SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 34
Lewis Central Community School District Facility Master Plan Board of Education February 1, 2010 Strategic Resources West, Inc.
Presentation Purpose ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Presentation Format ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Economic Characteristics ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Factors Influencing Economic Growth ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Summary: 2008 Pottawattamie County Employment by Industrial Classification 2008 Pottawattamie County  Employing Sector  Employment  Distribution  Private Sector:  Retail & Wholesale Trade 7,767  20.0% Leisure & Hospitality 6,706  17.3% Educational & Health Services 4,979  12.8% Manufacturing 4,827  12.5% Professional & Business Services 2,448  6.3% Transportation & Utilities 1,945  5.0% Financial Activities & Real Estate 1,229  3.2% Balance of Total Private Employ. 3,677  9.5% Total Private Employ.  33,578  86.6% Public Sector:  Local Government  4,325  11.2% State and Federal Government  865  2.2% Total Public  5,190  13.4% Grand Total  38,768  100.0%
1990 to 2000 Census, 2008 Population Estimate & Forecasts Source: Iowa Data Center. Census Population  Projected Population  Jurisdiction  1990 2000 2008 2010 2020 2030 Council Bluffs  54,315  58,359  59,536  NA  NA  NA  Pottawattamie County  82,628  87,704  89,647  89,738  92,335  95,762  Lewis Central SD  10,307  12,440  13,497  NA  NA  NA
School Age Population Distribution:  2000 Census Population Distribution by Age Group  Age Ranges  Pottawat. County  Mills County  Iowa  Birth-4  6.9% 6.4% 6.6% 5-9  6.8% 6.4% 6.4% 10-14  6.6% 7.3% 6.5% 15-19  7.0% 7.2% 7.2% 20-24  5.7% 5.9% 7.1% 25-34  13.0% 11.4% 12.3% 35-44  13.1% 13.4% 13.1% 45-54  15.3% 16.6% 14.9% 55-59  6.4% 7.2% 6.4% 60-64  5.2% 6.0% 4.8% 65-74  6.9% 6.8% 7.0% 75-84  4.8% 3.8% 5.3% 85+  2.0% 1.8% 2.4%
 
