Fast-track the end of AIDS in the EU - practical evidence-based interventions.
Presentation by: Jean-Michel Molina, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris
In a two-day meeting under the auspices of the Maltese Presidency of the Council of the European Union (30-31 January 2017), HIV experts from across the European Union discussed how to reverse this trend and how to prepare Europe to achieve the set target of ending AIDS by 2030.
Experience with the implementation of PrEP in France
1. Experience with the
Implementation of
PrEP in France
Jean-Michel Molina
Saint-Louis Hospital, University of Paris Diderot,
Inserm U941, Paris, France
Fast-track the end of AIDS in the EU
St Julians, Malta, January 2017
3. Reasons for PrEP Deferral in France
PrEP approved in 2012 by US FDA and recommended by US
CDC but:
•Uncertainty about real need
•Inconsistent efficacy across trials
•Questions regarding safety in healthy individuals
•Risk of selection of HIV resistance
•Impact on sexual behavior with reduction of condom use and
increase in STIs
•Issues of cost and cost-effectiveness
•Implementation challenges
4. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Year of Diagnosis
0
500
1000
1500
2500
2000
3000
43% MSM
23% Foreign Heterosexual women
15% Foreign Heterosexual men
9% French heterosexual men
7% French heterosexual women
2% UDI
6000 new HIV-infections in France in 2015
Public Health France, December 2016
Increase in Newly Diagnosed Infections
among MSM in France
5. 5
1. Adapted from Karim SS and Karim QA. Lancet 2011;378:e23–25; 2. Weller S and Davis K. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002:CD003255; 3. Smith DK et al. JAIDS 2015;68:337–344;
4. Baeten et al NEJM 2016; 5. van Damme L et al. NEJM 2012;367:411–422; 6. Marrazzo JM et al. NEJM 2014, Rees H, CROI 2015, Abs. 26LB
FEM-PrEP in women,5
VOICE (TDF/FTC, TDF vaginal gel), FACTS (TDF gel) in women6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Efficacy (%)
Studies
Reduction of HIV
Transmission
Non significant*
Condoms in heterosexuals2
80%
Partners PrEP in discordant couples1 75%
Condoms in US MSM3 70%
Bangkok PrEP in IDU 49%
TDF2 in men & women1
63%
Medical male circumcision1 54%
CAPRISA 004 (1% TDF vaginal gel) in women1 39%
iPrEx in MSM1 44%
Aspire / MTN 020 (Dapivirine ring)4 27%
Relative Efficacy of Prevention Strategies
6. Efficacy of Daily PrEP
in MSM in the UK
Group No. of
infections
Follow-
up (PY)
Incidence
(per 100 PY)
90% CI
Overall 23 465 5.0 3.5–6.9
Immediate 3 243 1.2 0.4–2.9
Deferred 20 222 9.0 6.1–12.8
Efficacy = 86% (90% CI: 64-96%)
P-value =0.0001
Number Needed to Treat =13 (90% CI: 9 – 23)
S. McCormack et al Lancet 2015
7. HIV Incidence (mITT Analysis)
97% relative reduction vs. placebo
Median Follow-up in Open-Label Phase 18.4 months (17.5-19.1)
Treatment
Follow-Up
Pts-years
HIV Incidence
per 100 Pts-years
(95% CI)
Placebo 212 6.60 (3.60-11.1)
TDF/FTC (double-blind) 219 0.91 (0.11-3.30)
TDF/FTC (open-label) 515 0.19 (0.01-1.08)
Molina et al AIDS 2016, July 20, Durban, South Africa
8. Lobbying for PrEP in France
• ANRS (leadership and communication)
• Community groups (AIDES and others)
• HIV specialists (clinicians, epidemiologists, virologists,
social sciences)
• ANSM (French Medicine Agency) group of experts
• National AIDS Council
• French group of experts
• International guidelines
• Media and social media
9. Temporary Recommendation for Use
(RTU) for Truvada for PrEP
• Specific French procedure to secure and regulate off-label
indication of a medicine for unmet medical needs
• ASM and Gilead set up an RTU to allow the use of
TDF/FTC for PrEP on January 4, 2016
• Adults (> 18 years) at high risk of sexual HIV acquisition
• Daily or On Demand PrEP (for MSM)
