the right to sell/give away or bequeath land in
absence of legal documents, therefore the indicator combines
documentation with the right to sell/give away or bequeath to render it
comparable across countries.
• Based on the analysis of the 7 pilots, the 3 proxies offer the most robust
measure of tenure rights ensuring comparability across countries with
diverse prevalence of documentation.
METHODOLOGY: 2 OPTIONS
• Recommended when countries
are only interested in estimating
SDG 5.a.1.
• 5 questions appended to a
national household survey
• Unit of observation is individual
• Recommended when:
 Countries want to collect more data
items for fuller understanding of
land tenure rights from a gender
perspective
or
 Survey already includes a parcel
level module
• Parcel-level module appended to a
national household survey
• Unit of observation is the
agricultural parcel
Minimum Set of Questions at individual
level
Parcel-level
Module
METHODOLOGY: EXAMPLE OF INDIVIDUAL LEVEL
QUESTIONS
QUESTIONS FUNCTION
Q1. Do you own or hold any agricultural land, either alone or
jointly with someone else? (Y/N)
respondent’s self-perception
Q2. what legally recognized documents do you have for any of
the agricultural land you own or hold? [tick all that apply]
(country specific list including legally recognized documents
and not. Only legally recognized documents shall be
considered for the computation of 5.a.1.
Presence of legally recognized
document an individual can use to
claim tenure rights in law over the
land
Q3. (for each selected document) Is your name is listed as an
owner or use right holder on [SELECTED DOCUMENT]? (Y/N)
Respondent has documented tenure
security
Q4. Do you have the right to sell or give away permanently any
of the agricultural land you own or hold, either alone or jointly
with someone else? (Y/N)
Respondent has alienation rights
Q5. Do you have the right to bequeath any of the agricultural
land you own or hold, either alone or jointly with someone
else? (Y/N)
Respondent has alienation rights
FAO – CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Ongoing work with 1.4.2 custodian agencies (WB and UN-Habitat) to:
 Develop a unique module that can generate both SDG 5.a.1 and SDG 1.4.2
 Draft of a joint publication presenting a unique module that collects data for
both the indicators
 Agree on a collaborative capacity development approach / strategy
E-learning course
Workshops / Trainings
 Side event to the IAEG-Gender Statistics, November 2017
 4 Regional Trainings (in collaboration with EDGE project) (2017-18)
 1 Global Training (2 countries per region plus FAO regional statisticians) (Jan/Feb
2018)
 1 training in collaboration with SDG 1.4.2 (WB Land Conference 2018)
 Ad-hoc technical assistance to support countries in the collection of 5.a.1 data
INDICATOR 5.A.2
Indicator 5.a.2 is a legal indicator:
“Percentage of countries where the legal framework (including customary law)
guarantees women’s equal rights to land ownership and/or control. “
Why focus on land? Land is a key economic resource inextricably linked to access to,
use of and control over other economic and productive resources.
Women’s land ownership and/or control is fundamental because:
 guarantees economic security and avoid falling into poverty;
 reduces women’s reliance on male partners and relatives;
 increases women’s bargaining power within the household;
 improves women’s chances of accessing extension services and credit;
 encourages women to undertake or expand their business investments, and, in
rural areas, to join producer organisations
INDICATOR OVERVIEW
Indicator 5.a.2 officially endorsed by the 47th Session of the UN Statistical
Commission, March 2016
Custodianship: FAO.
Methodological work: led by the Gender and Land Rights team of Social
Policies and Rural Institutions Division of FAO. It builds upon the FAO Legal
Assessment Tool (LAT) on gender equitable land tenure.
Piloting: Pilot studies have been carried out in 10 countries representative
of all the regions to ensure universality, feasibility, and clarity of the
methodology.
Initially classified as Tier III indicator. FAO has recently submitted the
methodology to the IAEG-SDG for its upgrade to Tier II Group in November
2017.
SOURCES
 Data on 5.a.2 is constituted by official published primary material, not
de facto status, i.e. customary law needs to be incorporated in the legal
framework to be considered.
 For the purpose of assessing 5.a.2 only primary and secondary
legislation are relevant, as they are legally binding documents
 Data for measuring 5.a.2: Laws (primary and secondary laws) i.e.:
Constitution, family laws, marriage laws, inheritance laws, land laws,
laws/regulations on registration of land, Laws on gender equality
 Although policies (i.e Agriculture, Land, Gender) are also collected and
analysed as they constitute the foundation of the laws, they do not
qualify for the reporting because they are not binding.
METHODOLOGY
Indicator 5.a.2 “Percentage of countries where the legal framework
(including customary law) guarantees women’s equal rights to land
ownership and/or control. “