Historical Residential Development Single Family  Multi-  Mobile  Proportion  Year Detached  Attached  family  Homes  Total  of Total  Before 1970  1,548  118  29  33  1,728  29.9% 1970-79  816  74  16  68  974  16.9% 1980-89  280  12  25  45  362  6.3% 1990-99  473  50  6  28  557  9.7% 2000-09  846  14  413  6  1,279  22.2% None Given  40  6  211  615  872  15.1% Total  4,003  274  700  795  5,772  100.0%
Student Generation Rates Applied Student Generation Rates by Unit Type  Unit Type  Primary  Interm.  Middle  Senior High  Total  Mobile Home  0.110  0.175  0.165  0.125  0.575  Multifamily  0.080  0.115  0.070  0.065  0.330  Singe Family Attached  0.034  0.061  0.075  0.085  0.255  Single Family Detached  0.065  0.135  0.105  0.155  0.460             
Assessed Valuation Assessed  Change From Prior Year  Year Valuation Asses. Val. Percent 2000 $  472,467,141  NA  NA  2001 535,356,871  $  62,889,730  13.3% 2002 561,371,578  26,014,707  4.9% 2003 559,110,370  (2,261,208) -0.4% 2004 575,340,092  16,229,722  2.9% 2005 641,095,128  65,755,036  11.4% 2006 682,284,384  41,189,256  6.4% 2007 780,169,896  97,885,512  14.3% 2008 858,652,158  78,482,262  10.1% 2009 927,444,122  68,791,964  8.0%
Resident  Enrollment  by  School  Level:  1999  -  2009 Resident Enrollment by School Level  Elemen.  Inter.  Middle  Sr. High  Total  Year (PK - 1)  (2 - 5)  (6 - 8)  (9 - 12)  (PK - 12)  1999 364  721  591  826  2,502  2000 336  726  599  731  2,392  2001 358  704  599  767  2,428  2002 347  725  612  809  2,493  2003 344  666  579  766  2,355  2004 419  670  591  778  2,458  2005 425  712  595  784  2,516  2006 398  726  574  763  2,461  2007 462  740  562  771  2,535  2008 467  740  559  798  2,564  2009 498  797  569  753  2,617
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enrollment Forecasts ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Enrollment Forecast Assumptions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ENROLLMENT  PROJECTIONS  SUMMARY  BY  SCENARIO — 2010 to 2015 SCENARIO LOW -- 10 Year Cohort/5 Year Percent Chg. Middle -- 5 Year Modified Cohort HIGH -- 3 Year Percent Change Prim. Inter.  Midd. Sr. High  Prim. Inter.  Midd. Sr. High  Prim. Inter.  Midd. Sr. High  YEAR  PK - 1 (2 - 5)  (6 - 8)  (9-12) Total  PK - 1 (2 - 5)  (6 - 8)  (9 - 12)  Total  PK - 1 (2 - 5)  (6 - 8)  (9 - 12)  Total  2009 Actual 498  797  569  753  2,617  PROJECTED:      2010 526  800  608  738  2,673  528  811  601  749  2,690  536  812  602  758  2,708  2011 543  826  624  722  2,715  544  849  614  735  2,742  551  858  615  753  2,777  2012 509  881  638  741  2,769  552  892  627  735  2,806  576  909  627  758  2,869  2013 517  873  670  771  2,832  560  911  649  762  2,882  601  940  652  788  2,980  2014 526  883  694  803  2,905  568  941  668  789  2,967  626  994  677  814  3,111  2015 534  875  739  818  2,965  576  957  708  800  3,041  653  1,038  728  825  3,244                                 
Table II-3.  PREFERRED  SCENARIO:  PROJECTIONS 2010-2015 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS  Kreft Primary (PK-1)  Titan Hill Intermediate (2-5)  Total  Year Pre-  Kinder-  Total  Interm.  (Fall) School  garten  1st  (PK-1)  2nd  3rd  4th  5th  (2-5)  Projected  Resident  Enrollment  2010 111  187  206  505  194  209  184  199  787  2011 119  190  190  500  208  196  212  186  803  2012 119  195  193  507  192  211  199  214  816  2013 119  200  198  517  195  195  213  201  804  2014 119  205  203  527  200  198  197  215  810  2015 119  210  208  538  205  203  200  199  807  Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Constant at 2009 Level   2010 111  229  241  582  243  248  242  243  977  2011 119  232  225  577  257  235  270  230  993  2012 119  237  228  584  241  250  257  258  1,006  2013 119  242  233  594  244  234  271  245  994  2014 119  247  238  604  249  237  255  259  1,000  2015 119  252  243  615  254  242  258  243  997  Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Slow Growth Scenario  2010 111  232  252  595  231  260  226  257  973  2011 119  237  239  595  256  235  265  227  983  2012 119  245  244  608  243  260  240  266  1,009  2013 119  252  251  623  248  246  265  241  1,000  2014 119  260  259  638  256  252  251  267  1,025  2015 119  268  267  654  263  259  257  253  1,032                     
Table II-4.  PREFERRED  SCENARIO:  PROJECTIONS 2010-2015 SECONDARY SCHOOLS  Total  MIDDLE SCHOOL (6-8)  SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL (9-12)  District  Year Total  Total  Enrollment  (Fall) 6th  7th  8th  (6-8)  9th  10th  11th  12th  (9-12)  (K-12)  Projected  Resident  Enrollment   2010 211  193  197  601  182  184  188  201  754  2,647  2011 199  214  193  606  198  180  184  190  752  2,660  2012 186  202  214  601  194  196  181  186  756  2,680  2013 214  188  201  604  214  193  196  182  786  2,710  2014 201  217  188  606  202  213  193  198  806  2,749  2015 215  203  217  635  189  201  213  195  797  2,777  Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Constant at 2009 Level   2010 253  234  232  719  228  225  223  234  909  3,187  2011 241  255  228  724  244  221  219  223  907  3,200  2012 228  243  249  719  240  237  216  219  911  3,220  2013 256  229  236  722  260  234  231  215  941  3,250  2014 243  258  223  724  248  254  228  231  961  3,289  2015 257  244  252  753  235  242  248  228  952  3,317  Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Slow Growth Scenario  2010 258  237  240  736  221  232  231  233  917  3,221  2011 260  263  239  762  245  222  234  229  931  3,271  2012 231  264  265  760  245  246  224  233  948  3,324  2013 270  235  266  771  270  246  248  223  987  3,381  2014 244  274  237  756  272  271  248  247  1,037  3,456  2015 270  249  276  795  242  273  273  246  1,034  3,515                       
Estimated Students From Potential Development Potential  Potential Students by Zoning  Housing Type  Housing Units  Primary  Interm.  Middle  Sr. High  Total  Mobile Home  851  94  149  140  106  489  Multifamily  1,611  129  185  113  105  532  Singe Family Attached  274  9  17  21  23  70  Single Family Detached  11,584  753  1,564  1,216  1,796  5,329  Total 14,320  985  1,915  1,490  2,030  6,419
Capacity Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Capacities by School Level Student Capacity Estimate Capacity Method  Kreft Primary*  Titan Hill Intermediate  Middle School  Senior High  Castaldi (Average)  534  832  742  1,073  University of Wisconsin  673  970  834  1,166  Oklahoma Dept. of Education  669  910  762  1,087  Staffing Ratios (optimum)  493  888  643  1,022  Staffing Ratios (maximum)  573  999  823  1,207  SRW Suggested Capacity  530  950  750  1,070  *:  Capacity includes Preschool.
Capacity per Grade and School: Facility Planning Implications School Level Student Capacity  No. of Grades Served  Seating Capacity* per Grade  Schools to Fill  Elementary  (PK - 1) 530  3  177  NA  Intermediate (2 - 5) 950  4  238  1.34  Middle  (6 - 8) 750  3  250  1.05  Senior High  (9 - 12) 1,070  4  268  1.07  *: Rounded.
Interim Facility Needs (to 2015) SRW  Current and Projected  Net Capacity  Suggested  RESIDENT  Enrollment  Available (Short)  .   School  Capacity  Fall 2009  Fall 2010  Fall 2015  Fall 2009  Fall 2015  Primary  530  498  505  538  32  (8) Intermediate  950  797  787  807  153  143  Middle  750  569  601  635  181  115  Senior High  1,070  753  754  797  317  273  SRW  Current and Projected  Net Capacity  Suggested  TOTAL  Enrollment*  Available (Short)  School  Capacity  Fall 2009  Fall 2010  Fall 2015  Fall 2009  Fall 2015  Primary  530  575  595  654  (45) (124) Intermediate  950  987  973  1,032  (37) (82) Middle  750  687  736  795  63  (45) Senior High  1,070  908  917  1,034  162  36  *:  Slow growth open enrollment applied.
Long-Term Facility Needs At 75% of Allowed Zoning:  Total Number  Total  of Schools  Student  Enrollment  Needed at  School Type Capacity  Potential*  Build Out  Primary 530  1,237  2.3  Intermediate 950  2,233  2.4  Middle  750  1,687  2.2  Senior High  1,070  2,275  2.1  Total    7,432   
Summary / Observations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Summary / Observations – cont’d ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Conclusions & Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Conclusions & Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Lewis Central Community SD

TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...
TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...
TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...Education Moving Up Cc.
 
NEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schools
NEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schoolsNEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schools
NEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schoolsEducation Moving Up Cc.
 
Trends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and Budgets
Trends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and BudgetsTrends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and Budgets
Trends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and BudgetsAmy Williams
 
432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.ppt
432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.ppt432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.ppt
432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.pptUmanImran56
 
China Education Statistics for international educators
China Education Statistics for international educatorsChina Education Statistics for international educators
China Education Statistics for international educatorsEIC Group China
 
SAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by design
SAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by designSAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by design
SAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by designEducation Moving Up Cc.
 
EIC stat report 2
EIC stat report 2EIC stat report 2
EIC stat report 2ca3344
 
J pang land use plan presentation
J pang land use plan presentationJ pang land use plan presentation
J pang land use plan presentationRonaldoDando
 
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16Michael Brazill
 
Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011
Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011
Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011kevert
 
Bukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdf
Bukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdfBukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdf
Bukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdfEjayRamonal
 
Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3
Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3
Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3gercohen
 
Results of the Class of 2019
Results of the Class of 2019 Results of the Class of 2019
Results of the Class of 2019 SABC News
 
Leadership Howard08
Leadership Howard08Leadership Howard08
Leadership Howard08lkenney
 
Economic Development Master Plan Phase I
Economic Development Master Plan Phase IEconomic Development Master Plan Phase I
Economic Development Master Plan Phase ICity of College Station
 
MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2
MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2
MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2massbayresearch
 
1st qtr. grading data comparisons
1st qtr. grading data comparisons1st qtr. grading data comparisons
1st qtr. grading data comparisonswpwebsite
 
CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...
CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...
CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...Education Moving Up Cc.
 

