1. Module Title CPI 2020
Student Name Dylan Atkinson
Student Number b9014243
Mark Awarded 65
(Summary of literature search) Good summary of literature search but lacking in some technical detail
(Search strategy) Limited search strategy with major expected elements omitted
(Results of search) Very low number of souces found making it difficult to appraise the search approach
(Best evidence - selection of sources)Good range of sources
(Best evidence - justification of sources)The explanation of why evidence was selected was superficial and lacked defined
reasoning(Introduction - basic background) Good introdction covering a wide range of content
(Intro - Pathogens and disease outcomes) Very good discussion of the pathogens that cause this disease and the outcomes
for patients
(Intro - Risk factors and epidemiology) Adequate description of the epidemiology of infection and on related risk factors
(Intro - Use of stats) Good use of validated statistics in your introduction
(Intro - Use of figures) No use of figures but this had no impact on the quality of the introduction
(VF - Range of mechanisms) Excellent range of mechanisms included in your figure
(VF - Depth of content) Good detail for multiple mechanisms included in your figure
(VF - Clarity of figure) Good figure but instead of including a figure legend you included an essay style content section which
you were told not to include
(VF - Use of evidence) Good citations but the paragrpah style of your "figure legend" gave you an unfair advantage over your
peers
(HDM - Range of mechanisms) Excellent range of mechanisms included in your figure
(HDM - Depth of content) Good detail for multiple mechanisms included in your figure
(HDM - Clarity of figure) Good figure, a little cluttered in places which make s it slightly difficult to follow
(HDM - Use of evidence) Very good integration of citations and source material
(Treatment - standard therapy) Good description of a variety of standard therapies
(Treatment - resistance, treatment failure, new agents) No content on treatment failure or novel drug discovery included
(Prevention - standard prevention techniques) Good description of a variety of standard prevention techniques both
immunological and non-immunological
(Prevention - novel strategies) Adequate descripton for the need for new prevention techniques, either immunological, non-
immunological or both, but the content was superficial and lacked specific molecular detail
(Structure and presentation of the report) Very good standard of presentation and a well structured report
(Referencing and citation) Very good range of carefully selected sources, good integration within the text