Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
X2RAIL2 and other S2R projects
1. X2RAIL-2 and other S2R Projects
18 – 19 March 2019, Vienna
PALAIS WERTHEIM / SPACE FOR INNOVATION IN RAIL
Salvatore Sabina (salvatore.sabina@ansaldo-sts.com)
2. While some activities among competitors are both legal and beneficial to the industry, group activities of competitors are inherently suspect under the antitrust/ competition laws of the countries in which our companies do
business. Agreements between or among competitors need not be formal to raise questions under antitrust laws. They may include any kind of understanding, formal or informal, secretive or public, under which
each of the participants can reasonably expect that another will follow a particular course of action or conduct. Each of the participants in this initiative is responsible for seeing that topics which may give an
appearance of an agreement that would violate the antitrust laws are not discussed. It is the responsibility of each participant in the first instance to avoid raising improper subjects for discussion, notably such as
those identifiedbelow.
It is the sole purpose of any meeting of this initiative to provide a forum for expression of various points of view on topics (i) that are strictly related to the purpose or the execution of the initiative, (ii) that need to be
discussed among the participants of the initiative, (iii) that are duly mentioned in the agenda of this meeting and (iv) that are extensively described in the minutes of the meeting. Participants are strongly
encouraged to adhere to the agenda. Under no circumstances shall this meeting be used as a means for competing companies to reach any understanding, expressed or implied, which restricts or tends to restrict
competition, or in any way impairs or tends to impair the ability of members to exercise independent business judgment regarding matters affecting competition.
As a general rule, participants may not exchange any information about any business secret of their respective companies. In particular, participants must avoid any agreement or exchange of information on topics on the
following non-exhaustive list:
Prices, including calculation methodologies, surcharges, fees, rebates, conditions, freight rates, marketing terms, and pricing policies in general;
any kind of market allocation, such as the allocation of territories, routes, product markets, customers, suppliers, and tenders;
production planning; marketing or investment plans; capacities; levels of production or sales; customer base; customer relationships; margins; costs in general; product development; specific R&D projects;
standards setting (when its purpose is to limit the availability and selection of products, limit competition, restrict entry into an industry, inhibit innovation or inhibit the ability of competitors to compete);
codes of ethics administered in a way that could inhibit or restrict competition;
group boycotts; validity of patents; ongoing litigations.
2
Antitrust Statement
3. Some Market Needs
Market
Needs
(All transport
part of a
modes
Single
become
Unified
Integrated Transport System)
Single Shared Transport
System
(Reduction of fixed Infrastructure Costs, Shift from Fixed to Variable Costs)
Cost Effective Solution, More
Attractive for Users
Safety and Performance
Improvement
3
(Safe Solutions, higher
capacity, higher availability,
better punctuality, ...)
4. S2R-TD2.4: Objectives vs. Market Needs
TD 2.4 Fail-
Safe Train
Positioning
Introduction of new Technology
Capabilities by “Combination of
Innovative Technologies”
(Location and Train Position principles
preserved; Use of the Virtual Balise concept;
Detection of Virtual Balises by means of a
combined use of GNSS, IMU, Radio Localization,
Digital Map, Odometry; Localization info to
other CCS components in other coordinates;
Cybersecurity)
Moving Signaling Intelligence
from Trackside to On-Board
Migration Strategy
(Technical, Operational and Regulatory Aspects;
Categories of Trains vs. Categories of
Infrastructure Capabilities)
THR Apportionment for
avoiding over specification
faults
(SIL 4 only when necessary)
4
5. S2R - TD2.4 Overview
Collaborations with GSA,
ESA, and ERA have been
foreseen.
