Business leaders are seen as important catalysts for building trust but there are gaps between what is important and how leaders are performing. While integrity, engagement, and products are seen as highly important for building trust, leaders are viewed as underperforming in these areas. There is an opportunity for leaders to focus more on ethical practices, transparency, social responsibility and listening to stakeholders to help close the trust gaps. Leadership's actions and values are key factors in building or eroding trust.
2. Introducing our panelists
Keith Thomas
CEO, Asia Pacific
Zurich Insurance
Group
Bob Grove
CEO, North Asia
Edelman
Fern Ngai
CEO
Community
Business
Pamela Ambler
Producer &
Presenter
Reuters TV
3. Informed Public
‣ 8 years in 20+ markets
‣ Represents 15% of total global population
‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries
Must meet 4 criteria:
‣ Ages 25-64
‣ College educated
‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country
‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news
General Online Population
‣ 5 years in 25+ markets
‣ Ages 18+
‣ 1,150 respondents per country
Methodology
28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000). Country-
specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500),
Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100).
‣ 16 years of data
‣ 33,000+ respondents total
‣ All fieldwork was conducted between
October 13th and November 16th, 2015
Online Survey in 28 Countries
Mass Population
‣ All population not including Informed Public
‣ Represents 85% of total global population
3
4. 49 Ireland
47 Turkey
46 Sweden
42 Poland
42 Russia
41 Japan
49 Australia
49 Italy
49 U.S.
47 Hong Kong
46 Spain
45 S. Africa
42 Germany
42 S. Korea
42 U.K.
41 France
41 Ireland
41 Turkey
39 Russia
38 Japan
37 Sweden
35 Poland
73 China
66 UAE
65 India
64 Singapore
62 Indonesia
60 Mexico
82 China
78 India
74 UAE
72 Mexico
72 Singapore
70 Indonesia
64 U.S.
63 Australia
63 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Colombia
56 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
51 Argentina
51 Malaysia
50 Brazil58 Brazil
58 Italy
58 Malaysia
57 U.K.
55 France
54 S. Africa
53 Argentina
53 Spain
52 Hong Kong
51 Germany
50 S. Korea
Average Trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs.
General Population, 2016
Nearly 6 in 10
countries are
distrusters among the
General Population
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s Trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
28-country global total.
Informed
Public
General
Population
60 Global 50 Global
4
Trusters
Neutrals
Distrusters
Trust Index
5. 51
48
45
41
55 53
47
42
63
57
51
48
67 63
57
51
Globally, trust rising
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you Trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public and General Population, 27-country global total.
5
Percent Trust in the four institutions of
government, business, media and NGOs, 2015 vs. 2016
NGOs Business Media Government
+4 +6 +6 +3
Informed
Public
General
Population
2015 2016
+4 +5 +2 +1
6. Institutions
NGOs
Media
Government
Business
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you Trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public and General Population, Hong Kong.
6
Percent Trust in the four institutions of
government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 vs. 2016
Trust in Hong Kong fails to recover
61
63 64
57 57
54
55 55
50
47
42
43
41
38
39
55
53
42
44
45
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
General
Population
7. Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you Trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public and General Population, Hong Kong, Singapore and UAE.
7
Percent Trust in business, 2012 vs. 2016
Business trust in Hong Kong falling behind
General
Population
55
53
42
44
45
59
60 60
57
60
54
63
62
65
67
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Business
Hong Kong
Singapore
United Arab Emirates
8. Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you Trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public and General Population, Hong Kong, Singapore and UAE.
8
Percent trust in government, 2012 vs. 2016
And trust in government also behind
General
Population
55
53
42
44 45
71
72 73
68
74
69
75
78
83
80
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Government
Hong Kong
Singapore
United Arab Emirates
9. 9
Skepticism across the generations
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you Trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Age
breakdown (18-34, 35-54, 55+), General Population, Hong Kong.
Percent trust per age group in the four institutions of
government, business, media and NGOs
Business MediaNGOs Government
60%
35%
45%
35%
55%
39%
49%
44%
58%
45% 47%
59%
General
Population
35 - 54
18 - 34
55 +
10. 50%
55
46
19 21
28
48
41
45
42
47
44
57
46
50
46
63
52
49
58 55 55
51
69
62 64
73 73
79 81
87
47
37
15
20
24
31 31 33 33 34 34
36 36 37
39
45 46 47 49 49 49
57
64 64 65
69 70
74
81 83
Global
GDP5
Japan
France
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Italy
S.Korea
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
HongKong
Canada
Russia
U.S.
