SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 40
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
2017 Edelman
Trust Barometer
Malaysia
1
Informed
Public
9 years in 20+ markets
Represents 13% of total global population
500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200
in all other countries
Must meet 4 criteria:
Ages 25-64
College educated
In top 25% of household income per
age group in each country
Report significant media consumption
and engagement in business news
General Online
Population
6 years in 25+ markets
Ages 18+
1,150 respondents
per country
All slides show General
Online Population unless
otherwise noted
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer
Methodology
28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000+). Country-
specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500),
Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100).
2
17 years of data
33,000+ respondents total
All fieldwork was conducted
between October 13th and
November 16th, 2016
Online Survey in
28 Countries
Mass
Population
All population not including
Informed Public
Represents 87% of total
global population
Trust in Retrospect
3
Rising Influence
of NGOs
2001
Business Must
Partner with
Government to
Regain Trust
2009
Fall of the
Celebrity CEO
2002
Earned Media
More Credible
Than Advertising
2003
U.S. Companies
in Europe Suffer
Trust Discount
2004
Trust Shifts from
“Authorities” to
Peers
2005
“A Person Like
Me” Emerges as
Credible
Spokesperson
2006
Business More
Trusted Than
Government
and Media
2007
Young Influencers
Have More Trust
in Business
2008
Trust is Now an
Essential Line
of Business
2010
Rise of
Authority
Figures
2011
Fall of
Government
2012
Crisis of
Leadership
2013
Business to
Lead the Debate
for Change
2014
Trust is
Essential to
Innovation
2015
Trust
in Crisis
2017
Growing
Inequality of Trust
2016
73%
60%
54%
46%
35%
29%
50%
41%
40%
28%
35%
19%
Trust Matters
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that
you trust/do not trust? (Yes Summary) Q598-609. Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following
authors or content creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general
news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust)
General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample.
4
Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust
Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies
Refused to buy products/services
Criticized companies
Shared negative opinions
Disagreed with others
Paid more than wanted
Sold shares
Chose to buy products/services
Recommended them to a friend/colleague
Shared positive opinions online
Defended company
Paid more
Bought shares
most trusted
content creators#1
Friends and
Family
most trusted
media source#1
Online Search
Engines
Behaviors for
Trusted Companies
Behaviors for
Distrusted Companies
Trust
in Crisis
How much do you
trust each institution
to do what is right?
Trust Index
A World of Distrust
Average trust in institutions,
2016 vs. 2017
7
47 Global
72 India
69 Indonesia
67 China
60 Singapore
60 UAE
53 Netherlands
52 Mexico
52 U.S.
50 Colombia
49 Canada
48 Brazil
48 Italy
48 Malaysia
45 Argentina
44 Hong Kong
44 Spain
43 Turkey
42 Australia
42 S. Africa
41 Germany
40 France
40 U.K.
38 S. Korea
37 Sweden
36 Ireland
35 Japan
35 Poland
34 Russia
2016 2017
50 Global
73 China
66 UAE
65 India
64 Singapore
62 Indonesia
60 Mexico
56 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
51 Argentina
51 Malaysia
50 Brazil
49 Australia
49 Italy
49 U.S.
47 Hong Kong
46 Spain
45 S. Africa
42 Germany
42 S. Korea
42 U.K.
41 France
41 Ireland
41 Turkey
39 Russia
38 Japan
37 Sweden
35 Poland
Trusters
(60-100)
Neutrals
(50-59)
Distrusters
(1-49)
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust
Index is an average of a country's trust in the institutions
of government, business, media and NGOs. General Population,
28-country global total.
3-point decrease
in the global
Trust Index
Trust declines in 21
of 28 countries—the
broadest declines
since beginning
General Population
tracking in 2012
2 in 3 countries are
now distrusters
45 Global
70 India
67 Indonesia
62 China
59 Singapore
59 UAE
52 Netherlands
50 Colombia
50 Mexico
47 Brazil
47 Canada
47 Italy
47 Malaysia
47 U.S.
45 Argentina
42 Hong Kong
41 S. Africa
41 Spain
41 Turkey
40 Australia
39 Germany
38 France
37 U.K.
36 S. Korea
36 Sweden
35 Ireland
34 Japan
34 Poland
31 Russia
Trust Index
Mass Population
Left Behind
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs. Mass Population
The Mass Population
distrusts
their institutions in
20 of 28 countries
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer.
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global
total.
Mass
Population
Informed
Public
8
60 Global
80 India
79 China
78 Indonesia
77 UAE
71 Singapore
68 U.S.
62 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Italy
61 Mexico
57 Malaysia
57 Spain
56 France
56 U.K.
55 Colombia
54 Australia
54 Germany
53 Hong Kong
51 Argentina
51 Brazil
50 S. Korea
50 Turkey
49 Japan
49 S. Africa
47 Sweden
45 Russia
44 Ireland
43 Poland
Trusters
(60-100)
Neutrals
(50-59)
Distrusters
(1-49)
2017: Trust Gap Widens
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
Informed Public and Mass Population, Malaysia.
9
Percent trust in the four institutions of government,
business, media and NGOs, 2012 to 2017
21 pts
19 pts
18 pts
57
58
57
53
50
47
2012 2016 2017
Informed
Public
10pt
Gap
4pt
Gap
A 2-point
increase in
the last year
8pt
Gap
Largest Gaps
Mass
Population
61 58
45
39
58 56
42
37
Trust in All Four Institutions Declines
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population,
Malaysia.
10
Percent trust in the four institutions of government,
business, media and NGOs, 2016 vs. 2017
Business MediaNGOs Government
Trust in govt
increased from 34%
to 43% among the
informed public
50%
Neutral
Trusted
Distrusted
-3 -2 -3 -2
20172016
The System
Is Broken
Without Trust,
Belief in the System Fails
12
How true are each of the following?
Sense of Injustice
Desire for Change
Need forceful reformers to bring change
Lack of Confidence
No confidence in current leaders
Lack of Hope
Hard work not rewarded, children will not
have a better life, country not moving in
right direction
System biased in favor of elites, elites
indifferent to the people, getting richer than
they deserve
How true is
this for you?
Sense of injustice
Lack of hope
Lack of confidence
Desire for change
52%
37%
12%
Majority Believe the
System is Failing Them
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. Malaysia For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated, please refer to the
Technical Appendix.
13
Not at all true
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
2 in 5 are uncertain
Completely true
System failing System working
Nearly
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690.
For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from
the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error. Countries were considered below the
global average if their score was lower than the global mean minus the margin of error. All other scores were considered aligned. 14
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Uncertain 32 22 24 25 24 25 25 25 27 26 29 30 26 33 33 30 29 29 37 31 28 41 40 45 45 50 43 47 40
In 14 countries, the percent of
population that has lost faith is
above the global average
Systemic loss of faith
restricted to Western-
style democracies1 in 2 Countries Have Lost
Faith in the System
Percent of population who believe
the system is not working
Above
global average
Aligned with
global average
Below
global average
Systemic Distrust and Fear Trigger Action
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalization Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. System is
failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of
error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean
plus the margin of error. 15
% Who Agree
System is Failing
53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19
Global
France
Italy
Mexico
S.Africa
Spain
Poland
Brazil
Colombia
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Ireland
U.S.
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Argentina
Malaysia
Turkey
Russia
S.Korea
Indonesia
Japan
India
HongKong
Singapore
China
UAE
Above-Average Level of Fear
Above-Average Belief the
System is Failing
Countries with Multiple
Fears and Failing System
10 countries with above-
average belief the system
is failing and multiple fears
4 countries with above-
average belief the system is
failing – but lack multiple fears
Corruption
Immigration
Globalization
Eroding social values
Pace of change
Even Those at the Top Are Disillusioned
Percent who believe the system is not working
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. S8. Thinking about your annual household income in 2015, which of the following categories best describes your total
household income that year? S7. What is the last grade in school you completed? S9. How often do you follow public policy matters in the news? S10. How often do
you follow business news and information? General Population, Malaysia, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’.
High-Income College-Educated Well-Informed
Top quartile of income College degree or higher
Follow business and public policy
information several times a week or more
53% 54% 54%
16
Echo Chamber Amplifies Fears
and Accelerates the Cycle
17
Corruption Globalization Eroding Social Values Immigration Pace of Innovation
Widespread corruption
Compromising the safety of
our citizens
Makes it difficult to institute the
changes necessary to solve our
problems
Protect our jobs from
foreign competition
Foreign companies/influence
damaging our economy/
national culture
Foreign corporations favor their
home country
Most countries cannot be
trusted to engage in fair
trade practices
Values that made this country
great are disappearing
Society changing too quickly and
not in ways that benefit people
like me
Influx of people from other
countries damaging our economy
and national culture
Technological innovations
happening too quickly and leading
to changes not good for
people like me
Concerns Have Become Fears
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalization Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation
Q677. Malaysia. For details on how the societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix.
18
Percent of respondents who are concerned or fearful regarding each issue
83% Concerned
58% Fearful
67% Concerned
34% Fearful
58% Concerned
24% Fearful
64% Concerned
26% Fearful
54% Concerned
21% Fearful
11
34
A Case in Point: U.S.
19
Trust Barometer Supplement: Post-U.S. Election Flash Poll,
1,000+ General Population Respondents, Nov. 28 to Dec. 11, 2016
Trump Voters Clinton Voters
25
42
67%
are fearful
45%
are fearful
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust U.S. Flash Poll Q14. Who did you vote for? Audience: U.S. General Population, grouped by “system failing” segments and level of fear
from the Trust Barometer. For details on how systemic distrust and societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondents were labeled
as “fearful” if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalization, eroding social values, and pace of innovation.
System Failing
and Fearful Fearful
7
20
A Case in Point: U.K.
20
Trust Barometer Supplement: UK Supplement, 1,150 General
Population Respondents, December 23, 2016 to January, 7 2017
Leave
the EU
Remain
in the EU
54%
are fearful
27%
are fearful
Source: 2017 UK Trust Supplement Q15. Did you vote…? Audience: UK General Population, grouped by ‘system failing’ segments and level of fear from the Trust
Barometer. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondents were
labeled as ‘fearful’ if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalization, eroding social values, and pace of
innovation.
System Failing
and Fearful Fearful
LEAVE
10
44
The Echo
Chamber
22
The Echo Chamber in Action
Facts matter less Bias is the filter No humans needed
3 in 5 agree
“I would support politicians
I trust to make things better
for me and my family
even if they
exaggerated the truth”
66%
Do not regularly listen to
people or organizations
with whom they often
disagree
3x more likely
to ignore information
that supports a position
they do not believe in
More likely
to believe
71%
Search
Engines
29%
Human
Editors
53%45% Never or rarely change their
position on important social issues
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q755 Have you ever changed your position on an
important social issue? (Sum of “Yes, but rarely”, “No, never”) General Population, 28-country global total. Q749. When someone you know provides you with some information that supports a position that you do
NOT believe, which of following do you typically do with it? Q752. How often do you read or listen to information or points of view from people, media sources or organizations with whom you often disagree? (Sum of
“Never”, “Almost Never”, “Several Times a year”, “Once or Twice a Month”) Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different format for
presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of
these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
More than
2016 2017
Search engines* 66 66
Online-only media** 52 52
Traditional media 49 51
Owned media 47 48
Social media 42 45
Trust in Media Continues to Change
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for
general news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.”
(Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
Percent trust in each source for general news and information
23
Change,
2016 - 2017
-
-
+2
+1
+3
Search Engines
remain most trusted
Social media
remains most
distrusted
Business
on Notice
Business Plays a Role in Stoking Societal Fears
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q693-762. Some people say they worry about many things while others say they have few concerns. We are interested in
what you worry about. Specifically, how much do you worry about each of the following? Please indicate your answer using a nine point scale where one means “I do
not worry about this at all” and nine means “I am extremely worried about this”. (Top 4 Box, Worried) Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate
how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, 28-country global total. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of
development and change and select the response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4 Box, Too Fast) General Population, Malaysia, question asked
of half the sample.
25
Malaysians worry about
losing their jobs due to:
47% globalization
is taking us in the
wrong direction
57% the pace of change
in business and industry is
too fast
68%
68%
72%
74%
75%
Jobs moving to cheaper markets
Automation
Lack of training/skills
Foreign competitors
Immigrants who work for less
Support for Anti-Business Policies
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q709-718 For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General
Population, Malaysia.
26
Nearly 3in5 agree 78%agree 77%agree
Protectionism Slower Growth
“The government
should protect our
jobs and local
industries, even if
it means that our
economy grows
more slowly.”
“We need to
prioritize the
interests of our
country over those
of the rest of the
world.”
“We should not
enter into free
trade agreements
because they hurt
our country’s
workers.”
Protectionism
License to Operate at Risk
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q667-670. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q661-
664. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q658. For the statement below, please indicate how
