NAAC : Complete Process - Dr HK Garg

$
Dr. H.K. GARG PROFESSOR
SAROJINI NAIDU GOVERNMENT GIRLS POST GRADUATE AUTONOMOUS COLLEGE BHOPAL INDIA
WORLD BANK SUPPORTED
MADHYA PRADESH HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME
State Level Training
on
Institutional Accreditation
for
PRINCIPALS I MASTER FACILITATORS I IQAC COORDINATORS of
All Government Colleges of Madhya Pradesh
RCVP NORONHA ACADEMY OF
ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT
DECEMBER 16-17, 2018
01

$430,000,000
Benefits of Accreditation
• Institution comes to know its strengths, weaknesses and
opportunities through an informed review process
• Identification of internal areas of planning and resource
allocation
• Collegiality on the campus
• Funding agencies look for objective data for performance
funding

$430,000,000
Benefits of Accreditation …..
• Institutions to initiate innovative and modern methods of
pedagogy
• New sense of direction and identity for institutions
• The society look for reliable information on quality education
offered
• Employers look for reliable information on the quality of
education offered to the prospective recruits
• Intra and inter-institutional interactions

$430,000,000
Eligibility Criterion Assessment & Accreditation
• Higher Education Institution (HEI), which is in existence for
six years or has a record of at least two passed-out batches.
• Provided the College is affiliated to a University recognized
by UGC for the purposes of affiliation.
(Constituent college of a Private and Deemed-to-be University is considered as the
constituent unit of the University and thus will not be considered for A & A
independently. Such constituent college needs to come along with the University)
• College received the status of Autonomy by UGC.

$430,000,000
Eligibility Criterion Assessment & Accreditation …..
• Provided the college / institution not affiliated to a University is
offering programs recognized by Statutory Professional Regulatory
Councils and has been recognized by Association of Indian
Universities (AIU) or other such Government agencies concerned,
as equivalent to a degree program of a University.
• The NAAC accreditation does not cover distance education units of HEI and off-
shore campuses.
• The institution intending to apply for Assessment and Accreditation by NAAC
must upload the information on All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE)
portal. AISHE code (reference number) is one of the requirements for
Registration.

$430,000,000
Re-accreditation or Subsequent Cycles
(Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4….)
• Institutions, which would like to make an improvement in the
accredited status, may apply for Re-assessment, after a
minimum of one year and before three years of accreditation.
• Institutions opting for Subsequent Cycles (Cycle 2, 3, 4….) of
Accreditation can submit the Institutional Information for
Quality Assessment (IIQA), beginning of the last quarter of
the validity period.

$430,000,000
Re-accreditation or Subsequent Cycles …..
For Cycles 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4….. the following are essential :
• IQAC to be functional ;
• Timely submission of AQARs every year ;
• Institutions to submit IIQA, six months before the expiry of the
accreditation status ; while
• Other steps remain the same as first cycle.

$430,000,000
• Institutions, seeking improvement in the accredited status, may volunteer for
re-assessment, after a minimum of 01 year or before 03 years of
accreditation.
• The current procedures, methodology and the manual for A & A is will be
same.
• However, the institution shall make specific responses based on the
recommendations made by peer team in the previous accreditation report,
as well as the specific quality improvements made by the institution in the
intervening period.
• The fee structure and other procedures would be the same with the
exception that the Institutions that volunteer for re-assessment will not be
eligible for fee waiver and reimbursement of accreditation expenses.
Reassessment

$430,000,000
Extension of validity period of NAAC accreditation from five years to seven
years may be given to those institutions which have concurrently obtained
highest grade* for two cycles and again obtains highest grade in the third cycle
also.
*The institutions graded with A++ and A+ (3.51 and above out of 4) would be
considered as the highest accreditation.
In the case of institutions which have or have NOT applied for reaccreditation
within the stipulated period of six months before the expiry of accreditation, the
gap period between two consecutive accreditation will be condoned, up to a
maximum of one year.
Extension of Validity Period of Accreditation

$
Process

$430,000,000
Process of Assessment & Accreditation
The process broadly consists of :
• Online submission of Institutional Information for Quality
Assessment (IIQA) and Self-Study Report (SSR) ;
• Data Validation and Verification (DVV) by NAAC ;
• Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) by NAAC ;
• Peer Team Visit ; and
• Institutional Grading.

$430,000,000
Online A & A Process Flow

$430,000,000
HEI Registration Process

$430,000,000
IIQA Submission Process

$430,000,000
The purpose of the IIQA process is:
• To ascertain the eligibility of the institution for comprehensive
assessment and accreditation by NAAC.
• To ensure that the applicant institutions fulfils statutory
requirements of agencies which govern it.
Why is there an IIQA process?

$430,000,000
New Fee Structure (w.e.f. March 21, 2018)
IIQA Fee
Rs. 25,000/- + GST 18% (Non-refundable)*
* In case of rejection of IIQA application, HEIs may resubmit IIQA
applications for maximum of three attempts without IIQA fees, including
the rejection attempt, within the period of a year.
Fee Structure & Other Financial Implications

$430,000,000
SSR Submission Process

$430,000,000
For Universities and Professional Institutions
Type Total amount of A & A
Fee
Amount to be Paid by
the Institution
1 to 10 departments Rs. 375,000 + GST18% Rs.187,500 + GST18%
> 10 departments Rs. 750,000 + GST18% Rs.375,000 + GST18%
• 50% of Total fee (Non-refundable) along with the online submission of SSR.
• Balance 50% of total fees along with 18% GST before 15 days from the date of
on site visit.
• The A & A fees and expenses on TA & logistics of peer team would be reimbursed
as per NAAC guidelines.
Assessment & Accreditation (A & A) Fee

$430,000,000
For Colleges (Government, Private & Grant-in-aid)
Type Total amount of A & A
Fee
Amount to be Paid
by the Institution
General College with
multi faculties
Rs. 185,000 + GST18% Rs.92,500 + GST18%
General College with
mono faculty
Rs. 125,000 + GST18% Rs.62,500 + GST18%
• 50% of Total fee (Non-refundable) along with the online submission of SSR.
• Balance 50% of total fees along with 18% GST before 15 days from the date of on-site
visit.
• The A & A fees and expenses on TA & logistics of peer team would be reimbursed as
per NAAC guidelines.
Assessment & Accreditation (A & A) Fee …..

$430,000,000
After filling up the SSR, it should be submitted on the NAAC
portal. The HEI will receive an auto generated link/ID of SSR
on their registered email ID. Then, the same SSR in PDF
format should be uploaded on the college/university website.
Assessment & Accreditation (A & A) Fee …..

