Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Openness and Quality – beyond User Generated Trash
1. Openness and Quality –
beyond User Generated Trash
Outcomes of the EFQUEL
Innovation Forum 2010
Walter F. Kugemann
2. Dream vs. Reality
OER OEP LGC UGC …
Great ideas,
do they work?
or
after bumping down onto reality
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
3. Am I a Quality OER?
- Certificates
- Branding
- „Social Assessment“
- Own Experiences
Do I contribute to Quality OEP?
- Cases / Stories
- Co-Actors
- Alumni
- Choice Monitoring
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
4. • Socrates c. 469 BC–399 BC (…) is an enigmatic
figure known chiefly through the accounts of later
classical writers, especially the writings of his
students Plato and Xenophon (…).
• Many would claim that Plato's dialogues are the
most comprehensive accounts of Socrates to
survive from antiquity.[2]
• Through his portrayal in Plato's dialogues, Socrates
has become renowned for his contribution to (…)
and it is this Platonic Socrates who also lends his
name to the concepts of Socratic irony and
the Socratic method, or elenchus. The latter
remains a commonly used tool in a wide range of
discussions, and is a type of pedagogy (…)
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
5. Plato
as a learner?
as a user?
as a co-learner?
as a co-user?
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
6. The Allegory of the Cave
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
7. OER OEP
LGC UGC UCDP
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
8. The Innovating Learning
Pyramide I
http://www.slideshare.net/
grainne/conole-eden-
budapest
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
13. EFQUEL Innovation Forum
„Our main goals are to make
things better. Knowledge is at
the heart of this process!“
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
Maria Helena André
Minister for Education and Social Solidarity,
Portugal
Speech at the EFQUEL Innovation Forum 2010
14.
15.
16. Research agendas should make room
for the issue of quality of open
educational practices (standards,
recommendations and
methodologies).
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
1.
17. EFQUEL should
- promote leadership by participatory
process to initiate, promote and sustain
open educational practices in
educational institutions.
- enrich existing European Institutions (EFQM
/ ENQA) for promotion and development
of evaluation as tool for quality of
education and training and
organisational development based on
research.
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
2.
18. Create a confidence culture to
share open educational
experiences, principles and
practices in networks and
communities with different
stakeholders (learners, teachers
and leaders).
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
3.
19. Establish a recognition
mechanism for the content
creation of students and
teachers e.g. by sharing
success stories on UGC
(potential role of EFQUEL).
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
4.
20. We need policies which ensure that
no social group is excluded (by
technological, economical,
cultural reasons), which promote
reusing of existing (learning)
resources, and which make open
educational practises attractive,
specifically for excluded groups.
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
5.
21. Stakeholders share open
pedagogic experiences,
principles and practices in
networks and in communities to
develop and adapt quality
standards, recommendations
and methodologies for open
educational practices.
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
6.
22. Smoothen and speed up
the process for research-
funding and
implementation.
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
7.
23. Promote a culture of assessment
in Europe by encouraging
research and user friendly self-
assessment methods and tools
for every sector of lifelong, life
wide, life relevant learning.
27.10.2010 | Budapest | Walter Kugemann
8.