Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) rubrics for assessing the IPCRF of Teachers.

1. PANGPANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
RUBRICS for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective in every KRA
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 1, Objective No. 1
Prepared detailed lesson
plans/ daily lesson logs of
activities including
appropriate, adequate
and updated instructional
materials
QUALITY
(Rater will use
Observation
tool and look
into the
Content,
Structure and
Relevance of
DLP/DLL)
IMs and DI’s
must be
relevant and
aligned w/
content
All dailylesson plans had
the following (5 parts):
 Objective/s
 Subject Matter
 Procedures
 Evaluation;and
 Assignment
Had 4 of the five parts
of the lesson
plan/DLP/DLL
Had 3 of the five parts
of the lesson
plan/DLP/DLL
Had 2 of the five parts of
the lesson plan/DLP/DLL
Had 1 of the five parts of
the lesson plan/DLP/DLL
Objective was Specific,
Measurable, Attainable,
Result-oriented and
Time-bound(SMART)
Objective was stated
with 1 behavioral
indicator missing
Objective was stated
with 2 behavioral
indicators missing
Objective was stated with
3 - 4 behavioral
indicators missing
Objective was stated
without behavioral
indicators
EFFICIENCY
MOVs: Mastery
Learning per
subject by
grade level
(reflected inthe
class record)
Attained 100% of the
desiredlearning
competencies.
Attained85-99% of the
desiredlearning
competencies.
Attained70-84% of the
desiredlearning
competencies.
Attained55-69% of the
desiredlearning
competencies.
Attained54% and below
of the desiredlearning
competencies.
TIMELINESS
Computation:
No. of Lesson
Delivered
divided by the
Total No. of
Lesson to be
Functionally
Delivered per
quarter (year) x
100
MOVs: BOW,
CGs and TGs
100% and above based
on the Budget of Work
(BOW)
85-99% basedon the
Budget of Work (BOW)
70-84% basedon the
Budget of Work (BOW)
55-69% basedon the
Budget of Work (BOW)
54% and belowbasedon
the Budget of Work
(BOW)
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating Average Score
Sample Computation for KRA 1,
Objective 1
Quality *Had 4 of the five parts of the lessonplan/DLP/DLL
*Objective was stated with2 behavioral indicators
missing
4 Points
3 Points
Q= 4+3
= 7

2. Final Q= 7/2
Q = 3.5 Points
Average Point for
Objective 1 is… 3.17
Q+E+T / 3
3.5 +3+3 = 9.5 /3
Ave.= 3.17
Efficiency Attained 70-84% of the desiredlearning
competencies.
E = 3 Points
Timeliness 70-84% basedon the Budget of Work(BOW) T = 3 Points
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 1, Objective No. 2
Facilitated learning in the
elementary/ secondary
schools through
functional lesson
plans/daily lesson logs
and innovative teaching
strategies
QUALITY
(Rater will use
Observation
tool and look
into the
Content,
Objectives and
competencies)
MOVs:DLP/DLL,
CG, BOW
The teacher established
challengingand
measurable goal/s for
student learning that is
aligned withthe DepEd
standards (Kto 12 BEC)
competencies
The teacher developed
a measurable goal for
student learning that is
aligned withthe DepEd
standards (Kto 12 BEC)
competencies
The teacher clearly
communicateda focus
for student learning
that is alignedwiththe
DepEd standards (Kto
12 BEC) competencies
The teacher didnot have
a clear focus for student
learning.
The teacher didnot have
a clear focus for student
learning or the objective
is too general to guide
lesson planning or the
objective is
inappropriate for
students.