$430,000,000
DVV Process

$430,000,000
NAAC will :
Go through the Self-Study Report through an online assessment
mechanism ;
Validate & verify the Quantitative metrics (Qnm) in the SSR ;
If institution clears the Pre-qualifier score of 30%, the Student
Satisfaction Survey will be administered and the Peer Team Visit
conducted.
If there is any discrepancy / factual error, then a Deviation Report is
sent to the institution seeking further clarifications.
NAAC Feedback

$430,000,000
The institution should edit the information and respond to
NAAC within 7 days ;
Subsequently, NAAC will again check the resubmitted data.
Depending on the extent of deviation, will inform the institution
of any of the following :
✓ Dates of the Peer Team Visit ;
✓ Deferring of the Peer Team Visit ; or
✓ Debarring the institution from having a Peer Team Visit.
HEI Response

$430,000,000
Student Satisfaction Survey Process
SSS

$430,000,000
Infilbnet Bibliometric Data Feed

$430,000,000
SSR QNM Evaluation for Pre-Qualification

$430,000,000
The institution has to pay in advance, logistic expenses for
arrangement of Peer Team Visit :
• for Colleges Rs.150,000 + GST 18%
• for Universities & Professional Institution Rs.300,000 + GST
18%
If the Institution does not take up the accreditation process, the fees will
NOT be returned to the institution. However, the same will be adjusted
when accreditation process is taken up. (Up to a maximum time limit of one
year).
Logistic Fee

$430,000,000
• Review of Accreditation (Grievance) Rs.100,000+GST18%
as applicable from time to time.
• Institution shall pay TA and Honorarium to Peer Team
Members through NAAC.
• In case of decision by the Appeals committee, the logistic
fee shall be applicable as mention in point 5.
Appeal Fee

$
IIQA
Institutional Information
for Quality Assessment

$430,000,000
Institutional Information for Quality Assessment
AISHE ID
Institution Track ID
1 Application for Accreditation
Cycle of Accreditation Cycle Date Grade
1
2
3
2 Name of the College
3 Date of Establishment of Institution
4 Name of the Head of Institution and
Designation
5 Does the College function from Own
Campus
IIQA

$430,000,000
6
Address of the College
State/UT
City
Pin
Phone No.
Fax No.
Mobile No.
Registered E-Mail
Alternate E-mail
7
Alternate Faculty Contact Details
Address
State/UT
City
Pin
IIQA

$430,000,000
Phone No.
Fax No.
Mobile No.
Registered E-Mail
Alternate E-mail
8 Website
9
Has the Institution completed 6 years of
existence/ years of graduation of last 2
batches
10 Nature of College
11 College affiliation
12 Name of the affiliating Universities/ State in
which the Univ. is located
State University Name Documents
IIQA

$430,000,000
13 Is the Institution recognized under section 2(f) of
the UGC Act?
14 Is the Institution recognized under section 12B
of the UGC Act?
If yes, date of recognition by UGC under section
12B along with latest Plan General
Development Grant release letter.
15 Is the Institution recognized as an Autonomous
College by the UGC?
16 Is the Institution recognized as a College with
Potential for Excellence (CPE) by the UGC?
17 Is the Institution recognized as a College for
Excellence by the UGC?
18 Is the college offering any programs recognized
by any Statutory Regulatory Authority (SRA)?
Statutory Regulatory Authorities SRA Program Document
IIQA

$430,000,000
19 If the Institution is not affiliated to a University
and is offering programs recognized by any
SRA or the programs recognized by
Association of Indian Universities (AIU) or
other appropriate Government authorities as
equivalent to UG/PG Programs of a University.
20 Number of programs offered
Programs Number
21 Program Details
Program Department University
Affiliation
SRA Recognition Affiliation Status
22 Number of Teaching Staff by Employment Status (Permanent/Temporary/Gender)
Male Female Transgender Total
IIQA

$430,000,000
23 Number of Non-Teaching Staff by Employment Status (Perm./ Temp./ By Gender)
24 Number of Students On Roll by Gender
25 Does the Institution have Statutory Cells/ Committees
26 Date of Establishment of IQAC Date View Document
The minutes of IQAC Meeting and Action
Taken Report should be uploaded on the
institutional website
27 Date of submission of AQARs of the last
4 years to NAAC
Date View Document
28 Has the Institution made statutory declaration on the
Institution website under section 4 (1) (b) of the RTI Act 2005
as issued and amended from time to time.
IIQA

$430,000,000
29 Does the College have an academic MoU with
any foreign institution
30 Date of uploading data on MHRD website for
All India Survey in Higher Education (AISHE)
31 Attach Certification by the Head of the
Institution for having complied with Rules &
Regulations of Central Government, UGC and
other Statutory Bodies, State Government and
Affiliating University in the prescribed format
enclosed herewith.
32 Registration Fee Payment Details
IIQA

$430,000,000
When an institution undergoes the accreditation process for the
first time, it is referred to as cycle 1 and the consecutive five
year periods as cycle 2, 3, etc.
The process in each cycle is similar, except that from cycle 2,
the frame of reference includes the impact of the last
assessment and the consequential quality improvement as
reflected in the AQARs submitted over the 4 year post-
accreditation period.
Explanations

$
SSR
An Overview

$430,000,000
No. Component / Format
01 Executive Summary
02 Profile of the Institution
03 Extended Profile of the Institution
04 Quality Indicator Framework (QIF)
05 Templates for Quantitative Metrics + Links for Document
Components of SSR

$430,000,000
Main Heads Features
Introductory Note Institution’s location, Vision, Mission, Type
Criterion-wise Summary Institution’s functioning on ALL 07 CRITERIA
(Not more than 250 words for each criterion)
SWOC Institutional Strength, Weaknesses,
Opportunities & Challenges
Additional Information If any (other than ones stated earlier)
Overview Overall Conclusive explication of the Institution’s
functioning.
Executive Summary

$430,000,000
Year Milestones
Current Year 2018-19 (Last Completed Year)
Previous Year 2017-18
Last Five Years 2014-19
(01 July 2014 to 30 June 2019)
Financial Year 01 April to 31 March
Unit cost of Education
(Including & Excluding Salary
Component)
Total actual recurring expenditure of the year
Total number of students enrolled
Profile & Extended Profile of the Institution
PROFILE & EXTENDED PROFILE
VIEW STATE LEVEL WORKSHOP

$430,000,000
Profile of the Institution
Name
Address
City Pin
State Website
Designation Name Telephone with
STD with Code
Mobile Fax e-mail
Contacts for Communication
Name and Address of the College

