1. To: judy356@msn.com
Subject: Visitation?
From: mjwaxy@aol.com
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:05:42 -0500
Judy:
I have received and reviewed your letter dated November 4, 2011 indicating-- for the first time in 6 months
-- that Dr. Handrahan would like to see her child. I am elated that she now seems to recognize that
seeing her child's face, holding her, telling her that she loves her is an important thing to do for her
daughter.
However, since you wrote this letter, your client has embarked on a remarkable, high-tech attack on Igor
and on me, in which she is illustrating that she is no longer capable of exercising good judgment, of
promoting her own child's best interest. Indeed, she recently posted a statement which indicates that
when she gets her hands on this child, she intends to flee with her to Africa: "@JordansConcept No worries!
I work in Internation Developement. When I get my daughter back we'll move to Africa and take care of baby elefants
who have lost their moms. That is Mila's dream and I promised to make it real." This comment may be found on
her YouTube posting of the Mila video: http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=iZI1E0zaz88
Accordingly, Igor is not willing to agree that Dr. Handrahan can have any visitation at all at this point. We
truly do not know what she is capable of. Indeed, in one of the posts, a woman named Jacklyn C. Ashley
writes "[t]hat man needs to die." And following that comment, your client clicked "like." Honestly, Judy, I
am fearful that your client or someone she pulls into her world will indeed attempt to kill Igor and/or me.
This is quickly getting out of control. Neither Igor nor I feel safe anywhere near your client and if she
shows up near me or Igor, we shall call the police. I am starting to wonder whether I should carry a
concealed weapon. You should see the hateful comments being made about me.
I know Dr. Handrahan believes that this new approach will somehow achieve what her attorneys and her
malicious and false claims to DHHS and the Courts have not, but she is terribly mistaken. All she is
succeeding in doing is scaring Igor and me and making us completely and utterly unwilling to have any
contact with her whatsoever. As we indicated on many occasions before, if Dr. Handrahan wishes to
restart visitation, especially unsupervised visitation, then the onus is on her to demonstrate that she has
turned over a new leaf and merely wishes to be a loving mother, not a digital warrior.
Additionally, we do not know this Joy Silberg. Also, even if this web site had not gone up, we would not
be willing to agree that Dr. Handrahan can enjoy an entire weekend with Mila, when she has not even
spoken to her or seen her in 6 months. Baby steps. Last, you claim that Dr. Handrahan "cannot afford to
pay anyone to supervise." Yet, this recent incredible wave of Internet activity suggests that she has
plenty of money . . . but that she would rather use it for war, rather than spend it on her child. How terribly
sad.
Michael
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4704 - Release Date: 12/26/11