Intro to Quality enhancement in eL Luleå Technical University

1. KVALITETSUTVECKLING
Arbetsterapeutprogrammet LTU 2014

2. 2
Ebba Ossiannilsson
Lunds universitet
Fil Dr. Projektledare
E-learning expert
Certifierad e-l quality
Reviewer
Forskningsledare ICDE
International Quality
Standard Study
Utvärderare SEQUENT
EDEN Fellow2014

3. Ebba Ossiannilsson, PhD Lund University, SE

4. Ossiannilsson (2012)
Benchmarking (e)-learning in higher education, Doctoral
dissertation, Oulu University, Finland
Ossiannilsson LTU2014
Rhizome

5. Ossiannilsson E & Landgren L (2011). Essential areas that benchmarking e-learning ought to
cover. Reprinted with permission from Wiley-Blackwell.
Ossiannilsson LTU2014

7. EC Recommendationer för högre utbildning
Opening up Education
review their organisational strategies
exploit the potential of Massive Open Online Courses
(MOOCs)
stimulate innovative learning practices such as blended
learning
equip teachers with high digital competences
equip learners with digital skills
think about how to validate and recognise learner’s
achievements in online education
make high quality Open Education Resources (OER) visible
and accessible
Ossiannilsson 2014

8. " Vi måste engarera oss fundamentalt i transformationen av
våra utbildningssystem
…och vi måste till fullo exploatera potentialerna som öppen och
flexibel utbildning erbjuder”
(Commissionaire Vassilio EADTU 130925)
Ossiannilsson 2014

9. Retrospektivt eller prospektivt?
• From control to
enhancement
• Self-evaluation
• Peer review
• Benchmarking
• Certification
• Accreditation
• Quality assurance
CC BY-NC Some rights reserved by Shira Golding
Ossiannilsson, E (2012) Benchmarking e-learning in higher education: lessons learned from
international projects. Oulu University, Finland

12. Lärande design
Ossiannilsson LTU2014

13. The Networked Teacher – my PLN
Ossiannilsson 2014
Social
Wikis media
Blogs
Work me Friends
Twitter
(# and
people)
Conferences/P
D meetings
Twitter
chats
Websites &
media

15. Benchmarking
“The locus of benchmarking lies between
the current and desirable states of affairs
and contributes to the transformation
process that realizes these improvements.”
Moriarty & Smallman (2009)
En route to a theory on
benchmarking

16. Benchmarking benefits and values
• Self assess institutions
• Better understand the
process
• Measure and compare
• Discover new ideas
• Obtain data to support
decision making
• Targets for improvements
• Strengthen identity,
strategy, implementation
• Enhance reputation
• Respond to national
indicators
• New standard for the
sector
Van Vught, F. (2008)
A practical guide. Benchmarking in European Higher Education

17. New benefits identified, old ones confirmed
Ossiannilsson 2012
• Attitudes
• Collaboration
• Committment
• Cultural issues
• Internal dialogue
• Internal processes
• Involvement
• Management
• Critical reflections
• Teambuilding
• Transparency
• Trust
Ossiannilsson LTU2014
KVALITETSKULTUR
Benchlearning

18. The benchmarking process
What to
benchmark
Benchmarking
team
Benchmarking
partners
Analyse
Take action
benchmarking
information
Ossiannilsson 2011. Reprinted with permission from SCIRP
Ossiannilsson LTU2014

19. 19
Ossiannilsson 2012
Ossiannilsson LTU2014

20. 20

21. 1. Strategic Management
1. The institution has an e-learning strategy that is widely understood and integrated into the
overall strategies for institutional development and quality improvement. E-learning policies
conform to legal and ethical frameworks.
Your answer: Not adequate in majority of aspects
It is recommended that institutions have a strategic plan that forms the uppermost tier in a
planning hierarchy. The plan should encompass a vision for the use and development of e-learning
within the institution.
The e-learning strategy of the institution should include:
Prioritisation of e-learning by the institution within its teaching and learning strategy
Measures to assess the impact of e-learning (on teaching and learning, administration procedures,
student data and so on)
Mechanisms to ensure that e-learning meets legal and ethical requirements (e.g. copyright, data
protection, privacy)
A low score against this benchmark may indicate that the institution’s approach to e-learning is not
integrated within its overall planning processes. Action may be required by institutional leaders to
address the issue.
21
Ossiannilsson LTU2014

22. Metod
1. Självvärdering
2. Intervjuer och seminarier
6 grupper är identifierade
3. Återkoppling
4. Full assessment
5. Roadmap
6. Ev workshop
22
Ossiannilsson LTU2014

23. Kostnader
Internt LTU
Externt E Ossiannilsson
Resurser internt
Ev kostnad för
EADTU Full assessment
Översättning / språkgranskning
Publicering
Oförutsedda utgifter

24. Tid och resurser
Initiering vt 2014
Projektet sept-dec 2014
v 40 intensiv vecka med
fokusgrupper+ student vecka
(dagar)
Bearbetning och rapport
Återkoppling
Förberedelse för Full
assessment
Slutrapport och seminarium
Full assessment 2015

25. Läser på distans från Skottland
Klara Tjäder kommer ifrån Stockholm, bor i Edinburgh, Skottland, och pluggar arbetsterapeut på
distans vid Luleå tekniska universitet.
Ossiannilsson_LTU 2014

26. Caring is sharing, sharing is caring
• Footprints
• W:www.lu.se/ced
• E:Ebba.Ossiannilsson@ced.lu.se
• FB:Ebba Ossiannilsson
• T:@EbbaOssian
• Phone: +4670995448
• S:http://www.slideshare.net/
EbbaOssiann
LinkedIn: Ebba Ossiannilsson
Ossiannilsson LTU2014 Presentationen är med CC BY SA, En del bilder kan ha annan licenciering