$430,000,000
Profile of the Institution …..
Institution to which the college if affiliated
Nature of
Institution
Institution Status
Type of
Institution
By Gender
By Shift
Establishment
Details
Date of establishment, prior to
the grant of (Autonomy)
Date of grant of ‘Autonomy’ to the
College by UGC
(Autonomous, Constituent, PG
Centre, any other)
Establishment date
State Institution Name View Document
Religious

$430,000,000
Recognition Details
If it is a recognized minority institution Yes No
If yes, Specify minority status
Religious
Linguistic
Any Other
Recognized Minority Institution
Date of Recognition by UGC or any Other National Agency
Under Section Date
2f of UGC
12B of UGC

$430,000,000
New Program introduced during the last five years
No of New Programmes introduced
during the last five years and name
Programs not covered under the
Autonomous status of UGC
No. Name UG PG
Latest year
1.
2.
3.
Programmes offered Aided Self-financed
Professional Programmes
offered

$430,000,000
Details of Recognition
Details of Recognition / Approval by Statutory/ Regulatory bodies like AICTE, NCTE, MCI, DCI, PCI,RCI,
etc (other than UGC)
Statutory Authority
Regulatory
Recognition / Approval
details Institution
/Department Programme
Day, Month,
Year
(DD/MM/YYYY)
Validity in
months
Remarks
NCTE
AICTE
DCI
PCI
ICAR
INC
BCI
CCIM
MCI
CCH
VCI
COA
RCI

$430,000,000
Institution with Potential for Excellence
Is the college recognition of UGC as a College with Potential for
Excellence (CPE)?
Yes No
If yes, date of recognition?
Is the college recognized for its performance by any other
government agency?
Yes No
If yes name the agency
Date of recognition
Location, Area and Activity of Campus
Campus Type Address Location Campus Area in
Acres
Built up Area in
sq. mts.
Urban
Semi Urban
Rural
Tribal
Hill

$430,000,000
ACADEMIC INFORMATION
Details of Teaching Faculty
Details of the Programmes Offered by the College (Given Data for Current Academic year)
Level of
Programme
Name of
Programme /
Course
Duration of
Months
Entry
Qualification
Medium of
Instruction
Sanctioned
Strength
No. Of
Students
Admitted
Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor
Male Female Other Total Male Female Other Total Male Female Other Total
Sanctioned
by the UGC
/ institution /
State Govt.
Recruited
Yet to
Recruit

$430,000,000
Non-Teaching Staff
On Contract
Sanctioned
Recruited
Yet to Recruit
Male Female Others Total
Sanctioned
Recruited
Yet to Recruit
Sanctioned by the Management /
Society/or other Authorised Body
Recruited
Yet to Recruit

$430,000,000
Technical Staff
Sanctioned by the UGC / institution / State
Government
Recruited
Yet to Recruit
Sanctioned by the Management / Society /
or other Authorised Body
Recruited
Yet to Recruit

$430,000,000
Qualification Details of the Teaching Staff
Permanent Teachers
Highest
Qualification
Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Total
Male Female Others Male Female Others Male Female Others
D.Sc. / D.Litt.
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG
Temporary Teachers
Highest
Qualification
D.Sc./ D.Litt.
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG

$430,000,000
Qualification Details of the Teaching Staff …..
Part Time Teachers
Highest
Qualification
D.Sc. / D.Litt.
Ph.D.
M.Phil.
PG
Details of Visiting / Guest Faculties
Number of Visiting/ Guest Faculty engaged
with the college

$430,000,000
Provide the following details of students enrolled in the college during the
current academic year
Programme From the
State Where
College is
Located
From Other
States of
India
NRI
Students
Foreign
Students
Total
PG Male
Female
Others
UG Male
Female
Others

$430,000,000
Provide the following details of students admitted to the college during the last
four academic year
Programme Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
SC Male
Female
Others
ST Male
Female
Others
OBC Male
Female
Others
General Male
Female
Others
Others Male
Female
Others
Total

$430,000,000
EVALUATIVE REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENTS
Department Name Upload Report
PROFILE & EXTENDED PROFILE
VIEW STATE LEVEL WORKSHOP

$430,000,000
Extended Profile of the Institution
PROGRAM
1.1. Number of programs offered year wise for last five years
Year
Number
STUDENTS
2.1. Number of students year wise during last five years
Year
Number
2.2. Number of outgoing / final year students year wise during last five years
Year
Number

$430,000,000
Extended Profile of the Institution …..
2.3. Number of students appeared in the examination conducted by the Institution, year
wise during the last five years
Year
Number
2.4 . Number of revaluation applications year wise during last five years
Year
Number
ACADEMIC
3.1. Number of courses in all programs year wise during last five years
Year
Number

$430,000,000
3.2. Number of full time teachers year wise during the last five years
Year
Number
3.3. Number of sanctioned posts year wise during last five years
Year
Number
INSTITUTION
1.1. Number of eligible applications received for admissions to all the programs year wise
during last five years
Year
Number

$430,000,000
1.2. Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI / State Govt rule year
wise during last five years
Year
Number
1.3. Total number of classrooms and seminar halls
Number
1.5. Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during last five years ( INR in Lakhs)
Year
Number
1.4. Total number of computers in the campus for academic purpose
Number

$
QIF
Quality Indicator Framework

$430,000,000
No. Name of the Criterion Weightage
01 Curricular Planning & Implementation 100
02 Teaching, Learning & Evaluation 350
03 Research, Innovations & Extension 120
04 Infrastructure & Learning Resources 100
05 Student Support & Progression 130
06 Governance, Leadership & Management 100
07 Institution Values & Best Practices 100
Quality Indicator Framework (QIF)

$430,000,000
• Maximum weightage of metrics that can be opted out shouldn’t
exceed 50 marks (up to 5%).
• Metrics with maximum of total 20 weightage per criteria can be
opted out.
• Criteria 07 is essential. No metrics can be opted out.
• Metrics identified as essential cannot be opted out
(list of essential metrics are enclosed).
• Qualitative metrics cannot be opted out.
The calculation of Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) of Higher Education
Institutions (HEIs) will be done excluding the 5% metrics as opted out by the HEIs. This
decision is aimed at helping HEIs as they will not be assessed on metrics not applicable to
them.
Guidelines to opt out Non-Applicable Metrics

$430,000,000
Metric No. Metric
1.3.2 Number of courses imparting transferable and life skills offered during
the last five years (15)
15
2.2.2 Student - Full time teacher ratio 10
2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D. during the last five
years
20
2.6.3 Average pass percentage of Students (Current year data 20
3.3.3 Number of research papers per teacher as per list of journals notified
on UGC website during the last five years
10
3.3.4 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and
papers in national/international conference proceedings during the last
five years
08
3.4.3 Number of extension and outreach Programs conducted in
collaboration with industry, community and Non- Government
Organizations through NSS/ NCC/ Red Cross/ YRC etc., during the last
five years
15
Essential Metrics for Affiliated / Constituent Colleges

$430,000,000
Metric No. Metric
4.2.4 Average annual expenditure for purchase of books and journals during
the last five years
05
4.3.2 Student - computer ratio 10
5.1.3 Number of capability enhancement and development schemes : 10
• For competitive examinations
• Career counselling
• Soft skill development
• Remedial coaching
• Language lab
• Bridge courses
• Yoga and meditation
• Personal Counselling
Opt any one :
• 7 or more of the above
• Any 6 of the above
6.3.4 Average percentage of teachers attending professional development
programs viz., Orientation Program, Refresher Course, Short Term
Course, Faculty Development Program during the last five years
05
Essential Metrics for Affiliated / Constituent Colleges …..

