Addressing the Causes and Effects of Global Educational Inequality: A Multi-Faceted Common-Values Approach
1. Addressing the
Causes and Effects
of Global
Educational
Inequality:
A Multi-Faceted Common-ValuesApproach
By Daniel Duvalle
2. The circumstances outside an individualâs control that
provide or prevent the opportunities to obtain a quality
education are not to be taken lightly.
⢠The value of an education to the individual receiving may be apparent to other
people â It may be less apparent that providing an education to an individual
can also be a benefit to others and larger society
⢠Corollary: When an individual does not receive a quality education, it is not
only a loss experienced by them, but to others around them and the larger
society they live in.
⢠Goal: Equal access to quality education regardless of original individual
circumstances â make investment in individual people and a common garden
of humanity.
2 5/3/2019
3. Why address educational inequality?
⢠Equality of education opportunity should be treated independently from other
theories of equal opportunity.Why?
⢠Shields, Newman, and Satz (2017): because of the
⢠âcentral place of education in modern societies and the myriad opportunities it affords;
⢠the scarcity of high-quality educational opportunities for many children;
⢠and the critical role of the state in providing educational opportunitiesâ
3 5/3/2019 Add a footer
5. A CommonThread of Global Educational Inequality:
The âRace to the Bottomâ
⢠The same places with the least access to quality education are the same
developing regions disproportionately affected by exploitative globalized
Neoliberal capitalism industrial/economic practices
⢠Local resources extracted but balanced reinvestment of benefits are not made
into local societies to ensure practices are sustainable
⢠Periphery and semi-periphery nations (Wallersteinâs World-SystemsTheory)
most affected:
⢠Nations in Africa, Asia, and Central/South America
5 5/3/2019 Add a footer
6. UNESCO
Sustainable
DevelopmentGoal
4 - Education
Most apparent hurdle to education
is poverty or low socioeconomic
status. Disproportionately affects
Africa and South Asia.
6 5/3/2019 Target 4.1 Universal Primary School Completion â Hurdle: Poverty
7. UNESCO
Sustainable
DevelopmentGoal
4 - Education
Most apparent hurdle to education
is poverty or low socioeconomic
status. Disproportionately affects
Africa, South Asia, and
Central/South America
7 5/3/2019 Target 4.1 Universal Secondary School Completion â Hurdle: Poverty
8. UNESCO
Sustainable
DevelopmentGoal
4 - Education
Apparent hurdle to education to
many is geographic:Access to local
educational opportunities are
limited by remote location and
rural obligations.
Disproportionately affects Africa,
South Asia, and Central/South
America
8 5/3/2019 Target 4.2 Early Childhood Care and Education â Hurdle: Remote Locations and Requirements of Rural Obligations
9. UNESCO
Sustainable
DevelopmentGoal
4 - Education
Apparent hurdle to educational
access is cultural perception of
gender roles, disproportionate
restriction of access to females in
Africa, South Asia, and
Central/South America
9 5/3/2019 Target 4.5 Equity by Gender â Hurdle: Cultural Restrictions due to Perceptions of Gender and Gender Roles
10. UNESCO
Sustainable
DevelopmentGoal
4 - Education
Apparent hurdle to educational
access is cultural perception of
gender roles, disproportionate
restriction of access to females in
Africa, South Asia, and
Central/South America
10 5/3/2019 Target 4.6 Youth Literacy â Hurdle: Cultural Restrictions due to Perceptions of Gender and Gender Roles
11. UNESCO
Sustainable
DevelopmentGoal
4 - Education
Apparent hurdle to educational
access is cultural perception of
gender roles, disproportionate
restriction of access to students in
Central/South America,
Australia/New Zealand,
Europe/Middle East, some parts of
Africa (refugees, war zones, and
isolated people)
11 5/3/2019 Target 4.5 Equity by Language â Hurdle: Cultural Restrictions due to Student Language Accessibility
12. Bottlenecks Impeding Educational Access
⢠Economics (and politics affecting economic distribution and redistribution)
⢠Geographic distances and language barriers
⢠Cultural and individual perceptions surrounding education
12 5/3/2019 Add a footer
13. According to Garcia &Weiss (2017), from the very
beginning of a personâs life, their familyâs
socioeconomic status is likely to make the biggest
difference in their chances at successful educational
attainment:
⢠âExtensive research has conclusively demonstrated that childrenâs social class
is one of the most significant predictorsâif not the single most significant
predictorâof their educational success. Moreover, it is increasingly apparent
that performance gaps by social class take root in the earliest years of
childrenâs lives and fail to narrow in the years that follow.That is, children who
start behind stay behindâthey are rarely able to make up the lost ground.â
13 5/3/2019 Add a footer
14. ⌠And that being behind in school is not only a
disadvantage to them individually through their
own life, but a loss to society and a loss to their
children and future generations of their family:
⢠âThese performance gaps reflect extensive unmet needs and thus untapped
talents among low-SES children.The development of strong cognitive and
noncognitive skills is essential for success in school and beyond. Low
educational achievement leads to lowered economic prospects later in life,
perpetuating a lack of social mobility across generations. It is also a loss to
society when childrenâs talents are allowed to go fallow for lack of sufficient
supports.The undeniable relationship between economic inequalities and
education inequalities represents a societal failure that betrays the ideal of the
âAmerican dream.ââ
14 5/3/2019 Add a footer
15. Economic Governance
⢠âIf we are to make our global economic system work better, we have to have better
systems of global economic governance.â (Stiglitz 2009)
⢠Continuum of ideas
⢠Conservatism is defined by insistence on maintaining of the status quo.