Singapore
Turkey
Ireland
S.Africa
Spain
Malaysia
Mexico
Argentina
Brazil
China
UAE
Indonesia
Colombia
India
In 19 of 28 countries, less than half of Mass Population
think they will be better off in five years
Mass population less optimistic
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q445. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing
in five years' time? (Top 2 Box, ‘Much better off than today,’ and ‘Somewhat better off than today.’) Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
10
Percent of the Informed Public vs. Mass Population who
believe they and their families will be better off in five years’ time Informed
Public
Mass
Population
17 10 12 13 10 21 10 13 18 6 3
12. 12
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
Trust declines in all sectors
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you Trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Hong Kong.
*From 2012-2014, Pharma included as subsector(Q61f-65f).
**From 2012-2015, Pharma included as an industry sector (Q43-60). 2012-2014 data recalibrated as a sector.
Trust in each industry sector, 2012 - 2016
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
5 yr.
Trend
Technology 78% 76% 79% 75% 69% 9
Food & Beverage 68% 69% 70% 64% 59% 9
Energy 68% 69% 68% 62% 59% 9
Automotive 66% 70% 74% 69% 58% 8
Telecommunications 64% 69% 69% 64% 58% 6
Consumer Packaged Goods 65% 68% 68% 62% 56% 9
Pharmaceutical 67% 69% 69% 66% 55% 12
Financial Services 57% 59% 62% 61% 54% 3
General
Population
13. 13
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
Trust compared
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you Trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Technology and Financial Services sector only, General Population, Hong Kong, Singapore
and UAE.
Trust in technology and financial services sectors, 2012 - 2016
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
General
Population
Technology Financial Services
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
UAE
Singapore
Hong Kong
14. 14
Business must lead to solve problems
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General
Population, Hong Kong, question asked of half the sample.
62% agree
“A company can take
specific actions that both
increase profits and
improve the economic
and social conditions in
the community where it
operates.”
General
Population
15. 15
Access to education/training
Address income inequality
Access to healthcare
Protecting/improving the environment
Reducing poverty
Supporting human & civil rights
Modern infrastructure
E
E
P
H
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q561-573 Thinking about businesses in your country, how important is it that they play a role in solving each of the following societal issues?
Please use a nine-point scale where one means that it is “not at all important” and nine means that it is “extremely important”. (Top 4 Box, Importance) General Population, 28-country
global total, question asked of one quarter the sample.
Societal
expectations
vary
Most important issue for
business to address in
each country
Canada
Brazil
Germany
France
China
U.S.
Poland
Argentina
Sweden
Mexico
U.K.
Ireland
Netherlands
Turkey
Singapore
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Colombia
Japan
Australia
Russia
S. Korea
Italy
Spain
Indonesia
UAE
S. Africa
India
General
Population
R
I
I
E
E
R
H
E
E
E
E
E
P
P
E
H
P
E
H
H
H
E
E
E
E
E
P
I
H
E
I
E
16.
17. 17
Importance Performance Gap
Integrity 37% 18% 19
Engagement 36% 18% 18
Products 32% 18% 14
Purpose 27% 16% 11
Operations 22% 15% 7
Trust-building attributes for business
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust
Barometer Q80-95 How important is
each of the following attributes to
building your TRUST in a company?
Use a 9-point scale where one means
that attribute is “not at all important to
building your Trust” and nine means it
is “extremely important to building
your Trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box,
Importance) Q114-129 Please rate
businesses in general on how well
you think they are performing on each
of the following attributes. Use a 9-
point scale where one means they are
"performing extremely poorly" and
nine means they are "performing
extremely well". (Top 2 Box,
Performance) General Population,
Hong Kong.
Company importance vs. business performance
General
Population
Has Ethical Business Practices 39% 18% 21
Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 37% 18% 19
Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 36% 17% 19
Treats Employees Well 39% 19% 20
Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 36% 18% 18
Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 36% 17% 19
Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 34% 18% 16
Offers High Quality Products Or Services 42% 20% 22
Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 23% 17% 6
Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 31% 17% 14
Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 24% 16% 8
Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 28% 18% 10
Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 26% 15% 11
Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 20% 14% 6
Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 21% 14% 7
Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 24% 17% 7
18. 18
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust
Barometer Q80-95 How
important is each of the following
attributes to building your
TRUST in a company? Use a 9-
point scale where one means
that attribute is “not at all
important to building your Trust”
and nine means it is “extremely
important to building your Trust”
in a company. (Top 2 Box,
Importance) Q114-129 Please
rate businesses in general on
how well you think they are
performing on each of the
following attributes. Use a 9-
point scale where one means
they are "performing extremely
poorly" and nine means they are
"performing extremely well". (Top
2 Box, Performance) General
Population, Asia Pacific.
