3. 3
Online proctoring, a contested solution.
Issues with online proctoring:
âȘ Algorithmic biases (colour, gender, health, family, etc.)
âȘ « the means we use contribute qualitatively to the very character of the
goals which they produce » Carr, 1992
âȘ Acceptance or critical approach to the surveillance society
âȘ âOn the Efficacy of Online Proctoring using Proctorio,â Bergmans et al. 2021
âInvigilation, and other measures to prevent
cheating, start from a default position of lack of trust
in students. Their use erodes the potential for
building trusting relationships between students and
staff.â (Ross and Macleod, 2018)
5. 5
Work in progress: What could trustworthy remote exams
look like in the (distance) university of the future?
Photo by C Carbonel
Speculative design thinking
approach:
âą Open the field of possibles
âą Critically discuss the
implications of these
possible futures
âą Values based
Ross, J. (2023). Digital futures for learning:
Speculative methods and pedagogies.
Routledge.
Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social
Science Research. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481141
7. 7
Resources
âȘ EDUDL+ resources: https://unidistance.ch/en/edudl-resources
âȘ Bergmans, L., Bouali, N., Luttikhuis, M., & Rensink, A. (2021). On the Efficacy of Online Proctoring using Proctorio: Proceedings of the 13th International
Conference on Computer Supported Education, 279â290. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010399602790290
âȘ Biesta, G. (2007). Why âWhat Worksâ Wonât Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1â22.
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
âȘ Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151â167.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
âȘ Boud, D., & Bearman, M. (2022). The assessment challenge of social and collaborative learning in higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1â10.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2114346
âȘ Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Liu, N.-F. (2006). How Assessment Supports Learning: Learning-Oriented Assessment in Action. Hong Kong University Press.
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ed/detail.action?docID=677207
âȘ Carr, D. (1992). Practical Enquiry, Values and the Problem of Educational Theory. Oxford Review of Education, 18(3), 241â251.
âȘ Fawns, T. (2019). Postdigital Education in Design and Practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 132â145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8
âȘ Ross, J., & Macleod, H. (2018). Surveillance, (dis)trust and teaching with plagiarism detection technology. Networked Learning, 8.
âȘ Rossade, K.-D., Janssen, J., Wood, C., & Ubachs, G. (2022). Designing Online Assessment. Solutions that are Rigorous, Trusted, Flexible and Scalable. Zenodo.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6563226
8. 8
Danke fĂŒr die Aufmerksamkeit!
Merci pour votre attention !
Thank you for your attention!