⢠Progressivism, which is defined by recognition of problems in society and need for development of solutions
⢠The research of Okulicz-Kozaryn, Holmes, & Avery (2014) on subjective well-being (SWB)
indicates a political paradox that :
âWhen measures capture what a country does (enacted political orientation),
greater liberalism corresponds with higher SWB, but when measures tap what citizens
believe (espoused political orientation), the pattern is the opposite.â Enacted left-wing, or
progressive-humanist politics, entail provision of greater social safety nets that provide a
better economic foundation for the improving social outcomes like education, while
personally espoused conservative political positions tend to stem from the beliefs that
âindividuals are responsible for their outcomes and, ultimately, get what they deserve (i.e.,
rationalize the status quo).â
⢠So aside from differences in beliefs concerning education itself, the differences of beliefs
on a political continuum that lead to enacted policies directly affect the type and budgets
for education as well as affecting the economic context of those obtaining education.
15 5/3/2019 Add a footer
16. 16 5/3/2019 Unable to find source of infographic creator, but sources listed on graphic areverified
17. Geographic Distance and Language Barriers
⢠Physical accessibility to a school is not an option for children and adults.
⢠Physical barriers or distances causing inaccessibility to isolated or rural areas
also serve as economic barriers
⢠Languages can serve as barriers to quality education if the language of
instruction at school is not a language spoken at home (World Inequality
Database on Education).
⢠War, poverty, famine, and crises drive people from their homes to new places,
adding challenges to education
17 5/3/2019 Add a footer
18. Cultural and Individual Perspectives Surrounding
Education
⢠Notions of what an education entails and the purpose it serves vary from person to person
and over time
⢠Storytelling and oral histories, shamanic magic and wisdom traditions
⢠Trades:Craftspeople and apprentices
⢠Aristotleâs Lycaeum
⢠Medieval Christian Cathedrals
⢠Now, in the US:
⢠âA majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents (58%) now say that colleges and universities
have a negative effect on the country, up from 45% last year. By contrast, most Democrats and Democratic
leaners (72%) say colleges and universities have a positive effect, which is little changed from recent years.â
(Pew Research 2017)
⢠Religious and secular world-views and educational systems: Differences in functional
definition of âtruthâ and truth. (Subjectivity and Objectivity)
⢠Synthesizing âtruthâ and truth:
⢠Picoâs âOration on the Dignity of Manâ (1486)
⢠Unitarian Universalism
⢠âthe free and responsible search for truth and meaning.â
18 5/3/2019 Add a footer
20. In San Diego: San Diego Public Library System
⢠Interview with Marisa, Clerk at Branch Library, previously Central Library
⢠Told me about array of services offered through the library system that are in place to help
alleviate educational inequality
⢠âComputers to SD Kidsâ provides technology to children in lower income families
⢠âDo your homework at the libraryâ program offers free homework assistance to K-8 children
⢠Online live tutoring program provides remote help to kids who need help and have internet access
⢠âCareer Online High Schoolâ allows adults to earn a high school diploma along with a vocational tech
certificate
⢠âRead San Diegoâ provides help to those seeking to improve their literacy and programs to help non-
English speakers to learn English as a second language and with resources to help them through the
process to obtain citizenship
⢠âInnovation/Idea Labâ at the library provides access to high-tech equipment like 3d printers and laser-
cutters and the Adobe Software Suite
⢠Among Marisaâs favorite recurring experiences are seeing familiar patrons stop showing up
for a while then return for a visit to inform her that sheâs helped them find a job as well as
seeing the children at the branch grow in excitement, curiosity, and ability over time.
21. Globally: One Laptop Per Child (OLPC)
⢠OLPC provides devices to remote locations to increase opportunities for few other
options, if any, for educating themselves to basic literacy.
⢠Working with the ZamoraTeran Foundation,
⢠âOLPCâs multidisciplinary teams work to identify and analyze the social, economic and
educational context to create a program tailored to address the specific needs and desired
outcomes of each community.With such knowledge and local context, OLPC identifies the key
items required for a successful program that includes both social and educational transformation.
Our goal is to support the processes of program design and implementation.With more than ten
years of experience in the field, OLPC is uniquely positioned as an expert in the integration of
technology into the learning environment. OLPC now seeks to share the knowledge that leads to a
transformation in schools and communities and to a stronger and more unified future for all.â (One
Laptop Per Child n.d.)
⢠Kids are smarter than you think they are!What happened in Ethiopia:
⢠âEarlier this year, OLPC workers dropped off closed boxes containing the tablets, taped shut, with
no instruction. âI thought the kids would play with the boxes.Within four minutes, one kid not only
opened the box, found the on-off switch ⌠powered it up.Within five days, they were using 47
apps per child, per day.Within two weeks, they were singing ABC songs in the village, and within
five months, they had hackedAndroid,â Negroponte said. âSome idiot in our organization or in the
Media Lab had disabled the camera, and they figured out the camera, and had hacked Android.ââ
(Talbot 2012)
22. BlinkNow: Glocalization
⢠Built a school for 350 children (and a home for 40 of them) in the foothills of
the Himalayan Mountains
⢠Global support through social media and internet
⢠âa program to prepare our graduates for their futuresâ
24. PerennialWisdom, Science, and Dialectic:
Synthesis of âTruthâ andTruth to Map Meaning
24 5/3/2019 Dialectic: thesis â antithesis/negative â synthesis/resolution
25. Clarifying Perception of Our OwnValuesThrough
Metaphors
⢠What stories did you learn when you were very young?