APAC trust
priorities
aligning
Most important attributes
for business to build
Trust in Asia Pacific
countries
General
Population
17
22. 22
Leader focus misplaced
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q451-461. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? [‘CEOs do too much lobbying,’ ‘Given that the
average tenure of CEOs is just 4 years, CEOs aren’t in their role long enough to make a positive impact,’ (Top 4 Box, Agree) ‘CEOs are too focused on short-term financial results,’ ‘CEOs can
be Trust to create jobs’ ] (Bot 5 Box, Do not agree) General Population, Hong Kong.
Percent who agree with each statement about CEOs
General
Population
Focus on short-term
financial results
Lobbying
Too Much
59%
48%
Positive
long-term impact
Job creation
Not Enough
50%
54%
23. 23
Purpose and profits matter
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q496-506. How visible do you think a CEO should personally be in these different types of business situations? Please
use a 9-point scale where one means that it is “not visible at all” and nine means that it is “extremely visible”. (Top 4 Box, Visible) General Population, Hong Kong,
question asked of half the sample.
Percent who agree that CEOs should be personally visible in discussing…
56%
Societal
Issues
‣ Income inequality
‣ Public policy discussions
‣ Personal views on
societal issues
54%
Financial
Results
General
Population
24. 24
Lack of purpose impacts trust
Percent who cite each as a reason for why their trust in business has decreased
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q328-329. For which of the following reasons, if any, has your Trust in each institution listed below increased over the past year? Q330-331. For which
of the following reasons, if any, has your Trust in each institution listed below decreased over the past year? General Population, Hong Kong.
Reasons trust in business has decreased
General
Population
40%
43%
62%Fails to contribute to the greater good
Provides few public services
Does not help me and my family live a fulfilling life
26. 26
Desired leadership qualities
Characteristics that make a CEO trustworthy, percent who
selected each as one of the top 5, Hong Kong vs. APAC
General
Population
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q515. Which of the following personal characteristics make a CEO Trustworthy? Please select the 5 most important
characteristics that make a CEO Trustworthy. General Population, Hong Kong and Asia Pacific.
25%
17%
31%
26%
35%
28%
31%
36%
44%
46%
Visionary
Competent
Decisive
Authentic
Experienced
Asia Pacific
Hong Kong
27. 27
60%
68%
72%75%
Their education and
how it shaped them
Their personal
success story
The obstacles
they have overcome
Their personal values
Personal values and history matter
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q507-514. Thinking about how a CEO communicates with a variety of groups and individuals, how important are each of the following activities a CEO could engage in?
Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your Trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your Trust”. (Top 4 Box, Important) General Population,
28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. [Media Engagement net = Q507 ‘Interviews with the media,’ and ‘Q512 ‘Sharing their views on a blog or on social media.’ Direct Engagement net = Q508
‘Communications with employees,’ and ‘Participation in industry conferences.’] Q516-524. For you to Trust a CEO, how important is it that you have information on each of the following aspects of the CEO’s
personal life outside of their business? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your Trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your Trust. (Top 4
Box, Important) General Population, Hong Kong, question asked of half the sample.
Percent who agree that each type of information
is important in building Trust in a CEO
General
Population
29. 29
50%
65
60
40
48 48 50
54 55 56
57 58 59 60 62 62 63 64 64 64
72 73 76 76 77 77 78 79
83 85
89
Global
GDP5
Japan
Russia
France
Sweden
Australia
S.Korea
Poland
UK
Italy
HongKong
Ireland
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Turkey
Canada
U.S.
S.Africa
Singapore
Malaysia
UAE
Indonesia
Brazil
Argentina
China
India
Colombia
Mexico
Significant employee lack of trust
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q525-526. Thinking about your own company and other companies in your industry, please indicate how much you Trust
each to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not Trust them at all” and nine means that you “Trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box,
Trust) General Population, 28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
Percent who trust the company for which they work
TrustedDistrusted
7 in 10 Agree
employees are credible
spokespeople
General
Population
30. 30
Company NOT
engaged in
societal issues
Company
engaged in
societal issues
Companies with CEOs addressing
societal issues do better
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q527-529. Does your company and your company’s CEO get involved in addressing broader societal issues beyond the
core business, through programs or relationships with other companies? Thinking about your current company, please indicate how much you agree with each of
the following statements using a 9-point scale where one means that you “strongly disagree” and nine means that you “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General
Population, Hong Kong, question asked of half the sample.