EFFICIENCY
(Rater will use
Observation
tool and look
into the
Method,
strategies,
learners’
interaction and
participation
aligned with
competencies)
MOVs:DLL/DLP,
IMs, Dis, ICT
IntegrationPlan
Teaching methods and
strategies elicited100%
and above interaction
from a class or classes
Teaching methods and
strategies elicited85-
99% interactionfroma
class or classes
Teaching methods and
strategies elicited70-
84% interactionfroma
class or classes
Teaching methods and
strategies elicited55-69%
interactionfrom a class
or classes
Teaching methods and
strategies elicited54%
and below interaction
from a class or classes
Result of student
observation/ appraisal
are 100% and above used
as basisfor follow-up
Result of student
observation/ appraisal
are 85-99% usedas
basisfor follow-up
Result of student
observation/ appraisal
are 70-84% usedas
basisfor follow-up
Result of student
observation/ appraisal
are 55-69% usedas basis
for follow-up
Result of student
observation/ appraisal
are not usedas basis for
follow-up
ICT integrationis 100%
and above evident
ICT integrationis 85-
99% evident
ICT integrationis 70-
84% evident
ICT integrationis 55-69%
evident
ICT integrationis not
evident
TIMELINESS
(Rater will use
Observation
tool and look
into the
relevance,
applicationand
appropriateness
Has providedand
developedrelevant,
applicable and
appropriate activities for
the classes handled
within the rating period
(quarter/yearly)
Has providedand
developedapplicable
activitiesfor the classes
handled withinthe
rating period
(quarter/yearly)
Has provided readily
available activities for
the classes handled
within the rating period
(quarter/yearly)
Has providedfew
activitiesfor the classes
handled withinthe rating
period(quarter/yearly)
Has providedirrelevant
and inappropriate
activitiesfor the classes
handled withinthe
rating period
(quarter/yearly)

3. of learning
activities)
MOVs:DLL/DLP,
Objectives, IMs,
DIs
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating Average Score
Sample Computation for KRA 1,
Objective 2
Quality The teacher developeda measurable goal for
student learning that is alignedwith the DepEd
standards (Kto 12 BEC) competencies
4 Points
Q = 4 Points
Average Point for
Objective 2 is… 3.56
Q+E+T / 3
4+3.67+3 = 10.67 / 3
Ave.= 3.56
Efficiency *Teaching methods and strategies elicited70-84%
interactionfrom a class or classes
* Result of student observation/ appraisal are 85-
99% used as basis for follow-up
* ICT integration is 85-99% evident
3 Points
4 Points
4 Points
3+4+4 = 11/3
E = 3.67 Points
Timeliness Has provided readilyavailable activities for the
classes handledwithin the rating period
(quarter/yearly)
T = 3 Points
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 1, Objective No. 3
Initiated discipline of
pupils/ students including
classroom rules,
guidelines and individual
group tasks
QUALITY Students were 100% and
above guided in the
observationof classroom
rules andguidelines.
Students were 85-99%
guidedinthe
observationof
classroomrules and
guidelines.
Students were 70-84%
guidedinthe
observationof
classroomrules and
guidelines.
Students were 55-69%
guidedinthe observation
of classroomrules and
guidelines.
Students were not
guidedinthe
observationof
classroomrules and
guidelines.
EFFICIENCY 100% and above of the
observedrules,
guidelinesand tasks are
reflectedin the
descriptive rating in the
report card or journal
85-99% of the observed
rules, guidelines and
tasks are reflectedin
the descriptive rating in
the report cardor
journal
70-84% of the observed
rules, guidelines and
tasks are reflectedin
the descriptive rating in
the report cardor
journal
55-69% of the observed
rules, guidelines and
tasks are reflectedin the
descriptive rating in the
report card or journal
There was noobserved
rules, guidelines and
tasks as manifested in
the descriptive rating in
the report cardor
journal
TIMELINESS 100 % and above of the
classroomrules,
guidelinesand tasks are
maintained withinthe
rating period.
85-99 % of the
classroomrules,
guidelinesand tasks are
maintained withinthe
rating period.
70-84 % of the
classroomrules,
guidelinesand tasks are
maintained withinthe
rating period.
55-69 % of the classroom
rules, guidelines and
tasks are maintained
within the rating period.
54 % and belowof the
classroomrules,
guidelinesand tasks are
maintained withinthe
rating period.
ACTUAL RESULTS Rating Average Score
Sample Computation for KRA 1,
Objective 3
Quality Students were 100% andabove guided in the
observationof classroom rules and guidelines.