⢠Of those stories, which âconnectâ with you on a personal level?
⢠Which parts of those stories really resonate with you?
⢠What stories did you learn as you got a little older and your world started to
become bigger?
⢠What stories capture your attention today?
⢠What kinds of characters capture your attention?
⢠What stories remind you of yourself?
⢠When you perceive the âstory of the world around youâ, what role(s) do you
play in it?
⢠If you could reimagine the âstory of the world around youâ and were able to shape the world
as you saw fit, what would you change or do differently?What would you keep the same or
continue doing?
26. Applied Anthropology: Modes of Acculturation
⢠Contact of cultures merges cultural systems:
⢠A + B + C = D
⢠Diffusion of knowledge between cultures
⢠A to B to C to D
⢠Assimilation of cultures by another, whether coerced or voluntary
⢠A + B + C = A
⢠Pluralism â For the Win!
⢠A + B + C = AD + BD + CD
⢠For the problem of global educational inequality at hand, the common D culture would entail
adding education as a common value to the cultures in contact while preserving appreciation
for oneâs cultural heritage
⢠How?
26 5/3/2019 Add a footer
27. Social Engineering and Psychological Operations:
Ethics
⢠Social engineering is old and has a long history
⢠TheTrojan Horse â Homerâs Odyssey
⢠âBe extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness.Thereby
you can be the director of the opponent's fate.â (SunTzu, Art ofWar)
⢠Slave Bibles â Bibles made for captive slaves with all concepts of liberation and freedom removed.
⢠Edward Bernays â Public Relations, Propaganda,The Engineering of Consent. Use of crowd psychology and psychoanalysis
⢠ColdWar: KGB âActive Measuresâ,
⢠Different forms â Personal and Political â Both rely on subtlety and deception
⢠Phishing
⢠âA lie travels farther than the truth.â (Irish Proverb)
⢠Counterpropaganda to overcome propaganda
⢠Counterpropaganda relies on precise delivery of factually true information
⢠To avoid compromising personal integrity and accomplishment of objective, truth cannot be compromised.
⢠Markets are not rational (flaws in rational market hypothesis)
⢠Goal:To persuade all people, using complete, truthful, and accurate information, that a lifetime of free education
access to all people by some means would benefit each of them personally.
⢠Impossible for a single person to know all information: Luckily, itâs the first time in history that pocket-sized computers make
accessing a vast portion of the sum of human knowledge accessible nearly instantaneously!
⢠Ethics â Prioritize highest standards through ethical and responsible search for truth. Pluralize codes of ethics through dialectic
comparison from various sources, from various international anthropological associations and their coalitions to various
organizations that standardize building codes to
⢠Prevent moral overload from being forced to choose between providing/obtaining education and other values or as economic
opportunity cost. (Van den Hoven, Lokhorst,Van de Poel 2011)
27 5/3/2019
28. Social Engineering asTechnological Development
⢠âEthics can be the source of technological development rather than just a
constraint and technological progress can create moral progress rather than
just moral problems.â (Van den Hoven, Lokhorst,Van de Poel 2011)
⢠Collaboration is preferable to competition, coercion or conquest
⢠Tale of Elephant and Blind Men
28 5/3/2019 Add a footer
29. Socially Engineering a Sustainable Pluralistic Society:
Addressing Economic Inequalities that Drive Education
Inequality
⢠Truth is priority, the inordinately wealthy are the âtargetsâ to resolve
⢠Use of dialectic for rational conversation
⢠Prioritize understanding of deepest values and build bridges to them through
metaphor to bypass the backfire effect.
⢠What stories do we tell ourselves about who we are and roles we play?
⢠What stories do others tell themselves about who they are and their place in the world?
⢠Appeal to individualâs self-perception of capability in Meritocracy. Issue challenge to their actual acumen and
abilities. Insert a wedge between the trappings of success and ability to obtain success. Demand proof with
high-goal posts. Induce humility by challenging competence like !Kung Bushmen (Lee, Christmas in the
Kalahari )
⢠âNothing wilts faster than laurels that have been rested upon.â Percy Bysshe Shelley
⢠Value bridging:Andrew Carnegie - (Gospel of )âWealthâ
⢠âThe man who dies thus rich dies disgraced.â
⢠Argument for social prioritization of capital wealth redistribution through top marginal tax rates
(âNew Dealâ Economics) as well as through personally established public trusts and foundations.
29 5/3/2019 Add a footer
30. Socially Engineering a Sustainable Pluralistic Society:
Addressing Cultural Differences that Drive Education
Inequality
⢠Conservatism and Progressivism exist as a continuum in all cultures.
⢠Two basic types of conservative with different sets of values:
⢠Wealthy: Beneficiaries of status quo. Perceive change as threat to wealth rather than opportunity.
⢠Poor: Destitute and afraid of change. Likely morally overloaded, unaware of benefits of change.