much you agree or disagree. (All respondents except Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of one-fifth the sample.
27
82%agree that the
pharmaceutical
industry needs
more regulations
75%agree that policy
makers should
tax foods that negatively
impact health
44%do not agree that
financial market reforms
have increased
economic stability
Regulation ReformTax Policy
Business
Must Act
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q732. What can businesses do that would cause the most damage to your trust in a better future?
(Please select up to five.) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
29
First, Do No Harm
Actions business can take that would most damage
trust in a better future (top 5 most-selected)
1.
Pay bribes to
government
officials to
win contracts
2.
Reduce costs
by lowering
product
quality
3.
Overcharge
for products
that people
need to live
4.
Reduce
employees’
benefits
5.
Pay
executives
hundreds of
times more
than workers
When the System is Failing,
Companies Must Do More
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q80-639. How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale
where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2
Box, Importance) Data displayed is mean Top 2 Box rating for the listed items. Items were included if they were considered important by 50% or more of those
who believe the system is failing. General Population and cut by “the system is failing segments,” Malaysia. 30
Percent who rate each attribute as important in building trust in a company
(top 5 most important shown)
47
48
48
50
50
58
59
60
63
64
Takes responsible actions to
address an issue or a crisis
Listens to customer needs and
feedback
Has transparent and open business
practices
Offers high quality products or
services
Has ethical business practices
Among those who have
lost faith in the system,
expectations are higher
across the board
On average
+12pts
higher expectations
System Failing
General Population
1
60 60 59
46
41 40 39
36
30
Technical
expert
Apersonlike
yourself
Academic
expert
Financial
industry
analyst
NGO
representative
CEO
Employee
Boardof
directors
Government
official/
regulator
Peers Now as Credible as Technical Experts
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q130-747 Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
31
Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible,
and change from 2016 to 2017
CEO credibility decreased the
most, dropping to an all-time low
A person like yourself now tied
for most credible spokesperson
-7 +3 -10 -12 -2 -16 +2 -15 -5
Y-to-Y Change+−
Partnerships/
programs to address
societal issues
Business practices/
crisis handling
Financial earnings &
operational
performance
Multiple Faces Drive more credibility for businesses
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q610. Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational
performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611. A company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612. A company’s employee
programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613. A company’s partnerships
with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614. A company’s innovation efforts and new product development?
Q615. A company’s stand on issues related to the industry in which it operates? General Population, Malaysia, question asked of one-quarter of the sample.
32
Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic
Innovation effortsTreatment of
employees/customers
Views on
industry issues
Company CEO
Senior executive
Employee
Activist consumer
Academic
Media spokesperson
26
28
31
33 33
2626
29
32
38
36
29
49
28
40
31
27
34
42
40
37
34 34
40
22
28
22 21
23
25
6 6 5
12 12 13
Which is more believable?
Talk With, Not At
33
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a
different format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are
more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two
options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Malaysia, choices shown to half the sample.
36%
Personal
experience
64%
Data
57%
Spontaneous
speaker
43%
Rehearsed
speaker
19%
Blunt and
outspoken
81%
Diplomatic
and polite
61%
Company’s
social media
39%
Advertising
Integrity 48 43 5
Has Ethical Business Practices 50 44 6
Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 47 42 5
Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 48 42 6
Engagement 47 42 5
Treats Employees Well 47 42 5
Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 48 42 6
Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 45 42 3
Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 46 44 2
Products 44 40 4
Offers High Quality Products Or Services 50 44 6
Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 39 37 2
Purpose 39 36 3
Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 42 41 1
Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 42 37 5
Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 39 35 4
Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 34 32 2
Operations 39 37 2
Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 42 38 4
Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 36 36 0
Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 39 37 2
The Trust-building Attributes
Company Importance vs. Performance
%
Performance
%
Importance Gap
34
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust
Barometer Q80-639. How important is
each of the following attributes to
building your TRUST in a company?
Use a 9-point scale where one means
that attribute is “not at all important to
building your trust” and nine means it
is “extremely important to building
your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box,
Importance) Q114-654. Please rate
businesses in general on how well
you think they are performing on each
of the following attributes. Use a 9-
point scale where one means they are
"performing extremely poorly" and
nine means they are "performing
extremely well". (Top 2 Box,
Performance) General Population,
Malaysia.
69
72
67
71
75
59
76 75 73 74
71
75
79
71
81
FinancialServices
Energy
ConsumerPackaged
Goods
Fashion
Telecommunications
Entertainment
HealthCare
Automotive
FoodandBeverage
ProfessionalServices
Retail
Transportation
Education
Manufacturing
Technology
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again,
please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust)
General Population, 28-country global total.
Tech Sector Most Trusted
35
Percent who trust each industry - 2017
NeutralDistrust Trust
Companies Headquartered in
Developed Markets Most Distrusted
Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q26-Q422. Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much
you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at
all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 25-country global total, countries shown to half the sample.
36
Trust in companies headquartered in each country
72 70 69
64 61
57 57
47
80
39 38
65
71
37
31
61 6366
62
71 69
57
52
61
48
76
43
33
66
70
31 28
56
69
UK
Germany
Switzerland
Sweden
France
Italy
Netherlands
Spain
Japan
China
India
SouthKorea
Australia
Brazil
Mexico
US
Canada
General
Population
Significant Decrease
WORKING DRAFT
With the People,
Not For the People
38
A Fundamental Shift
38
Current
Tension
Old Model:
For the People
New Model:
With the People
Elites manage
institutions to
do things “for”
the people
Influence has
shifted to the
people; people
using influence to
reject established
authority
Institutions
working
with the people;
institutional silos
dissolved
Influence
& Authority
Influence
& Authority
Influence
& Authority
The
Trust
10
1. Trust in
Crisis
2. Trust
inequality
grows
3. A Broken
System
4. Concerns
& Fears
5. Failing
Systems +
fears = action
6. Media Echo
Chamber
7. Peers highly
credible
9. High
Expectations
for business
8. Business
adds to fears 10. With the
people
Thank You