5 Points
Q = 5 Points

4. Efficiency 85-99% of the observedrules, guidelines andtasks
are reflected inthe descriptive rating in the report
card or journal
E = 4 Points
Average Point for
Objective 3 is…4.33
Q+E+T / 3
5 +4+4 = 13 /3
Ave.= 4.33
Timeliness 785-99 % of the classroomrules, guidelines and
tasks are maintainedwithinthe ratingperiod.
T = 4 Points
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 1, Objective No.4
Monitored attendance,
diversity appreciation,
safe, positive and
motivating environment,
overall physical
atmosphere, cleanliness
and orderliness of
classrooms including
proper waste disposal
QUALITY Attendance checking was
100% and above
systematicallycarried out
Attendance checking
was 85 - 99%
systematicallycarried
out
Attendance checking
was 70 - 84%
systematicallycarried
out
Attendance checking was
55 - 69% systematically
carriedout
Attendance checking
was 54 % andbelow
carriedout
Safety, orderlinessand
cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste
disposal were 100% and
above maintained
Safety, orderlinessand
cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper
waste disposalwere
85-99% maintained
Safety, orderlinessand
cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper
waste disposalwere
70-84% maintained
Safety, orderlinessand
cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste
disposal were 55-69%
maintained
Safety, orderlinessand
cleanliness of floors,
toilets and proper waste
disposal were 54%
maintained
100% and above diversity
appreciation wasevident
in both academic
instruction andgroup
tasks
85-99% diversity
appreciation was
evident in both
academic instruction
and grouptasks
70-84% diversity
appreciation was
evident in both
academic instruction
and grouptasks
55-69% diversity
appreciation wasevident
in both academic
instruction andgroup
tasks
54% and belowdiversity
appreciation was
evident in both
academic instruction
and grouptasks
EFFICIENCY Provisionof attendance
monitoringwas 100%
and above evident
Provisionof attendance
monitoringwas 85 -
99% evident
Provisionof attendance
monitoringwas 70-84%
evident
Provisionof attendance
monitoringwas 55-69%
evident
Provisionof attendance
monitoringwas 54% and
below evident
Provisionof cleanliness,
safetyand orderliness
were 100% andabove
manifestedinclass
rules/grouptasks
Provisionof cleanliness,
safetyand orderliness
were 85 – 99%
manifestedinclass
rules/grouptasks
Provisionof cleanliness,
safetyand orderliness
were 70 – 84%
manifestedinclass
rules/grouptasks
Provisionof cleanliness,
safetyand orderliness
were 55 – 69%
manifestedinclass
rules/grouptasks
Provisionof cleanliness,
safetyand orderliness
were 54 % and below
manifestedinclass
rules/grouptasks
Student-learners are
100% and above engaged
in various activities and
tasks withpositive results
Student-learners are
85-95% engagedin
various activitiesand
tasks withpositive
results
Student-learners are
70-84 % engaged in
various activitiesand
tasks bearingsignificant
results but with1 or 2
concerns for
improvement /
betterment
Student-learners are 55-
69 % engaged in various
activitiesandtasks
bearing some good
results but with3 or 4
concerns for
improvement /
betterment
Student-learners are
54% and belowengaged
in various activities and
tasks bearing
insignificant results and
with more concerns for
improvement /
betterment
TIMELINESS Preparation and
submissionof attendance
record/report was
submittedwithinthe
requiredtime
Preparation and
submissionof
attendance
record/report was
submittedwith1 or 2
Preparation and
submissionof
attendance
record/report was
submittedwith3 – 4
Preparation and
submissionof attendance
record/report was
submittedwith5 or more
issues inline with time-
on-taskprinciples.
Preparation and
submissionof
attendance
record/report was
submittedwithmore

5. issues inline with time-
on-taskprinciples.
issues inline with time-
on-taskprinciples.
issues inline with time-
on-taskprinciples.