⢠Prioritize understanding of deepest values and build bridges to them through
metaphor to bypass the backfire effect and confirmation bias.
⢠What stories do we tell ourselves about who we are?
⢠What stories do others tell themselves about who they are and their place in the world?
⢠Demonstrate value and appreciation for culture and cultural history
⢠Emphasize values
⢠Culturally specific stories and ways to attribute honor or shame
⢠Divergence of cultural literature provides a diverse array of resources, even within one
culture
⢠E.g. Christian Bible and apocrypha, Slave Bibles and maps to freedom
30 5/3/2019 Add a footer
31. âThe best way to predict your future is to create it.â â Abraham Lincoln
31 5/3/2019 Add a footer
32. References:
⢠References:
⢠Shields, L., Newman, A., & Satz, D. 2017. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equal-ed-opportunity/
⢠World Inequality Database on Education. UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report. Retrieved from https://www.education-inequalities.org/
⢠Eitzen, D. S., & Baca Zinn, M. (2012). Chapter 1 - Globalization: An Introduction. Globalization: The Transformation of Social Worlds (pages 1-9). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning
⢠Brecher, J., Costello, T., & Smith, B. (2000). Chapter 2, Reading 4 â Globalization and Its Specter. Globalization: The Transformation of Social Worlds (pages 30-37).
⢠Garcia, E. & Weiss, E. (2017). Education Inequalities at the School Starting Gate. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/education-inequalities-at-the-
school-starting-gate/
⢠Stiglitz, J. (2009). Chapter 4, Reading 14 â A Real Cure for the Global Economic Crackup. Globalization: The Transformation of Social Worlds (pages 104-109).
⢠Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., Holmes, O., & Avery, D. (2014). The Subjective Well-Being Political Paradox: Happy Welfare States and Unhappy Liberals. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 6, p.
1300 â1308. doi:10.1037/a0037654 . Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/apl-a0037654.pdf
⢠Pew Research Center. (2017). Sharp Partisan Divisions in Views of National Institutions. Retrieved from: http://www.people-press.org/2017/07/10/sharp-partisan-divisions-in-views-of-national-
institutions/
⢠Pico della Mirandola, G. (2014). Oration on the Dignity of Man. (University of Adelaide Library, Trans.) Public Domain. (Original work published 1486) Retrieved from:
https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/pico_della_mirandola/giovanni/dignity/
⢠Unitarian Universalist Association. (n.d.). Beliefs & Principles. Retrieved from: https://www.uua.org/beliefs/what-we-believe
⢠One Laptop Per Child. (n.d.). Support Strategy. Retrieved from: http://one.laptop.org/content/support-strategy
⢠Talbot, D. (2012). Given Tablets but No Teachers, Ethiopian Children Teach Themselves. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/506466/given-tablets-
but-no-teachers-ethiopian-children-teach-themselves/
⢠BlinkNow. (n.d.). Our Work. Retrieved from: https://blinknow.org/our-work
⢠Van den Hoven, J., Lokhorst, G., & Van de Poel, I. (2011). Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Mar; 18(1): p. 143â155. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9277-z .
Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275721/?fbclid=IwAR1KYzUk9YRGWtFa0XDICLHOxvBBOGnyAoyaan6pr2jgIg8b725WbtNCFwI#
⢠Unable to find source for original âNew Deal vs Trickle Down Economicsâ Infographic. Retrieved from facebook.com
32 5/3/2019 Add a footer
Hinweis der Redaktion
âAbove all, we should bear in mind that our liberty is not an end in itself; it is a means to win respect for human dignity for all classes of our society.â- Hyman Rickover
Â
Â
Â
Â
The circumstances outside an individualâs control that provide or prevent the opportunities to obtain a quality education are not to be taken lightly. On one hand, it may be a given to many people that the value of an education to a person is a benefit to them, but it may be less apparent that providing quality education to individuals is also a benefit to other people. On the other hand, it may be obvious that an individual not provided a quality education may be limited in the scope in which they interact with the world, but it may be less apparent that preventing a person with a thinking mind from obtaining informational resources limits the success of the society by limiting the size of the pool of ideas generated within it. Educational inequality is complicated with many factors that make unequal access to resources common to many but unique in the types of disparities that individual people may face. People must deal with many hurdles and obstacles to education outside of their control, as circumstances of their birth (such as social class, race, and gender). To examine the dimensions of educational inequality, it may be helpful to examine the abstract ideal and practical goal of educational equality: Equal access to quality education regardless of individual circumstances. The case is made that equality of education opportunity should be treated independently from other theories of equal opportunity by Shields, Newman, and Satz (2017) because of the âcentral place of education in modern societies and the myriad opportunities it affords; the scarcity of high-quality educational opportunities for many children; and the critical role of the state in providing educational opportunitiesâ. Beyond the benefits of education conferred to the individual, it will be argued that difficult-to-quantify benefits to society are also conferred and that subsidizing education of others is not an expense, but an investment in a human garden. Like any other garden, for society to flourish, its soil must be fertile. To address educational inequality, examinations will be made of its prevalence and extent around the globe, efforts already underway to alleviate it, and my own thoughts on how to approach the factors limiting educational inequality.