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust BarometerDaniel Roth
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential ElectionEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global ResultsEdelman
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust BarometerMatthew Gain
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family BusinessEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer Edelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global ReportJesper Andersen
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman Japan
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007edelman.milan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services ResultsEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - IrelandEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - IrelandEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash PollEdelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash PollEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - TechnologyEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California ResultsEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
 
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
 
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
 
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - IrelandEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
 
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash PollEdelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
Edelman Trust Barometer Special Flash Poll
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
 

Andere mochten auch

Globalization in Malaysia
Globalization in MalaysiaGlobalization in Malaysia
Globalization in MalaysiaLeeya Najwa
 
Client delight strategies
Client delight strategiesClient delight strategies
Client delight strategiesFaisyal Firdaus
 
2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible Landscapes
2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible Landscapes2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible Landscapes
2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible LandscapesWalter Bone, RLA ASLA
 
Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013
Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013
Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013Ipsos
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Japan
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Japan2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Japan
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer JapanEdelman APACMEA
 
Amir Almas Resume
Amir Almas ResumeAmir Almas Resume
Amir Almas ResumeAmir Almas
 

Andere mochten auch (7)

Globalization in Malaysia
Globalization in MalaysiaGlobalization in Malaysia
Globalization in Malaysia
 
Client delight strategies
Client delight strategiesClient delight strategies
Client delight strategies
 
2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible Landscapes
2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible Landscapes2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible Landscapes
2016 02-09 Future Landscape and Public Realm Conference - Edible Landscapes
 
Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013
Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013
Ipsos - Online Audience Consumption Habits 2013
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Japan
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Japan2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Japan
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Japan
 
2015 Earned Brand India
2015 Earned Brand India2015 Earned Brand India
2015 Earned Brand India
 
Amir Almas Resume
Amir Almas ResumeAmir Almas Resume
Amir Almas Resume
 

Ähnlich wie 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia

2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global ResultsEdelman
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Soymimarca
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman_UK
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy ResultsEdelman
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf instituteChristina Fuhr, Ph.D.
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Italia
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa ReportEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 IndonesiaEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia ResultsEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World Edelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 

Ähnlich wie 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia (20)

2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 IndonesiaEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 

Mehr von Edelman APACMEA

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - ChinaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan Edelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Edelman APACMEA
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Edelman APACMEA
 
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016   Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016 Edelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - EnglishEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - ChineseEdelman APACMEA
 

Mehr von Edelman APACMEA (14)

