SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 5
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC
1PEOPLE
National Account
CASE STUDY 2007-2009
Introduction
From 2005-2008, the hospitality industry experienced
significant growth in new projects identified for development.
The confluence of a strong economy, liberal consumer
spending and low airfares gave rise to a need for the addition
of hotel rooms across the country. This demand, coupled with
historically low interest rates and relatively small barriers to
entry into the industry resulted in an unprecedented surge in
applications for new hotel projects.
The select service category, introduced in the 1980’s, filled the
void between luxury accommodations and the economy tier
of hotels. This category was defined by its strategy to provide
targeted services for its guests at a moderate price point. The
select service group gained strength throughout the 1990’s
and 2000’s, with established brands growing their recognition
and loyalty, while new brands proliferated at record levels.
As a leader in the hospitality business, Marriott International
was one of the primary beneficiaries of these developments.
The company’s pipeline grew at an extraordinary rate, with
select service and extended stay properties opening at a pace
of one every other day throughout the North America Lodging
Operations (NALO) region in 2007 and 2008.
At the same time, new challenges emerged for all hotel
branding companies, ranging from the development of
effective brand segmentation strategies to the orderly rollout
of projects and brand initiatives. In addition, travel websites
such as Expedia, Travelocity and Orbitz sought to erode
brand equity through the commodification of hotel rooms.
This case study will focus on the management of Marriott’s
design approval process during one of the busiest eras in the
history of hotel development. The company, in conjunction
with the design professionals at Zimmerman-Weintraub
Associates, LLC, implemented an extensive and aggressive
outsourcing program to support the growing volume of
projects submitted to Marriott International for review and
approval.
Marriott International- Outsource Program
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
In 2004, Marriott established a Strategic Business Unit (SBU)
tasked with restoring Fairfield Inn to a position of brand
leadership in the lower moderate tier. Over the preceding five
years the brand had experienced significant erosion in brand
equity as a result of an aging portfolio and an opportunistic
development approach. First generation product, featuring
small guest accommodations, economy-grade finishes
and exterior corridors comprised approximately 15% of the
Fairfield portfolio. Approximately half of the new development
projects were conversions and brand standards were
frequently waived for franchise owners who chose to develop
new-build projects.
The SBU conceptualized, planned and implemented the
brand’s “Prune & Plant” strategy, with the intent of eliminating
the portfolio’s lowest performing properties and replacing
them with higher value, new build prototype and custom
properties. The strategy was successful and restored
franchisee confidence in the brand. Beginning in 2005,
the Fairfield Inn brand experienced a significant rise in the
number of projects identified for development as Fairfield Inn
properties.
To maintain the credibility built by the SBU, it was imperative
that Marriott’s Architecture & Construction Division devise a
sustainable strategy to review and approve the extraordinary
volume of projects submitted by franchisees. The review
process was designed to add value to each project through a
comprehensive evaluation of project plans. This review not
only verified compliance with brand standards, it provided
meaningful guidance for franchisees and their consultants as
they developed site-specific design documents.
Vocabulary – Definition of Terms
Leadership: Marriott Senior Management including
Senior Vice Presidents and Vice Presidents of Marriott
CFRST divisions and ZWA Principals.
Program Directors: Marriott directors from Marriott’s
Design, Construction, Procurement and Systems teams.
Managers: Managers from Marriott’s Design,
Construction, Procurement and Systems teams and
ZWA’s Senior Project Manager.
Stakeholders: Marriott Divisions including Marriott
Lodging and Development, Marriott Owner and
Franchisee Services and Marriott Brand, providing
oversight and interactive services with Marriott
Operations, Marriott Product Development, and Project
Development and Marriott Project Management teams.
Franchisees: Owners and Ownership groups owning
and/or managing Fairfield Inn & Suites properties.
CFRST: The collective Marriott brands of Courtyard,
Fairfield Inn, Residence Inn, SpringHill Suites and
TownePlace Suites.
Brand Standards: Specific requirements for every
hotel brand regarding the operation, furnishings, facility,
service offerings, and the look and feel of a property to
ensure consistency across the system of hotels.
Oasis: Owner Account Strategic Information System.
Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC
2PEOPLE
The Outsource Program
In January 2006, Marriott reached out to one of its trusted
service providers, Zimmerman-Weintraub Associates, LLC,
to develop a robust outsource program, capable of handling
the increased volume of work submitted to Marriott for
review. It was critically important that the program address
the qualitative aspects of the review process in addition to the
quantitative aspects of volume and process timing.
The approach was predicated on developing expertise
through an ongoing training effort with the staff at
Zimmerman-Weintraub, thereby allowing the Zimmerman-
Weintraub staff to interface directly with franchisees and
reduce the volume of work flowing directly to Marriott’s
Headquarters-based Architecture & Construction Group.
Program objectives:
The Program Director designated two associates as Program
Managers, one Marriott associate and one Zimmerman-
Weintraub associate to act as counterparts and serve as
liaisons between the two companies. Each was dedicated to
the project to ensure that there were no distractions that might
impede the progress and success of the program.
Careful consideration was given to the organization, planning
and staffing of the outsource program. Team members were
selected based upon their possession of skills, emotional
intelligence and communication style that was most
compatible with the staff at Marriott International as well as
Franchisees who develop Fairfield Inn properties.
Where skills were lacking and as project scopes evolved,
Marriott and Zimmerman-Weintraub worked collectively to
make staffing adjustments as well as process enhancements.
The Program Managers worked in conjunction with one
another to organize and roll out training programs focused on
Marriott processes and procedures. Zimmerman-Weintraub,
in turn, worked to optimize the communication skills and
emotional intelligence of the staff deployed to the outsource
program.
Existing processes, team dynamics and management
decisions were analyzed on an ongoing basis, measured
for results and monitored to determine the root causes for
program and process deficiencies. Processes for making
continuous adjustments were developed and implemented.
