Comparison Complexities: The Challenges of Automating Cost-per-use Data Management
•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•
1 gefällt mir•409 views
Cornell University has had mixed results obtaining accurate cost-per use data for e-journals. In many cases, it is a simple feat of comparing the subscription cost to the COUNTER comliant usage data, but as we look deeper, and we continue to attempt to automate this process as much as possible, we uncover complexities that make this a considerable challenge. We will share our experiences and help attendees to better understand the complexities involved.
![Cost per Use Data ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie Comparison Complexities: The Challenges of Automating Cost-per-use Data Management
Ähnlich wie Comparison Complexities: The Challenges of Automating Cost-per-use Data Management (20)
Mehr von Electronic Resources & Libraries
Mehr von Electronic Resources & Libraries (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Comparison Complexities: The Challenges of Automating Cost-per-use Data Management
- 1. Comparison Complexities: The Challenges of Automating Cost-per-use Data Management Bill Kara – Head, Electronic Resources and Serials Management Jesse Koennecke – Electronic Resources Librarian
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Multiple platforms – did we pay once for several? Did we pay several times? Some are part of a package Although COUNTER compliant, YTD Total may not mean the same thing from pub to pub Journal Report 1a – Number of Successful Full-Text Article Requests from an Archive by Month and Journal Journal report 5 - Number of Successful Full-Text Article Requests by Year and Journal
- How are titles related in cost terms. Part of a package, combined titles, Ability to add/edit.