$430,000,000
Metric No. Metric
6.5.4 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 06
• Regular meeting of Internal Quality
Assurance Cell (IQAC); timely
submission of Annual Quality
Assurance Report (AQAR) to NAAC;
Feedback collected, analyzed and
used for improvements
• Academic Administrative Audit (AAA)
and initiation of follow up action
• Participation in NIRF
• ISO Certification
• NBA or any other quality audit
Opt any one :
• None of the above
Essential Metrics for Affiliated / Constituent Colleges …..

$430,000,000
Metric No. Metric
1.1.2 Percentage of programs where syllabus revision was carried out during
the last five years
20
1.2.2 Percentage of programs in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/
elective course system has been implemented (current year data)
20
1.3.2 Number of value-added courses imparting transferable and life skills
offered during the last five years
10
2.2.2 Student - Full time teacher ratio (current year data) 15
2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D. during the last five
years
20
2.6.3 Average pass percentage of Students (current year data) 20
3.2.4 Average number of Research Projects per teacher funded by
Government/ Non-government agencies during the last five year
03
3.4.5 Number of research papers per teacher in the journals notified on UGC
website during the last five years
02
Essential Metrics for Autonomous Colleges

$430,000,000
Metric No. Metric
3.4.6 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and
papers in national/international conference proceedings during the last
five years
05
3.6.3 Number of extension and outreach Programs conducted in
collaboration with industry, community and Non- Government
Organizations through NSS/ NCC/ Red Cross/ YRC etc., during the last
five years
15
4.2.4 Average annual expenditure for purchase of books and journals during
the last five years
07
4.3.2 Student - computer ratio (current year data) 14
5.1.3 Number of capability enhancement and development schemes :
• Guidance for competitive
examinations
• Career counselling
• Soft skill development
• Remedial coaching
• Language lab
• Bridge courses
• Yoga and meditation
• Personal Counselling
Essential Metrics for Autonomous Colleges …..

$430,000,000
Metric No. Metrics
5.1.3
contd….
Opt any one :
• 7 or more of the above
• ≤ 3 of the above
09
5.2.1 Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last
five years
10
6.3.4 Average percentage of teachers attending professional development
programs viz., Orientation Program, Refresher Course, Short Term
Course, Faculty Development Program during the last five years
05
6.5.4 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 06
• Regular meeting of IQAC; timely
submission of AQAR; Feedback
collected, analyzed ……
• Academic Administrative Audit (AAA)
• Participation in NIRF; ISO Certification
• NBA or any other quality audit
Opt any one :
• None of the above
Essential Metrics for Autonomous Colleges …..

$430,000,000
To avoid hassles in On-line entry, please proceed as follows :
• First try to understand, what kind of information has to be given
and how much. How is the data to be given ;
• Collect, compile or compute the data accordingly ;
• Arrange the data sheets in the order of Metric number. For
example, 1.1.1, 1.1.2 ….and so on ;
Important Instructions

$430,000,000
• Open a File Folder on your desktop. Scan the requisite documents.
• Keep all the scanned documents in that FOLDER and arrange them
in the order of Metrics.
• Having compiled all the information and procured all the documents,
now you can fill up the On-line SSR.
• The actual On-line Format may have minor change in appearance
due to its IT layout.
Important Instructions …..

$430,000,000
Metric No. Key Indicators
1.1 Curriculum Design and Development
1.2 Academic Flexibility
1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
1.4 Feedback System
Curricular Aspects

$430,000,000
No. Metric information
1.1.1 Curricula developed / adopted and its relevance with the local /
national / global developmental needs with learning objectives
including Program outcomes, Program specific outcomes and
course outcomes.
1.1.2 Percentage of Programs where syllabus revision was carried out
during the last five years.
1.1.3 Average percentage of courses having focus on employability /
Entrepreneurship / skill development during the last five years.
1.1 - Curriculum Design & Development

$430,000,000
1.2.1 Percentage of new courses introduced of the total number of
courses across all programs offered during the last five years.
1.2.2 Percentage of Programs in which Choice Based Credit System
(CBCS) / elective course system has been implemented (Current
year data).
1.2 - Academic Flexibility

$430,000,000
1.3.1 Institution integrates cross cutting issues relevant to Gender,
Environment & Sustainability, Human Values and Professional
Ethics into the Curriculum.
1.3.2 Number of value-added courses imparting transferable and life skills
added during the last five years.
1.3.3 Average Percentage of students enrolled in the courses under 1.3.2
above.
1.3.4 Percentage of students undertaking field projects / internships
(Current year data).
1.3 - Curriculum Enrichment

$430,000,000
1.4.1 Structured feedback received from :
i) Students; ii) Teachers; iii) Employers; iv) Alumni; and
v) Parents, for design and review of syllabus - Semester wise /
year wise.
1.4.2 Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows :
Feedback collected;
Analyzed;
Action taken; and
Feedback available on website.
1.4 - Feedback System

$430,000,000
2.1 Student Enrolment & Profile
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.3 Teaching Learning Process
2.4 Teachers Profile & Quality
2.5 Evaluation Process & Reforms
2.6 Student Performance & Learning Outcomes
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
Teaching, Learning & Evaluation

$430,000,000
2.1.1 Average Percentage of students from other States and Countries
2.1.2 Demand Ratio / Average Enrolment Percentage of last 5 years.
2.1.3 Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for
various categories as per applicable reservation policy during last
five years.
2.1 - Student Enrolment & Profile

$430,000,000
2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students, after
admission and organizes special programs for advanced learners
and slow learners.
2.2.2 Student - Full time teacher ratio (current year data).
2.2.3 Percentage of differently abled students on rolls (current year
data).
2.2 - Catering to Student Diversity

$430,000,000
2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative
learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing
learning experiences.
2.3.2 Percentage of teachers using ICT for effective teaching with Learning
Management Systems (LMS), e-Learning resources etc. (current year
data).
2.3.3 Ratio of students to mentor for academic and stress related issues
(current year data).
2.3.4 Preparation and adherence to Academic Calendar and Teaching plans
by the institution. Innovation and Creativity in Teaching - Learning.
2.3 - Teaching Learning Process

$430,000,000
• Experiential Learning (Practicum & Demonstrations)
• Instrumentation
• Hands-on Training
• Group Discussions
• Class-room Interactions & Brainstorming Sessions
• Debates
• Subject related Quiz & Extemporè
• Case Studies
• Projects & Assignments
Modes of Teaching Learning

$430,000,000
• Script / Creative writing
• Role plays, Drama & Skits
• Poster / Paper Presentation
• Power Point Presentation
• Trainings
• Seminars & Workshops
• Symposium & Extension lectures
• Invited Guest Lectures
Modes of Teaching Learning …..