• Subject registration mandatory
– Data collected by physicians on a Gilead website
– PrEP initiation, HIV seroconversion, AEs, pregancy
– Data analyzed by Gilead and reported to ANSM every 3
months
– Prescription for 1 month then 3 months
10. Who is Eligible for the Truvada RTU
• MSM or transgender individuals with:
– Condomless anal sex with at least two different partners over the last 6
months
– Episodes of STIs (syphilis, chlamydiae, gonorrhea, HBV, HCV) over the last
12 months
– Multiple PEP treatments in the last 12 months
– Use of drugs during sexual intercourse (cocaine, GHB, MDMA, etc…)
• Other persons at high risk of HIV acquisition on a case by
case basis:
– Sex workers exposed to condomless sex
– Vulnerable persons exposed to condomless sex with people from a group
with a high prevalence of HIV
• Person from areas/countries of high HIV prevalence
• Person with multiple sexual partners
• IVDU
11. Places where PrEP can be Prescribed
and Delivered in France
• Hospitals (80%) HIV specialists
• STI clinics (21%)
• GP will be able renew prescriptions in 03/2017
• Drugs are delivered in hospital and private pharmacies.
13. Number of Subjects Registered per Region
Haute
Normandie
Basse
Normandie
Bretagne
Pays de
la Loire
Poitou-
Charentes
Aquitaine
Midi-Pyrénées
Languedoc-
Roussillon
Provence
Alpes Côte
d’Azur
Centre
Ile-de-
France
Bourgogne
Picardie
Nord
Pas-de-Calais
Champagn
e Ardenne
Lorraine
Alsace
Franche-
Comté
Rhône
AlpesAuvergne
Limousin
> 1000
> 50
> 1
> 300
14. Subjects Registered up to January 2017
Patients (Median, range) or (%) N= 2998
Age 37 (18-84)
French 88.9%
Men 97.8%
Women 0.7% (n=20)
Transgender 0.7% (n=19)
MSM 97.4%
Chemsex 19.9%
STIs in prior 12 months 30.6%
PEP in prior 12 months 10.9%
PrEP on demand 59%
2 HIV seroconversion with 1100 person-years of FU:
HIV Incidence of 0.17/100 PY
15. Lessons Learned in France
Close partnership with the community and has led to PrEP
approval
Increase PrEP awareness among doctors and people at risk
(MSM, transgender, and heterosexual migrants)
Adapt available resources and provide comprehensive sexual
health care
Define best models of care and access points (hospitals,
sexual health clinics, GP)
Monitor and evaluate PrEP implementation
High risk people self-select for PrEP: HIV-infection detected at
screening or soon after PrEP initiation
Demonstrate the public health benefit of PrEP implementation:
ANRS « PREVENIR » project
17. Acknowledgments
• Europe should get PrEPared for the PrEP
revolution
• PrEP is an additional tool to prevent HIV-
infection, and people at risk of HIV-
acquisition should have access to PrEP
• PrEP is a unique opportunity to change the
course of the HIV epidemic
• Europe should unite make PrEP available
at an affordable price
Summary
Hinweis der Redaktion
86% reduction is greater than seen in placebo-controlled HIV prevention trials.
The 90% confidence interval gives us 95% confidence around the lower bound of 58% reduction. The 95% lower bound is 52% - both exceed the 50% reduction we considered would make a useful impact on our epidemic.
Rate difference is important for public health as it informs the number who would need to be treated. The number of gay men who need to be treated for one year to avert one infection is very low – only 13.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Estimates of Time to HIV Infection (Modified Intention-to-Treat Population). The cumulative probability of HIV acquisition is shown for the two study groups. The efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC–TDF) was 44%, as compared with placebo (P=0.005). The inset graph shows a more detailed version of the overall graph up to a probability of 0.10.