Progress under indicator 5.a.2 is measured by testing the legal and policy
framework against six proxies:
1. Mandatory joint registration, or economic incentives for joint registration of
land;
2. Spousal consent prior to land transactions;
3. Equal rights for sons and daughters to inherit and for surviving spouses to
receive an inheritance share;
4. Budgetary commitments to strengthen equal rights for women regarding both
the ownership and/or control of land;
5. Where customary systems are recognized in the legal and policy framework,
women’s land rights are protected.
6. Mandatory participation of women in land institutions
METHODOLOGY: TERMINOLOGY
Land – is all immovable property – for instance the house, the land upon which a
house is built and land which is used for others purposes, such as agricultural
production. It also encompasses any other structures built on land to meet
permanent purposes.
Land ownership - is a legally recognised right to acquire, to use and to transfer
land. In private property systems, this is a right akin to a freehold tenure. In
systems where land is owned by the state, the term land ownership refers to
possession of the rights most akin to ownership in a private property system.
Control over land - is the ability to make decisions over land. It may include
rights to make decisions about how the land should be used, including what
crops should be planted, and to benefit financially from the sale of crops.
Legal and policy framework - encompasses the Constitution, policy, primary
legislation and secondary legislation. The legal and policy framework includes
customary legal systems where they have been recognised by statutory law or
the Constitution.
METHODOLOGY: KEY RULES FOR THE ASSESSMENT
• Data sources: Official published primary material on the law and
policy framework: not de facto status, i.e. customary law needs to
be incorporated in the legal framework to be considered.
• Religious laws: in systems with multiple religious laws, focus on
situation for two largest religious groups.
• Customary law: only relevant when recognized in legal framework
(i.e. no measuring of de facto incidence).
METHODOLOGY: CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING
Where Proxy E is applicable Where Proxy E is not
applicable
Classification
None of the six proxies are present
in the primary or primary and
secondary legislation
None of the five proxies are
present in the primary or primary
and secondary legislation
Band 1: No evidence of guarantees of
gender equality in the land ownership
and/or control in the legal framework.
One of the proxies present in
primary or primary and secondary
legislation
One of the proxies present in
primary or primary and
secondary legislation
Band 2: Very low levels of guarantees of
gender equality in land ownership
and/or control in the legal framework.
Two the proxies present in primary
or primary and secondary legislation
Two of the proxies present in
primary and secondary
legislation
Band 3: Low levels of guarantees of
gender equality in land ownership
and/or control in the legal framework.
Three of the proxies are present in
primary legislation or primary and
secondary legislation
Three of the proxies are present
in primary legislation or primary
and secondary legislation
Band 4: Medium levels of guarantees of
gender equality in land ownership
and/or control in the legal framework.
Four of the proxies are present in
primary legislation or primary and
secondary legislation
Four of the proxies are present in
primary legislation or primary
and secondary legislation
Band 5: High levels of guarantees of
gender equality in land ownership
and/or control in the legal framework.
Five or six proxies are present in
primary legislation or primary and
secondary legislation
All five proxies are present in
primary legislation or primary
and secondary legislation
Band 6: Very high levels of guarantees
of gender equality in land ownership
and/or control in the legal framework.
Countries are classified according to the number of proxies identified in the primary and/or
secondary laws
FAO – CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
E-learning course
Workshops / Trainings
 4 Regional Trainings (2018-19)
 1 Global Training (2 countries per region plus FAO regional gender officers) (Feb
2018)
 2 raising awareness workshop (WB Land Conference 2018 and CSW)
 Ad-hoc technical assistance to support countries in the 5.a.2 assesment
QUESTIONS FOR THE PANEL
5.a.1 (statistical indicator)
What do you think are the most important challenges for the monitoring of indicator
5.a.1?
Which kind of support you think that FAO can provide to overcome these challenges?
what types of surveys, in your country, are more likely to be used for the collection of
this indicator?
5.a.2 (legal indicator)
What do you think are the most important challenges for the monitoring of indicator
5.a.2?
Which kind of support you think that FAO can provide to overcome these challenges?
FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:
INDICATOR 5.A.1 – CHIARA BRUNELLI (CHIARA.BRUNELLI@FAO.ORG)
INDICATOR 5.A.2 – MARTHA OSORIO (MARTHA.OSORIO@FAO.ORG)
20