Throughout the world, educational inequality takes many forms and reaches people differently due to a wide variety of factors. However, there are common threads throughout. Comparing data compiled in the World Inequality Database on Education from UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report, itâs apparent that geographically, the same places with the least access to quality education are the same developing regions disproportionately affected by exploitative economic industrialized ârace to the bottomâ capital industrialization practices (Eitzen & Baca Zinn 2012; Brecher, Costello, & Smith 2000) â Countries in Africa, South Asia, and Central America. The targets of UNESCOâs Sustainable Development Goal 4 for education (World Inequality Database on Education) illuminate specific characteristics of people and their families that affect their opportunities for education, the most apparent of those being poverty and socioeconomic status (âIn 40 out of 93 countries, fewer than 50% of the poorest children have completed primary school, more than 50% of young people in 57 out of 127 countries have not completed upper secondary schoolâ), lack of access due to the specifics of rural lifestyle, namely distance and family obligations (âSince 2010, in 24 out of 52 countries fewer than 25% of children in rural areas have the opportunity to attend a pre-primary programmeâ), cultural restrictions due to gender and perceptions of gender roles, experienced by females (âIn 30 out of 127 countries, fewer than 90 females for every 100 males completed lower secondary school. In 17 countries, fewer than 90 males for every 100 females completed lower secondary school,â âIn 35 out of 75 countries, at least 25% of the poorest young women are not literateâ), and language proficiency obstacles to access (âGrade 4 students who did not speak the language of the test at home were at least 10 percentage points less likely than other students to reach the lowest level of proficiency in reading in 20 out of 47 countries that took part in the PIRLS assessment.â). Generalized, the data from the World Inequality Database on Education points to several bottlenecks to address in order to improve educational opportunity and access to everyone around the globe: economics and politics, geographic distances and language barriers, and cultural and individual perceptions.
According to Garcia & Weiss (2017), from the very beginning of a personâs life, their familyâs socioeconomic status is likely to make the biggest difference in their chances at successful educational attainment:
âExtensive research has conclusively demonstrated that childrenâs social class is one of the most significant predictorsâif not the single most significant predictorâof their educational success. Moreover, it is increasingly apparent that performance gaps by social class take root in the earliest years of childrenâs lives and fail to narrow in the years that follow. That is, children who start behind stay behindâthey are rarely able to make up the lost ground.â
and that being behind in school is not only a disadvantage to them individually through their own life, but a loss to society and a loss to their children and future generations of their family:
âThese performance gaps reflect extensive unmet needs and thus untapped talents among low-SES children. The development of strong cognitive and noncognitive skills is essential for success in school and beyond. Low educational achievement leads to lowered economic prospects later in life, perpetuating a lack of social mobility across generations. It is also a loss to society when childrenâs talents are allowed to go fallow for lack of sufficient supports. The undeniable relationship between economic inequalities and education inequalities represents a societal failure that betrays the ideal of the âAmerican dream.ââ
Intricately linked to the micro- and macro-economics that stratify the educational outcomes of people all over the world are the political aims of the people that live near them as well as those that live far away. The radically interconnected globalized economy that determines the ability to provide educational access for everyone is deeply affected by government regulation, subsidy, and direct programs locally and globally. Accordingly, political divisions and relative successes or failures of various policies and political ideologies to achieve positive outcomes for their people can be examined to determine how to better achieve positive outcomes for people, given the economic and social dependencies on political institutions. âIf we are to make our global economic system work better, we have to have better systems of global economic governance.â (Stiglitz 2009). The research of Okulicz-Kozaryn, Holmes, & Avery (2014) on subjective well-being (SWB) indicates a political paradox that âWhen measures capture what a country does (enacted political orientation), greater liberalism corresponds with higher SWB, but when measures tap what citizens believe (espoused political orientation), the pattern is the opposite.â Enacted left-wing, or progressive-humanist politics, entail provision of greater social safety nets that provide a better economic foundation for the improving social outcomes like education, while personally espoused conservative political positions tend to stem from the beliefs that âindividuals are responsible for their outcomes and, ultimately, get what they deserve (i.e., rationalize the status quo).â Aside from differences in beliefs concerning education itself, the differences of beliefs on a political continuum that lead to enacted policies directly affect the type and budgets for education as well as affecting the economic context of those obtaining education.
Geographic conditions can greatly hinder a personâs ability to obtain a quality education primarily by limiting physical accessibility. Distance from home to school can be so great as to be an untenable burden to a child or adult and their family, being too expensive an opportunity cost for rural families dependent entirely on wage labor that may be seasonal. Economic, political, and ecological conditions unique to specific geographic locations may also cause people to migrate from their homes in search of better opportunities, leading them to new places with new languages. Abstractly like geographic barriers and distances, languages can serve as barriers to quality education if the language of instruction at school is not a language spoken at home (World Inequality Database on Education). While it is a classic hopeful story to hear of displaced people successfully making a new life in a new place, not everyone can move or want to move in order to better themselves, and if too many people flee, a local society may collapse. Many higher order issues stem from mass migrations of asylum seekers and âbrain drainâ of intelligentsia from unstable or destabilized nations, leaving much room for creative solutions to be thought of to help local people stabilize their communities and nations while building or rebuilding local opportunities for them to educate themselves and their children.