Collaboration among all team members was of paramount
importance. Marriott International and Zimmerman-
Weintraub worked tirelessly to integrate team goals, build
strong relationships and provide the infrastructure necessary
to ensure the success of the program. There was a particular
focus on the development of a comprehensive understanding
of the program’s objectives in the context of a broader
business environment.
In addition, it was imperative that staff members of the
Zimmerman-Weintraub team meet and become acquainted
with Marriott stakeholders outside of the Architecture &
Construction group, including the brand and operations
group(s), to build an understanding of the many facets of the
hospitality business and Marriott dynamics.
The earliest challenges with the outsource program were
the result of the Architecture & Construction Group’s limited
experience in the outsourcing of project-based work. There
was concern on many fronts, from how to plan and implement
the program to the anxiety of job losses at headquarters. To
mitigate these concerns, program directors from Marriott and
Zimmerman-Weintraub worked collaboratively to identify
potential challenges and made a firm commitment to resolve
all issues that might form barriers to the success of the
program.
Key macro-level challenges identified:
Obtaining buy-in from the affected stakeholders
at Marriott Headquarters.
Developing an understanding of the unique
character of the Marriott / Franchisee
relationship.
Creating an effective system for the fluid
exchange of information.
Developing an effective training program with
essential tools and procedures.
Managing variability in the process.
Tracking productivity from headquarters and
outsource service providers.
Reduce backlog review workload and allocate
sufficient design support for projects throughout
their design and construction cycle.
Develop strategic approach and response to
projects that incorporated variances to the
brand’s prototypical arrangement of spaces and
amenities, particularly in strategic markets.
Reduce the process time required for preliminary
design and construction drawing reviews.
Improve the responsiveness to franchisee
inquiries and requests.
Improve the quality and quantity of information
retained about each project throughout the
design and construction process.
Program Construct
Fairfield Inn and Suites Exterior EntranceFairfield Inn and Sd Suitesites ExtExt iierioerior EnEr Enr Enr Entrantrantrantrantrancecececece
Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC
3PEOPLE
Physical Separation of Offices
One of the early challenges that the project faced was
the remoteness in the locations of the two offices. This
arrangement created two issues that required innovative
solutions:
•The remoteness of Zimmerman-Weintraub’s associates
insulated them from the main hub of activity and interaction
that is embedded within Marriott’s Headquarters building.
That remoteness slowed the ramp-up process, as they did
not see first-hand how issues were resolved by headquarters-
based associates.
•Although there are many technologies available to manage
remote operations, the program initially relied on traditional
methodologies to move work product between each office.
Drawings and project files were mailed through conventional
mechanisms (such as postal and overnight deliveries).
Marriott leveraged technology developing a project
infrastructure that included AutoDesk’s Buzzsaw application
and Seibel’s OASIS database. BuzzSaw facilitated the
sharing of electronic files between team members from both
offices while OASIS allowed for account- and project-based
information to be saved to a central location. Each of these
tools where instrumental in enabling the virtual work teams
that defined the Strategic Outsource Program.
Communication Barriers
During the process of developing training programs and out of
the struggles the outsource team faced in identifying process
criteria without defined process protocols, program directors
realized that making adjustments to the internal stakeholder
communication could result in significant progress in reaching
the project’s stated objectives as well as benefit many other
aspects of the program’s operations. Moreover, the removal
of communication barriers between the consultant team
and internal stakeholders that had different (and sometimes
conflicting) business interests was an effective measure
against the potential risk of damaging the relationship
between Marriott and its franchisees.
Program Challenges
During the course of the engagement, there were many
challenges that required definition and prompted discussions
between the staff(s) at Marriott International and Zimmerman-
Weintraub. Many of these challenges centered around four
key areas:
Chalanges:
Aspects of the design review process that were
poorly defined, not documented or inefficient.
A task-focused approach to the design review
process.
The physical separation between the offices of
Marriott International (Washington, D.C.) and
Zimmerman-Weintraub (Chicago).
Communication barriers
Process Definition
The outsource program quickly revealed one of the biggest
liabilities the Marriott Architecture & Construction Group
faced and needed to solve: weak process definition and
documentation. As the program ramped up, it became
apparent that most of the processes that defined the
design review workflow were either not recorded or were
documented in a fragmented manner. The absence of
comprehensive process protocols limited the passage of
institutional knowledge and best practices from incumbent
staff members to new associates or consultants engaged to
perform tasks on behalf of the Architecture & Construction
Group.
Task-Focused Approach
At the outset of the program, Marriott approached
Zimmerman-Weintraub to perform task-based work, instead
of engaging Zimmerman-Weintraub to manage the projects
at a program level. This was likely the result of a task-
focused approach to the design review process at Marriott.
The submittal-review cycle drives the process toward a
“transactional” view of the design management process,
and does not highlight the broader opportunities to influence
design through a program-based approach.
Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC
4PEOPLE
Over the two-and-one-half years that the program was in
place, there was significant improvement in the quantitative
and qualitative aspects of the program. Moreover, there were
a number of key lessons learned that could be derived from
the program for any firm that is contemplating an outsource
model as a mechanism to expand production capability.
Program Results
As the program reached maturity in 2008, Zimmerman-
Weintraub performed nearly 30% of all plan reviews issued
by the Architecture & Construction Group, and almost all
of the reviews issued for prototypical Fairfield Inn & Suites
projects. Process improvements reduced the overall delivery
time of reviews issued through Zimmerman-Weintraub’s
offices from an average of 28 business days to just under 13
business days. Owner and Franchisee Services regional vice
presidents, charged with managing the franchisee accounts,
noted a significant reduction in complaints about the timing
and content of design reviews issued by the Zimmerman-
Weintraub team.