AREA SCOPE
TD2.4: Fail-
Safe Train
Positioning
(including
satellite
technologies)
Development of a fail-safe, multi-sensor train positioning system by applying GNSS technology to the current
ERTMS/ETCS core and by using new technologies (e.g. Inertial Measurement Units, Radio Localization and Digital
Map) or of other on-board existing sensors (e.g. accelerometers, odometer sensors). This Fail-Safe Train Positioning
will be specified, developed and verified to guarantee the backward compatibility, compatibility, and
interoperability;
Definition of the System Requirement Specification and the System Architecture in the context of the ERTMS
evolutions;
Execution of System Hazard Analysis;
Identification of different possible technological solutions, develop proof of concepts based also on modeling and
simulators;
Identification of enhancements to the Railway V&V Processes to also include the new technologies and their
impacts at the level of interoperable constituents and Command & Control Subsystems;
Development of Technology Demonstrators to be verified both in Laboratory and on the Field;
Analysis of a Business Model for the application of the TD 2.4 solutions in Railway;
TD = Technology
Demonstrator
Adaptable
Communicati
onSystem
Automatic
Train
Operation
Moving
Block
Fail-SafeTrain
Positioning
Train Zero On- Formal
(Incl. Satellite)
Integrity site Testing Methods
Virtual
Coupling nt
Evolution
Manageme Connected
All-in-all
Wayside
Objects
TD2.1 TD2.2 TD2.3
Shift2Rail – Innovation Programme2
TD2.4 TD2.5 TD2.6 TD2.7 TD2.8 TD2.9
Traffic
TD2.10
Smart
Radio
TD2.1
1
Cyber
Security
5
6. S2R-TD2.4: Where do we stand?
6
Task 3.2 – General Specification
• Analysis of the State-of-Art radio localisation and GNSS technologies;
• Definition and delivery of the System Requirement Specifications (i.e. functional and non-functional
requirements) (Deliverable D3.1);
• Definition of the System Architecture. During the architectural design phase, a preliminary System Functional
Hazard Analysis was performed (Deliverable D3.2);
Task 3.3 – On site GNSS performance tests
• Data collection activities were planned and executed in the following locations: Sardinia, Italy; the Brno – Tisnov
line, Czech Republic; Stuttgart – Berlin, Germany
• The following measurements were collected:
Kinematic Sensor and IMU raw measurements, along with Ground Truth;
Further GNSS measurements for specific local effects analysis;
Radio localisation measurements;
Task 3.4 – Analysis of the results of the GNSS Performance test activities
• Analysis of recorded measurements (Deliverable D3.4).
• This deliverable also includes the description of the main properties of different GNSS performance analysis tools
(proprietary or open source).
7. S2R-TD2.4: The Backbone for Train Positioning Initiatives
CRs for next TSI and market
uptaking for the innovative
Train Positioning
Previous R&D Projects:
3InSat, ERSAT-EAV, NGTC, RHINOS, STARS
S2R OC Projects:
ASTRail and the new Gate4Rail
7
Other Projects such ESA STEMS, ESA CAPRESE, and GSA
ERSAT-GGC requested the Collaboration Agreements with
TD 2.4
8. Conclusions
8
• Upgrade of the Fail-Safe Train Positioning Specifications and the Functional
Architecture are expected by the middle of 2019 to include the results of other on-
going analysis;
• TD 2.4 is the framework where (a) the investigations of innovative technologies
are expected to be executed and (b) the results of other R&D initiatives have to be
harmonized;
• Three Technology Demonstrators have been planned since the TD 2.4 concept
phase; their implementations are schedule in 2021 and 2022.
9. X2Rail-2 Beneficiaries: ANSALDO STS S.p.A., Alstom Transport S.A. AZD Praha s.r.o, Bombardier Transportation Sweden
AB, CAF Signalling S.L., Asociación Centro Tecnológico Ceit-IK4, Deutsche Bahn AG, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und
Raumfahrt e.V.,SCHWEIZERISCHE BUNDESBAHNEN SBB AG, Hacon Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Indra Sistemas S.A., Mer
Mec SPA, Network Rail Infrastructure Limited, Nottingham Scientific LTD, Railenium, Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, SNCF
RESEAU, Thales Transportation Systems GmbH, Trafikverket