Ähnlich wie Lewis Central Community SD (20)

TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...
TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...
TeachSA 2016 cohort - The Why, What, How and When of school turnaround method...
 
NEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schools
NEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schoolsNEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schools
NEMAS - The essence of school leadership to transform schools
 
SAPA WC - Excellent schools by design 1
SAPA WC - Excellent schools by design 1SAPA WC - Excellent schools by design 1
SAPA WC - Excellent schools by design 1
 
Trends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and Budgets
Trends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and BudgetsTrends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and Budgets
Trends Shaping Perth: Boom, Busts and Budgets
 
432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.ppt
432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.ppt432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.ppt
432900106-Pakistan-Edu-Sector-Reforms-Efforts-presentation.ppt
 
China Education Statistics for international educators
China Education Statistics for international educatorsChina Education Statistics for international educators
China Education Statistics for international educators
 
SAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by design
SAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by designSAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by design
SAPA Gauteng Province - Excellent schools by design
 
EIC stat report 2
EIC stat report 2EIC stat report 2
EIC stat report 2
 
J pang land use plan presentation
J pang land use plan presentationJ pang land use plan presentation
J pang land use plan presentation
 
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
Campstone Offering Memorandum 5-12-16
 
Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011
Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011
Igl Board Of Realtors April 2011
 
Bukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdf
Bukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdfBukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdf
Bukidnon DEDP Presentation.pdf
 
Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3
Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3
Redistricting 2011 & Vt Ds V3
 
NYCDOE INFOGRAPHICS
NYCDOE INFOGRAPHICSNYCDOE INFOGRAPHICS
NYCDOE INFOGRAPHICS
 
Results of the Class of 2019
Results of the Class of 2019 Results of the Class of 2019
Results of the Class of 2019
 
Leadership Howard08
Leadership Howard08Leadership Howard08
Leadership Howard08
 
Economic Development Master Plan Phase I
Economic Development Master Plan Phase IEconomic Development Master Plan Phase I
Economic Development Master Plan Phase I
 
MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2
MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2
MassBay Fast Facts PowerPoint v2
 
1st qtr. grading data comparisons
1st qtr. grading data comparisons1st qtr. grading data comparisons
1st qtr. grading data comparisons
 
CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...
CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...
CWED - Roles and Responsibilities of Heads of Department in Curriculum Manage...
 