The roles that culture and belief play in the way the value of education is perceived are nebulous but play distinct roles in educational opportunities and outcomes. Traditional vs progressive views on the role of education can vary widely. Historically, education has been seen to serve many purposes and has been limited in who is granted access to educational institutions. From basic traditions surrounding survival and passing on oral histories and storytelling through shaman or âwise menâ of the village, to tradecraft passed on from master craftsman to apprentices, to Aristotleâs early school at the Lyceum dedicated to cooperative research and medieval Christian cathedrals dedicated to getting closer to understanding God, among many more, what education does for a person and a society is different through historical contexts. Since the world doesnât develop technologically and socially at even paces in all places, perspectives concerning what an education entails are not in agreement on what an adequate or quality education entails for dealing with a changing modern world. For example, according to Pew Research Center polling (2017):
âA majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents (58%) now say that colleges and universities have a negative effect on the country, up from 45% last year. By contrast, most Democrats and Democratic leaners (72%) say colleges and universities have a positive effect, which is little changed from recent years.â
Before examining a root of ideological differences that may indicate differences in the beliefs between progressives and conservatives, the difference in the perspectives on higher education between conservatives and progressives indicated by the Pew Research Center (2017) and the difference in perspectives on subjective well-being between conservatives and progressives indicated by Okulicz-Kozaryn, Holmes, & Avery (2014) serve to illuminate that there is a difference in ideologies that would be beneficial to all to reconcile peacefully. As conservatism and progressivism contain ideas that separate from each other on a spectrum within cultural systems that vary in unique ways to different extents, specific forms of general conservative and progressive positions are common to every culture and vary depending on inherited traditions and how effective the maps of reality in those traditions are perceived to function in the context of the world and society the individual exists and make decisions in. In addition, even if agreement can be reached regarding the value of a âquality educationâ, a person who believes a high-quality education is rooted in religious traditions will have different expectations than someone who believes a secular education rooted in scientific and rational thinking is high-quality. Similarly, a person who has grown accustomed to inherited beliefs of their own âracialâ superiority and that âracesâ of people should be separate may believe that a high-quality education should segregate people while a person accultured to understand and appreciate diversity of thought, culture, and appearance of other people would likely expect that a high-quality education would entail learning to appreciate and work with a variety of people and perspectives aside from their own. To argue the merits of all the specific differences in ideology between conservatism and progressivism is beyond the scope of my argument as conservatism and progressivism manifest themselves differently in every person and every culture. However, I will hypothesize that the greatest functional difference that extends to different cultural modeling through conservative and progressive perspectives or maps of reality is the functional definition of the word âtruth.â Essentially, the secular and progressive definition of truth is a description of reality viewed through evidence-based inquiry and fact. In contrast, the traditional and conservative definition of âtruthâ is a prescriptive view of reality viewed through the pursuit or attainment of an objective â âtrueâ as an arrow may fly, or âtrueâ to a pre-set course. For clarity, I will continue to use quotations to describe âtrueâ as a conservative measure for staying on course but not true as statement of fact.
With the several sets of factors that contribute to educational inequality of opportunities (economic and political, geographic distances and language barriers, and cultural and individual perceptions) come targeted efforts to reduce educational inequality where it exists, both locally and globally. There are wide varieties of educational goals people set for themselves and many ideas about the value of the education theyâre pursuing, and to recognize that diversity of thought in the provision of education to everyone is in accordance with humanist ideas of education provides a common focal point to aim for a synthesis of truth and âtruthâ. A short-lived a Renaissance philosopher provides an example of such a synthesis, Pico della Mirandola (2014/1486) endorses the dignity of human existence by providing an early synthesis of truth and âtruthâ in his Oratorio by elaborating on the idea that people could ascend the âchain of beingâ by use of our intellect and by exercising our free will to better ourselves and society. Another more modern synthesis comes from Unitarian Universalist Association (n.d.) shared covenant demonstrating their support for âthe free and responsible search for truth and meaning.â Guided by humanist values promoted from a diversity of different traditions, people are acting now to work towards the betterment of society.
While education inequality is a global issue, it is an issue that makes its presence most apparent when it is local. While educational systems in California are among the best in the world, the benefits of that educational system are not received by all and are not the only option for those who seek to improve themselves and their stations throughout their lives. I spoke with Marisa, who works in the San Diego Public Library System at the Serra Mesa Branch Library and formerly at the Central Library downtown, about the types of services and assistance offered through the library system in San Diego. There is a wide range of services provided to the public with no fees or payment associated beyond book-lending, such as a program called âComputers to SD Kidsâ that provides technology vital to todayâs markets to children in lower-income families to boost their abilities to educate themselves, as well as the âDo your homework at the libraryâ program, which offers free homework assistance to children in K-8 schooling and an âonline live tutoringâ program that also provides remote help to kids who need help with their homework and with internet access. In addition to programs for children, Marisa told me about programs for adults whoâve been disadvantage and are working on improving their own situations through the âCareer online high schoolâ, which allows adults to earn a high school diploma along with a vocational tech cert in their own time as well as an adult literacy program called âRead San Diegoâ that provides help to those seeking to improve their own literacy and programs offering assistance to people whoâve traveled here from elsewhere or speak another language to help learn English as another language and resources to help them do what is necessary of them to obtain citizenship. The libraryâs Innovation/Idea labs are ways for the public to access high-tech equipment and software to learn on such as 3D printers, laser-cutters, and the Adobe photoshop suite. There are many more programs offered by the library that boost educational opportunities to everyone in local community that Marisa mentioned, and there are new programs all the time. Marisaâs work at the library provides her with experiences that enrich her life, even if the wages sheâs paid prevent the job from being financially stable in the long-term for her. Among her favorite recurring experiences are seeing familiar patrons stop showing up for a while then return for a visit to inform her that sheâs helped them find a job as well as watching the children at the branch grow in excitement, curiosity, and ability over time. Knowing wonderful and gracious people like Marisa are supporting the efforts to alleviate education inequality here at home give me great hope for global efforts to alleviate education inequality and the people around the world contributing to them.