Monitoring andensuring
cleanliness, safetyand
orderliness were done
regularlywithpositive
results
Monitoring and
ensuringcleanliness,
safetyand orderliness
were done most ofthe
time with 1 or 2 issues
affecting positive
results
Monitoring and
ensuringcleanliness,
safetyand orderliness
were done at times
with 3 or 4 issues
affecting positive
results
Monitoring andensuring
cleanliness, safetyand
orderliness were not
done some of the time
with 5 or more issues
affecting positive results
Monitoring andensuring
cleanliness, safetyand
orderliness were not
done most of the time
with more issuesthat
needs applicable
interventions
Leaners’ diversity
appreciation are evident
everytime when
incorporated inthe
learning process/group
tasks
Leaners’ diversity
appreciation are
evident most of the
time when
incorporated inthe
learning process/group
tasks
Leaners’ diversity
appreciation are
evident some of the
times when
incorporated inthe
learning process/group
tasks
Leaners’ diversity
appreciation are not
evident andnot
incorporated inthe
learning process/group
tasks most of the time
Leaners’ diversity
appreciation are not
evident andnot
incorporated inthe
learning process/group
tasks at all times
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 2, Objective No. 1
Monitored and evaluated
and maintained
pupils’/students’ progress
QUALITY Evidencesshowedthat
the teacher purposely
plans assessments and
varies assessment
choices to match the
different student needs,
abilities andlearning
styles
The teacher explained
the various uses and
limitations ofthe
different kinds of
assessments or tests.
Evidencesshowedthat
students needs and
avenuesfor growth
were clearlyidentified
There is evidence of
more thanone
measure of student
performance bit there
is difficultyin analysing
data to inform
instructionalplanning
and delivery
The teacher planned
instructions without
analysingstudent
learning data
No evidence ofstudent
monitoringor evaluation
of student progress
EFFICIENCY Class recordreflected the
basesof 100% and above
of students’ ratinginall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class recordreflected
the basesof 85-99% of
students’ rating inall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class recordreflected
the basesof 70-84% of
students’ rating inall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class recordreflected the
basesof 55-69% of
students’ rating inall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class recordreflected
the basesof 54% and
below students’ ratingin
all classes/subject areas
handled
Students’ portfolio
contained100% and
above oftheir
accomplishment
Students’ portfolio
contained85-99% of
their accomplishment
Students’ portfolio
contained70-84% of
their accomplishment
Students’ portfolio
contained55-69% of
their accomplishment
Students’ portfolio
contained54% and
below of their
accomplishment
Test questions were
100% and above logically
sequencedwithTable of
specifications showing
congruence between
content andskills tested.
Test questions were 85-
99% logically
sequencedwithTable
of specifications
showing congruence
betweencontent and
skills tested.
Test questions were 70-
84% logically
sequencedwithTable
of specifications
showing some
congruence between
content andskills
tested.
Test questions were 55-
69% logicallysequenced
but the Table of
specifications does not
show congruence
betweencontent and
skills tested.
Test questions were not
logicallysequencedand
there is notable of
specifications to show
congruence between
content andskills tested.