General
Population
Impact of
Company
Engagement
19
30
21
20
34
26
2276
79
79
79
81
81
89Do the best possible job for the customer
Recommend products and services to others
Committed to achieving our strategy
Motivated to perform
Confidence in the future of the company
Stay working for the company
Recommend company as an employer
54
53
45
59
60
51
70
32. 32
76
67
71
56
55
59
60 60 60
53
59
56
57
51
43
47 47
50
51
41
46
45
47
44
35
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Transformed media landscape
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you Trust each type of source for general
news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not Trust it at all” and nine means that you “Trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box,
Trust) General Population, Hong Kong, question asked of half the sample.
Trust in each source for general news and information
*From 2012-2015, we included Online Search Engines as a media type. In 2016, we changed to Search Engines.
**From 2012-2015, we included Hybrid as a media type. In 2016, we changed this over to Online-Only.
Owned media
Globally, owned
media is 46% and
rising (+3 points)
year on year for 2
years, surpassing
social media.
General
Population
Media type
Traditional Media
Search Engines*
Online-only Media**
Social media
Owned media
33. 55
60 60
57
45
43 42
40
44
64
60
58 58
49
46
41 40
38
Peers, experts more credible than leaders
Source: 2016 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-587. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Hong Kong, question asked of half the sample.
33
Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible
2015 2016
+3+9
Technical
Expert
Academic
Expert
A person
like
yourself
Financial
Industry
Analyst
CEONGO
representative
Board of
Directors
Government
official/regul
ator
A person like yourself
credibility
increased the most
General
Population
Employee
most trusted
content creators:#1
Friends and
Family
35. 35
Influence
The inversion of
influence
Influence
& Authority
Authority
Old Model
‣ Informed public have
access
to more/better
information
‣ Top-down influence
through a set number of
channels
New Reality
‣ Peer-to-peer influence
more powerful than top-
down
‣ Increasing lack of trust
among population,
characterized by
significantly lower
optimism about the
future
The Gap
‣ Democratization of
information access
‣ Discrepancy in
communications leaders
who haven’t adapted to
this new reality
36. 36
Embracing the new reality
of influence to
address the trust gap
‣ Create societal impact in addition to profits
through purposeful action
‣ Express your values through ethical
engagement in which you share your story
‣ Ignite your most powerful advocate, your
employees
‣ Engage cross channel to meet stakeholders,
where they are, about what most
interests/concerns them
Actions
Values
Employee
Advocacy
Engagement
Influence
AuthorityLeadership
TRUST
37. 37
60
41
39
32
30
20
51
47
18
22
24
27
Trust matters
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies
that you Trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Hong Kong, question asked of half the sample. Q377-380. Still thinking about the past
12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you do not Trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population,
Hong Kong, question asked of half the sample.
Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust
Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies
Refused to buy products/services
Criticized Companies
Shared Negative Opinions
Disagreed with others
Paid More than
wanted
Sold Shares
Chose to buy products/services
Recommended them to a friend/colleague
Shared Positive Opinions Online
Defended Company
Paid More
Bought Shares
most trusted
content creators:#1
Friends and
Family
General
Population
40. 40
Introducing our panelists
Keith Thomas
CEO, Asia Pacific
Zurich Insurance
Group
Bob Grove
CEO, North Asia
Edelman
Fern Ngai
CEO
Community
Business
Pamela Ambler
Producer &
Presenter
Reuters TV
This is our largest study ever. In total, we surveyed more than 33,000 respondents around the world
This year, we added Colombia to the survey, going from 27 to 28 countries
We survey 1,000 general online population respondents per market who are representative of the online population in each market
As in previous years, we oversample for Informed Publics, which must meet 4 criteria: age, college-educated or higher, top income earners, and they over-index on media consumption
New this year: For the first time we analyzed the differences between the Informed Public, which make up 15% of the total sample, and the remaining 85% of the general population, which we call Mass Population in the report.
Overall in Asia, we have a certain number of countries up in the Truster category, for example China, India, Singapore, Indonesia.
