2. Background
• Retrograde approach improved recanalization success rate
in CTO interventions.
• In principle retrograde CTO crossing could be “easier” than
antegrade because the distal cap is usually softer than the
proximal.
• However, in some cases, CTO recanalization still remain
difficult even with retrograde approach.
• Even in presence of a “good” retrograde collateral channel,
difficulties may be encountered in crossing the channel
and then the CTO.
22. J-CTO SCORE: 4
56y man, previous PCI on LAD and prox LCx + distal
LCx PCI failure. Persistent effort angina CCS III
23. Dual arterial access with 8 Fr right femoral and
6 Fr right radial artery EBU 8 French 90 cm
2nd Antegrade attempt failure
Fielder XT-A, Gaia 2 and Conquest Pro unsuccessful
CorsairFinecross
28. Corsair and FineCross 150 unable to retrograde
crossing despite retrograde wire trapping and
Guideliner (severe calcified lesion).
Guideliner
Ping pong technique
XT-A
29. “Tip-in" technique
Switch from XT-A to RG3 but
RG3 stucked into the 6 Fr
catheter
Finecross 130 antegrade
(bare)
Finecross advanced through
Retrograde RG3 guidewire
(then carried in front of
calcified stenosis)
33. Conclusions / Take Home message
• Retrograde approach in CTO recanalization still
represent a challenge in interventional cardiology.
• Even in presence of a “good” retrograde collateral
channel, difficulties may be encountered in crossing
the channel and then the CTO.
• Dedicated materials and operators’ experience are the
Key to overcome this difficulties and reach CTO-PCI
success.