3. Not-for-profit membership association of
scholarly publishers
4000+ international publishers
All subjects, all business models
83 non-publisher affiliates, 2000 library affiliates
63 million DOIs
Tuesday, 22 October 13
4. A standard way of reporting funding
sources for published scholarly research
🌍🌍
Tuesday, 22 October 13
9. <fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p>This work was supported in part by NIH
grant R01 GM094800B to G.J.J., a gift to Caltech from
the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and a stipend
from the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung to M.P. The
funders had no role in study design, data collection and
analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
manuscript.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
Tuesday, 22 October 13
10. <body>
...
<sec>
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the
<grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://
www.grf.org" id="GS1">Generic
Research Foundation</grant-sponsor>,
the <grant-sponsor
xlink:href="http://www.energy.gov"
id="GS2">Department of Energy</grantsponsor> Office of Science grant
number <grant-num rid="GS2">DE-FG0204ER63803</grant-num>, and the
<grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://
www.nih.gov" id="GS3">National
Institutes of Health</grant-sponsor>.
</p>
</sec>
</body>
Tuesday, 22 October 13
11. National Institutes of Health
NIH? N.I.H.? National Institute of Health?
Abbreviations, misspellings, translations...
Tuesday, 22 October 13
13. Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Tuesday, 22 October 13
14. Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result
from research supported by specific funders or grants
Tuesday, 22 October 13
15. Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result
from research supported by specific funders or grants
Institutions cannot easily link funding received to
published output
Tuesday, 22 October 13
16. Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result
from research supported by specific funders or grants
Institutions cannot easily link funding received to
published output
Lack of standard metadata for funding sources makes
it difficult to analyse or data mine
Tuesday, 22 October 13
17. Funders
Publishers
Established award
systems and research
management processes
Established publishing
and peer-review
systems
Relationship with
researchers funded by
agencies
Relationship with
authors submitting
manuscripts
Tuesday, 22 October 13
18. Funders
Publishers
Established award
systems and research
management processes
Established publishing
and peer-review
systems
Relationship with
researchers funded by
agencies
Relationship with
authors submitting
manuscripts
Tuesday, 22 October 13
22. FundRef Registry
4000 funder names and ID numbers from curated
Elsevier SciVal registry, donated to FundRef
Tuesday, 22 October 13
23. FundRef Registry
4000 funder names and ID numbers from curated
Elsevier SciVal registry, donated to FundRef
Hosted by CrossRef, available under CC0
Tuesday, 22 October 13
24. FundRef Registry
4000 funder names and ID numbers from curated
Elsevier SciVal registry, donated to FundRef
Hosted by CrossRef, available under CC0
Will be added to and updated
Tuesday, 22 October 13
25. FundRef Registry
4000 funder names and ID numbers from curated
Elsevier SciVal registry, donated to FundRef
Hosted by CrossRef, available under CC0
Will be added to and updated
Publishers to use this list to ensure consistency
Tuesday, 22 October 13
26. FundRef Registry
4000 funder names and ID numbers from curated
Elsevier SciVal registry, donated to FundRef
Hosted by CrossRef, available under CC0
Will be added to and updated
Publishers to use this list to ensure consistency
www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_registry.html
Tuesday, 22 October 13
37. Implementation
1. Collect funding data from authors on submission using
FundRef Registry taxonomy
http://www.crossref.org/fundref
Tuesday, 22 October 13
40. Implementation
2. Pass funding data from submission system to production
systems
Publisher
Submission System
Funder
Grant Number
Tuesday, 22 October 13
41. Implementation
2. Pass funding data from submission system to production
systems
Publisher
Submission System
Funder
Grant Number
Tuesday, 22 October 13
Production
Systems
42. Implementation
3. Deposit FundRef data with CrossRef
CrossMark participants should
deposit FundRef data within
CrossMark deposits
CrossMark participation
recommended for standard
display of funding information
Tuesday, 22 October 13
56. American Chemical Society
American Diabetes Association
American Institute of Physics
American Psychiatric Publishing
American Psychological Association
American Physical Society
American Society of Neuroradiology
Association for Computing Machinery
Bioscientifica
Elsevier
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
International Union of Crystallography
Internet Medical Publishing
IOP Publishing
Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development
Just Medical Media, Ltd.
Kowsar Medical Institute
Landes Bioscience
Optical Society of America
Oxford University Press
Royal Society of Chemistry
The Royal Society
Wiley-Blackwell
http://www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_agreement.html
Tuesday, 22 October 13
57. Publishers: sign up now!
FundRef Terms & Conditions: www.crossref.org/fundref
No fees for FundRef deposits
Everyone else: no action required!
No need to “join” - querying freely available
Tuesday, 22 October 13