$430,000,000
• Field visits, Excursions / Study tours
• Industrial & Corporate visits
• Campaigns & Rallies for Social sentience
• Book Review
• Bibliographic Compilations
• Surveys & Report writing
• Innovation & Research
• Maps, Charts, Posters and Models
Modes of Teaching Learning …..

$430,000,000
2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during
last five years.
2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D. during last five years.
2.4.3 Teaching experience of full time teachers in number of years (current year
data).
2.4.4 Percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition,
fellowship at State, National, International level from government
recognized bodies during last five years.
2.4.5 Average percentage of full time teachers from other states against
sanctioned posts during last five years.
2.4 - Teacher Profile & Quality

$430,000,000
2.5.1 Reforms in Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) System at the
Institution level.
2.5.2 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in
terms of frequency and variety.
2.5.3 Mechanism to deal with examination related grievances is
transparent, time-bound and efficient.
2.5.4 The institution adheres to the academic calendar for the conduct
of CIE.
2.5 - Evaluation Process & Reforms
For Affiliated Colleges

$430,000,000
2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end
examination till the declaration of results during the last five years.
2.5.2 Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation
against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five
years.
2.5.3 Average percentage of applications for revaluation leading to change in
marks during the last five years.
2.5.4 Positive impact of reforms on the examination procedures and processes
including IT integration and continuous internal assessment on the
examination management system.
2.5.5 Status of automation of Examination division along with approved
Examination Manual
2.5 - Evaluation Process & Reforms …..
For Autonomous Colleges

$430,000,000
2.6.1 Programs Outcomes, Programs Specific Outcomes and Course
Outcomes for all Programs offered by the institution are stated
and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and
students.
2.6.2 Attainment of Program Outcomes, Program Specific Outcomes
and Course Outcomes are evaluated by the institution.
2.6.3 Average Pass Percentage of the students (Current year data).
2.6 - Student Performance & Learning Outcome

$430,000,000
Students’ Performance in :
• Basic Questions or Memory based questions - What ?
• Descriptive or Illustrative - Describe, Explain or Discuss.
• Concept based - Why and How?
• Logic & Reasoning based questions;
• Analytical and numerical problems;
• Application based questions;
• Problems which require High Order Thinking.
Learning Outcome

$430,000,000
2.7.1 On-line Student Satisfaction Survey regarding teaching learning
process.
* Name, Class & Gender
* Student Id Number/ Aadhar Enrolment Number
* Mobile Number
* E-mail Id
* Degree Program
2.7 - Student Satisfaction Survey
SSS

$430,000,000
• Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have to upload data of all
currently enrolled students as per data template format of excel sheet
given in portal.
• Data will be accepted in text format only as per the template given by
NAAC. Column names (case sensitive) and order should not be
altered. No column should be left blank.
• Repetition of Name, e-mail address, Mobile number is not allowed.
• There are two separate columns for student ID and Enrollment ID. In
absence of either of the two, the institutions can repeat same ID in
both the cells.
• Total entries should not be greater than the students marked in IIQA.
• SSS will be administered simultaneously with Data Validation &
Verification (DVV) process.
Student Satisfaction Survey : Guidelines …..

$430,000,000
• The SSS questionnaire (20 objective & 01 subjective) will be e-
mailed to students.
• Maximum 2 survey attempts will be initiated to reach the desired
level.
I. For Colleges: at least 10% of the total students or 100, whichever is lesser.
II. For Universities: at least 10% of the total students or 500, whichever is lesser.
• SSS will be completed within 30 days alongside DVV process.
• The institute can encourage students to participate in survey to
make the SSS possible within the given time frame of 10 days.
• If the response rate is lower than the limits mentioned by NAAC, the
metric will not be taken up for evaluation.
• SSS is available in English & Hindi on NAAC website.

$430,000,000
• The questionnaire will be based on the Likert type scale with responses
scaled between 0 (most negative) and 4 (most positive).
• The questionnaire refers to specific skills of the teacher like, subject
knowledge, communication skills, class preparation, use of ICT tools …
• The second major component relates to teacher and institution with
respect to environment, motivation, interpersonal relationship, feedback
etc.
• Analysis of the survey would be done using software which will
aggregate the responses and generate the score between 0 and 4 on a
five point scale.
• The survey analysis score will be used as a key component of
accreditation and would affect the overall score of second criteria on
Teaching-Learning and evaluation.

$430,000,000
3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities
3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
3.3 Innovation Ecosystem
3.4 Research Publications and Awards
3.5 Consultancy
3.6 Extension Activities
3.7 Collaboration
Research, Innovations & Extension

$430,000,000
3.1.1 The institution has a well defined policy for promotion of research and the
same is uploaded on the institutional website.
3.1.2 The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research
(average per year) (INR in Lakhs).
3.1.3 Number of teachers awarded international fellowship for advanced
studies/research during the last five years.
3.1.4 Institution has the following facilities
• Central Instrumentation Centre
• Animal House/Green House / Museum
• Central Fabrication facility
• Media laboratory/Business Lab/Studios
• Research/Statistical Databases
3.1 - Promotion of Research and Facilities

$430,000,000
3.2.1 Grants for research projects sponsored by the government and non-
government sources such as industry, corporate houses, international
bodies, endowments, chairs in the institution during the last five years
(INR in Lakhs).
3.2.2 Number of research Centers recognized by Institution and National/
International Bodies.
3.2.3 Percentage of teachers recognized as research guides.
3.2.4 Number of research projects per teacher funded by government and
non-government agencies during the last five years.
3.2 - Resource Mobilization for Research

$430,000,000
3.3.1 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations including
Incubation center and other initiatives for creation and transfer of
knowledge.
3.3.2 Number of workshops / seminars conducted on Intellectual Property
Rights (IPR) and Industry-Academia Innovative practices during the
last five years.
3.3.3 Number of awards for innovation won by institution / teachers /
research scholars / students during the last five years.
3.3.4 Number of start-ups incubated on campus during the last five years.
3.3 - Innovation Ecosystem

$430,000,000
3.4.1 The institution has a stated Code of Ethics to check malpractices
and plagiarism in Research.
3.4.2 The institution provides incentives to teachers who receive state,
national and international recognition / awards.
3.4.3 Number of Patents published/awarded during the last five years.
3.4.4 Number of PhDs awarded per teacher during the last five years.
3.4.5 Number of research papers per teacher in the Journals notified on
UGC website during the last five years.
3.4 - Research Publications & Awards

$430,000,000
3.4.6 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes / books
published, and papers in national / international conference-
proceedings per teacher during the last five years.
3.4.7 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based
on average citation index in Scopus / Web of Science or PubMed /
Indian Citation Index.
3.4.8
Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based
on Scopus / Web of Science, h-index of the Institution.
3.4 - Research Publications & Awards …..

