R. Gaafar - Lung cancer - Guidelines and clinical case presentation (2-3 cases)
Principles of pathology and microscopic analysis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma
1. Principles of pathology and microscopic. The paradigm of diffuse large B cell lymphoma Luca Mazzucchelli Istituto cantonale di patologia, Locarno ESO Course, Leukaemia and Lymphoma, Ascona, June 12-14, 2011
8. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma A Alizadeh AA et al.: Distinct type of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000, 403:503
9. Decision tree for classification of DLBCL based on immunohistochemistry CD10 MUM1 bcl6 GCB GCB Non-GCB Non-GCB + + + - - - Hans et al. Blood 2004
10.
11. Gene expression-based distinction of DLBCL in subgroups Gene expression-based distinction between GCB and ABC DLBCL carried a prognostic impact in the CHOP and R-CHOP treatment era Lenz G et al. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2313
12. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:5494 Concordance rate with GEP of 93% versus 86%
13. CHOP R-CHOP GEP New Algorithm Overall Srvival Overall Srvival Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:5494
14. Immunoblastic morphology but not the immunohistochemical GCB/non-GCB classifier predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the RICOVER-60 trial of the DSHNHL. G Ott et al. Blood 2010, prepublished online August 24 Extension of the study published in Heamatologica 2009; 15:5494 Immunoblastic lymphoma Immunoblastic lymphoma with plasmablastic features
15. G Ott et al. Blood 2010, prepublished online August 24
16. G Ott et al. Blood 2010, prepublished online August 24
17.
18.
19.
20.
21. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:3360 Univariate Kaplan-Maier analysis of overall survival in the MYC-R versus non rearranged patients
31. DLBCL BL Burkit-like lymphoma Atypical Burkitt lymphoma Gray-zone lymphoma B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable Borderline lymphoma Intermediate between DLBCL and BL (WHO 2008) This is a heterogeneous category that is not considered a distinct disease entity, but is useful in allowing the classification of cases not meeting criteria for classical BL or DLBCL
32. Adv Anat Pathol 2011, 18:219-228 Lymphoma MYC Rearrangement BL Present in >90% of cases; Primary genetic event. Translocations involve Ig partner genes only: 85% t(8;14), 15% t(2;8) or t(8;22). Not associated with “double hit” lymphoma DLBCL Present in 7-14% of de novo cases. Usually a secondary genetic event. Translocations involve IG (70%) and non-IG (30%) partner genes. Associated with “double hit” lymphoma BCLU Present in 35-50% of cases. Translocations rarely involve IGH as a partner gene. Translocations involve IGk , IG or non-IG partner genes. Associated with “double hit” lymphoma PBL Present in approximately 50% of cases. Translocations involve IG partner genes in the majority of cases, usually IGH . Not associated with “double hit” lymphoma
33. Proposed algorithm for highly aggressive lymphomas Cogliatti S et al. Br J Heamatol 2006; 134:294 (modified) Burkitt lymphoma MYC+ DLBCL Intermediate lymphoma Intermediate lymphoma