Pre-test andpost-test
were 100% andabove
administered inall
Pre-test andpost-test
were 85-99%
administered inall
Pre-test andpost-test
were 70-84%
administered inall
Pre-test andpost-test
were 55-69%
administered inall
Pre-test andpost-test
were never
administered

6. classes / subject area
supportedbyanalysis
report
classes / subject area
supportedbyanalysis
report
classes / subject area
supportedbyanalysis
report
classes / subject area
supportedbyanalysis
report
TIMELINESS Monitoring, evaluation
and maintaining
students’ progress were
done everytime within
the rating period
(quarterly, semestral)
Monitoring, evaluation
and maintaining
students’ progress
were done most ofthe
time within the rating
periodwith1 or 2
issues that needs
attention
Monitoring, evaluation
and maintaining
students’ progress
were done most ofthe
time within the rating
periodwith3 or 4
issues that needs
attention
Monitoring, evaluation
and maintaining
students’ progress were
done some of the times
within the rating period
with 5 or more issues
that needs attention
Monitoring, evaluation
and maintaining
students’ progress were
not done within the
rating period
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 2, Objective No. 2
Conducted
remediation/enrichment
programs to improve
performance indicators
QUALITY
Remediation/
enrichment programis
offeredto 100% and
above ofthe students
who needit
Remediation/
enrichment programis
offeredto 85-99% of
the students whoneed
it
Remediation/
enrichment programis
offeredto 70-84% of
the students whoneed
it and it manifested
some improvement in
the performance
indicators
Remediation/
enrichment programis
offeredto 55-69% of the
students whoneed it and
it manifested minimal
improvement inthe
performance indicators
Remediation/
enrichment programis
offeredto 54% and
below of the students
who needit andit
manifestedno
improvement inthe
performance indicators
EFFICIENCY Remediation/
enrichment planwas
preparedwith100% and
above results showing
manifestationof
improvement inthe
performance indicators
Remediation/
enrichment planwas
preparedwith85-99%
results showing
manifestationof
improvement inthe
performance indicators
Remediation/
enrichment planwas
preparedwith85-99%
results showing
manifestationof
improvement inthe
performance indicators
Remediation/
enrichment planwas
preparedwith55-69%
results showing
manifestationof
improvement inthe
performance indicators
Remediation/
enrichment planwas
preparedwith54% and
below results showing
manifestationof
improvement inthe
performance indicators
TIMELINESS Remediation/
enrichment activities
were deliveredevery
time as reflectedinthe
DLL / needs assessment
Remediation/
enrichment activities
were deliveredmost of
the time as reflectedin
the DLL / needs
assessment
Remediation/
enrichment activities
were deliveredsome of
the times as reflected
in the DLL / needs
assessment
Remediation/
enrichment activities
were not deliveredmost
of the time as reflectedin
the DLL / needs
assessment
Remediation/
enrichment activities
were not deliveredat all
times andwas not
reflectedin the DLL /
needs assessment
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 2, Objective No. 3
Maintained/updated
pupils/students’ school
records
QUALITY Teacher maintainedand
updated100% and above
of the students’ school
records
Teacher maintained
and updated85-99 % of
the students’ school
records
Teacher maintained
and updated70-84 % of
the students’ school
records
Teacher maintainedand
updated55-69 % of the
students’ school records
Teacher maintainedand
updated54 % and
below of the students’
school records
EFFICIENCY Students’ school records
contains 100% andabove
of the students’ progress,
data andrelevant
informationshowing
Students’ school
records contains 85-
99% of the students’
progress, data and
relevant information
showing positive
Students’ school
records contains 70-
84% of the students’
progress, data and
relevant information
showing positive
Students’ school records
contains 55-69% of the
students’ progress, data
and relevant information
showing positive results,
Students’ school records
contains 54% and below
of the students’
progress, data and
relevant information
showing positive results,

7. positive results, follow-up
and intervention
results, follow-upand
intervention
results, follow-upand
intervention
follow-up and
intervention
follow-up and
intervention
TIMELINESS Students’ school records
are maintainedand
updatedat requiredtime
within the rating period
Students’ school
records are maintained
and updatedat most of
the requiredtime
within the rating period
Students’ school
records are maintained
and updatedat some of
the requiredtime
within the rating period
Students’ school records
are not maintained and
updatedat some ofthe
requiredtime withinthe
rating period
Students’ school records
are not maintained and