Lewis Central Community SD

  • 1. Lewis Central Community School District Facility Master Plan Board of Education February 1, 2010 Strategic Resources West, Inc.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. Summary: 2008 Pottawattamie County Employment by Industrial Classification 2008 Pottawattamie County Employing Sector Employment Distribution Private Sector: Retail & Wholesale Trade 7,767 20.0% Leisure & Hospitality 6,706 17.3% Educational & Health Services 4,979 12.8% Manufacturing 4,827 12.5% Professional & Business Services 2,448 6.3% Transportation & Utilities 1,945 5.0% Financial Activities & Real Estate 1,229 3.2% Balance of Total Private Employ. 3,677 9.5% Total Private Employ. 33,578 86.6% Public Sector: Local Government 4,325 11.2% State and Federal Government 865 2.2% Total Public 5,190 13.4% Grand Total 38,768 100.0%
  • 7. 1990 to 2000 Census, 2008 Population Estimate & Forecasts Source: Iowa Data Center. Census Population Projected Population Jurisdiction 1990 2000 2008 2010 2020 2030 Council Bluffs 54,315 58,359 59,536 NA NA NA Pottawattamie County 82,628 87,704 89,647 89,738 92,335 95,762 Lewis Central SD 10,307 12,440 13,497 NA NA NA
  • 8. School Age Population Distribution: 2000 Census Population Distribution by Age Group Age Ranges Pottawat. County Mills County Iowa Birth-4 6.9% 6.4% 6.6% 5-9 6.8% 6.4% 6.4% 10-14 6.6% 7.3% 6.5% 15-19 7.0% 7.2% 7.2% 20-24 5.7% 5.9% 7.1% 25-34 13.0% 11.4% 12.3% 35-44 13.1% 13.4% 13.1% 45-54 15.3% 16.6% 14.9% 55-59 6.4% 7.2% 6.4% 60-64 5.2% 6.0% 4.8% 65-74 6.9% 6.8% 7.0% 75-84 4.8% 3.8% 5.3% 85+ 2.0% 1.8% 2.4%
  • 9.  
  • 10. Historical Residential Development Single Family Multi- Mobile Proportion Year Detached Attached family Homes Total of Total Before 1970 1,548 118 29 33 1,728 29.9% 1970-79 816 74 16 68 974 16.9% 1980-89 280 12 25 45 362 6.3% 1990-99 473 50 6 28 557 9.7% 2000-09 846 14 413 6 1,279 22.2% None Given 40 6 211 615 872 15.1% Total 4,003 274 700 795 5,772 100.0%
  • 11. Student Generation Rates Applied Student Generation Rates by Unit Type Unit Type Primary Interm. Middle Senior High Total Mobile Home 0.110 0.175 0.165 0.125 0.575 Multifamily 0.080 0.115 0.070 0.065 0.330 Singe Family Attached 0.034 0.061 0.075 0.085 0.255 Single Family Detached 0.065 0.135 0.105 0.155 0.460            
  • 12. Assessed Valuation Assessed Change From Prior Year Year Valuation Asses. Val. Percent 2000 $ 472,467,141 NA NA 2001 535,356,871 $ 62,889,730 13.3% 2002 561,371,578 26,014,707 4.9% 2003 559,110,370 (2,261,208) -0.4% 2004 575,340,092 16,229,722 2.9% 2005 641,095,128 65,755,036 11.4% 2006 682,284,384 41,189,256 6.4% 2007 780,169,896 97,885,512 14.3% 2008 858,652,158 78,482,262 10.1% 2009 927,444,122 68,791,964 8.0%
  • 13. Resident Enrollment by School Level: 1999 - 2009 Resident Enrollment by School Level Elemen. Inter. Middle Sr. High Total Year (PK - 1) (2 - 5) (6 - 8) (9 - 12) (PK - 12) 1999 364 721 591 826 2,502 2000 336 726 599 731 2,392 2001 358 704 599 767 2,428 2002 347 725 612 809 2,493 2003 344 666 579 766 2,355 2004 419 670 591 778 2,458 2005 425 712 595 784 2,516 2006 398 726 574 763 2,461 2007 462 740 562 771 2,535 2008 467 740 559 798 2,564 2009 498 797 569 753 2,617
  • 14.  
  • 15.  
  • 16.  
  • 17.  
  • 18.  
  • 19.  
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS SUMMARY BY SCENARIO — 2010 to 2015 SCENARIO LOW -- 10 Year Cohort/5 Year Percent Chg. Middle -- 5 Year Modified Cohort HIGH -- 3 Year Percent Change Prim. Inter. Midd. Sr. High Prim. Inter. Midd. Sr. High Prim. Inter. Midd. Sr. High YEAR PK - 1 (2 - 5) (6 - 8) (9-12) Total PK - 1 (2 - 5) (6 - 8) (9 - 12) Total PK - 1 (2 - 5) (6 - 8) (9 - 12) Total 2009 Actual 498 797 569 753 2,617 PROJECTED:     2010 526 800 608 738 2,673 528 811 601 749 2,690 536 812 602 758 2,708 2011 543 826 624 722 2,715 544 849 614 735 2,742 551 858 615 753 2,777 2012 509 881 638 741 2,769 552 892 627 735 2,806 576 909 627 758 2,869 2013 517 873 670 771 2,832 560 911 649 762 2,882 601 940 652 788 2,980 2014 526 883 694 803 2,905 568 941 668 789 2,967 626 994 677 814 3,111 2015 534 875 739 818 2,965 576 957 708 800 3,041 653 1,038 728 825 3,244                                