Over time, Zimmerman-Weintraub’s participation in projects
migrated from task work to program management and
eventually evolved to include many aspects of the interior
design process, including the preparation of project-specific
bills of materials and material take-offs. Together the
Marriott and ZWA teams enhanced the value associated
with the design review process to levels that were beyond
what was initially anticipated. As the tactical pressures
from the program were shared across the offices of Marriott
International and Zimmerman-Weintraub, Directors from
each office could invest more time in thinking strategically
about process and devise new and better ways manage the
program.
One positive and unanticipated outcome of the outsource
program was that it created an environment where
established practices could be evaluated and new best
practices established. The program was not tethered to
long-held institutional framework and could therefore consider
alternative methodologies for managing the program and
performing tasks that could further optimize the performance
of the program.
Program Results
Lessons Learned
To ensure the success of any future outsource endeavors, it is
imperative to fully define and document the process slated for
outsourcing. Such documentation should not only include the
basic processes involved, but also incorporate best practices
and any institutional knowledge that could enhance program
performance.
While the outsourcing program outlined in this document
appears to be task-focused, there are wide ranges of
relationship dynamics that require consideration:
•Creating alliances with outside providers requires an
understanding by the providers of the corporate culture and
stakeholder objectives.
•Regularly socializing new ideologies to stakeholders
throughout the corporation reduces buy-in time, and
accelerates positive results by the managed services
program. Through focused attention, team members were
able to identify key issues early in the process, develop
collaborative solutions and improve customer service.
•Ongoing process analysis and training programs provide
continual improvement in the performance of the program.
•Developing and maintaining total transparency best
reconciles the needs and the skills of each team member and/
or stakeholder with the broader needs of the program.
•Hierarchical structures that reinforce “vertical”
communication, rather than “horizontal” communication
create silos that work against the success of any outsource
program. Effective lateral communication produces greater
efficiencies and builds staff understanding, enthusiasm and
fulfillment.
•Conducting open forums, and also employing an
“Appreciative Inquiry” technique (asking “what is working”)
will facilitate collaboration and result in optimal process
improvement and problem solving.
•A systematic long-range view and salesmanship from
leadership is important in building collaboration between in-
house and outsource staff.
•Employing state-of–the-art technology allows for the fluid
exchange of data, enhanced communication and reduced
throughput time and project cost.
Lastly, it is essential to evaluate the appropriate
implementation and integration of technology on a proactive,
rather than reactive basis. This aspect of program
management has become increasingly important, as
processes have become more complex and centralized
resources have become more difficult to deploy. In this
model technological advancements increased tracking and
forecasting so that stakeholders, directors and managers
could make better decisions and assist in the success of their
respective staff members.
Example of Redline Markups -Design by Scott Drasler from ZWA
Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC
5PEOPLE
In an economically challenging climate, the ability of large
organizations to improve innovative product and service
offerings while maintaining appropriate staffing levels is a key
predictor of success. The economic recession has compelled
all companies to evaluate their organizations and staffing
levels to assess their readiness and abilities to meet current
and future needs. While some may burrow in and weather the
recession storm other organizations are seeking to improve
the quality of their product and service offerings, leveraging
themselves into a position to handle inevitable workload
variability. These organizations are facing challenges
with “right size” staffing to encompass variability without
significantly increasing fixed expenses.
Outsourcing is an excellent tool to engage in handling these
challenges. Outsourcing presents an efficient operating
model, through which companies can establish core teams
to maintain efficiency, stay lean and maximize the skill
development and competitive impact of their staff while
meeting the increasing (new) needs of their clients and new
market initiatives.
An experienced outsource provider will use key strategies
of cultural recognition and adaptation, evolutionary training
practices, program and process analysis, communication
development with performance tracking and measurement to
elevate program performance from expectations to perform
tasks to the level of creating unencumbered thinking.
With the proper model, outsourcing will lead to discovering
resource potential, creation of personal growth for staff
members and improved product and service deliverables.
While managing internal costs and maintaining lean
efficiencies, a collaborative outsource model can assist
in developing an increase in market share and exceeding
business objectives.
Conclusions
Prototypical Business CenterPrototypical Buffet
Prototypical Guestroom
Prototypical Exterior Facade
Construction of Entrance gablePrototypical Elevator Lobby
Prototypical Exercise room
Prototypical Fairfield Lobby
P tP tP ttProtProttProttoProttotProttPrProtPProtrProtrot tttttttttotypotypotypotyptytyotypotypt ppotyppotypotypotypyptypotypotypotypotypotypotypotypiii llllii licalllicalaliicccalcacalicaaicalcaiccalicaiccalcaicaliccaicalicalicaicalical E tEEEE tE tE tE tE tExtEEEEEExtExEExExtExtExtExExtExxxxExtxExExExtExtExtEExtExtExtExt iiierioiiiiiiiiiierioeriorioerioerioerioerioerioriooerioerioerioooeriorioeerioerioerioerioerio FFFFFFFFr FaFFr FaFr FFFr FFar FaFr Farr FaFr Far Far Far FaFr Far Far Far Far Far Far Fa dddddddddddcadddcadcadecadecadcadcadcadeadadcadccadedecadecadecadeccadecadecadecadecadedcadecade
David W. Crookall –AIA, Owner of an architectural and construction
management business for 24 years dealing primarily in the residential and
corporate office development markets. David was the ZWASenior Project
Manager on this project with a staff of seven members.
Edward Toro –Architectural Consultant, based out of the Washington,
D.C. area. Edward was the Marriott International Director of Design
Management of CFIRST for this outsource program from its inception in
2007 to its conclusion in 2009. He held various associate postitions at
Marriott over the previous 10 years.
J. Douglas Zimmerman – Principal Zimmerman Weintraub &Associates
with a 25+ year career in helping corporate, hospitality, retail, and
institutional indusrty leaders with strategic thinking, design, procurement,
construction and operational management of innovative facilities and real
estate portfolios. Doug has a deep passion for thinking “out of the box.”