One such effort to help alleviate education inequality on a global scale is an organization called One Laptop Per Child that provides devices to remote locations to increase opportunities for people who have few other options, if any, for educating themselves. Working with the Zamora Teran Foundation,
âOLPCâs multidisciplinary teams work to identify and analyze the social, economic and educational context to create a program tailored to address the specific needs and desired outcomes of each community. With such knowledge and local context, OLPC identifies the key items required for a successful program that includes both social and educational transformation. Our goal is to support the processes of program design and implementation. With more than ten years of experience in the field, OLPC is uniquely positioned as an expert in the integration of technology into the learning environment. OLPC now seeks to share the knowledge that leads to a transformation in schools and communities and to a stronger and more unified future for all.â (One Laptop Per Child n.d.)
An early pilot experiment done by the foundation demonstrated the ingenuity of children given the opportunity to follow their curiosity and creativity:
âEarlier this year, OLPC workers dropped off closed boxes containing the tablets, taped shut, with no instruction. âI thought the kids would play with the boxes. Within four minutes, one kid not only opened the box, found the on-off switch ⌠powered it up. Within five days, they were using 47 apps per child, per day. Within two weeks, they were singing ABC songs in the village, and within five months, they had hacked Android,â Negroponte said. âSome idiot in our organization or in the Media Lab had disabled the camera, and they figured out the camera, and had hacked Android.ââ (Talbot 2012)
While this anecdote is great encouragement, the challenge remains that around 100 million first-grade-aged children lack access to schools. Luckily, this organization isnât the only one making efforts to improve access to education around the globe. There are relatively small organizations like BlinkNow (n.d.) that have obtained global support through social media and the internet that are able to create local impact by building a school for 350 children (and a home to 40 of them) at the foothills of the Himalayas with âa program to prepare our graduates for their futures.â BlinkNowâs efforts make it apparent that efforts of individuals and small people can have impacts that can scale and snowball when able to take advantage of the world interconnectedness characterized as globalization.
However, in order for Stiglitzâs (2009) âbetter systems of global economic governanceâ to emerge effectively, the solution I offer has to do with a return to the way we shape our beliefs in the context of culture and the societies we live in and engineering them to better serve humanity. According to Van den Hoven, Lokhorst, & Van de Poel (2011), âEthics can be the source of technological development rather than just a constraint and technological progress can create moral progress rather than just moral problems.â While Pico della Mirandola (2014/1486) came up with an effective synthesis of truth with âtruthâ in his âOration on the Dignity of Manâ that came to be known by some as the âmanifesto of the Renaissanceâ, 530 years is a long time to reconsider the meanings of truth and âtruthâ in light of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats afforded by each. Engaging a philosophical framework known as dialectics, and prioritizing its form over debate, is what I believe can be the engine behind a framework for ethically socially engineering a society that prioritizes and optimizes achievement of humanist values that benefit all people. I am not a social engineer, but the literature Iâve reviewed makes it apparent that instilling a collective focus on prioritizing global collaboration rather than competition, conquest, or coercion, is the most preferable game strategy to obtain the most desirable possible future. In order to address educational inequality, educational equality must be recognized as a common value and a common bond.
To conclude, Abraham Lincoln has been attributed as saying âThe best way to predict your future is to create it.â
Â
Â
Â
References:
Shields, L., Newman, A., & Satz, D. 2017. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equal-ed-opportunity/
World Inequality Database on Education. UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report. Retrieved from https://www.education-inequalities.org/
Eitzen, D. S., & Baca Zinn, M. (2012). Chapter 1 - Globalization: An Introduction. Globalization: The Transformation of Social Worlds (pages 1-9). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning
Brecher, J., Costello, T., & Smith, B. (2000). Chapter 2, Reading 4 â Globalization and Its Specter. Globalization: The Transformation of Social Worlds (pages 30-37).
Garcia, E. & Weiss, E. (2017). Education Inequalities at the School Starting Gate. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/education-inequalities-at-the-school-starting-gate/
Stiglitz, J. (2009). Chapter 4, Reading 14 â A Real Cure for the Global Economic Crackup. Globalization: The Transformation of Social Worlds (pages 104-109).