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan
 
2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India
 
2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
 
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016   Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Cash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girl
Cash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girlCash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girl
Cash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girlCall girl Jaipur
 
Aryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptx
Aryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptxAryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptx
Aryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptxtegevi9289
 
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15SearchNorwich
 
personal branding kit for music business
personal branding kit for music businesspersonal branding kit for music business
personal branding kit for music businessbrjohnson6
 
Unraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptx
Unraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptxUnraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptx
Unraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptxelizabethella096
 
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?riteshhsociall
 
Brand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdfBrand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdftbatkhuu1
 
How to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setups
How to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setupsHow to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setups
How to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setupsssuser4571da
 
Labour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptx
Labour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptxLabour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptx
Labour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptxelizabethella096
 
VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...
VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...
VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...aditipandeya
 
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdfThe+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdfSocial Samosa
 
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best StrategiesGoogle 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best StrategiesSearch Engine Journal
 
Situation Analysis | Management Company.
Situation Analysis | Management Company.Situation Analysis | Management Company.
Situation Analysis | Management Company.DanielaQuiroz63
 
Social Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid media
Social Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid mediaSocial Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid media
Social Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid mediaadityabelde2
 
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristics
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristicsSocial media, ppt. Features, characteristics
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristicswasim792942
 
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentationKraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentationtbatkhuu1
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Cash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girl
Cash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girlCash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girl
Cash payment girl 9257726604 Hand ✋ to Hand over girl
 
Aryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptx
Aryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptxAryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptx
Aryabhata I, II of mathematics of both.pptx
 
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
Five Essential Tools for International SEO - Natalia Witczyk - SearchNorwich 15
 
personal branding kit for music business
personal branding kit for music businesspersonal branding kit for music business
personal branding kit for music business
 
Unraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptx
Unraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptxUnraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptx
Unraveling the Mystery of the Hinterkaifeck Murders.pptx
 
Digital Strategy Master Class - Andrew Rupert
Digital Strategy Master Class - Andrew RupertDigital Strategy Master Class - Andrew Rupert
Digital Strategy Master Class - Andrew Rupert
 
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
 
No Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found Online
No Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found OnlineNo Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found Online
No Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found Online
 
Brand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdfBrand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Peoria City Soccer Presentation.pdf
 
How to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setups
How to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setupsHow to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setups
How to utilize calculated properties in your HubSpot setups
 
Foundation First - Why Your Website and Content Matters - David Pisarek
Foundation First - Why Your Website and Content Matters - David PisarekFoundation First - Why Your Website and Content Matters - David Pisarek
Foundation First - Why Your Website and Content Matters - David Pisarek
 
Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...
Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...
Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...
 
Labour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptx
Labour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptxLabour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptx
Labour Day Celebrating Workers and Their Contributions.pptx
 
VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...
VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...
VIP 7001035870 Find & Meet Hyderabad Call Girls Film Nagar high-profile Call ...
 
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdfThe+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
 
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best StrategiesGoogle 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
Google 3rd-Party Cookie Deprecation [Update] + 5 Best Strategies
 
Situation Analysis | Management Company.
Situation Analysis | Management Company.Situation Analysis | Management Company.
Situation Analysis | Management Company.
 
Social Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid media
Social Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid mediaSocial Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid media
Social Media Marketing PPT-Includes Paid media
 
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristics
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristicsSocial media, ppt. Features, characteristics
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristics
 
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentationKraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
 