$430,000,000
3.5.1 Institution has a policy on consultancy including revenue sharing
between the institution and the individual.
3.5.2 Revenue generated from consultancy during the last five years
(INR in Lakhs).
3.5.3
Revenue generated from corporate training by the institution
during the last five years (INR in Lakhs).
3.5 - Consultancy

$430,000,000
3.6.1 Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and
sensitizing students to social issues and holistic development during the last five
years.
3.6.2 Number of awards and recognition received for extension activities from
Government / recognized bodies during the last five years.
3.6.3 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted in collaboration with
industry, community and Non-Government Organizations through NSS / NCC /
Red cross / YRC etc., during the last five years.
3.6.4 Average percentage of students participating in extension activities with
Government Organizations, Non-Government Organizations and Programs such
as Swachh Bharat, Aids Awareness, Gender Issue, etc. during the last five years.
3.6 - Extension Activities

$430,000,000
3.7.1 Number of Collaborative activities for research, faculty exchange, student
exchange per year.
3.7.2 Number of linkages with institutions / industries for internship, on-the-job
training, project work, sharing of research facilities etc. during the last five
years.
3.7.3 Number of functional MoUs with institutions of national, international
importance, other Institutions, industries, corporate houses etc. during the
last five years (only functional MoUs with ongoing activities to be
considered).
3.7 - Collaboration

$430,000,000
4.1 Physical Facilities
4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
4.3 IT Infrastructure
4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
Infrastructure & Learning Resources

$430,000,000
4.1.1 The institution has adequate facilities for teaching - learning, viz.,
classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment, etc.
4.1.2 The institution has adequate facilities for sports, games (indoor,
outdoor) gymnasium, yoga center etc. and cultural activities.
4.1.3 Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT - enabled
facilities such as smart class, LMS, etc. (current year data).
4.1.4 Average percentage of budget allocation, excluding salary for
infrastructure augmentation during the last five years(INR in
Lakhs)
4.1 - Physical Facilities

$430,000,000
4.2.1 Library is automated using Integrated Library Management
System (ILMS).
4.2.2 Collection of rare books, manuscripts, special reports or any other
knowledge resource for library enrichment.
4.2.3 Does the institution have the following :
• e - Journals
• e - Shodh Sindhu
• Shodhganga
• e - books
• Databases
4.2 - Library as a Learning Resource

$430,000,000
4.2.4 Average annual expenditure for purchase of books and journals
during the last five years (INR in lakhs).
4.2.5 Availability of remote access to e-resources of the library.
4.2.6 Percentage per day usage of library by teachers and students
(current year data)
4.2 - Library as a Learning Resource …..

$430,000,000
4.3.1 Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi.
4.3.2 Student - Computer ratio (current year data).
4.3.3 Available bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution
(Leased line)
4.3.4 Facilities for e-content development such as Media Center,
Recording facility, Lecture Capturing System (LCS)
4.3 - IT Infrastructure

$430,000,000
4.4.1 Average expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities
and academic support facilities excluding salary component, as a
percentage during the last five years (INR in lakhs).
4.4.2 There are established systems and procedures for maintaining
and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities - laboratory,
library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc.
4.4 - Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure

$430,000,000
5.1 Student Support
5.2 Student Progression
5.3 Student Participation and Activities
5.4 Alumni Engagement
Student Support & Progression

$430,000,000
5.1.1 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and
free-ships provided by the Government during the last five years.
5.1.2 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships, free-
ships, etc. provided by the institution besides government
schemes during the last five years.
5.1.3 Number of capability enhancement and development schemes.
5.1 - Student Support

$430,000,000
5.1.4 Average percentage of students benefited by guidance for
competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the
institution during the last five years.
5.1.5 Average percentage of students benefitted by Vocational
Education and Training (VET) during the last five years.
5.1.6 The institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal
of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging
cases.
5.1 - Student Support …..

$430,000,000
5.2.1 Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the
last five years.
5.2.2 Percentage of student progression to higher education (previous
graduating batch) (current year data).
5.2.3 Average percentage of students qualifying in state / national /
international level examinations during the last five years (NET /
SLET / GATE / GMAT / CAT / GRE / TOEFL / Civil Services / State
government examinations).
5.2 - Student Progression

$430,000,000
5.3.1 Number of awards / medals for outstanding performance in sports
/ cultural activities at national / international level (award for a
team event should be counted as one) during the last five years.
5.3.2 Presence of an active Student Council & representation of
students on academic & administrative bodies / committees of the
institution.
5.3.3 Average number of sports and cultural activities / competitions
organized at the institution level per year.
5.3 - Student Participation & Activities

$430,000,000
5.4.1 The Alumni Association / Chapters (registered and functional)
contributes significantly to the development of the institution
through financial and non financial means during the last five
years.
5.4.2 Alumni contribution during the last five years (Amount in Rupees).
5.4.3 Number of Alumni Association /Chapters meetings held during the
last five years.
5.4 - Alumni Engagement

$430,000,000
6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
Governance, Leadership and Management

$430,000,000
6.1.1 The governance of the institution is reflective of an effective
leadership in tune with the vision and mission of the Institution.
6.1.2 The institution practices decentralization and participative
management.
6.1 - Institutional Vision and Leadership

$430,000,000
6.2.1 Perspective / Strategic plan and deployment documents are available in the
institution.
6.2.2 Organizational structure of the Institution including governing body, administrative
setup and functions of various bodies, service rules, procedures, recruitment,
promotional policies as well as grievance redressal mechanism.
6.2.3 Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation :
1. Planning and Development ; 2. Administration ;
3. Finance and Accounts ;
4. Student Admission and Support ; 5. Examination.
6.2.4 Effectiveness of various bodies / cells / committees is evident through minutes of
meetings and implementation of their resolutions.
6.2 - Strategy Development & Deployment