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., Holmes, O., & Avery, D. (2014). The Subjective Well-Being Political Paradox: Happy Welfare States and Unhappy Liberals. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 6, p. 1300 â1308. doi:10.1037/a0037654 . Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/apl-a0037654.pdf
Pew Research Center. (2017). Sharp Partisan Divisions in Views of National Institutions. Retrieved from: http://www.people-press.org/2017/07/10/sharp-partisan-divisions-in-views-of-national-institutions/
Pico della Mirandola, G. (2014). Oration on the Dignity of Man. (University of Adelaide Library, Trans.) Public Domain. (Original work published 1486) Retrieved from: https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/pico_della_mirandola/giovanni/dignity/
Unitarian Universalist Association. (n.d.). Beliefs & Principles. Retrieved from: https://www.uua.org/beliefs/what-we-believe
One Laptop Per Child. (n.d.). Support Strategy. Retrieved from: http://one.laptop.org/content/support-strategy
Talbot, D. (2012). Given Tablets but No Teachers, Ethiopian Children Teach Themselves. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/506466/given-tablets-but-no-teachers-ethiopian-children-teach-themselves/
BlinkNow. (n.d.). Our Work. Retrieved from: https://blinknow.org/our-work
Van den Hoven, J., Lokhorst, G., & Van de Poel, I. (2011). Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Mar; 18(1): p. 143â155. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9277-z . Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275721/?fbclid=IwAR1KYzUk9YRGWtFa0XDICLHOxvBBOGnyAoyaan6pr2jgIg8b725WbtNCFwI#
The research of Okulicz-Kozaryn, Holmes, & Avery (2014) on subjective well-being (SWB) indicates a political paradox that âWhen measures capture what a country does (enacted political orientation), greater liberalism corresponds with higher SWB, but when measures tap what citizens believe (espoused political orientation), the pattern is the opposite.â Enacted left-wing, or progressive-humanist politics, entail provision of greater social safety nets that provide a better economic foundation for the improving social outcomes like education, while personally espoused conservative political positions tend to stem from the beliefs that âindividuals are responsible for their outcomes and, ultimately, get what they deserve (i.e., rationalize the status quo).â Aside from differences in beliefs concerning education itself, the differences of beliefs on a political continuum that lead to enacted policies directly affect the type and budgets for education as well as affecting the economic context of those obtaining education.
The research of Okulicz-Kozaryn, Holmes, & Avery (2014) on subjective well-being (SWB) indicates a political paradox that âWhen measures capture what a country does (enacted political orientation), greater liberalism corresponds with higher SWB, but when measures tap what citizens believe (espoused political orientation), the pattern is the opposite.â Enacted left-wing, or progressive-humanist politics, entail provision of greater social safety nets that provide a better economic foundation for the improving social outcomes like education, while personally espoused conservative political positions tend to stem from the beliefs that âindividuals are responsible for their outcomes and, ultimately, get what they deserve (i.e., rationalize the status quo).â Aside from differences in beliefs concerning education itself, the differences of beliefs on a political continuum that lead to enacted policies directly affect the type and budgets for education as well as affecting the economic context of those obtaining education.
The research of Okulicz-Kozaryn, Holmes, & Avery (2014) on subjective well-being (SWB) indicates a political paradox that âWhen measures capture what a country does (enacted political orientation), greater liberalism corresponds with higher SWB, but when measures tap what citizens believe (espoused political orientation), the pattern is the opposite.â Enacted left-wing, or progressive-humanist politics, entail provision of greater social safety nets that provide a better economic foundation for the improving social outcomes like education, while personally espoused conservative political positions tend to stem from the beliefs that âindividuals are responsible for their outcomes and, ultimately, get what they deserve (i.e., rationalize the status quo).â Aside from differences in beliefs concerning education itself, the differences of beliefs on a political continuum that lead to enacted policies directly affect the type and budgets for education as well as affecting the economic context of those obtaining education.
Within Hegelianism, the word dialectic has the specialised meaning of a contradiction between ideas that serves as the determining factor in their relationship. Dialectic comprises three stages of development: first, a thesis or statement of an idea, which gives rise to a second step, a reaction or antithesis that contradicts or negates the thesis, and third, the synthesis, a statement through which the differences between the two points are resolved. (From wikipedia)
Once upon a time, there lived six blind men in a village. One day the villagers told them, "Hey, there is an elephant in the village today.â
They had no idea what an elephant is. They decided, "Even though we would not be able to see it, let us go and feel it anyway." All of them went where the elephant was. Everyone of them touched the elephant."Hey, the elephant is a pillar," said the first man who touched his leg.
"Oh, no! it is like a rope," said the second man who touched the tail.
"Oh, no! it is like a thick branch of a tree," said the third man who touched the trunk of the elephant.
"It is like a big hand fan" said the fourth man who touched the ear of the elephant.
"It is like a huge wall," said the fifth man who touched the belly of the elephant.
"It is like a solid pipe," Said the sixth man who touched the tusk of the elephant.
They began to argue about the elephant and everyone of them insisted that he was right. It looked like they were getting agitated. A wise man was passing by and he saw this. He stopped and asked them, "What is the matter?" They said, "We cannot agree to what the elephant is like." Each one of them told what he thought the elephant was like. The wise man calmly explained to them, "All of you are right. The reason every one of you is telling it differently because each one of you touched the different part of the elephant. So, actually the elephant has all those features what you all said."
"Oh!" everyone said. There was no more fight. They felt happy that they were all right.
The moral of the story is that there may be some truth to what someone says. Sometimes we can see that truth and sometimes not because they may have different perspective which we may not agree too. So, rather than arguing like the blind men, we should say, "Maybe you have your reasons." This way we donât get in arguments. In Jainism, it is explained that truth can be stated in seven different ways. So, you can see how broad our religion is. It teaches us to be tolerant towards others for their viewpoints. This allows us to live in harmony with the people of different thinking. This is known as the Syadvada, Anekantvad, or the theory of Manifold Predictions.
https://www.jainworld.com/literature/story25.htm