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4
Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4
Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4
Dr.Mohammad Alamgir
 
Gender inequalities
Gender inequalitiesGender inequalities
Gender inequalities
Steven Heath
 
Gender Budget Analysis Tools
Gender Budget Analysis ToolsGender Budget Analysis Tools
Gender Budget Analysis Tools
begraj SIWAL
 
Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]
Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]
Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]
WriteKraft Dissertations
 
Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012
Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012
Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012
dibs61
 
Slide share on gender analysis
Slide share on gender analysisSlide share on gender analysis
Slide share on gender analysis
mahmudaanwar
 
Gender Awareness [Autosaved] no video
Gender Awareness [Autosaved] no videoGender Awareness [Autosaved] no video
Gender Awareness [Autosaved] no video
Maria Brown, MBA, PHR
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Gender Responsive Budgeting and Planning
Gender Responsive Budgeting and PlanningGender Responsive Budgeting and Planning
Gender Responsive Budgeting and Planning
 
Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4
Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4
Early Childhood Marriage Intervention Project Proposal v4
 
Gender discrimination in india
Gender discrimination in indiaGender discrimination in india
Gender discrimination in india
 
Gender Concepts
Gender ConceptsGender Concepts
Gender Concepts
 
Gender inequalities
Gender inequalitiesGender inequalities
Gender inequalities
 
Gender Budget Analysis Tools
Gender Budget Analysis ToolsGender Budget Analysis Tools
Gender Budget Analysis Tools
 
FIVE YEAR PLANS
FIVE YEAR PLANSFIVE YEAR PLANS
FIVE YEAR PLANS
 
Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]
Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]
Women empowerment synopsis [www.writekraft.com]
 
Gender Analysis
Gender AnalysisGender Analysis
Gender Analysis
 
Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012
Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012
Gender mainstreaming and social inclusion 25.7.2012
 
women empowerment
women empowermentwomen empowerment
women empowerment
 
Gender equality
Gender equalityGender equality
Gender equality
 
Gender Discrimination & Women Empowerment
Gender Discrimination & Women EmpowermentGender Discrimination & Women Empowerment
Gender Discrimination & Women Empowerment
 
Gender analytical framework
Gender analytical frameworkGender analytical framework
Gender analytical framework
 
Gender inequality
Gender inequalityGender inequality
Gender inequality
 
Gender Equality
Gender Equality Gender Equality
Gender Equality
 
women empowerment
women empowermentwomen empowerment
women empowerment
 
Gender issue
Gender issueGender issue
Gender issue
 
Slide share on gender analysis
Slide share on gender analysisSlide share on gender analysis
Slide share on gender analysis
 
Gender Awareness [Autosaved] no video
Gender Awareness [Autosaved] no videoGender Awareness [Autosaved] no video
Gender Awareness [Autosaved] no video
 

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (9)

Indicator 2.4.1 – Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustai...
Indicator 2.4.1 – Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustai...Indicator 2.4.1 – Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustai...
Indicator 2.4.1 – Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustai...
 
Use of Technology for field data capture and compilation, and the implications
Use of Technology for field data capture and compilation, and the implications Use of Technology for field data capture and compilation, and the implications
Use of Technology for field data capture and compilation, and the implications
 
Les progrès réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de la Stratégie Mondiale en Afriqu...
Les progrès réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de la Stratégie Mondiale en Afriqu...Les progrès réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de la Stratégie Mondiale en Afriqu...
Les progrès réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de la Stratégie Mondiale en Afriqu...
 
L’expérience du Congo dans la réalisation du recensement général de l’agricul...
L’expérience du Congo dans la réalisation du recensement général de l’agricul...L’expérience du Congo dans la réalisation du recensement général de l’agricul...
L’expérience du Congo dans la réalisation du recensement général de l’agricul...
 