$430,000,000
6.3.1 The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching
staff.
6.3.2 Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend
conferences / workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies
6.3.3 Average number of professional development / administrative training programs
organized by the Institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five
years.
6.3.4 Average percentage of teachers attending professional development Programs
viz., Orientation Programs, Refresher Course, Short Term Course, Faculty
Development Programs during the last five years.
6.3.5 Institution has Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching
staff.
6.3 - Faculty Empowerment Strategies

$430,000,000
6.4.1 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly.
6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals,
philanthropes during the last five years (not covered in Criterion
III) (INR in Lakhs).
6.4.3 Institutional strategies for mobilization of funds and the optimal
utilization of resources.
6.4 - Financial Management & Resource Mobilization

$430,000,000
6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed
significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies
and processes.
6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures &
methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic
intervals through IQAC set up as per norms.
6.5.3 Average number of quality initiatives by IQAC for promoting
quality culture per year.
6.5 - Internal Quality Assurance System

$430,000,000
6.5.4 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include :
• Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC), timely submission of
Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) to NAAC; Feedback collected, analyzed
and used for improvements ;
• Academic Administrative Audit (AAA) and initiation of follow up action ;
• Participation in NIRF ;
• ISO Certification ; and
• NBA or any other quality audit.
6.5.5 Incremental improvements made during the preceding five years
(in case of first cycle).
6.5 - Internal Quality Assurance System …..

$430,000,000
7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
7.2 Best Practices
7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
Institutional Values & Best Practices

$430,000,000
GENDER EQUITY
7.1.1 Number of gender equity promotion Programs organized by the
institution during the last five years.
7.1.2 Institution shows gender sensitivity in providing facilities such as:
• Safety and Security
• Counselling
• Common Room
7.1 - Institutional Values & Social Responsibilities

$430,000,000
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS AND SUSTAINABILITY
7.1.3 Percentage of power requirement of the Institution met by the
renewable energy sources (current year data).
7.1.4 Percentage of annual lighting power requirements met through
LED bulbs (current year data).
7.1.5 Waste Management steps including:
• Solid waste management
• Liquid waste management
• E-waste management
7.1 - Institutional Values & Social Responsibilities …..

$430,000,000
7.1.6 Rain water harvesting structures and utilization in the campus.
7.1.7 Green Practices :
Students, staff using Bicycles / Public Transport / Pedestrian Friendly Roads ;
Plastic free campus ;
Paperless office ; and Green landscaping with trees and plants.
7.1.8 Average percentage expenditure on green initiatives and waste
management excluding salary component during the last five
years (INR in lakhs).

$430,000,000
7.1.9 Differently abled friendliness
Resources available in the institution :
1. Physical facilities 2. Provision for lift
3. Ramp / Rails 4. Braille Software / facilities
5. Rest Rooms 6. Scribes for examination
7. Special skill development for differently abled students
8. Any other similar facility (Specify)

$430,000,000
INCLUSION AND SITUATEDNESS
7.1.10 Number of specific initiatives to address locational advantages
and disadvantages during the last five years.
7.1.11 Number of initiatives taken to engage with and contribute to local
community during the last five years (Not addressed elsewhere).
HUMAN VALUES AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
7.1.12 Code of conduct handbook exists for students, teachers,
governing body, administration including Principal / Officials and
support staff.

$430,000,000
7.1.13 Display of core values in the institution and on its website.
7.1.14 The institution plans and organizes appropriate activities to increase
consciousness about national identities and symbols; Fundamental Duties &
Rights of Indian citizens and other constitutional obligations.
7.1.15 The institution offers a course on Human Values and professional ethics.
7.1.16 The institutional functioning is as per professional code of prescribed /
suggested by statutory bodies / regulatory authorities for different
professions.

$430,000,000
7.1.17 Number of activities conducted for promotion of universal values (Truth,
Righteous conduct, Love, Non-Violence, Peace); national values, human
values, national integration, communal harmony and social cohesion as well
as for observance of fundamental duties during the last five years.
7.1.18 Institution organizes national festivals and birth / death anniversaries of the
great Indian personalities.
7.1.19 The institution maintains complete transparency in its financial, academic,
administrative and auxiliary functions.

$430,000,000
7.2.1 Describe at least two institutional best practices (as per format).
7.2 - Best Practices
1. Title of the Practice Title / keyword that describes the practice
2. Objectives of the Practice The underlying principles or concepts
3. The Context Challenging issues to be addressed
4. The Practice Uniqueness in the context of Indian HE
5. Evidence of Success Targets, benchmarks, review and results
6. Problems Encountered and
Resources Required
Problems met and resources required to
resolve them
7. Notes (Optional) Any other relevant information

$430,000,000
7.3.1 Describe / Explain the performance of the institution in one area
distinctive to its vision, priority and thrust.
7.3 - Institutional Distinctiveness

$430,000,000
Evaluative Report of the Department
Name of the College
Name of the Department
District State
Total Number of Departments in the institution
S No Name of the Department
1. Year of Establishment
2. Names of programmes offered
3. Number of teaching posts Sanctioned/Filled
4. Number of students enrolled
5. Number of Research Projects:
Total grants received

$430,000,000
Evaluative Report of the Department …..
6. Inter-institutional collaborative projects and Associated grants received
National collaboration
International collaboration
7. Departmental projects funded by DST-FIST, DBT, ICSSR
….Total grants received
8. Special research laboratories sponsored by / created by
industry or corporate bodies
9. Publications:
Number of Papers published
Number of Books with ISBN
Number of Citation Index - range / average
Number of Impact Factor - range / average
Number of h-index

$430,000,000
Evaluative Report of the Department …..
10. Details of patents and income generated
11. Areas of consultancy and income generated
12. Awards / Recognitions received at the National and International level by :
Faculty
Doctoral / Post doctoral fellows
Students
13.
How many students have cleared Civil Services and Défense
Services examinations, NET, SET (SLET), GATE and other
competitive examinations
14. List of doctoral, post-doctoral students and research associates
From the host institution / institution
From other institutions / universities
15.
Number of Research Scholars/ Post Graduate students getting
financial assistance from the Institution / State / Central
Organizations

$
Annexures

$430,000,000
Declaration by the Head of the Institution
I certify that the data included in this Self-Study Report (SSR) are true to the best
of my knowledge.
This SSR is prepared by the institution after internal discussions, and no part
thereof has been outsourced.
I am aware that the Peer Team will validate the information provided in this SSR
during the peer team visit.
Signature
of the Head of the institution
with seal
Place ………….
Date …………..