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie FFIS case Study Final

Hany Khalil Profile S160201
Hany Khalil Profile S160201Hany Khalil Profile S160201
Hany Khalil Profile S160201Hany Khalil
 
Mark Haigh Resume Marketing Director
Mark Haigh Resume Marketing DirectorMark Haigh Resume Marketing Director
Mark Haigh Resume Marketing DirectorHaigh, Mark
 
Michael Meyer _CV 1
Michael Meyer _CV 1Michael Meyer _CV 1
Michael Meyer _CV 1Mike Meyer
 
Senior sales & business development executive
Senior sales & business development executiveSenior sales & business development executive
Senior sales & business development executiveEd Graham
 
Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11
Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11
Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11Lauren7284
 
Neil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business Development
Neil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business DevelopmentNeil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business Development
Neil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business DevelopmentNeil Peterson
 
Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13
Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13
Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13dclarance
 
Tim Rowe Resume Li
Tim Rowe Resume LiTim Rowe Resume Li
Tim Rowe Resume LiTim Rowe
 
Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2
Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2
Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2Justin Madha
 
Kurt Worden Resume
Kurt Worden ResumeKurt Worden Resume
Kurt Worden ResumeKurt Worden
 
Jose F Valdes Resumé
Jose F Valdes ResuméJose F Valdes Resumé
Jose F Valdes ResuméJose Valdes
 
mark_neveu_resume_2015
mark_neveu_resume_2015mark_neveu_resume_2015
mark_neveu_resume_2015Mark Neveu
 
Michael Geers Resume 2016
Michael Geers Resume 2016Michael Geers Resume 2016
Michael Geers Resume 2016Michael Geers
 
Updated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CS
Updated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CSUpdated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CS
Updated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CSDylan Smith
 