Implementing a methodology for estimating post-harvest losses in Malawi
Implementing a methodology for estimating post-harvest losses in MalawiImplementing a methodology for estimating post-harvest losses in Malawi
Implementing a methodology for estimating post-harvest losses in Malawi
 
Tabulation, Dissemination and Archiving
 Tabulation, Dissemination and Archiving Tabulation, Dissemination and Archiving
Tabulation, Dissemination and Archiving
 
Census Theme 4 - Crops
Census Theme 4 - CropsCensus Theme 4 - Crops
Census Theme 4 - Crops
 
L’ère des ODD et le défi de produire plus et mieux des données agricoles
L’ère des ODD et le défi de produire plus et mieux des données agricolesL’ère des ODD et le défi de produire plus et mieux des données agricoles
L’ère des ODD et le défi de produire plus et mieux des données agricoles
 
Contributing to the new FAO homepage
Contributing to the new FAO homepage Contributing to the new FAO homepage
Contributing to the new FAO homepage
 

Ähnlich wie Women’s Access to Land

Strengthening Women’s Assets
Strengthening Women’s Assets Strengthening Women’s Assets
Strengthening Women’s Assets
IFPRI Gender
 
Securing tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and research
Securing tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and researchSecuring tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and research
Securing tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and research
Ilc Landcoalition
 
Disentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopia
Disentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopiaDisentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopia
Disentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopia
Alexander Decker
 

Ähnlich wie Women’s Access to Land (20)

Womens Access Land SDGs 5.a.1 & 5.a.2_ENGLISH
Womens Access Land SDGs 5.a.1 & 5.a.2_ENGLISHWomens Access Land SDGs 5.a.1 & 5.a.2_ENGLISH
Womens Access Land SDGs 5.a.1 & 5.a.2_ENGLISH
 
Africa’s Monitoring of Land Policy Links to the 2030 Agenda
Africa’s Monitoring of Land Policy Links to the 2030 AgendaAfrica’s Monitoring of Land Policy Links to the 2030 Agenda
Africa’s Monitoring of Land Policy Links to the 2030 Agenda
 
Gltn regional land forum
Gltn regional land forumGltn regional land forum
Gltn regional land forum
 
FAO's role in the SDG indicators and practice
FAO's role in the SDG indicators and practiceFAO's role in the SDG indicators and practice
FAO's role in the SDG indicators and practice
 
Integrated System of Agricultural Statistics
Integrated System of Agricultural StatisticsIntegrated System of Agricultural Statistics
Integrated System of Agricultural Statistics
 
FAO's role in the SDGs indicators and practice
FAO's role in the SDGs indicators and practiceFAO's role in the SDGs indicators and practice
FAO's role in the SDGs indicators and practice
 
02 fao jansen_ljm
02 fao jansen_ljm02 fao jansen_ljm
02 fao jansen_ljm
 
Assaad Bridging Evidence & Policy Talk.pptx
Assaad Bridging Evidence & Policy Talk.pptxAssaad Bridging Evidence & Policy Talk.pptx
Assaad Bridging Evidence & Policy Talk.pptx
 
Enabling the Exchange and use of Data in Agriculture
Enabling the Exchange and use of Data in AgricultureEnabling the Exchange and use of Data in Agriculture
Enabling the Exchange and use of Data in Agriculture
 
Overview of the 2017 2018 annual trends and outlook report (ATOR)
Overview of the 2017 2018 annual trends and outlook report (ATOR)Overview of the 2017 2018 annual trends and outlook report (ATOR)
Overview of the 2017 2018 annual trends and outlook report (ATOR)
 
Synergies between Social Protection and Agriculture
Synergies between Social Protection and AgricultureSynergies between Social Protection and Agriculture
Synergies between Social Protection and Agriculture
 
Tracking Sustainable Development Goals on the road to 2030 – 159th Session FA...
Tracking Sustainable Development Goals on the road to 2030 – 159th Session FA...Tracking Sustainable Development Goals on the road to 2030 – 159th Session FA...
Tracking Sustainable Development Goals on the road to 2030 – 159th Session FA...
 
Strengthening Women’s Assets
Strengthening Women’s Assets Strengthening Women’s Assets
Strengthening Women’s Assets
 
Combining agricultural & social protection interventions - the potential for ...
Combining agricultural & social protection interventions - the potential for ...Combining agricultural & social protection interventions - the potential for ...
Combining agricultural & social protection interventions - the potential for ...
 