updatedat alltimes
within the rating period
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 2, Objective No. 4
Attained the required
GSA for grade level and
learning areas
QUALITY Attained100% and
above MPS or GSA inall
classes or subject areas
handled
Attained85-99% MPS
or GSA in all classesor
subject areashandled
Attained70-84% MPS
or GSA in all classesor
subject areashandled
Attained55-69% MPS or
GSA in all classes or
subject areashandled
Attained54% and below
MPS or GSA in all classes
or subject areas handled
EFFICIENCY Class recordreflected the
basesof 100% and above
of students’ ratinginall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class record reflected
the basesof 85-99% of
students’ rating inall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class recordreflected
the basesof 70-84% of
students’ rating inall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class recordreflected the
basesof 55-69% of
students’ rating inall
classes/subject areas
handled
Class recordreflected
the basesof 54% and
below students’ ratingin
all classes/subject areas
handled
TIMELINESS Computationof the
requiredMPS or GSA was
done everyquarter /
semester showing
positive results
Computationof the
requiredMPS or GSA
was done everyquarter
/ semester showing 1
or 2 issues but
produced positive
results
Computationof the
requiredMPS or GSA
was done everyquarter
/ semester showing 3
or 4 issues but
produced positive
results
Computationof the
requiredMPS or GSA was
done everyquarter /
semester showing5 or
more issues andclearly
affectedpositive results
Computationof the MPS
or GSA was done every
quarter / semester
showing critical issues
and it failed to produce
positive results
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 3, Objective No. 1
Conducted regular
/periodic Homeroom PTA
meetings/conferences
QUALITY 100% and above of the
planned meetings were
conducted
85-99% of the planned
meetings conducted
70-84% of the planned
meetings conducted
55-69% of the planned
meetings conducted
54% and belowof the
planned meetings
conducted
EFFICIENCY Provisionof reports and
agreements contained
remarkable
accomplishment withset
agreements met
Provisionof reports
and agreements
containedonlyset of
agreements andpartial
accomplishment
Provisionof reports
and agreements
produced onlyset of
agreements
Provisionof reports and
agreements produced
minimal results
Provisionof reports and
agreements produced
no results
TIMELINESS Conductedat least twice
everysemester or once
everyquarter or as
requiredeverytime
within the rating period
Conductedwithinthe
rating periodbut not
aligned withthe school
calendar for 1 instance
/ case
Conductedwithinthe
rating periodbut not
aligned withthe school
calendar for 2 to 3
instances
Conductedwithinthe
rating periodbut not
aligned withthe school
calendar for 4 to 5
instances
Conductedwithinthe
rating periodbut not
aligned withthe school
calendar for 6 or more
instances
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 3, Objective No. 2 QUALITY Academic monitoring/
follow-up wasinitiatedto
Academic monitoring/
follow-up wasinitiated
Academic monitoring/
follow-up wasinitiated
Academic monitoring/
follow-up wasinitiatedto
Academic monitoring/
follow-up wasinitiated

8. Visited parents of
pupils/students needing
academic
monitoring/follow-up
100 % and above of the
students whoneed it
to 85-99% of the
students whoneed it
to 70-84% of the
students whoneed it
55-69% of the students
who needit
to 54% and below ofthe
students whoneed it
EFFICIENCY 100% and above
accomplishment ofset
visits with successful
interventions
85-99%
accomplishment of
visits with partial
success in
implementationof
interventions
70-84%
accomplishment of
visits with suggested
planned interventions
55-69% accomplishment
of visits withplanned
interventions
54% and below
accomplishment withno
interventions
TIMELINESS Activityconductedat
least twice every
semester or once every
quarter
Activityconductedat
least once every
semester or once in
every2 quarters
Activityconductedonly
when the needarises
but withinthe rating
period
Activityconductedonly
when there is a great
need to addressrelevant
issues andconcerns
within the rating period
Activitywas never
conducted withinthe
rating period
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 3, Objective No. 3
Supported
projects/events/activities
with external
funding/sponsorship
QUALITY Supported100% and
above ofthe projects,
events, activitieswith
external fundingor
sponsorship
Supported85-99% of
the projects, events,
activitieswith external
fundingor sponsorship
Supported70-84% of
the projects, events,
activitieswith external
fundingor sponsorship
Supported55-69% of the
projects, events,
activitieswith external
fundingor sponsorship
Supported54% and
below of the projects,
events, activitieswith
external fundingor
sponsorship