CimaMarkExecutiveResume
CimaMarkExecutiveResumeCimaMarkExecutiveResume
CimaMarkExecutiveResumeMark Cima
 

Ähnlich wie FFIS case Study Final (20)

Hany Khalil Profile S160201
Hany Khalil Profile S160201Hany Khalil Profile S160201
Hany Khalil Profile S160201
 
Mark Haigh Resume Marketing Director
Mark Haigh Resume Marketing DirectorMark Haigh Resume Marketing Director
Mark Haigh Resume Marketing Director
 
Michael Meyer _CV 1
Michael Meyer _CV 1Michael Meyer _CV 1
Michael Meyer _CV 1
 
Senior sales & business development executive
Senior sales & business development executiveSenior sales & business development executive
Senior sales & business development executive
 
Deandra Cassidy
Deandra CassidyDeandra Cassidy
Deandra Cassidy
 
Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11
Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11
Lauren Dyer Resume 3.11
 
Neil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business Development
Neil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business DevelopmentNeil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business Development
Neil Peterson-VP Sales, Marketing and Business Development
 
Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13
Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13
Deanna Clarance Resume - 12/13
 
Tim Rowe Resume Li
Tim Rowe Resume LiTim Rowe Resume Li
Tim Rowe Resume Li
 
Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2
Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2
Justin_Madha_Resume_Draft2
 
Robert manning resume
Robert manning resumeRobert manning resume
Robert manning resume
 
Kurt Worden Resume
Kurt Worden ResumeKurt Worden Resume
Kurt Worden Resume
 
Jose F Valdes Resumé
Jose F Valdes ResuméJose F Valdes Resumé
Jose F Valdes Resumé
 
Susan Friedman Resume
Susan Friedman ResumeSusan Friedman Resume
Susan Friedman Resume
 
mark_neveu_resume_2015
mark_neveu_resume_2015mark_neveu_resume_2015
mark_neveu_resume_2015
 
Shelly olson 05-24-16
Shelly olson 05-24-16Shelly olson 05-24-16
Shelly olson 05-24-16
 
Michael Geers Resume 2016
Michael Geers Resume 2016Michael Geers Resume 2016
Michael Geers Resume 2016
 
Updated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CS
Updated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CSUpdated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CS
Updated CV Dylan Smith 040115.doc CS
 
Advertising and Marketing Technology Perspective
Advertising and Marketing Technology PerspectiveAdvertising and Marketing Technology Perspective
Advertising and Marketing Technology Perspective
 
CimaMarkExecutiveResume
CimaMarkExecutiveResumeCimaMarkExecutiveResume
CimaMarkExecutiveResume
 