Securing tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and research
Securing tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and researchSecuring tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and research
Securing tenure rights among the rural women: priorities for action and research
 
Women’s Rights & SDGs: Concepts, Tools and Practical Action Points
Women’s Rights & SDGs: Concepts, Tools and Practical Action PointsWomen’s Rights & SDGs: Concepts, Tools and Practical Action Points
Women’s Rights & SDGs: Concepts, Tools and Practical Action Points
 
Presentation by Hannah Nyota-Gender workshop September 2013
Presentation by Hannah Nyota-Gender workshop September 2013Presentation by Hannah Nyota-Gender workshop September 2013
Presentation by Hannah Nyota-Gender workshop September 2013
 
Disentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopia
Disentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopiaDisentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopia
Disentangling rural land certification processes and practices in ethiopia
 
Impact assessment of Volta2 innovation platforms on improvement of crop and l...
Impact assessment of Volta2 innovation platforms on improvement of crop and l...Impact assessment of Volta2 innovation platforms on improvement of crop and l...
Impact assessment of Volta2 innovation platforms on improvement of crop and l...
 
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ONTOLOGY BASED ON SEMANTIC ANALYSIS FOR GIS APPL...
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ONTOLOGY BASED ON SEMANTIC ANALYSIS FOR GIS APPL...DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ONTOLOGY BASED ON SEMANTIC ANALYSIS FOR GIS APPL...
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ONTOLOGY BASED ON SEMANTIC ANALYSIS FOR GIS APPL...
 

Mehr von FAO

Mehr von FAO (20)

Nigeria
NigeriaNigeria
Nigeria
 
Niger
NigerNiger
Niger
 
Namibia
NamibiaNamibia
Namibia
 
Mozambique
MozambiqueMozambique
Mozambique
 
Zimbabwe takesure
Zimbabwe takesureZimbabwe takesure
Zimbabwe takesure
 
Zimbabwe
ZimbabweZimbabwe
Zimbabwe
 
Zambia
ZambiaZambia
Zambia
 
Togo
TogoTogo
Togo
 
Tanzania
TanzaniaTanzania
Tanzania
 
Spal presentation
Spal presentationSpal presentation
Spal presentation
 
Rwanda
RwandaRwanda
Rwanda
 
Nigeria uponi
Nigeria uponiNigeria uponi
Nigeria uponi
 
The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 2)
The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 2)The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 2)
The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 2)
 
The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 1)
The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 1)The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 1)
The multi-faced role of soil in the NENA regions (part 1)
 
Agenda of the launch of the soil policy brief at the Land&Water Days
Agenda of the launch of the soil policy brief at the Land&Water DaysAgenda of the launch of the soil policy brief at the Land&Water Days
Agenda of the launch of the soil policy brief at the Land&Water Days
 
Agenda of the 5th NENA Soil Partnership meeting
Agenda of the 5th NENA Soil Partnership meetingAgenda of the 5th NENA Soil Partnership meeting
Agenda of the 5th NENA Soil Partnership meeting
 
The Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management
The Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil ManagementThe Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management
The Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management
 
GLOSOLAN - Mission, status and way forward
GLOSOLAN - Mission, status and way forwardGLOSOLAN - Mission, status and way forward
GLOSOLAN - Mission, status and way forward
 
Towards a Global Soil Information System (GLOSIS)
Towards a Global Soil Information System (GLOSIS)Towards a Global Soil Information System (GLOSIS)
Towards a Global Soil Information System (GLOSIS)
 
GSP developments of regional interest in 2019
GSP developments of regional interest in 2019GSP developments of regional interest in 2019
GSP developments of regional interest in 2019
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 