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia

  • 2. Informed Public 9 years in 20+ markets Represents 13% of total global population 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries Must meet 4 criteria: Ages 25-64 College educated In top 25% of household income per age group in each country Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news General Online Population 6 years in 25+ markets Ages 18+ 1,150 respondents per country All slides show General Online Population unless otherwise noted 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Methodology 28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000+). Country- specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100). 2 17 years of data 33,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between October 13th and November 16th, 2016 Online Survey in 28 Countries Mass Population All population not including Informed Public Represents 87% of total global population
  • 3. Trust in Retrospect 3 Rising Influence of NGOs 2001 Business Must Partner with Government to Regain Trust 2009 Fall of the Celebrity CEO 2002 Earned Media More Credible Than Advertising 2003 U.S. Companies in Europe Suffer Trust Discount 2004 Trust Shifts from “Authorities” to Peers 2005 “A Person Like Me” Emerges as Credible Spokesperson 2006 Business More Trusted Than Government and Media 2007 Young Influencers Have More Trust in Business 2008 Trust is Now an Essential Line of Business 2010 Rise of Authority Figures 2011 Fall of Government 2012 Crisis of Leadership 2013 Business to Lead the Debate for Change 2014 Trust is Essential to Innovation 2015 Trust in Crisis 2017 Growing Inequality of Trust 2016
  • 4. 73% 60% 54% 46% 35% 29% 50% 41% 40% 28% 35% 19% Trust Matters Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you trust/do not trust? (Yes Summary) Q598-609. Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following authors or content creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. 4 Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies Refused to buy products/services Criticized companies Shared negative opinions Disagreed with others Paid more than wanted Sold shares Chose to buy products/services Recommended them to a friend/colleague Shared positive opinions online Defended company Paid more Bought shares most trusted content creators#1 Friends and Family most trusted media source#1 Online Search Engines Behaviors for Trusted Companies Behaviors for Distrusted Companies
  • 6. How much do you trust each institution to do what is right?
  • 7. Trust Index A World of Distrust Average trust in institutions, 2016 vs. 2017 7 47 Global 72 India 69 Indonesia 67 China 60 Singapore 60 UAE 53 Netherlands 52 Mexico 52 U.S. 50 Colombia 49 Canada 48 Brazil 48 Italy 48 Malaysia 45 Argentina 44 Hong Kong 44 Spain 43 Turkey 42 Australia 42 S. Africa 41 Germany 40 France 40 U.K. 38 S. Korea 37 Sweden 36 Ireland 35 Japan 35 Poland 34 Russia 2016 2017 50 Global 73 China 66 UAE 65 India 64 Singapore 62 Indonesia 60 Mexico 56 Canada 55 Colombia 52 Netherlands 51 Argentina 51 Malaysia 50 Brazil 49 Australia 49 Italy 49 U.S. 47 Hong Kong 46 Spain 45 S. Africa 42 Germany 42 S. Korea 42 U.K. 41 France 41 Ireland 41 Turkey 39 Russia 38 Japan 37 Sweden 35 Poland Trusters (60-100) Neutrals (50-59) Distrusters (1-49) Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country's trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. General Population, 28-country global total. 3-point decrease in the global Trust Index Trust declines in 21 of 28 countries—the broadest declines since beginning General Population tracking in 2012 2 in 3 countries are now distrusters
  • 8. 45 Global 70 India 67 Indonesia 62 China 59 Singapore 59 UAE 52 Netherlands 50 Colombia 50 Mexico 47 Brazil 47 Canada 47 Italy 47 Malaysia 47 U.S. 45 Argentina 42 Hong Kong 41 S. Africa 41 Spain 41 Turkey 40 Australia 39 Germany 38 France 37 U.K. 36 S. Korea 36 Sweden 35 Ireland 34 Japan 34 Poland 31 Russia Trust Index Mass Population Left Behind Average trust in institutions, Informed Public vs. Mass Population The Mass Population distrusts their institutions in 20 of 28 countries Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total. Mass Population Informed Public 8 60 Global 80 India 79 China 78 Indonesia 77 UAE 71 Singapore 68 U.S. 62 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Italy 61 Mexico 57 Malaysia 57 Spain 56 France 56 U.K. 55 Colombia 54 Australia 54 Germany 53 Hong Kong 51 Argentina 51 Brazil 50 S. Korea 50 Turkey 49 Japan 49 S. Africa 47 Sweden 45 Russia 44 Ireland 43 Poland Trusters (60-100) Neutrals (50-59) Distrusters (1-49)
  • 9. 2017: Trust Gap Widens Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and Mass Population, Malaysia. 9 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 to 2017 21 pts 19 pts 18 pts 57 58 57 53 50 47 2012 2016 2017 Informed Public 10pt Gap 4pt Gap A 2-point increase in the last year 8pt Gap Largest Gaps Mass Population
  • 10. 61 58 45 39 58 56 42 37 Trust in All Four Institutions Declines Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-620. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Malaysia. 10 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2016 vs. 2017 Business MediaNGOs Government Trust in govt increased from 34% to 43% among the informed public 50% Neutral Trusted Distrusted -3 -2 -3 -2 20172016
  • 12. Without Trust, Belief in the System Fails 12 How true are each of the following? Sense of Injustice Desire for Change Need forceful reformers to bring change Lack of Confidence No confidence in current leaders Lack of Hope Hard work not rewarded, children will not have a better life, country not moving in right direction System biased in favor of elites, elites indifferent to the people, getting richer than they deserve
  • 13. How true is this for you? Sense of injustice Lack of hope Lack of confidence Desire for change 52% 37% 12% Majority Believe the System is Failing Them Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. Malaysia For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. 13 Not at all true 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 in 5 are uncertain Completely true System failing System working Nearly
  • 14. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the “system failing” measure was calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error. Countries were considered below the global average if their score was lower than the global mean minus the margin of error. All other scores were considered aligned. 14 Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE System failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Uncertain 32 22 24 25 24 25 25 25 27 26 29 30 26 33 33 30 29 29 37 31 28 41 40 45 45 50 43 47 40 In 14 countries, the percent of population that has lost faith is above the global average Systemic loss of faith restricted to Western- style democracies1 in 2 Countries Have Lost Faith in the System Percent of population who believe the system is not working Above global average Aligned with global average Below global average