FFIS case Study Final

  • 1. Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC 1PEOPLE National Account CASE STUDY 2007-2009 Introduction From 2005-2008, the hospitality industry experienced significant growth in new projects identified for development. The confluence of a strong economy, liberal consumer spending and low airfares gave rise to a need for the addition of hotel rooms across the country. This demand, coupled with historically low interest rates and relatively small barriers to entry into the industry resulted in an unprecedented surge in applications for new hotel projects. The select service category, introduced in the 1980’s, filled the void between luxury accommodations and the economy tier of hotels. This category was defined by its strategy to provide targeted services for its guests at a moderate price point. The select service group gained strength throughout the 1990’s and 2000’s, with established brands growing their recognition and loyalty, while new brands proliferated at record levels. As a leader in the hospitality business, Marriott International was one of the primary beneficiaries of these developments. The company’s pipeline grew at an extraordinary rate, with select service and extended stay properties opening at a pace of one every other day throughout the North America Lodging Operations (NALO) region in 2007 and 2008. At the same time, new challenges emerged for all hotel branding companies, ranging from the development of effective brand segmentation strategies to the orderly rollout of projects and brand initiatives. In addition, travel websites such as Expedia, Travelocity and Orbitz sought to erode brand equity through the commodification of hotel rooms. This case study will focus on the management of Marriott’s design approval process during one of the busiest eras in the history of hotel development. The company, in conjunction with the design professionals at Zimmerman-Weintraub Associates, LLC, implemented an extensive and aggressive outsourcing program to support the growing volume of projects submitted to Marriott International for review and approval. Marriott International- Outsource Program Fairfield Inn by Marriott In 2004, Marriott established a Strategic Business Unit (SBU) tasked with restoring Fairfield Inn to a position of brand leadership in the lower moderate tier. Over the preceding five years the brand had experienced significant erosion in brand equity as a result of an aging portfolio and an opportunistic development approach. First generation product, featuring small guest accommodations, economy-grade finishes and exterior corridors comprised approximately 15% of the Fairfield portfolio. Approximately half of the new development projects were conversions and brand standards were frequently waived for franchise owners who chose to develop new-build projects. The SBU conceptualized, planned and implemented the brand’s “Prune & Plant” strategy, with the intent of eliminating the portfolio’s lowest performing properties and replacing them with higher value, new build prototype and custom properties. The strategy was successful and restored franchisee confidence in the brand. Beginning in 2005, the Fairfield Inn brand experienced a significant rise in the number of projects identified for development as Fairfield Inn properties. To maintain the credibility built by the SBU, it was imperative that Marriott’s Architecture & Construction Division devise a sustainable strategy to review and approve the extraordinary volume of projects submitted by franchisees. The review process was designed to add value to each project through a comprehensive evaluation of project plans. This review not only verified compliance with brand standards, it provided meaningful guidance for franchisees and their consultants as they developed site-specific design documents. Vocabulary – Definition of Terms Leadership: Marriott Senior Management including Senior Vice Presidents and Vice Presidents of Marriott CFRST divisions and ZWA Principals. Program Directors: Marriott directors from Marriott’s Design, Construction, Procurement and Systems teams. Managers: Managers from Marriott’s Design, Construction, Procurement and Systems teams and ZWA’s Senior Project Manager. Stakeholders: Marriott Divisions including Marriott Lodging and Development, Marriott Owner and Franchisee Services and Marriott Brand, providing oversight and interactive services with Marriott Operations, Marriott Product Development, and Project Development and Marriott Project Management teams. Franchisees: Owners and Ownership groups owning and/or managing Fairfield Inn & Suites properties. CFRST: The collective Marriott brands of Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, Residence Inn, SpringHill Suites and TownePlace Suites. Brand Standards: Specific requirements for every hotel brand regarding the operation, furnishings, facility, service offerings, and the look and feel of a property to ensure consistency across the system of hotels. Oasis: Owner Account Strategic Information System.
  • 2. Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC 2PEOPLE The Outsource Program In January 2006, Marriott reached out to one of its trusted service providers, Zimmerman-Weintraub Associates, LLC, to develop a robust outsource program, capable of handling the increased volume of work submitted to Marriott for review. It was critically important that the program address the qualitative aspects of the review process in addition to the quantitative aspects of volume and process timing. The approach was predicated on developing expertise through an ongoing training effort with the staff at Zimmerman-Weintraub, thereby allowing the Zimmerman- Weintraub staff to interface directly with franchisees and reduce the volume of work flowing directly to Marriott’s Headquarters-based Architecture & Construction Group. Program objectives: The Program Director designated two associates as Program Managers, one Marriott associate and one Zimmerman- Weintraub associate to act as counterparts and serve as liaisons between the two companies. Each was dedicated to the project to ensure that there were no distractions that might impede the progress and success of the program. Careful consideration was given to the organization, planning and staffing of the outsource program. Team members were selected based upon their possession of skills, emotional intelligence and communication style that was most compatible with the staff at Marriott International as well as Franchisees who develop Fairfield Inn properties. Where skills were lacking and as project scopes evolved, Marriott and Zimmerman-Weintraub worked collectively to make staffing adjustments as well as process enhancements. The Program Managers worked in conjunction with one another to organize and roll out training programs focused on Marriott processes and procedures. Zimmerman-Weintraub, in turn, worked to optimize the communication skills and emotional intelligence of the staff deployed to the outsource program. Existing processes, team dynamics and management decisions were analyzed on an ongoing basis, measured for results and monitored to determine the root causes for program and process deficiencies. Processes for making continuous adjustments were developed and implemented. Collaboration