Women’s Access to Land

  • 1. AGENDA ITEM 3.6 WOMEN’S ACCESS TO LAND African Commission on Agriculture Statistics / Commission africaine des statistiques agricoles, Entebbe, Uganda, 13 - 17 Nov 2017
  • 2. SDG GOAL, TARGET & INDICATOR Indicator 5.a.1 “(a) Percentage of people with ownership or secure rights over agricultural land (out of total agricultural population), by sex; and (b) Share of women among owners or rights- bearers of agricultural land, by type of tenure” Indicator 5.a.2 “Proportion of countries where the legal framework (including customary law) guarantees women’s equal rights to land ownership and/or control”. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls Target 5.a “undertake reforms to give women equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to ownership and control over land and other forms of property, financial services, inheritance and natural resources, in accordance with national laws”
  • 3. INDICATOR FORMULA Indicator 5.a.1 is divided in two sub-indicators: Part (a) measures the prevalence of people with ownership or secure rights over agricultural land, disaggregated by sex: 𝑛𝑜. 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 , by sex Part (b) focusses on the gender parity measuring the extent to which women are disadvantaged in ownership / rights over ag land 𝑛𝑜.𝑤𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑
  • 4. INDICATOR OVERVIEW Indicator 5.a.1 officially endorsed by the 47th Session of the UN Statistical Commission, March 2016 Custodianship: FAO. UNSD and UNWOMEN acting as contributing agencies Methodological work: led by the Evidence and Data for Gender Equality (EDGE) project, a joint initiative of UNSD and UN Women, in collaboration with the Asian Development Bank, FAO and WB. Piloting: 7 Pilot studies provided recommendations on critical aspects of the methodology, such as the interview setting, the minimum set of questions, adaptation to different survey designs. Initially classified as Tier III indicator. Thanks to the considerable methodological work undertaken and to the finalization of a data collection protocol, 5.a.1 has been upgraded to the Tier II group at the 5th IAEG-SDG (March, 2017)
  • 5. INDICATOR OVERVIEW  Why agricultural land and not any land? Ag land is a key input in developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector.  Why agricultural population? Tenure rights over agricultural land are particularly relevant for individuals whose livelihood relies on agriculture. Therefore, the target population of the indicator (denominator) is the adult agricultural population • In the context of 5.a.1, household operating land and/or raising and tending animals are the reference population for this indicator (denominator)
  • 6. SOURCES National Household Surveys: Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS); Living Conditions Surveys; Multipurpose Surveys; Household Budget Surveys (HBS); Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS); Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS). Why? • Cover the entire population, including households with wage agricultural labourers. • Flexible and conducted regularly by countries Alternatively, agricultural surveys can be used. National Statistical Offices (NSOs) are strongly recommended to collect self-reported data rather than proxy data – ie., to ask individuals about what they hold, not about what other household members hold. The number of household members to interview depends on the objectives of the surveys and resources available: either one randomly selected adult household member, or all household members.
  • 7. METHODOLOGY • Individuals may have the right to sell/give away or bequeath land in absence of legal documents, therefore the indicator combines documentation with the right to sell/give away or bequeath to render it comparable across countries. • Based on the analysis of the 7 pilots, the 3 proxies offer the most robust measure of tenure rights ensuring comparability across countries with diverse prevalence of documentation.
  • 8. METHODOLOGY: 2 OPTIONS • Recommended when countries are only interested in estimating SDG 5.a.1. • 5 questions appended to a national household survey • Unit of observation is individual • Recommended when:  Countries want to collect more data items for fuller understanding of land tenure rights from a gender perspective or  Survey already includes a parcel level module • Parcel-level module appended to a national household survey • Unit of observation is the agricultural parcel Minimum Set of Questions at individual level Parcel-level Module
  • 9. METHODOLOGY: EXAMPLE OF INDIVIDUAL LEVEL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS FUNCTION Q1. Do you own or hold any agricultural land, either alone or jointly with someone else? (Y/N) respondent’s self-perception Q2. what legally recognized documents do you have for any of the agricultural land you own or hold? [tick all that apply] (country specific list including legally recognized documents and not. Only legally recognized documents shall be considered for the computation of 5.a.1. Presence of legally recognized document an individual can use to claim tenure rights in law over the land Q3. (for each selected document) Is your name is listed as an owner or use right holder on [SELECTED DOCUMENT]? (Y/N) Respondent has documented tenure security Q4. Do you have the right to sell or give away permanently any of the agricultural land you own or hold, either alone or jointly with someone else? (Y/N) Respondent has alienation rights Q5. Do you have the right to bequeath any of the agricultural land you own or hold, either alone or jointly with someone else? (Y/N) Respondent has alienation rights
  • 10. FAO – CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Ongoing work with 1.4.2 custodian agencies (WB and UN-Habitat) to:  Develop a unique module that can generate both SDG 5.a.1 and SDG 1.4.2  Draft of a joint publication presenting a unique module that collects data for both the indicators  Agree on a collaborative capacity development approach / strategy E-learning course Workshops / Trainings  Side event to the IAEG-Gender Statistics, November 2017  4 Regional Trainings (in collaboration with EDGE project) (2017-18)  1 Global Training (2 countries per region plus FAO regional statisticians) (Jan/Feb 2018)  1 training in collaboration with SDG 1.4.2 (WB Land Conference 2018)  Ad-hoc technical assistance to support countries in the collection of 5.a.1 data
  • 11. INDICATOR 5.A.2 Indicator 5.a.2 is a legal indicator: “Percentage of countries where the legal framework (including customary law) guarantees women’s equal rights to land ownership and/or control. “ Why focus on land? Land is a key economic resource inextricably linked to access to, use of and control over other economic and productive resources. Women’s land ownership and/or control is fundamental because:  guarantees economic security and avoid falling into poverty;  reduces women’s reliance on male partners and relatives;  increases women’s bargaining power within the household;  improves women’s chances of accessing extension services and credit;  encourages women to undertake or expand their business investments, and, in rural areas, to join producer organisations