However, we see an the number of markets in the Distruster zone increase among General Populat
When we look at the overall global numbers, among informed publics and general population, we see Trust is rising across all four institutions.
This is the highest level of Trust we’ve seen since the 2008 global financial crisis.
Event business I back on the heals of NGO, suggesting maybe that NGOs are not alone anymore in their ability to solve the world’s problems.
But it’s not all good news, in Hong Kong, we have got a flat lining Trust situation. Over the last 3 years, we have seen Trust decline in turn in government, business than media. This hasn’t changed this year.
The general sentiment for HK still is that there is a failure to recover and uncertainty about the future, though we do notice a smidge of optimism in the more informed public because they overall feel better looked after.
This sentiment echoes itself again when you look at it split by generations.
In business and government, the younger you are, the more skeptical you are. But this isn’t necessarily true along all institutions, since NGOs and media are on part of this trend.
In fact, if you look at it again through another perspective of mass population vs informed public, there is a big gap in between how optimistic informed public feels about the future. This says that the rich are getting richer, and they feel ok while the rest of the population doesn’t, and we see those same traits appear in 70% of markets that we surveyed.
HK is amongst the top 10 countries globally with the highest gap, and shows the highest disparity in Asia.
When we look at emerging markets in the world (India, Indonesia, UAE, Brazil), gaps are smaller because there is general optimism about the future.
We’ve looked at the big picture of Trust globally, now let’s narrow into business, where Trust is influenced by 4 factors:
Industry sector
Type of business
Country of origin
Leadership
I’ll touch on 3 of them that cannot be altered , and then Adrian will provide you a deep dive into leadership.
First of all, let’s look at industry sectors. While Trust in business has flat lined, Trust in all core sectors have declined.
If we look at the biggest drops year on year:
Automotive (-11): fairly obvious with emissions scandal very prominent worldwide last September
Technology (-6): remains the most Trusted industry but gap has decreased with several recent news, such as data security breach, NFC credit card issues locally last October, and the world publicized Ashley Madison data security hack last July.
Pharmaceutical (-11): sees the biggest drop, which has been significant over the last 2 years.
Globally, the Trust is steady, China has even increased
One explanation of this drop could be the widely publicized 5,000% increase of price AIDS and cancer drug by Turing Pharma in the US.
Locally, we have seen a higher profiling in media of medical blunders.
First of all, let’s look at industry sectors. While Trust in business has flat lined, Trust in all core sectors have declined.
If we look at the biggest drops year on year:
Automotive (-11): fairly obvious with emissions scandal very prominent worldwide last September
Technology (-6): remains the most Trusted industry but gap has decreased with several recent news, such as data security breach, NFC credit card issues locally last October, and the world publicized Ashley Madison data security hack last July.
Pharmaceutical (-11): sees the biggest drop, which has been significant over the last 2 years.
Globally, the Trust is steady, China has even increased
One explanation of this drop could be the widely publicized 5,000% increase of price AIDS and cancer drug by Turing Pharma in the US.
Locally, we have seen a higher profiling in media of medical blunders.
We’ve looked what Trust in Business consists of. Now let’s look at what’s expected of businesses in today’s world.
In HK, a pure focus on profit is not enough, 64% of respondents agree that improving economic and social conditions in the community where it operates is essential.
Today, business is expected to play a role in solving a broad range of societal issues. Here we show the top most important issue in which business is expected to play a role in each country. In Hong Kong, the most business should be focusing on is access to education and training as well as healthcare. Hong Kong shares several countries concerns for education, but globally, the other countries in the region and abroad, Environment is key.
Now we’re going to look at a list Trust-Building Attributes for Business which are separated into 5 categories:
Integrity
Engagement
Products
Purpose
Operations
As you can see, we survey the importance of the attribute, as well as how people feel a company is performing in each attribute.
The gap between the two is the one companies must fill to catch-up, and the biggest one is integrity, engagement and product quality. These indicators always come higher in China/HK then rest of the world.
As usual, it’s not a one size fits all solution – and the answer vary per market across the region. Although what we are seeing is that ethics and treatment of employees as well as listening to customers are the 3 most prevalent of Trust across most of the region.
I’ve just shown you the drivers of Trust and expectations in business, and what can be done about that. The other determinant is leadership. Considering the 3 (industry, type, country of origin) invariables, let’s look at the only one you can change, leadership. What are the things a leader can address in order to close that gap between performance and expectations we’ve just seen.