  • 15. Systemic Distrust and Fear Trigger Action Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalization Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. System is failing: Q672-675, 678-680, 688-690. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. The margin of error for the countries scores was added and subtracted from the global mean. Countries were considered above the global average if their score was higher than the global mean plus the margin of error. 15 % Who Agree System is Failing 53 72 72 67 67 67 64 62 62 62 60 59 59 57 56 55 55 53 52 51 48 48 42 42 36 35 30 23 19 Global France Italy Mexico S.Africa Spain Poland Brazil Colombia Germany U.K. Australia Ireland U.S. Netherlands Canada Sweden Argentina Malaysia Turkey Russia S.Korea Indonesia Japan India HongKong Singapore China UAE Above-Average Level of Fear Above-Average Belief the System is Failing Countries with Multiple Fears and Failing System 10 countries with above- average belief the system is failing and multiple fears 4 countries with above- average belief the system is failing – but lack multiple fears Corruption Immigration Globalization Eroding social values Pace of change
  • 16. Even Those at the Top Are Disillusioned Percent who believe the system is not working Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. S8. Thinking about your annual household income in 2015, which of the following categories best describes your total household income that year? S7. What is the last grade in school you completed? S9. How often do you follow public policy matters in the news? S10. How often do you follow business news and information? General Population, Malaysia, cut by ‘the system is failing segments’. High-Income College-Educated Well-Informed Top quartile of income College degree or higher Follow business and public policy information several times a week or more 53% 54% 54% 16
  • 17. Echo Chamber Amplifies Fears and Accelerates the Cycle 17
  • 18. Corruption Globalization Eroding Social Values Immigration Pace of Innovation Widespread corruption Compromising the safety of our citizens Makes it difficult to institute the changes necessary to solve our problems Protect our jobs from foreign competition Foreign companies/influence damaging our economy/ national culture Foreign corporations favor their home country Most countries cannot be trusted to engage in fair trade practices Values that made this country great are disappearing Society changing too quickly and not in ways that benefit people like me Influx of people from other countries damaging our economy and national culture Technological innovations happening too quickly and leading to changes not good for people like me Concerns Have Become Fears Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Corruption Q685-687, Globalization Q681-684, Eroding social values Q676 and Q758, Immigration Q685, Pace of innovation Q677. Malaysia. For details on how the societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix. 18 Percent of respondents who are concerned or fearful regarding each issue 83% Concerned 58% Fearful 67% Concerned 34% Fearful 58% Concerned 24% Fearful 64% Concerned 26% Fearful 54% Concerned 21% Fearful
  • 19. 11 34 A Case in Point: U.S. 19 Trust Barometer Supplement: Post-U.S. Election Flash Poll, 1,000+ General Population Respondents, Nov. 28 to Dec. 11, 2016 Trump Voters Clinton Voters 25 42 67% are fearful 45% are fearful Source: 2017 Edelman Trust U.S. Flash Poll Q14. Who did you vote for? Audience: U.S. General Population, grouped by “system failing” segments and level of fear from the Trust Barometer. For details on how systemic distrust and societal fears were measured, please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondents were labeled as “fearful” if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalization, eroding social values, and pace of innovation. System Failing and Fearful Fearful
  • 20. 7 20 A Case in Point: U.K. 20 Trust Barometer Supplement: UK Supplement, 1,150 General Population Respondents, December 23, 2016 to January, 7 2017 Leave the EU Remain in the EU 54% are fearful 27% are fearful Source: 2017 UK Trust Supplement Q15. Did you vote…? Audience: UK General Population, grouped by ‘system failing’ segments and level of fear from the Trust Barometer. For details on how the societal fears and the “system failing” measure were calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix. Respondents were labeled as ‘fearful’ if they were fearful of at least one of the following societal issues: corruption, immigration, globalization, eroding social values, and pace of innovation. System Failing and Fearful Fearful LEAVE 10 44
  • 22. 22 The Echo Chamber in Action Facts matter less Bias is the filter No humans needed 3 in 5 agree “I would support politicians I trust to make things better for me and my family even if they exaggerated the truth” 66% Do not regularly listen to people or organizations with whom they often disagree 3x more likely to ignore information that supports a position they do not believe in More likely to believe 71% Search Engines 29% Human Editors 53%45% Never or rarely change their position on important social issues Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q755 Have you ever changed your position on an important social issue? (Sum of “Yes, but rarely”, “No, never”) General Population, 28-country global total. Q749. When someone you know provides you with some information that supports a position that you do NOT believe, which of following do you typically do with it? Q752. How often do you read or listen to information or points of view from people, media sources or organizations with whom you often disagree? (Sum of “Never”, “Almost Never”, “Several Times a year”, “Once or Twice a Month”) Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. More than
  • 23. 2016 2017 Search engines* 66 66 Online-only media** 52 52 Traditional media 49 51 Owned media 47 48 Social media 42 45 Trust in Media Continues to Change Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. Percent trust in each source for general news and information 23 Change, 2016 - 2017 - - +2 +1 +3 Search Engines remain most trusted Social media remains most distrusted
  • 25. Business Plays a Role in Stoking Societal Fears Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q693-762. Some people say they worry about many things while others say they have few concerns. We are interested in what you worry about. Specifically, how much do you worry about each of the following? Please indicate your answer using a nine point scale where one means “I do not worry about this at all” and nine means “I am extremely worried about this”. (Top 4 Box, Worried) Q709-718. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, 28-country global total. Q349-671. For the statements below, please think about the pace of development and change and select the response that most accurately represents your opinion. (Top 4 Box, Too Fast) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 25 Malaysians worry about losing their jobs due to: 47% globalization is taking us in the wrong direction 57% the pace of change in business and industry is too fast 68% 68% 72% 74% 75% Jobs moving to cheaper markets Automation Lack of training/skills Foreign competitors Immigrants who work for less
  • 26. Support for Anti-Business Policies Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q709-718 For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Malaysia. 26 Nearly 3in5 agree 78%agree 77%agree Protectionism Slower Growth “The government should protect our jobs and local industries, even if it means that our economy grows more slowly.” “We need to prioritize the interests of our country over those of the rest of the world.” “We should not enter into free trade agreements because they hurt our country’s workers.” Protectionism