  • 12. INDICATOR OVERVIEW Indicator 5.a.2 officially endorsed by the 47th Session of the UN Statistical Commission, March 2016 Custodianship: FAO. Methodological work: led by the Gender and Land Rights team of Social Policies and Rural Institutions Division of FAO. It builds upon the FAO Legal Assessment Tool (LAT) on gender equitable land tenure. Piloting: Pilot studies have been carried out in 10 countries representative of all the regions to ensure universality, feasibility, and clarity of the methodology. Initially classified as Tier III indicator. FAO has recently submitted the methodology to the IAEG-SDG for its upgrade to Tier II Group in November 2017.
  • 13. SOURCES  Data on 5.a.2 is constituted by official published primary material, not de facto status, i.e. customary law needs to be incorporated in the legal framework to be considered.  For the purpose of assessing 5.a.2 only primary and secondary legislation are relevant, as they are legally binding documents  Data for measuring 5.a.2: Laws (primary and secondary laws) i.e.: Constitution, family laws, marriage laws, inheritance laws, land laws, laws/regulations on registration of land, Laws on gender equality  Although policies (i.e Agriculture, Land, Gender) are also collected and analysed as they constitute the foundation of the laws, they do not qualify for the reporting because they are not binding.
  • 14. METHODOLOGY Indicator 5.a.2 “Percentage of countries where the legal framework (including customary law) guarantees women’s equal rights to land ownership and/or control. “ Progress under indicator 5.a.2 is measured by testing the legal and policy framework against six proxies: 1. Mandatory joint registration, or economic incentives for joint registration of land; 2. Spousal consent prior to land transactions; 3. Equal rights for sons and daughters to inherit and for surviving spouses to receive an inheritance share; 4. Budgetary commitments to strengthen equal rights for women regarding both the ownership and/or control of land; 5. Where customary systems are recognized in the legal and policy framework, women’s land rights are protected. 6. Mandatory participation of women in land institutions
  • 15. METHODOLOGY: TERMINOLOGY Land – is all immovable property – for instance the house, the land upon which a house is built and land which is used for others purposes, such as agricultural production. It also encompasses any other structures built on land to meet permanent purposes. Land ownership - is a legally recognised right to acquire, to use and to transfer land. In private property systems, this is a right akin to a freehold tenure. In systems where land is owned by the state, the term land ownership refers to possession of the rights most akin to ownership in a private property system. Control over land - is the ability to make decisions over land. It may include rights to make decisions about how the land should be used, including what crops should be planted, and to benefit financially from the sale of crops. Legal and policy framework - encompasses the Constitution, policy, primary legislation and secondary legislation. The legal and policy framework includes customary legal systems where they have been recognised by statutory law or the Constitution.
  • 16. METHODOLOGY: KEY RULES FOR THE ASSESSMENT • Data sources: Official published primary material on the law and policy framework: not de facto status, i.e. customary law needs to be incorporated in the legal framework to be considered. • Religious laws: in systems with multiple religious laws, focus on situation for two largest religious groups. • Customary law: only relevant when recognized in legal framework (i.e. no measuring of de facto incidence).
  • 17. METHODOLOGY: CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING Where Proxy E is applicable Where Proxy E is not applicable Classification None of the six proxies are present in the primary or primary and secondary legislation None of the five proxies are present in the primary or primary and secondary legislation Band 1: No evidence of guarantees of gender equality in the land ownership and/or control in the legal framework. One of the proxies present in primary or primary and secondary legislation One of the proxies present in primary or primary and secondary legislation Band 2: Very low levels of guarantees of gender equality in land ownership and/or control in the legal framework. Two the proxies present in primary or primary and secondary legislation Two of the proxies present in primary and secondary legislation Band 3: Low levels of guarantees of gender equality in land ownership and/or control in the legal framework. Three of the proxies are present in primary legislation or primary and secondary legislation Three of the proxies are present in primary legislation or primary and secondary legislation Band 4: Medium levels of guarantees of gender equality in land ownership and/or control in the legal framework. Four of the proxies are present in primary legislation or primary and secondary legislation Four of the proxies are present in primary legislation or primary and secondary legislation Band 5: High levels of guarantees of gender equality in land ownership and/or control in the legal framework. Five or six proxies are present in primary legislation or primary and secondary legislation All five proxies are present in primary legislation or primary and secondary legislation Band 6: Very high levels of guarantees of gender equality in land ownership and/or control in the legal framework. Countries are classified according to the number of proxies identified in the primary and/or secondary laws
  • 18. FAO – CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE E-learning course Workshops / Trainings  4 Regional Trainings (2018-19)  1 Global Training (2 countries per region plus FAO regional gender officers) (Feb 2018)  2 raising awareness workshop (WB Land Conference 2018 and CSW)  Ad-hoc technical assistance to support countries in the 5.a.2 assesment
  • 19. QUESTIONS FOR THE PANEL 5.a.1 (statistical indicator) What do you think are the most important challenges for the monitoring of indicator 5.a.1? Which kind of support you think that FAO can provide to overcome these challenges? what types of surveys, in your country, are more likely to be used for the collection of this indicator? 5.a.2 (legal indicator) What do you think are the most important challenges for the monitoring of indicator 5.a.2? Which kind of support you think that FAO can provide to overcome these challenges?
  • 20. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: INDICATOR 5.A.1 – CHIARA BRUNELLI (CHIARA.BRUNELLI@FAO.ORG) INDICATOR 5.A.2 – MARTHA OSORIO (MARTHA.OSORIO@FAO.ORG) 20