The research shows that, while share holders may evaluate you based on your balance sheet, your broader stakeholders and the population at large shape their opinions and decide whether they Trust you through four lenses: your actions, your perceived values, how you treat your employees—and what they say about you, and how you engage with the community. All four are essential to informing Trust, and we will look at each in turn.
First: actions speak louder than words, and how you behave is far more important than your press release.
But when we asked people to tell us their views on business leaders today, they are not necessarily seeing the actions they want to see. They believe that CEOs are too focused on short-term results, not enough on driving long-term impact. Too much lobbying; not enough job creation.
But their expectations are not unrealistic. Of course they expect CEOs to be talking about finances. And I’m sure 100% of you have a client CEO out there on financial results. But how many of you have a client CEO front and center on making sure purpose is a part of the company’s strategy?
People want to hear what CEOs have to say about societal issues; to take a stand on issues such as income inequality, public policy and their personal views on societal issues.
And purpose matters because it has a direct impact on Trust. When asked for their most important reasons why Trust in business has decreased, a failure to contribute to greater good is at the top of the list at 62%.
A big part of that is about the visible actions you take but also demonstrating why that’s important to you as a leader.
As important as what you do is WHY you do it. What are your values?
Who you are, how you lead and what you stand for -- for leaders.
What are the personal characteristics that make a CEO Trustworthy? In Hong Kong, we are a very practical market, where visionary and competent rank first.
The characteristics ranked lowest are:
From a good background (3%)
Self-sacrificing (6%)
Charismatic (7%)
And they want to know about the personal values and obstacles overcome of those in authority: how did they earn the opportunity to lead? What were the obstacles they overcame, their personal success story and how did it shape them?
Personal values and history matter to people. In HK and globally, we see a very high importance in the need to hear about leader’s history and background.
Third, in a world where peer influence is paramount, your employees are the gateway to connecting authentically and earning the Trust of the broader population.
Why does it matter? Employees are more Trusted spokespeople for their companies than the CEOs are. When you don’t convince the people that work for you to Trust your company you are wasting one of your largest and best assets. Either you can turn your employees into brand advocates or you can ignore this data and leave them as a liability for your business.
We’ve looked at companies who were not engaged in societal issues and how much engagement / advocacy their employees have for the company on several criteria.
For each of these, the figure jumps tremendously by 20 to 30 points if the company is engaged in societal issues.
Hence the data reveals a very important finding: employees of companies which are engaged in societal issues are markedly more committed to their company on many levels.
The connection between purpose, employee loyalty and advocacy is clear – and will drive far broader engagement across the broader population.
And engagement is the fourth element to bridging the Trust divide. For engagement, let’s look at the type of channels to use, and how to embody them in the best way we can.
The media landscape is changing dramatically and appearing more fractured. Trust is declining in media generally, though is up for social media among millenials. Today, it is no longer enough to rely on traditional media for your message to be heard: you have to be everywhere.
Hong Kong figures are generally low compared to the rest of world, but of particular note, we see a significant divide in owned media which is globally 11 points higher and rising, while HK is declining (-9). HK company websites have not been keeping with the rest of the world in terms of owned content and it shows.
Now if we look at the most credible spokesperson, we see that a person like yourself continues to increase dramatically, which goes in par with additional data showing us that the #1 most Trusted content creator for online / social media channels, is a friend or family.
CEOs still have ground to make up. Trust in them went up 3 points, but they still fall into the distrusted category.
What does all of this mean for companies?
Because as we have seen, the old world no longer works. We are now operating in a new reality characterized by peer-to peer influence, a reality where there is a divide between influence and authority divide.
In the old model, those with authority had better access to information. There was a general sense that the interest of the elites were aligned with those of the masses, and that the opportunity to gain authority and influence was open to all who were willing to work hard.
Today, however, that reality has changed. Peer influence is more powerful than top-down influence, and there is an increasing distrust among the mass population characterized by a lock of optimism in the future.
This has led to a significant divide between authority and influence, and in which the traditional forms of “talk at” marketing no longer work.
This year’s Trust Barometer introduces a new model of influence, one that is designed to build Trust and, through that Trust, to bridge the divide between those with influence and those with authority.
Through these four Trust-building elements—how you behave, your values, your level of employee advocacy, your model of engagement—those with authority have the opportunity to lead—and to earn the influence of the broader set of stakeholders.
It means that Trust matters tremendously. It matters for sale of product. It matters for recruiting. And, at a time when peers are so influential and everyone goes online to research products and services, it matters for your reputation.