  • 27. License to Operate at Risk Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q667-670. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q661- 664. For each of the statements below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (Top 4 Box, Agree) Q658. For the statement below, please indicate how much you agree or disagree. (All respondents except Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of one-fifth the sample. 27 82%agree that the pharmaceutical industry needs more regulations 75%agree that policy makers should tax foods that negatively impact health 44%do not agree that financial market reforms have increased economic stability Regulation ReformTax Policy
  • 29. Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q732. What can businesses do that would cause the most damage to your trust in a better future? (Please select up to five.) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 29 First, Do No Harm Actions business can take that would most damage trust in a better future (top 5 most-selected) 1. Pay bribes to government officials to win contracts 2. Reduce costs by lowering product quality 3. Overcharge for products that people need to live 4. Reduce employees’ benefits 5. Pay executives hundreds of times more than workers
  • 30. When the System is Failing, Companies Must Do More Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q80-639. How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Importance) Data displayed is mean Top 2 Box rating for the listed items. Items were included if they were considered important by 50% or more of those who believe the system is failing. General Population and cut by “the system is failing segments,” Malaysia. 30 Percent who rate each attribute as important in building trust in a company (top 5 most important shown) 47 48 48 50 50 58 59 60 63 64 Takes responsible actions to address an issue or a crisis Listens to customer needs and feedback Has transparent and open business practices Offers high quality products or services Has ethical business practices Among those who have lost faith in the system, expectations are higher across the board On average +12pts higher expectations System Failing General Population
  • 31. 1 60 60 59 46 41 40 39 36 30 Technical expert Apersonlike yourself Academic expert Financial industry analyst NGO representative CEO Employee Boardof directors Government official/ regulator Peers Now as Credible as Technical Experts Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q130-747 Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 31 Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible, and change from 2016 to 2017 CEO credibility decreased the most, dropping to an all-time low A person like yourself now tied for most credible spokesperson -7 +3 -10 -12 -2 -16 +2 -15 -5 Y-to-Y Change+−
  • 32. Partnerships/ programs to address societal issues Business practices/ crisis handling Financial earnings & operational performance Multiple Faces Drive more credibility for businesses Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q610. Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611. A company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612. A company’s employee programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613. A company’s partnerships with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614. A company’s innovation efforts and new product development? Q615. A company’s stand on issues related to the industry in which it operates? General Population, Malaysia, question asked of one-quarter of the sample. 32 Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic Innovation effortsTreatment of employees/customers Views on industry issues Company CEO Senior executive Employee Activist consumer Academic Media spokesperson 26 28 31 33 33 2626 29 32 38 36 29 49 28 40 31 27 34 42 40 37 34 34 40 22 28 22 21 23 25 6 6 5 12 12 13
  • 33. Which is more believable? Talk With, Not At 33 Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q754. You are about to see a series of two choices. Each choice describes a different source of information, a different format for presenting information, or a different style of communicating information. For each pair, we want you to choose the one that you are more likely to believe is giving you the truth. While we know that some of these choices may not be easy, please do your best to select only one of the two options given--the one that is most likely to be true most often. General Population, Malaysia, choices shown to half the sample. 36% Personal experience 64% Data 57% Spontaneous speaker 43% Rehearsed speaker 19% Blunt and outspoken 81% Diplomatic and polite 61% Company’s social media 39% Advertising
  • 34. Integrity 48 43 5 Has Ethical Business Practices 50 44 6 Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 47 42 5 Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 48 42 6 Engagement 47 42 5 Treats Employees Well 47 42 5 Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 48 42 6 Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 45 42 3 Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 46 44 2 Products 44 40 4 Offers High Quality Products Or Services 50 44 6 Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 39 37 2 Purpose 39 36 3 Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 42 41 1 Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 42 37 5 Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 39 35 4 Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 34 32 2 Operations 39 37 2 Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 42 38 4 Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 36 36 0 Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 39 37 2 The Trust-building Attributes Company Importance vs. Performance % Performance % Importance Gap 34 Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q80-639. How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Importance) Q114-654. Please rate businesses in general on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a 9- point scale where one means they are "performing extremely poorly" and nine means they are "performing extremely well". (Top 2 Box, Performance) General Population, Malaysia.
  • 35. 69 72 67 71 75 59 76 75 73 74 71 75 79 71 81 FinancialServices Energy ConsumerPackaged Goods Fashion Telecommunications Entertainment HealthCare Automotive FoodandBeverage ProfessionalServices Retail Transportation Education Manufacturing Technology Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 28-country global total. Tech Sector Most Trusted 35 Percent who trust each industry - 2017 NeutralDistrust Trust
  • 36. Companies Headquartered in Developed Markets Most Distrusted Source: 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Q26-Q422. Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 25-country global total, countries shown to half the sample. 36 Trust in companies headquartered in each country 72 70 69 64 61 57 57 47 80 39 38 65 71 37 31 61 6366 62 71 69 57 52 61 48 76 43 33 66 70 31 28 56 69 UK Germany Switzerland Sweden France Italy Netherlands Spain Japan China India SouthKorea Australia Brazil Mexico US Canada General Population Significant Decrease
  • 37. WORKING DRAFT With the People, Not For the People
  • 38. 38 A Fundamental Shift 38 Current Tension Old Model: For the People New Model: With the People Elites manage institutions to do things “for” the people Influence has shifted to the people; people using influence to reject established authority Institutions working with the people; institutional silos dissolved Influence & Authority Influence & Authority Influence & Authority
  • 39. The Trust 10 1. Trust in Crisis 2. Trust inequality grows 3. A Broken System 4. Concerns & Fears 5. Failing Systems + fears = action 6. Media Echo Chamber 7. Peers highly credible 9. High Expectations for business 8. Business adds to fears 10. With the people