  • 23. Table II-3. PREFERRED SCENARIO: PROJECTIONS 2010-2015 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Kreft Primary (PK-1) Titan Hill Intermediate (2-5) Total Year Pre- Kinder- Total Interm. (Fall) School garten 1st (PK-1) 2nd 3rd 4th 5th (2-5) Projected Resident Enrollment 2010 111 187 206 505 194 209 184 199 787 2011 119 190 190 500 208 196 212 186 803 2012 119 195 193 507 192 211 199 214 816 2013 119 200 198 517 195 195 213 201 804 2014 119 205 203 527 200 198 197 215 810 2015 119 210 208 538 205 203 200 199 807 Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Constant at 2009 Level 2010 111 229 241 582 243 248 242 243 977 2011 119 232 225 577 257 235 270 230 993 2012 119 237 228 584 241 250 257 258 1,006 2013 119 242 233 594 244 234 271 245 994 2014 119 247 238 604 249 237 255 259 1,000 2015 119 252 243 615 254 242 258 243 997 Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Slow Growth Scenario 2010 111 232 252 595 231 260 226 257 973 2011 119 237 239 595 256 235 265 227 983 2012 119 245 244 608 243 260 240 266 1,009 2013 119 252 251 623 248 246 265 241 1,000 2014 119 260 259 638 256 252 251 267 1,025 2015 119 268 267 654 263 259 257 253 1,032                    
  • 24. Table II-4. PREFERRED SCENARIO: PROJECTIONS 2010-2015 SECONDARY SCHOOLS Total MIDDLE SCHOOL (6-8) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL (9-12) District Year Total Total Enrollment (Fall) 6th 7th 8th (6-8) 9th 10th 11th 12th (9-12) (K-12) Projected Resident Enrollment 2010 211 193 197 601 182 184 188 201 754 2,647 2011 199 214 193 606 198 180 184 190 752 2,660 2012 186 202 214 601 194 196 181 186 756 2,680 2013 214 188 201 604 214 193 196 182 786 2,710 2014 201 217 188 606 202 213 193 198 806 2,749 2015 215 203 217 635 189 201 213 195 797 2,777 Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Constant at 2009 Level 2010 253 234 232 719 228 225 223 234 909 3,187 2011 241 255 228 724 244 221 219 223 907 3,200 2012 228 243 249 719 240 237 216 219 911 3,220 2013 256 229 236 722 260 234 231 215 941 3,250 2014 243 258 223 724 248 254 228 231 961 3,289 2015 257 244 252 753 235 242 248 228 952 3,317 Projected With Out of District Enrollment -- Slow Growth Scenario 2010 258 237 240 736 221 232 231 233 917 3,221 2011 260 263 239 762 245 222 234 229 931 3,271 2012 231 264 265 760 245 246 224 233 948 3,324 2013 270 235 266 771 270 246 248 223 987 3,381 2014 244 274 237 756 272 271 248 247 1,037 3,456 2015 270 249 276 795 242 273 273 246 1,034 3,515                      
  • 25. Estimated Students From Potential Development Potential Potential Students by Zoning Housing Type Housing Units Primary Interm. Middle Sr. High Total Mobile Home 851 94 149 140 106 489 Multifamily 1,611 129 185 113 105 532 Singe Family Attached 274 9 17 21 23 70 Single Family Detached 11,584 753 1,564 1,216 1,796 5,329 Total 14,320 985 1,915 1,490 2,030 6,419
  • 26.
  • 27. Capacities by School Level Student Capacity Estimate Capacity Method Kreft Primary* Titan Hill Intermediate Middle School Senior High Castaldi (Average) 534 832 742 1,073 University of Wisconsin 673 970 834 1,166 Oklahoma Dept. of Education 669 910 762 1,087 Staffing Ratios (optimum) 493 888 643 1,022 Staffing Ratios (maximum) 573 999 823 1,207 SRW Suggested Capacity 530 950 750 1,070 *: Capacity includes Preschool.
  • 28. Capacity per Grade and School: Facility Planning Implications School Level Student Capacity No. of Grades Served Seating Capacity* per Grade Schools to Fill Elementary (PK - 1) 530 3 177 NA Intermediate (2 - 5) 950 4 238 1.34 Middle (6 - 8) 750 3 250 1.05 Senior High (9 - 12) 1,070 4 268 1.07 *: Rounded.
  • 29. Interim Facility Needs (to 2015) SRW Current and Projected Net Capacity Suggested RESIDENT Enrollment Available (Short) . School Capacity Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2015 Fall 2009 Fall 2015 Primary 530 498 505 538 32 (8) Intermediate 950 797 787 807 153 143 Middle 750 569 601 635 181 115 Senior High 1,070 753 754 797 317 273 SRW Current and Projected Net Capacity Suggested TOTAL Enrollment* Available (Short) School Capacity Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2015 Fall 2009 Fall 2015 Primary 530 575 595 654 (45) (124) Intermediate 950 987 973 1,032 (37) (82) Middle 750 687 736 795 63 (45) Senior High 1,070 908 917 1,034 162 36 *: Slow growth open enrollment applied.
  • 30. Long-Term Facility Needs At 75% of Allowed Zoning: Total Number Total of Schools Student Enrollment Needed at School Type Capacity Potential* Build Out Primary 530 1,237 2.3 Intermediate 950 2,233 2.4 Middle 750 1,687 2.2 Senior High 1,070 2,275 2.1 Total   7,432  
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.