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Sex disaggregated data (SDD) on land ownership disclose the situation of women’s legal security in relation to agricultural land. The analysis of legal framework helps identifying causes and bottlenecks. National Statistical Offices should collaborate with the overseeing body tasked with the monitoring of legal framework to help determine whether or not special measures should be discontinued, adjusted or prolonged to better address the disparities
  2. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  3. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  4. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  5. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  6. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  7. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  8. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  9. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  10. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay
  11. Additional note on “why agricultural land?“: not only agricultural land is a key input in many developing countries, where poverty reduction and development strategies are necessarily based on the agricultural sector. BUT it is crucial to know of what type of land we are talking about. An indicator that is measuring land rights in general, without distinguishing between residential, business or agricultural land is of little value from the policy point of view. Questions developed to identify ‘agricultural population’. Scenario A: the country can collect information at the individual level. In this case, the following three questions are recommended for each adult HH member Q1. In the last 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH], did [NAME] do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) Which of the following best describes what [NAME] was mainly doing in the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] to [MONTH]? [tick the 2 main activities] 1 – Farming or raising livestock 2 – Forestry or fishing 3 – Working in a sector other than agriculture or fishing (questions end) 4 – Studying (questions end) 5 – Looking for work (questions end) 6 – Taking care of household or family (questions end) 7 – With long-term illness or disability (questions end) 8 – Retired or pensioner (questions end) 9 – Other (specify): _______________ (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities was [NAME]… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay Scenario B: the survey cannot append individual level questions. In this case, the following three questions are recommended at the household level: Q1. Over the past 12 months, which is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did anybody in the household do or help with farming land to produce food or raising/tending livestock? (Y/N) Q2. (if yes) In the past 12 months, that is from [MONTH] up to [MONTH], did any member of this household spend most of his/her time farming, raising or raising/tending livestock? 1 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the main activity for at least one member 2 – yes, farming or raising livestock were the second main activity for at least one member 3 – no, none in the household farmed or raised livestock as main or second activity (questions end) (supplementary question) Q3. In these activities were these people… [tick all that applies] 1 - working for someone else for pay (ie., employee, on paid apprentice / internship) 2 - working as an employer (with regular employees) 3 - working as own-account worker (without regular employees) 4 - helping in the household / family business 5 - helping a family member who works for someone else for a pay