EFFICIENCY 100% and above project
accomplishment withfull
completionand
documentationreport
85-99% project
accomplishment with
partial completion
70-84% project
initiative withno
completionreport
55-69% project initiative
with no completion
report
No project, event or
activityinitiated and
supported
TIMELINESS Done withinthe rating
period
Done withinthe rating
periodbut with 1 issue
or concern that needs
intervention
Done withinthe rating
periodbut with 2 or 3
issues or concerns that
need intervention
Done withinthe rating
periodbut with 4 or
more issues that need
intervention
Not done withinthe
rating period
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 4, Objective No. 1
Conducted action
research
QUALITY Conducted100% and
above ofthe required
number of researchto
address classroom /
learning problems
Conducted85-99% of
the requirednumber of
researchto address
classroom/ learning
problems
Conducted70-84% of
the requirednumber of
researchto address
classroom/ learning
problems
Identifiedonlyclassroom
or learning problem with
a research proposal
Identifiedonly
classroomor learning
problemwithno
researchproposal
EFFICIENCY 100% and above full
documentationon
completionof
intervention
85-99% documentation
on completion of
intervention
70-84% documentation
on completion of
intervention
55-69% documentation
on completion of
intervention
No documentationon
completionor inthe
conduct of research / no
interventiondone
TIMELINESS Conductedevery
semester withinthe
rating period
Conductedevery
semester within the
rating periodbut with1
or 2 issues affecting its
full implementation
Conductedevery
semester within the
rating periodbut with3
or 4 issues affecting its
full implementation
Conductedevery
semester within the
rating periodbut with5
or more issues affecting
its full implementation
Not conducted within
the rating period
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T Outstanding Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

9. (5) (3) (2) (1)
KRA 4, Objective No. 2
Participated in activities
such as teachers
association and other
related
organizations/trainings
QUALITY Initiated/ participatedin
100% and above required
or agreedco-curricular or
school activities
Initiated/ participated
in 85-99% of the
requiredor agreed co-
curricular or school
activities
Initiated/ participated
in 70-84% of the
requiredor agreed co-
curricular or school
activities
Initiated/ participatedin
55-69% of the required
or agreedco-curricular or
school activities
Initiated/ participatedin
54% and belowof the
requiredor agreed co-
curricular or school
activities
EFFICIENCY Extent of participation
and involvement
manifestedfull
documentationon
completion and results
Initiatedor participated
in co-curricular or
school activitieswith
partial documentation
on completion and
results
Initiatedor participated
in co-curricular or
school activitieswith
minimal partial
documentationonly
Initiatedor participated
in co-curricular or school
activitieswith no
documentation
Participationand
involvement is not
evident
TIMELINESS Withinthe ratingperiod Withinthe rating
periodbut with 1 or 2
issues andconcerns for
improvement on
participationand
involvement
Withinthe rating
periodbut with 3 or 4
issues andconcerns for
improvement on
participationand
involvement
Withinthe ratingperiod
but with 5 or more issues
and concerns for
improvement on
participationand
involvement
Not within the rating
period
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
KRA 4, Objective No. 3
Attended In-Service-
Trainings and other
relevant trainings/
seminars/ workshops
for teachers.
QUALITY Attended100% and
above ofthe INSET or
requiredrelevant
trainings/ seminars/
workshops/ LACsessions
Attended85-99% of the
INSET or required
relevant trainings/
seminars/ workshops/
LAC sessions
Attended70-84% of the
INSET or required
relevant trainings/
seminars/ workshops/
LAC sessions
Attended55-69% of the
INSET or required
relevant trainings/
seminars/ workshops/
LAC sessions
Attended54% and
below of the INSETor
requiredrelevant
trainings/ seminars/
workshops/ LACsessions
EFFICIENCY 100% and above of the
attendance and
appearances complied
85-99% of the
attendance and
appearances complied
70-84% of the
attendance and
appearances complied
55-69% of the
attendance and
appearances complied
54% and belowof the
attendance and
appearances complied
TIMELINESS Withinthe ratingperiod Withinthe rating
periodbut with 1 or 2
issues andconcerns for
improvement on
participationand
involvement
Withinthe rating
periodbut with 3 or 4
issues andconcerns for
improvement on
participationand
involvement
Withinthe ratingperiod
but with 5 or more issues
and concerns for
improvement on
participationand
involvement
Not within the rating
period
Objectives
Performance Indicators
Q, E, T
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)