$430,000,000
(The following should be given on letterhead of the Institution)
Date …………………:
This is to declare that ..………… College, ……… MP is affiliated to ……… University .
and /or recognized by the SRA (if applicable) and the following programs are taught in the
college.
Signature ………………………..
Name of the Institution/Head of the Institution ………………………..
• The letter should be in English. If the letter is in Regional Language an English translation Version may
be enclosed. If the institution gives false information with respect to affiliation and any other information
the Accreditation given by NAAC will be withdrawn and disciplinary action initiated as per law.
S
No
Name of the Program Program
Duration
Current Affiliation Status
Permanent / Temporary
1. B.Sc. 3 Years Permanent
2. B.Com. 3 Years Permanent
3. B.A. 3 Years Temporary
4. M.Sc. Animal Science 2 Years Permanent
Self Declaration for Affiliation

$430,000,000
(The following should be given on letterhead of the Institution)
Undertaking
(Universities / Colleges)
This is to declare that ............................................................................. University / College
Address:………………………………….…………………………………………………………...
adheres to the provisions of Statutory Regulatory Authorities (SRA - like UGC, AICTE,
MCI, DCI, INC, AYUSH, PCI, RCI, BCI, and others) as applicable to the institution, and
also undertakes to adhere to changes, if any, from time to time.
Further this is to declare and undertake that:
✓ The institution has valid approval / University affiliation for all the program offered by
the institution.
✓ The institution has obtained necessary approval / permission / recognition from
appropriate SRA as under law and is valid / applied for renewal as applicable.
✓ The information / responses provided in IIQA online are genuine and valid.
✓ At the time of submission of IIQA, it is certified that the institution is not debarred of
made ineligible for further renewal of affiliation /recognition etc., by any competent
authority / court of Law.
✓ The students who have graduated from this Institution have been issued degree / PG
certificate from the legally designated authorities.

$430,000,000
✓ No Government body has declared the institution as an illegal entity.
✓ The institution undertakes to inform NAAC of any changes in the status indicated
during / after submission of IIQA & thereof i.e., till the validation of the accreditation
status bestowed upon them.
✓ The IIQA has been prepared & submitted online from within the institution with an IP
address ………..of computer belonging to the Institution.
✓ Acceptance of IIQA by NAAC is only provisional and the onus of adhering to eligibility
norms lies with the Institution.
In case information provided is found to be contrary to the fact, it shall result in cancellation
of NAAC grading, along with initiation of legal action. It will be the total responsibility of the
Institution to substantiate claims made by the Institution in its application to the satisfaction
of NAAC when ever called for.
Name and Signature
of the Head of the Institution
Date …………..
Note: The above declaration will be displayed in the website of Institution from the date of submission of
IIQA till the accreditation by NAAC is valid.
Undertaking …..

$
Grading

$430,000,000
Criterion Key Indicators University Autonomous
College
Affiliated
College
1.
CurricularAspects
Curriculum Design & Development (U) 50 50 NA
Curricular Planning & Implementation (A) NA NA 20
Academic Flexibility 50 40 30
Curricular Enrichment 30 40 30
Feedback System 20 20 20
TOTAL 150 150 100
2.
Teaching
Learning&
Evaluation
Student Enrolment & Profile 10 20 30
Catering to Students’ Diversity 20 30 50
Teaching Learning Process 20 50 50
Teacher Profile & Quality 50 60 80
Evaluation Process & Reforms 40 40 50
Weightage across 07 Criteria & 34 Key Indicators

$430,000,000
College
Affiliated
College
2.
Teaching
Learning&
Evaluation
Student Performance & Learning
Outcomes
30 50 40
Students Satisfaction Survey 30 50 50
TOTAL 200 300 350
3.
ResearchInnovations&
Extension
Promotion of Research & Facilities 20 20 NA
Resource Mobilization for Research 20 10 10
Innovation Ecosystem 30 20 10
Research Publications & Awards 100 20 20
Consultancy 20 10 NA
Extension Activities 40 50 60
Collaborations 20 20 20
TOTAL 250 150 120
Weightage across 07 Criteria & 34 Key Indicators …..

$430,000,000
College
Affiliated
College
4.
Infrastructure&
Learning
Resources
Physical Facilities 30 30 30
Library as a Learning Resource 20 20 20
IT Infrastructure 30 30 30
Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure 20 20 20
TOTAL 100 100 100
5.
StudentSupport
&Progression
Student Support 30 30 50
Student Progression 40 30 45
Student Participation & Activities 20 30 25
Alumni Engagement 10 10 10
TOTAL 100 100 130
All these weightages may vary for Institutions which opt for 5% Non-Applicable Metrics

$430,000,000
College
Affiliated
College
6.
Governance,
Leadership&
Management
Institutional Vision & Leadership 10 10 10
Strategy Development & Deployment 10 10 10
Faculty Empowerment Strategies 30 30 30
Financial Management & Resource
Mobilization
20 20 20
Internal Quality Assurance System 30 30 30
TOTAL 100 100 100
7.
Institutional
Values&Best
Practices
Institutional Values & Social
Responsibilities
50 50 50
Best Practices 30 30 30
Institutional Distinctiveness 20 20 20
TOTAL 100 100 100

$430,000,000
Range of CGPA Letter Grade Status
3.51 4.00 A++ Accredited
3.26 3.50 A+ Accredited
3.01 3.25 A Accredited
2.76 3.00 B++ Accredited
2.51 2.75 B+ Accredited
2.01 2.50 B Accredited
1.50 2.00 C Accredited
<=1.50 D Not Accredited
Cumulative Grade Point Average

$430,000,000
• On announcement of the A & A outcome, the institution not satisfied with the
accreditation status may submit :
• A letter of intent for appeal along with a request to provide the criterion wise
scores so as to reach NAAC within 30 days from the receipt of the letter
intimating the accreditation status from NAAC.
• The application for Appeal in the format prescribed by NAAC should reach
NAAC within 30 days from the date of receipt of the criterion wise scores
from NAAC.
• The requisite non-refundable fee of Rs. 1,00,000 plus GST @ 18%.
• No correspondence / phone calls will be entertained on the matter till the
appeal is disposed of by the Appeals Committee / final decision taken by
EC of NAAC.
Grievance Redressal

$430,000,000
Thank You

NAAC : Complete Process - Dr HK Garg

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Ähnlich wie NAAC : Complete Process - Dr HK Garg

Ähnlich wie NAAC : Complete Process - Dr HK Garg (20)

Mehr von PROFESSOR Dr. H.K. Garg

Mehr von PROFESSOR Dr. H.K. Garg (13)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (16)

NAAC : Complete Process - Dr HK Garg