among all team members was of paramount importance. Marriott International and Zimmerman- Weintraub worked tirelessly to integrate team goals, build strong relationships and provide the infrastructure necessary to ensure the success of the program. There was a particular focus on the development of a comprehensive understanding of the program’s objectives in the context of a broader business environment. In addition, it was imperative that staff members of the Zimmerman-Weintraub team meet and become acquainted with Marriott stakeholders outside of the Architecture & Construction group, including the brand and operations group(s), to build an understanding of the many facets of the hospitality business and Marriott dynamics. The earliest challenges with the outsource program were the result of the Architecture & Construction Group’s limited experience in the outsourcing of project-based work. There was concern on many fronts, from how to plan and implement the program to the anxiety of job losses at headquarters. To mitigate these concerns, program directors from Marriott and Zimmerman-Weintraub worked collaboratively to identify potential challenges and made a firm commitment to resolve all issues that might form barriers to the success of the program. Key macro-level challenges identified: Obtaining buy-in from the affected stakeholders at Marriott Headquarters. Developing an understanding of the unique character of the Marriott / Franchisee relationship. Creating an effective system for the fluid exchange of information. Developing an effective training program with essential tools and procedures. Managing variability in the process. Tracking productivity from headquarters and outsource service providers. Reduce backlog review workload and allocate sufficient design support for projects throughout their design and construction cycle. Develop strategic approach and response to projects that incorporated variances to the brand’s prototypical arrangement of spaces and amenities, particularly in strategic markets. Reduce the process time required for preliminary design and construction drawing reviews. Improve the responsiveness to franchisee inquiries and requests. Improve the quality and quantity of information retained about each project throughout the design and construction process. Program Construct Fairfield Inn and Suites Exterior EntranceFairfield Inn and Sd Suitesites ExtExt iierioerior EnEr Enr Enr Entrantrantrantrantrancecececece
  • 3. Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC 3PEOPLE Physical Separation of Offices One of the early challenges that the project faced was the remoteness in the locations of the two offices. This arrangement created two issues that required innovative solutions: •The remoteness of Zimmerman-Weintraub’s associates insulated them from the main hub of activity and interaction that is embedded within Marriott’s Headquarters building. That remoteness slowed the ramp-up process, as they did not see first-hand how issues were resolved by headquarters- based associates. •Although there are many technologies available to manage remote operations, the program initially relied on traditional methodologies to move work product between each office. Drawings and project files were mailed through conventional mechanisms (such as postal and overnight deliveries). Marriott leveraged technology developing a project infrastructure that included AutoDesk’s Buzzsaw application and Seibel’s OASIS database. BuzzSaw facilitated the sharing of electronic files between team members from both offices while OASIS allowed for account- and project-based information to be saved to a central location. Each of these tools where instrumental in enabling the virtual work teams that defined the Strategic Outsource Program. Communication Barriers During the process of developing training programs and out of the struggles the outsource team faced in identifying process criteria without defined process protocols, program directors realized that making adjustments to the internal stakeholder communication could result in significant progress in reaching the project’s stated objectives as well as benefit many other aspects of the program’s operations. Moreover, the removal of communication barriers between the consultant team and internal stakeholders that had different (and sometimes conflicting) business interests was an effective measure against the potential risk of damaging the relationship between Marriott and its franchisees. Program Challenges During the course of the engagement, there were many challenges that required definition and prompted discussions between the staff(s) at Marriott International and Zimmerman- Weintraub. Many of these challenges centered around four key areas: Chalanges: Aspects of the design review process that were poorly defined, not documented or inefficient. A task-focused approach to the design review process. The physical separation between the offices of Marriott International (Washington, D.C.) and Zimmerman-Weintraub (Chicago). Communication barriers Process Definition The outsource program quickly revealed one of the biggest liabilities the Marriott Architecture & Construction Group faced and needed to solve: weak process definition and documentation. As the program ramped up, it became apparent that most of the processes that defined the design review workflow were either not recorded or were documented in a fragmented manner. The absence of comprehensive process protocols limited the passage of institutional knowledge and best practices from incumbent staff members to new associates or consultants engaged to perform tasks on behalf of the Architecture & Construction Group. Task-Focused Approach At the outset of the program, Marriott approached Zimmerman-Weintraub to perform task-based work, instead of engaging Zimmerman-Weintraub to manage the projects at a program level. This was likely the result of a task- focused approach to the design review process at Marriott. The submittal-review cycle drives the process toward a “transactional” view of the design management process, and does not highlight the broader opportunities to influence design through a program-based approach.
  • 4. Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC 4PEOPLE Over the two-and-one-half years that the program was in place, there was significant improvement in the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the program. Moreover, there were a number of key lessons learned that could be derived from the program for any firm that is contemplating an outsource model as a mechanism to expand production capability. Program Results As the program reached maturity in 2008, Zimmerman- Weintraub performed nearly 30% of all plan reviews issued by the Architecture & Construction Group, and almost all of the reviews issued for prototypical Fairfield Inn & Suites projects. Process improvements reduced the overall delivery time of reviews issued through Zimmerman-Weintraub’s offices from an average of 28 business days to just under 13 business days. Owner and Franchisee Services regional vice presidents, charged with managing the franchisee accounts, noted a significant reduction in complaints about the timing and content of design reviews issued by the Zimmerman- Weintraub team. Over time, Zimmerman-Weintraub’s participation in projects migrated from task work to program management and eventually evolved to include many aspects of the interior design process, including the preparation of project-specific bills of materials and material take-offs. Together the Marriott and ZWA teams enhanced the value associated with the design review process to levels that were beyond what was initially anticipated. As the tactical pressures from the program were shared across the offices of Marriott International and Zimmerman-Weintraub, Directors from each office could invest more time in thinking strategically about process and devise new and better ways manage the program. One positive and unanticipated outcome of the outsource program was that it created an environment where established practices could be evaluated and new best practices established. The program was not tethered to long-held institutional framework and could therefore consider alternative methodologies for managing the program and performing tasks that could further optimize the performance of the program. Program Results Lessons Learned To ensure the success of any future outsource endeavors, it is imperative to fully define and document the process slated for outsourcing. Such documentation should not only include the basic processes involved, but also incorporate best practices and any institutional knowledge that could enhance program performance. While the outsourcing program outlined in this document appears to be task-focused, there are wide ranges of relationship dynamics that require consideration: •Creating alliances with outside providers requires an understanding by the providers of the corporate culture and stakeholder objectives. •Regularly socializing new ideologies to stakeholders throughout the corporation reduces buy-in time, and accelerates positive results by the managed services program. Through focused attention, team members were able to identify key issues early in the process, develop collaborative solutions and improve customer service. •Ongoing process analysis and training programs provide continual improvement in the performance of the program. •Developing and maintaining total transparency best reconciles the needs and the skills of each team member and/ or stakeholder with the broader needs of the program. •Hierarchical structures that reinforce “vertical” communication, rather than “horizontal” communication create silos that work against the success of any outsource program. Effective lateral communication produces greater efficiencies and builds staff understanding, enthusiasm and fulfillment. •Conducting open forums, and also employing an “Appreciative Inquiry” technique (asking “what is working”) will facilitate collaboration and result in optimal process improvement and problem solving. •A systematic long-range view and salesmanship from leadership is important in building collaboration between in- house and outsource staff. •Employing state-of–the-art technology allows for the fluid exchange of data, enhanced communication and reduced throughput time and project cost. Lastly, it is essential to evaluate the appropriate implementation and integration of technology on a proactive, rather than reactive basis. This aspect of program management has become increasingly important, as processes have become more complex and centralized resources have become more difficult to deploy. In this model technological advancements increased tracking and forecasting so that stakeholders, directors and managers could make better decisions and assist in the success of their respective staff members. Example of Redline Markups -Design by Scott Drasler from ZWA
  • 5. Zimmerman Weintraub Associates LLC 5PEOPLE In an economically challenging climate, the ability of large organizations to improve innovative product and service offerings while maintaining appropriate staffing levels is a key predictor of success. The economic recession has compelled all companies to evaluate their organizations and staffing levels to assess their readiness and abilities to meet current and future needs. While some may burrow in and weather the recession storm other organizations are seeking to improve the quality of their product and service offerings, leveraging themselves into a position to handle inevitable workload variability. These organizations are facing challenges with “right size” staffing to encompass variability without significantly increasing fixed expenses. Outsourcing is an excellent tool to engage in handling these challenges. Outsourcing presents an efficient operating model, through which companies can establish core teams to maintain efficiency, stay lean and maximize the skill development and competitive impact of their staff while meeting the increasing (new) needs of their clients and new market initiatives. An experienced outsource provider will use key strategies of cultural recognition and adaptation, evolutionary training practices, program and process analysis, communication development with performance tracking and measurement to elevate program performance from expectations to perform tasks to the level of creating unencumbered thinking. With the proper model, outsourcing will lead to discovering resource potential, creation of personal growth for staff members and improved product and service deliverables. While managing internal costs and maintaining lean efficiencies, a collaborative outsource model can assist in developing an increase in market share and exceeding business objectives. Conclusions Prototypical Business CenterPrototypical Buffet Prototypical Guestroom Prototypical Exterior Facade Construction of Entrance gablePrototypical Elevator Lobby Prototypical Exercise room Prototypical Fairfield Lobby P tP tP ttProtProttProttoProttotProttPrProtPProtrProtrot tttttttttotypotypotypotyptytyotypotypt ppotyppotypotypotypyptypotypotypotypotypotypotypotypiii llllii licalllicalaliicccalcacalicaaicalcaiccalicaiccalcaicaliccaicalicalicaicalical E tEEEE tE tE tE tE tExtEEEEEExtExEExExtExtExtExExtExxxxExtxExExExtExtExtEExtExtExtExt iiierioiiiiiiiiiierioeriorioerioerioerioerioerioriooerioerioerioooeriorioeerioerioerioerioerio FFFFFFFFr FaFFr FaFr FFFr FFar FaFr Farr FaFr Far Far Far FaFr Far Far Far Far Far Far Fa dddddddddddcadddcadcadecadecadcadcadcadeadadcadccadedecadecadecadeccadecadecadecadecadedcadecade David W. Crookall –AIA, Owner of an architectural and construction management business for 24 years dealing primarily in the residential and corporate office development markets. David was the ZWASenior Project Manager on this project with a staff of seven members. Edward Toro –Architectural Consultant, based out of the Washington, D.C. area. Edward was the Marriott International Director of Design Management of CFIRST for this outsource program from its inception in 2007 to its conclusion in 2009. He held various associate postitions at Marriott over the previous 10 years. J. Douglas Zimmerman – Principal Zimmerman Weintraub &Associates with a 25+ year career in helping corporate, hospitality, retail, and institutional indusrty leaders with strategic thinking, design, procurement, construction and operational management of innovative facilities and real estate portfolios. Doug has a deep passion for thinking “out of the box.”